He is a lawyer specializing in selling US citizenships:
Khizr Khan, the father of a fallen Muslim U.S. soldier, is an immigration attorney whose specialty is a program that critics say allows immigrants to buy their way in the United States.
According to Khan’s website, he specializes in law related to the E-2 and EB-5 programs, which hands out green cards to foreign investors that put at least $500,000 into certain American firms. The investor can also get green cards for certain family members.
Khan says he helps his clients buy real estate in the U.S. as well as start businesses.
“The E-2 and EB-5 are two of the most notoriously abused visa categories that essentially allow wealthy foreigners to buy their way to U.S. residency, and possibly citizenship, with a relatively modest investment,” Jessica Vaughan, the policy director for the Center for Immigration Studies,” told The Washington Examiner.
He’s written extensively about Sharia law:
“The Shari’ah-was completed during the lifetime of Prophet Muhammed, in the Quran and Sunnah. This brings up an important fact which is generally overlooked, that the invariable and basic rules of Islamic Law are only those prescribed in the Shari’ah (Quran and Sunnah), which are few and limited,” Khan continues to write. “All other juridical works which have been written during more than thirteen centuries are very rich and indispensable, but they must always be subordinated to the Shari’ah and open to reconsideration by all Muslims.”
And he’s thick with the Clinton’s:
Khan, according to Intelius as also reported by Walid Shoebat, used to work at the law firm Hogan Lovells, LLP, a major D.C. law firm that has been on retainer as the law firm representing the government of Saudi Arabia in the United States for years. Citing federal government disclosure forms, the Washington Free Beacon reported the connection between Saudi Arabia and Hogan Lovells a couple weeks ago.
“Hogan Lovells LLP, another U.S. firm hired by the Saudis, is registered to work for the Royal Embassy of Saudi Arabia through 2016, disclosures show,” Joe Schoffstall of the Free Beacon reported.
The federal form filed with the Department of Justice is a requirement under the Foreign Agents Registration Act of 1938, which makes lobbyists and lawyers working on behalf of foreign governments and other agents from abroad with interests in the United States register with the federal government.
The government of Saudi Arabia, of course, has donated heavily to the Clinton Foundation.
“The Kingdom of Saudi Arabia has given between $10 and $25 million to the foundation while Friends of Saudi Arabia has contributed between $1 and $5 million,” Schoffstall wrote.
UPDATE: Mr. Khan has joined the Clinton deletion team:
Panic Mode: Khizr Khan Deletes Law Firm Website that Specialized in Muslim Immigration
Last election we had fact-checkers who pointed out that a ”Republican-for-life” who was now going to vote for Obama was really a Democrat and even sometimes working for some official.
This time, we better keep up that work.
This guy, for example, practices what he preaches about Sharia: his wife is a piece of property to him with no right to speak her own mind about anything.
How Hillary thought he could be trotted out and no one would look (or that in looking the investigator was automatically in the wrong) is just another example of her bad judgement.
It’s simple. The left fears no fact checking by the left wing media. What little truth DOES leak out, those with their hands extended for the give-always could not care less.
How strange. I served in the Navy over 50 years ago. I have lived in America all my life. I have never heard the term “Gold Star Family” until this week when the Clinton press started telling us how great this Muslim Brotherhood supporter is to have been the father of a soldier that was killed. Well, Mr Khan did nothing to aid the USA when he moved here. He only moved here to take advantage of the American system of giving a foreigner a free education. I say, tell him to go back to Muslim land and pretend they are really great as he seems to want us to believe.
in the Corp for a number of years, it was my family for a number of years. what is a gold star family other than on top of the welfare chain. khan had his 15 min in the spot light-now he the dead beat needs to crawl back under his rock.
Oh what a spectacular deliema you Trump lickers have gotten yourselves into.
Today you must defend Trump’s war on families of war heroes. Tomorrow you’ll have to defend his new war on sexually harrassed women, his new war on babies and if there’s enough time in the day, his war on Wisconsin and Arizona GOP parties. And for those night owls, maybe you can squeeze in some kudos for his war on Purple Hearts for Wounded Vets Only.
And on Thursday, who knows what bizarre new war you’ll be backing him on. One can only imagine.
You mean like defending someone that murdered their counsel? Or someone that got a call for help from Benghazi and didn’t bother to respond. What the hell, it would involve those ‘ugh’ military guys that she couldn’t stand the sight of. Then she wouldn’t even invite the wives or mothers of those killed there to speak while allowing the mother’s of cop killers to speak. She’s a real fine piece of trash all right and I don’t even know very many that would be a willing Hillary licker.
So now you’re making it up as you go along. Hop along there Froggie.
Came after my original comment on this thread.
It is an important update.
Mr. Khan’s act is what is known as “consciousness of guilt”.
There was no other reason to do it.
In the Watergate investigation the best advice was given by ”deep throat,” Follow The Money.
Mr. Khan is trying to make that more difficult.
So much for transparency.
IF Trump had been president before 9-11-01 a family from UAE would have been happily admitted into the USA.
If Trump had been president in the 2002-5 years, the Khan family would not have lost a son in Iraq because, as president, Donald Trump would not have gone into Iraq.
If Donald Trump becomes president in Jan 2017, the Khan family has nothing to fear about being deported.
Mr. Khan’s anti-Trump construct is a completely false narrative.
There is no time, in the past, the present or the future where Donald Trump, as president would endanger the Khans.
@Nanny G: It’s looking like Hillary has the same problem with campaign props as Obama did with examples of why Obamacare was needed so badly. One would think that if their message was so clear and necessary, they would not have to lie to deliver it.
Not sure if the argument flew over your head but while you’re relying on old worn out sound bites, over hyped and failed scandals, and mostly debunked gibberish to discredit Hillary, your Frankenstien is becoming more out of control by the hour, leaving Trump lickers to defend the monster
@Froggie: Now you’re speaking in Froggieese
@Ajay42302: Actually, as it has so often, Trump is being proven to be 100% correct.
Trump is addressing a Muslim zealot that puts Islam before everything… even his son’s life. For, it was not Trump that got his son killed, but the people Khan defends and makes a fine living ushering into this country. Trump has been 100% correct on this issue, even if he verbalizes it clumsily (for politics). Meanwhile, Hillary calls the mother of one of the boys SHE killed a liar.
You mean Bill’s victims? No, Hillary is way ahead on that front. That’s her job.
Does it bother you to be so stupid? Does it hurt?
It is Bill and Hillary who “loathe” the military.
Obviously my fault.
As I’ve said repeatedly here, you just can’t have an intelligent adult conversation with a Trump licker.
Again, my fault for attempting such an impossibility.
You’re well versed on ‘lickers’ are you? Maybe friends with RW’s new gay black vegetarian candidate? Maybe you can fill us in on your lickers group.
@Redteam: There was really no need to validate my argument. You’ve already proven my point.
Khizr Khan had an honorable son, but he has dishonored the Gold Star Families by his associations and comments.
@Ajay42302): If and when you going to conjure a “point”, do so. Otherwise, you really have to study the Democrat party when it comes to character assassination, sound-bites, and just plain dirty ways of slandering it’s foes. They wrote the book on it.
The expected response from the Right? Use similar tactics. A simple arms race the dems started.
You’re arguments were handily defeated before they even got started: you’re going to forgive all transgressions of your favored candidate, but use opposing standards on those you want to “beat”.
If you have a problem with how Hillary is being treated, then you had a big, big problem with how W was treated and now Trump it treated. It’s only logical.
Trump licker? Do you have a slang term for Black people, too?
You have no argument. You simply want Hillary to win on your sentiments alone. That’s not intelligent.
@Ajay42302): No, YOU simply can’t have a conversation that involves facts, for you are a lying, cowardly liberal.
Answer my questions yet, cowardly froggie? Will you support someone who sent weapons to terrorists to kill Americans and allies, then lied about it?
Hillary pushed to provide weapons for ISIS in Syria
How about a President that cannot negotiate his way out of a paper bag and pays ransoms to terrorists? I thought Jefferson stopped that.
Obama’s hard-nosed negotiation or ransom?
Come on…. don’t be such a chicken. Fess up the garbage you support.
I’d suggest you read my #5 comment, read your response, and then ask yourself what precisely in the hell you’re talking about.
You seem to join the crowd of ideology only, party only, that the “Democrat party” (sic) must lose and like Bill admits, even at a price of voting for Lucifer or Hitler. I just can’t buy that concept.
But my point and consistent argument has pointed more towards the damage Trump is doing to the Republican party and the price they’ll pay on down tickets. With this runaway train wreck becoming more devisive and insulting by the day, it puts his supporters in a bind, making them defend him for foolish things. The worse he gets (which seems to be at warp speed) the more egg he puts on his supporters face.
Now as for adult conversations, I’d suggest you read the incoherent babble of Bill and schoolyard gibberish of Redteam and explain how one is suppose to rebut such nonsensical claptrap.
Again, Trump lickers are just unreasonable angry people who don’t care if he shoots people in the streets and would still defend him, likely blame non Trump lickers for it. And then there’s the rest of us.
You either need to read the responses to your own stupid, nonsensical, anything-but-liberal-failure asinine questions or admit to being a cowardly, scumbag, goddamn f****ng trolling liar. Think you can handle that task, little boy?
Then answer the SAME question posed at yourself, Hillary-humper.
Bill, as previously stated, I’m uninterested in your responses and accordingly, reading your diatribes would only consume minutes that I’d never get back which in your case, is just too much of a price.
You are indeed the very poster child of a Trump licker I’ve mentioned, intentionally derailing the argument and taunting childish jabs. There’s nothing I could possibly say to you, there’s no answer that I could give you to your questions, there’s no facts that you’d accept and there’s no rational rebuttal that you’ll give. And you’ve proven this over and over and over again. And your fellow cohort Trump lickers don’t seem to fall far from that tree.
It’s almost as if you look at Trump for guidance in how he handles confrontation. Let’s look at this. I asked if you would vote for (and this is close as I’m not going to backtrack pages for cut and paste) Hitler over Gore, Lucifer over Kerry, Kim Jong over Biden and you responded yes. I’m not making this up. That’s what you admitted to. And in Trump fashion, your response when called out on it is:
I mean, in what adult conversation sitting can one counter such vile diatribe?
And here’s another example of your trolling spin. You say;
Well, I did. I even went as far as to admit that I’d vote GWB, Paul Ryan, even the likes of Donald Trump over Jong et al. Yet here you are, like so many other cases, claiming I didn’t even answer your question while it’s in black and white. You did the same over racism, demanding me to give examples. When I gave many many including his remarks of an American judge of Mexican heritage as well as him being sued by the DOJ (twice) for housing discrimination of blacks, even his remarks of wanting to send blacks back tom Africa, you again claim I never gave an example. And you played the same game after I listed over 40 quotes of sexism. It isn’t that you argued what I wrote but you denied I even wrote it-when it’s right there on the very same forum.
So again I ask, how does one even attempt to rationalize or have any type of adult conversation with one in such denial or hellbent on changing dialog to diatribe? You can’t do it. You just can’t have a reasonable discussion with a Trump licker. And your comrades here who are abetting you in that prove it.
@Ajay42302): Let’s say it another way, since you are only a hired mouthpiece, we know your ‘statements’ are only what you’ve been told to state, you have no mind of your own. We fully expect you to be 100% against anyone with any sense and totally in cahoots with fellow idiots. It was predicted when you would show up, along with a few others, which all happened on schedule. Kinda like prostitutes, except less reputable. We know after Nov we’ll never hear from you again. As far as carrying on a conversation, I write what I want to in response to any comment I read. I care not if you like it or do not like it. You don’t need to bother telling us you’re not a hired gun, we know your contract requires you to deny it. Would you like to see a copy of your work agreement? Anyhow Froggie, bump along now.
I am going to repeat myself here. Bill Clinton dodged the Draft in Vietnam, as did anyone who was in college at that time. Now as a mature adult, I view that as Wrong. The war may have went very differently if the boys from rich families were sent off to die.
Hillary was free to demonstrate against the war. She sacrificed Nothing. She Never waited to hear if her boyfriend and then husband died in combat. She Never saw him come home disabled for life. She Never saw his handsome face disfigured by shrapnel.
Now Hillary trotts out the Kahns as a Muslim symbol of American sacrifice to freedom. That’s OK. It is their right to do so. To accuse Trump of making “no sacrifice” in blood, when Bill did the the same? Typical Clinton hypocrisy and manipulation. It is really too bad Trump and the Republican Party don’t do a better job of calling them out on it.
Froggie, no one expects paid whores to respond. As far as rebut, follow your guidelines you were provided by your employer. He has that situation covered. You must not have paid attention in class.
But we do fully understand you can’t have a reasonable discussion with anyone because you are paid NOT to.
One minor correction Songbird, Trump was rejected for military service for medical reasons, that is hardly the same as felony draft dodging by going to Russia after you have received your ‘notice to report’ for induction as Slick did.
I will point out that Khan was killed in Iraq by Muslims, not by Americans. So I think Muslims are more at fault in his death than the USA.
@Ajay42302: In other words, you are too much of an effeminate coward to answer the same hypothetical (and stupid) question you asked me.
@Redteam: @Songbird: And Trump has never written or said that he “loathed” the military.
Hillary humper? AJ is a girl? I hadn’t thought of that. I just thought ‘it’ was a froggie.
I agree. That’s all Hillary.
Do you not even see how utterly stupid your claim is further validating my claim? So, uh, I’m “paid” by I assume to be the Hillary campaign to spend time on a blog of maybe a dozen or so (and I’m being generous) regular contributors who are obviously toward the far right, some who even admit they’d vote for Lucifer or bin Laden (while most of the rest silently nod in agreement) before ever voting for a Democrat to do precisely what?
The conspiracy theories do run deep here don’t they?
Here’s a hint for you. While sitting at your checker board at your local barber shop with your fellow retirees talking about Honest Don having Mexico pay for a wall etc etc and the stranger in the barber seat laughs out loud at you, odds are he’s a paid Hillary plant.
@Redteam: @Redteam: Yes Bill you are right Trump did have a medical exemption from the draft, heel spurrs. Since people scoff at that, I stated he qualified for the college exemption. You also correct about the term “draft dodgers” in the Vietnam era were referring to those who committed the felony by running to another country or hiding. College boys “avoided” the draft. I mean no disrespect for those boys in college at the time and make no accusations of them being un-patriotic. If I were them, I would have done the same. However, as I look at it now, it was a rigged system. The college exemption was put into law by the elite in politics who were putting their boys in college rather than war. They had a perfectly legal exemption.
I thought the whole Kahn speech was irrelevant to start with. I heard it and thought, What’s that got to do with Trump? A Muslim American died in combat. His parents entered this country legally and if vetted today they no doubt would gain entry. That had nothing to do with Trump and their accusations that he made no sacrifice in war. “Sacrifice” meaning the ultimate sacrifice. Bill and Hillary made no sacrifice of any kind.
P.S. Willy went to Russia? I thought he was in college and then partying in Europe as a Rhodes Scholar, who didn’t exactly finish the program.
@Songbird: Yes, after he was instructed to report for induction, he fled to Russia. Sen Fulbright (I think) got him out of trouble and he came back. He was actually guilty of felony draft dodging.
@Redteam:Thanks Redteam for the trip down Clinton memory lane and Bill avoiding the draft through political connections. I remember now. It’s just they have done so many shifty things through the decades, it’s hard to remember them all. Oh yes, Moscow was really the place to be back then. Lee Harvey Oswald was a big fan too.
You’re right that even trying to have an intelligent conversation with these people is like talking to a brick wall- of ignorance and hate and fear- the very things Trump inspires in the uniformed and/or stupid people amongst us…
@xplorer59: two peas in a pod
Who would that be, lying coward? Got any names you want to link to that lie? Do you lie constantly because the ideology you support is so bereft of benefit that you have nothing positive to argue with?
Yeah, I’m pretty sure that’s it.
Yes, you’re right.
Then I’d recommend you didn’t hang out with uninformed and stupid people. Maybe you could seek out some Republicans.
Trump Adversary Khan
Could Run For Office
Daily Caller, by Phillip Stucky
So perhaps this was why Hillary put him on stage in the 1st place.
That and manufacturing some bogus outrage.
@Nanny G: This is a losing issue for Trump.
He should quickly endorse Ryan and Mac as he has Marco.
Then get after HRC–HE’LL MOVE BACK UP IN THE POLLS
@MOS #8541: Gold Star family top of the welfare chain–What a terrible thing to say Marine
BTW It’s Corps–Semper Fi RW
@Richard Wheeler: In case you were unaware, an incumbent who was also a Never Trump LOST his primary bid Tues.
Tim Huelskamp was favored to win, by a lot.
Polls favored him, too.
Then he lost by more than 10 points.
Conservative icon Phyllis Schlafly thunders
for Ryan ouster: ‘Get Rid of Him!’
But, to be fair, VP candidate Mike Pence endorsed Ryan.
And Paul Manafort like him, too.
House Speaker Paul Ryan’s policy record is collapsing among voters here under scrutiny from Republican challenger Paul Nehlen.
Ryan preferred to fund Obama’s amnesty program over our US Veterans.
He won’t answer why.
I don’t know whether Donald Trump will endorse either man before Tue’s primary.
Supposedly it won’t matter either way.
Ryan is supposedly way ahead in the polls.
As of yesterday and today, during three well attended rallies, Donald Trump did go after Hillary in a big way.