A Trail of FBI Abuse…The Horowitz report confirms that the bureau deceived FISA judges with the Steele dossier.

Loading

The press corps is portraying Monday’s report by Justice Department Inspector General Michael Horowitz as absolution for the Federal Bureau of Investigation, but don’t believe it. The report relates a trail of terrible judgment and violations of process that should shock Americans who thought better of their premier law-enforcement agency.

Readers can look at the detailed executive summary and decide for themselves. But our own initial reading confirms the worst of what we feared about the bureau when it was run by James Comey. The FBI corrupted the secret court process for obtaining warrants to spy on former Trump aide Carter Page. And it did so by supplying the court with false information produced by Christopher Steele, an agent of the Hillary Clinton campaign.



How can anyone, most of all civil libertarians, pass this off as no big deal? The absolution is supposedly that Mr. Horowitz concludes that the FBI decision to open a counter-intelligence probe against the Trump campaign in July 2016 “was sufficient to predicate the investigation” under current FBI rules.

Yet Mr. Horowitz also notes that these rules amount to a “low threshold for predication.” John Durham, the U.S. Attorney investigating these matters for Attorney General William Barr, said Monday he disagrees with Mr. Horowitz’s conclusions on predication, albeit without elaboration for now.

Mr. Horowitz confirms what the FBI had already leaked to friendly reporters, which is that the bureau’s alarm in July 2016 was triggered by a conversation that former Trump aide George Papadopoulos had with Australian Alexander Downer. But we learn for the first time that the FBI immediately ramped up its counter-intelligence probe to include four Trump campaign officials: Messrs. Page and Papadopoulos, then campaign chairman Paul Manafort, and former head of the Defense Intelligence Agency Michael Flynn.

The bureau quickly moved to a full-scale investigation it called Crossfire Hurricane. The FBI’s justification, as related to Mr. Horowitz, is that the risk of Russian disruption of the 2016 election was too great to ignore.

Yet the bureau never told anyone in the Trump campaign, or even Donald Trump, whom or what it was investigating so he could reduce the danger or distance himself from those advisers. The FBI was investigating the campaign but wouldn’t tell the candidate who would soon be elected.

The FBI abuses escalated when it was presented with the now infamous Steele dossier. Mr. Steele was hired by Glenn Simpson and Fusion GPS, the oppo-research outfit hired by a law firm for the Clinton campaign. Mr. Horowitz confirms that the FBI then used the Steele dossier to trigger its application to the FISA court to spy on Mr. Page.

“We determined that the Crossfire Hurricane team’s receipt of Steele’s election reporting on September 19, 2016 played a central and essential role in the FBI’s and Department’s decision to seek the FISA order,” Mr. Horowitz says. This confirms what Rep. Devin Nunes and House Republicans first disclosed in February 2018, which was denied by Rep. Adam Schiff and sneered at by the press at the time.

Mr. Horowitz also finds that the FBI told the FISA court that Mr. Steele was credible without having tried to confirm the details or verify his sources. Mr. Horowitz found no fewer than seven key “errors or omissions” in the FBI’s original FISA application, and 10 more in the three subsequent applications. The latter were especially egregious because they ignored information that the FBI’s own Crossfire Hurricane team had later gathered that cast doubt on the Steele claims.

The omissions include the stunner that Mr. Page had been working as an “operational contact” for what Mr. Horowitz calls another U.S. agency from 2008-2013. Mr. Page has said this is the CIA, which Mr. Horowitz doesn’t confirm, though he does say that Mr. Page was reporting on his Russian contacts, which the agency deemed credible.

In other words, the FBI was using Mr. Page’s Russian contacts as evidence against him to the FISA court even as the other agency considered his reports on those Russians to be helpful to the U.S. Mr. Horowitz says the FBI never disclosed this information to the FISA judges.

“Much of that information was inconsistent with, or undercut, the assertions contained in the FISA applications that were used to support probable cause and, in some instances, resulted in inaccurate information being included in the [FISA] applications,” the report says. This is the Inspector General’s bland way of saying that the FBI deceived four FISA judges.

Democrats and the press are making much of Mr. Horowitz’s conclusion that he “did not find documentary or testimonial evidence that political bias or improper motivation” influenced FBI decisions. But his report does show that political bias was conveyed to the FISA court from the Clinton campaign via the Steele dossier through the FBI.

It was conveyed by Bruce Ohr, a senior Justice Department official whose wife, Nellie Ohr, worked for Fusion GPS. Mr. Horowitz may not have found a memo with the words “let’s get Trump,” but his evidence shows that getting Mr. Trump was the goal of Mr. Steele and Fusion GPS. Mr. Ohr met 13 times with the FBI to discuss the Steele findings.

Even if you buy the “no bias” line, all of this had major political consequences. Fusion GPS used its media contacts to spread word of the Steele dossier’s accusations, and news of the FBI’s use of that dossier became a media hook to suggest the accusations were credible. This became another part of the false Russia collusion narrative played up by the press and the likes of former CIA director John Brennan.

Read more

0 0 votes
Article Rating
Subscribe
Notify of
2 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments

This morning I came to the realization that much of what is reported by the great folks at Fox News is in a real sense, futile. Horowitz did a great disservice by softening the criminality and treason that took place and continues to take place right in front of our faces. We already know that had Killery Clinton been the President, most if not all of what we know about the sewer rats and deep state would never have seen the light of day…..My issue is this: No one has served one minute in a federal prison for crimes committed at the highest level. Treason surely took place and yet we see that no one has paid the price for their deceit..their selling out of our country to the highest bidder…Horowitz is known to be a long time deep state participant. I knew that he would not come down hard on some of those involved in the intentional targeting of an American President…I don’t see William Barr or anyone else succeeding in their efforts, going after all of the players in this because it would lead right up to Obama. Obama is shielded by the color of his skin, a massive main stream media who continues in its sedition 24/7 and by the democrats. Obviously some Republicans have his back as well…. No. I don’t see any real justice taking place. The rats will scurry back to their well maintained mansions with their ample secured incomes, paid for by corrupt media entities, taxpayer monies, publishing houses and indoctrinated dumb downed Americans who would march into hell with them…..America will flip over time because of the indoctrination in the schools. No one has addressed this critical problem. It is simple deduction. The future leaders of America will be well saturated socialist who believe in multiculturalism and globalism. Unless by miracle, our education system is purged of leftist and rebuilt from top to bottom, American patriots are going to find themselves in a stark futile place……..

Yet Mr. Horowitz also notes that these rules amount to a “low threshold for predication.”

So, what they are saying is that when national security is at stake, the threshold to begin looking into that possibility is low. OK, fine. I agree. So, explain then why, when the Clinton Foundation took in $1.5 million from Russia and Russians, then Hillary provides her approval to a sale of uranium (you know… the bomb stuff) to a company she and the rest of the committee KNEW was probably controlled by Russia (and, indeed, it was), there was NO investigation? THAT was a threshold that illegal immigrants couldn’t climb over.

The bureau quickly moved to a full-scale investigation it called Crossfire Hurricane. The FBI’s justification, as related to Mr. Horowitz, is that the risk of Russian disruption of the 2016 election was too great to ignore.

Yet the Obama administration had issued a stand down order to block Russian interference. They don’t really seem all that concerned with Russia’s involvement… unless they can control and assist what that involvement targets.

Yet the bureau never told anyone in the Trump campaign, or even Donald Trump, whom or what it was investigating so he could reduce the danger or distance himself from those advisers.

True, one would have to be cautious about who the ongoing investigation was revealed to, but letting Trump know, then carefully monitoring his reactions (using the surveillance you already had in place) would clearly reveal whose side Trump was on. But, that wasn’t important or critical to the FBI at that time because the real and true purpose was to destroy his campaign.

In other words, the FBI was using Mr. Page’s Russian contacts as evidence against him to the FISA court even as the other agency considered his reports on those Russians to be helpful to the U.S. Mr. Horowitz says the FBI never disclosed this information to the FISA judges.

But, remember, withholding that vital, critical, exculpatory information was just an “oopsie”, not based on the desire to carry on an investigation no matter what, driven by political zealotry. Nooooo….

Democrats and the press are making much of Mr. Horowitz’s conclusion that he “did not find documentary or testimonial evidence that political bias or improper motivation” influenced FBI decisions.

So, no one interviewed or investigated stated they made the decisions they made because they wanted Hillary to be President? What a shock. Though, the Page/Strzok texts pretty much state exactly that.

@Frank Gonzales: Indeed, the media is the tool of Democrats. I was watching Kevin McCarthy make his statement after the announcement of the phony impeachment articles. He tore the Democrat’s asses UP, making far more sense than Nadler or Schiff. When he took questions, of course the media wanted to go down the same path of misdirection and ask questions about anything but the validity of the charges. This was on Fox, of course; when I switched around, only OAN was carrying his comments; MSNBC and CNN were not, of course. But, they carried Nadler and Schiff lying. Only those that the truth can hurt fear the truth.