Sociopathic Washington Post reporter imperils the life of Libs of TikTok owner

Loading

 

 

Taylor Lorenz is a hypocritical b*tch. That’s where we begin.

She is a reporter for the Washington Post. Revolver describes her as a used-up cocktail waitress for the regime.”  She was apparently assigned to destroy the person behind the Libs of TikTok twitter account and she sought help to do it.

Libs of TikTok takes public posts on TikTok made by various snowflakes and left-wing creeps and posts them on Twitter.  For instance

This isn’t Russian disinformation. There is nothing edited or doctored. These lunatics out themselves publicly. There is a really good piece at Spectatorworld which dives deeply into this

Lorenz provides the example of Tyler Wrynn, an English teacher who resigned following a backlash over a video he posted on TikTok. Lorenz characterizes the video as merely an expression of pride and love for his LGBTQ students. But Wrynn’s actual words were “if your parents don’t love and accept you for who you are this Christmas, fuck them, I’m your parents now.” LibsOfTikTok tweeted this clip, along with the commentary: “This teacher was let go last week after complaints of grooming and this tiktok + others containing questionable content were brought to the principal’s attention.” This plays into the culture war, to be sure, but so does the outright claim that teachers should supplant the parental role.

and

And then there’s the State University of New York professor who was relieved of contact with students after LibsOfTikTok shared video of him advocating for pedophilia, saying, “the notion that [sexual contact] is wrong even with a one-year old is not quite obvious to me. There are reports in some cultures of grandmothers fellating baby boys to calm them down when they are colicky.” What did supposed hatemonger LibsOfTikTok say about this? “This guy needs to be fired ASAP.”

Do read the entire piece. Mind you, these are NOT undercover stings. These were videos posted on TikTok.

Lorenz went on to doxx the person behind LibsofTikTok with the aid of a professional doxxer.

In the Washington Post, Taylor Lorenz herself credits Brown for confirming Libs Of TikTok’s identity.

On Saturday, software developer Travis Brown (who is working on a project with support from Prototype Fund, an organization that backs open-source projects) unearthed the account’s Twitter history and posted a thread detailing information about its profile changes.

Brown is the creator of the so-called “Hate Speech Tracker,” a program whose explicit purpose is to aid Antifa extremists in tracking and archiving statements by its enemies, and find “connections” between them to aid in doxxing.

Basically, “Brown” is a fascist funded by what smells a lot like something out the Third Reich.

This isn’t some one-off fluke. Much like Brandy Zadrozny, whom Revolver profiled in 2020, Travis Brown exists as a small part of a much larger ecosystem.

Brown’s doxxing operation isn’t an independent venture. He is backed by the Prototype Fund, a project of the Open Knowledge Foundation Germany, an “independent not-for-profit organization.” The notion that the foundation is “independent” is, of course, a lie. OKFG receives funding directly from the the German Federal Ministry of Education and Research.

And hold on to your hat

The same German government-backed organization that is targeting political dissidents in the West is also funding the transgender mania and the foreign policy priorities of the Western elite. In many ways, Prototype resembles Bellingcat—an “NGO” funded by the United Kingdom that played a key role in amplifying the Russia collusion narrative, targets “far-right” domestic dissidents, and promoted the Syria gas attack hoax. In 2021, The Grayzone revealed that Bellingcat took UK intelligence money to run overseas influence operations intended to “weaken Russia.”

In other words, this is a program of intimidation and suppression, and Twitter is completely on board. Again, I urge you to read the whole thing.

Lorenz accomplished her goal. The person behind Libs of TikTok is getting death threats

As of this writing, the Twitter post remains. Now for the irony. Taylor Lorenz imploded when someone doxxed her.

 

Lorenz harassed the formerly anonymous poster and her family

Lorenz has a history of stalking teenagers and has been sued for defamation.

Taylor Lorenz is a sociopath and a hypocritical b*tch. The Washington Post is worth sh*t in its complicity but this is the state of journalism today. Now if anyone has Lorenz’s home address and sends it to me, I’ll try to disapprove.

If you want a good laugh in regard to this, go here.

 

0 0 votes
Article Rating
Subscribe
Notify of
37 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments

She is a sociopath just like the rest of her comrades on the left. The tide is turning against them. though. They need to be destroyed lest they destroy us first.

They need to be destroyed

What does that look like?

What does that look like?

CNN+. Air America.

LGBT isn’t a thing. You make decisions base on your feelings and desired curbed by rational thought.

The goal is to normalize LGBT for the sole purpose of assuaging the feelings of those who think their sexual kinks make them another class of person.

LGBT isn’t a thing.

Do you think that being gay or lesbian is a choice?

Of course it is. Otherwise, you wouldn’t have such wide variations in the amount of gay and lesbian expressiveness across cultures, communities, and throughout history. If it was something you were born with, the percentage of gay and lesbian people would remain steady no matter where and when people are living.

Agreed. What they are doing is like if we tore down every doorway in the world and made it only 5 feet tall, so the small percentage of Little People felt better…

…and then they taught our children they could cut off their legs and be LPs too…

Last edited 1 year ago by Nathan Blue

…very interesting anal-ogy!

Otherwise, you wouldn’t have such wide variations in the amount of gay and lesbian expressiveness across cultures, communities, and throughout history.

Or the percentage of homosexuals has remained relatively constant and the variable is how closeted they have had to be in various societies over the millennia.

Yes. It’s all sexuality. How one expresses that is their choice.

They are not another “race” or “class” of person. That was a political choice to graft the Civil Rights movement from the 60s to benefit mainly white “LGBT” people looking for a subjective and un-provable status that makes them special.

My entire life I’ve fought for gay rights and lost many friends after holding them accountable for their hate-mongering against LGBT folks…but now, I see it’s gone too far.

For the most part, LGBT is sexualized psychological trauma.

What we’re doing now is like if we tore down ever doorway and made them only 5 feet tall so the small percentage of Little People feel “tolerated”…

…and then our children think they will get attention and a special status if they cut their legs off and pretend to be an LP.

“For the most part, LGBT is sexualized psychological trauma”

Q-would it be safe to say that many in that lifestyle been abused as children?

For the most part, LGBT is sexualized psychological trauma.

Where’d you come up with that?

Where’d you come up with that?

Oh, you know…actual science and historical record. But go ahead. Pretend unfettered sex expression is something new, and that we don’t know where it leads.

What education did you get that failed to teach you science and history?

Do you think that being gay or lesbian is a choice?

In a majority of the cases, it is. It’s SOMEONE’S choice.

In a majority of the cases, it is.

Where do you get that information?

Where did you get the information to the contrary…that’s the real question.

From observation. It’s a popular fad, like “gender fluidity”. It’s guaranteed acceptance in the leftist crowd (well, as long as you promote leftist ideals, such as depravity).

Is grooming and confusing young children about sexuality, gender and deviant behavior acceptable to you?

Last edited 1 year ago by Just Plain Bill

From observation. It’s a popular fad, like “gender fluidity”. It’s guaranteed acceptance in the leftist crowd (well, as long as you promote leftist ideals, such as depravity).

Being gay is socially acceptable now, it’s true, and thank goodness for that, but there have always been homosexuals, even when being gay meant being socially ostracized at the least or imprisoned—even killed—at the worst. There are homosexuals in fundamentalist muslim countries in which gays are thrown to their deaths from towers.

What, aside from the “popular fad” theory, would account for that?

Last edited 1 year ago by Michael

What, aside from the “popular fad” theory, would account for that?

Um… nothing. Just as I said. Kids seeking attention can “come out” and be cool. Also, some mothers get a kick out of grooming their young sons as girls or gay. It’s only “socially acceptable” among those who condone deviancy. Normal society doesn’t need nor want to know about one’s sexuality.

Gays aren’t exactly “coming out” in Islamic areas, are they? NOT that popular there, therefore not a lot of people seeking attention (when they have nothing else to offer) saying, “HEY! Look at ME! I’m all GAY and stuff! And, YOU have to accept and endorse it!”

Um… nothing. Just as I said. Kids seeking attention can “come out” and be cool.

So nothing explains homosexuality in fundamentalist Muslim countries except for the “popular fad” theory. You’re saying that gay Muslims who face the death penalty are doing it because they’re “seeking attention”?

People who face ostracism and sometimes death because of their sexual orientation are doing it on a whim, not because it’s part of who they are?

So nothing explains homosexuality in fundamentalist Muslim countries except for the “popular fad” theory. 

You don’t see homosexuals “coming out” in droves in Muslim countries, do you? You don’t see parades, drag queen programs in schools, deviants trolling for converts in kindergartens, do you? There’s not an epidemic of “gay” here, it’s a fad.

You’re confusing being closeted with not being gay.

but there have always been homosexuals,

Indeed, there have always been those with physcial or behavior disabilities.

We help them function in a normal society, but we don’t build a society around them.

Notice Michael doesn’t refute what we say, just ask questions like a bot.

It’s hard trying to explain things to uneducated, rather low-IQ Leftists. They just can’t seem to keep up, intellectually.

I certainly don’t mind having my views questioned and am happy to explain them, when necessary. It will be interesting to see how it is digested. He puts are pretty narrow definition on terms, that is for sure. Personally, I would loathe to be in the position of defending child predatory behavior.

Have they found the “gay” gene?

Have they found the “gay” gene?

Not one single gene, but several that seem to have an effect on same-sex orientation.

From Nature (emphasis mine):

The largest study to date on the genetic basis of sexuality has revealed five spots on the human genome that are linked to same-sex sexual behaviour — but none of the markers are reliable enough to predict someone’s sexuality.

The findings, which are published on 29 August in Science and based on the genomes of nearly 500,000 people, shore up the results of earlier, smaller studies and confirm the suspicions of many scientists: while sexual preferences have a genetic component, no single gene has a large effect on sexual behaviours.

No ‘gay gene’: Massive study homes in on genetic basis of human sexualityNearly half a million genomes reveal five DNA markers associated with sexual behaviour — but none with the power to predict the sexuality of an individual.

I read the article. I can cut and paste too. Thanks for playing.

I read the article. I can cut and paste too.

And you choose to cut and paste information that undercuts your own position.

What animal outside of humans has this never found gene combo been found? Its just another I can find what you are funding grant.
Why didnt you high light this part but none of the markers are reliable enough to predict someone’s sexuality.
An article can disprove what it claims to prove and you turn all bobblehead, Yup Yup babies are gay.
It isnt a characteristic that genetics would evolve unable to carry to the next generation, damn anti science, Gays cant breed. No one is born gay nothing is born gay it is a learned, groomed behavior or mental illness.
I dont want them dead, harmed or harrassed I want them to leave children alone allow them to go through natural growing processes give them the time of innocence they deserve.

this never found gene combo

Except the scientists specifically found the gene combination thousands of times.

Why didnt you high light this part 

I provided the quote. I have to highlight for you as well? Do it yourself.

Last edited 1 year ago by Michael

This is a case where the bias of the researches is distorting the science.

“Preference” is not a strong word. I’m sure a pedophile “prefers” to do what they want.

But in our society, they are not allowed.

This is a case where the bias of the researches is distorting the science.

That’s just coming out of your own head.

Of course it is a choice. Being born a male or a female is the only outcome of birth.
These confused psychopaths who think they are a gender other than what they were born, suffer from severe mental duress

I specifically referred only to homosexuality, but thanks for your input.

Hell, Taylor Lorenz is just a typical liberal. The left, because there are so many sick, deviant, sexual mutants in the Democrat party, wants to make child sexual predators normal and acceptable. Before this can happen, all evidence of opposition to this mental illness has to be suppressed.

It is how the left deals with EVERY issue; they have no policies that appeal to normal, patriotic Americans, so they have to suppress every bit of evidence of better options.