“Newsflash for D.C. Republicans: Trying to throw Trump under the bus is not only a stupid, losing strategy but it’s also confirmation that you’re out of touch with who your base is”

Loading


 

I for one will never hold my nose and vote for the lesser of two evils ever again. These wishy-washy Republicans have no idea they will never be in power again if they continue down this road.

0 0 votes
Article Rating
Subscribe
Notify of
105 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments

@Ronald J. Ward: What will you who relied so completely on fraud, lies, corrupt and theft do when this information finally gets thoroughly investigated?

Navarro Report Vol 1, “Immaculate Deception”
https://bannonswarroom.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/12/The-Immaculate-Deception-12.15.20-1.pdf

Navarro Report Vol 2, “Art of the Steal”
https://img1.wsimg.com/blobby/go/be36dc6d-0df4-4c20-addf-fca72be46150/The%20Art%20of%20the%20Steal%201.5.21%20FINAL.pdf?fbclid=IwAR1IGiZYcF4_3T3D-bjVZg0-1xVxQV0Ess1yZGS1dVVVbnuS4QbrsTkl61g

Navarro Report, Vol 3
https://img1.wsimg.com/blobby/go/be36dc6d-0df4-4c20-addf-fca72be46150/The%20Navarro%20Report%20Volume%20III%20Final%201.13.21-0001.pdf

It’s thoroughly damning. A denial of election fraud is simply a lie. Grampa Grope wasn’t taken out of context and he didn’t misspeak. He just forgot to keep the secret.

@Ronald J. Ward: A 3rd vaxx developed by operation warp speed is asking for emergency use, only requires a single dose.
Bars in NY resorting to accept only bitcoin after NY empties out a bank account of a gym owner refusing to close, thieving democrat bastids!
Have they shut down the filthy subways yet?
When will they give the true numbers for Covid, they wont yet cause its less than 20K.
BREAKING: CNN’s Jade Sacker penetrating the Capitol with a member of BLM/Antifa cheering, “We did it!” And then asking her conspirator if he was filming, he said he’d delete it, he lied. CNN was in on it.

@Nathan Blue:

Ever notice how Ward/AJ demonizes his adversaries by calling us names? Refer to your history. Who demonized his adversaries? Once you remove a person or group’s humanity by demonizing them, then you can do anything to them you want without repercussion.

Ward/AJ goes to sleep to dream of the trains and the camps that he, and others like him, would see all us who supported Trump rounded up and put in. He is a good little Democrat who lives his life without conscience. His political adversaries are his enemies and they (we) are not human to him. We are baskets, lickers, Klan members. Any slur he can lob at us.

The man is as sick as the people he emulates.

@Deplorable Me:

One has to wonder if you seriously expect the likes of Peter Navarro to be taken seriously of if you delight in seeing how divorced from reality you are in your alternative world.

As Philip Bump explains of 1 of the Navarro reports

The first thing I did when I cracked open White House trade adviser Peter Navarro’s 30-page compilation of President Trump’s voter-fraud greatest hits was check a footnote. The introduction claimed that, as of midnight on Election Day, Trump looked to be “well on his way to winning a second term,” given that he “was already a lock to win both Florida and Ohio.”

“No Republican has ever won a presidential election without winning Ohio,” the document notes, “while only two Democrats have won the presidency without winning Florida.”

I was curious about the source for that claim, so I checked Footnote 3. And, lo and behold, the source was … me, writing in 2016.

Of course, my point wasn’t that winning Ohio and Florida were a guarantee of victory. Instead, I was pointing out that there were certain states that Democrats and Republicans usually won before winning the presidency. Navarro’s right that no Republican has won the presidency without winning Ohio — but plenty of Democrats have, rendering his point entirely moot. And that’s even assuming that his point was useful at all anyway, which we shouldn’t. Bill Clinton lost Florida in 1992 while winning the presidency. Joe Biden did it this year, meaning that in one-fourth of the past eight elections it has happened. Hardly something particularly remarkable.

But this, in broad strokes, is how Navarro’s document operates. It throws out as near-certainties things that are unfounded, misrepresented or unimportant.

His claims about who won what states are actually some of his better points. First, they are accurate and, second, his source was a reputable news organization. But his footnotes cite the blatantly pro-Trump Epoch Times more than The Washington Post and the New York Times combined. In fact, he celebrates his reliance on biased and flawed sources of information.

“From Steve Bannon’s War Room Pandemic and John Solomon’s Just the News to Raheem Kassam’s National Pulse, to Newsmax, and One America News Network,” Navarro writes, “Americans hungry for facts and breaking developments have been able to find such critical information only by following this alternative coverage.”

Put another way, Americans seeking dubious or debunked information are only able to find it from outlets willing to publish and air dubious and debunked information.

One of the hallmark characteristics of rhetoric from the White House is the substitution of volume for value. Trump offers dishonest statements with abandon, hoping that his audience will accept as true at least some small percentage of his blizzard of nonsense. But the White House also uses presenting a lot of accusations as somehow being evidence supporting the accusations, as though getting 500 people to say they believe aliens invented pistachios makes it more likely to be true than if one person said it. Navarro does this exact thing explicitly at one point, in fact, hyping widespread belief that something dubious occurred — belief fostered by Trump and the above-named media outlets — as evidence that it did.

The goal of Navarro’s document was largely to elevate unfounded suspicion by creating a catalogue of various false claims about the election, many of which have been similarly elevated by Trump. That includes most of the claims that we’ve not only debunked but also compiled as having been debunked. It includes analysis of the voting in Michigan from the guy who at one point erroneously presented Minnesota data as having come from Michigan.

It’s not a report. It’s a garbage dump.

It includes statements such as this:

“At midnight on the evening of November 3, and as illustrated in Table 1, President Trump was ahead by more than 110,000 votes in Wisconsin and more than 290,000 votes in Michigan. In Georgia, his lead was a whopping 356,945; and he led in Pennsylvania by more than half a million votes. By December 7, however, these wide Trump leads would turn into razor thin Biden leads — 11,779 votes in Georgia, 20,682 votes in Wisconsin, 81,660 votes in Pennsylvania, and 154,188 votes in Michigan.”
Right. Because they counted more votes — mail-in votes, which heavily favored Biden and couldn’t be counted before Election Day in Wisconsin, Pennsylvania and Michigan.

If you are still making claims such as the one above, you should not be taken seriously. It can’t be said more plainly than that. It is the flat-Earth theory of election fraud, something that maybe people long ago were justified in believing but that, by now, has no place being treated as a serious argument. If Navarro sincerely believes this implies questionable activity, then his “report” should be treated as inherently ridiculous, since he hasn’t done his homework. If he doesn’t believe his insinuations, then the report shouldn’t be taken seriously, because it’s obviously aimed at misleading the reader.

This is by no means the only example of Navarro presenting as nefarious something that he can’t actually prove to be anything outside the norm.

Part of his report, for example, includes the claim that “outright voter fraud” occurred in each of the six states — fraud such as “bribery,” for which he includes a citation to a legal definition of the crime. (This is another feature of the Trump-world effort to prove fraud: making things seem more serious by injecting unnecessary efforts to demonstrate authority.)

Navarro alleges that bribery occurred in Arizona and Nevada. His evidence? Well, a report that, in Nevada, a group held a raffle that anyone who had voted could enter. This, he says, was an attempt to buy votes from Native American voters. The organization holding the raffle responded by pointing out that such raffles are legal. The Trump campaign included this allegation in a lawsuit in Nevada — one of the campaign’s numerous legal losses since the election. The judge in the case ruled that the campaign didn’t prove the allegation.

That happened two weeks ago, yet there was the claim in Navarro’s document.

Anyway, that’s just Nevada. What about the claim it also happened in Arizona?

“According to the Epoch Times, such vote-buying schemes also may have occurred in eight other states, including Arizona and Wisconsin,” the report states. Oh, well, if the Epoch Times says so.

The document just goes on at length in the same way, picking out the sort of cruft that’s been littering Trump’s Twitter feed since Nov. 3 and tying it all into one stinky package. It’s sincerely not worth running through the entire litany again; simply consider The Post’s Fact Checker articles as an effective rejoinder.

What we should do, though, is consider the broader context for Navarro’s claims. He focuses on the six states that have been targeted by Trump since the election. We’ve labeled them as the “irregularity” states below, to translate them to Navarro’s document, but one could also call them “swing states” — except that Michigan wasn’t really all that close.

Anyway, the point is that, if these were states where something demonstrably unusual happened, if there was some exceptional fraud at play, they would look different from other states. But, as we’ve repeatedly demonstrated, they don’t.

For example, Trump and his allies like to claim that it was fraud in big cities that led to Trump’s defeat in states such as Michigan and Pennsylvania — except that this demonstrably isn’t what happened. In the swing states, the shift to Biden relative to the 2016 vote was larger in more-suburban counties than in urban ones. This is the trend that gave Democrats the House in 2018 — an erosion of support for Trump among college-educated voters in the suburbs.

If we compare the average shifts in counties in each kind of state, the average shifts to Biden relative to Hillary Clinton were much larger in heavily urban counties in states that voted narrowly for Biden or Trump (meaning a statewide margin under 10 points) or heavily for Trump. But most of the shifts were to Biden, save in the most rural areas.

There’s similarly not any obvious difference in the county-level shifts when one considers education. We took the density of college degrees among those 25 or older in each county and put them in eight evenly sized buckets. In the counties with the highest density of college-educated voters, Biden saw bigger gains; in those with the lowest density, Trump did. (There are only three states that Biden won by less than 10 percent that aren’t in Navarro’s “irregularity” list, so consider that line a bit iffy.)

Again, the “irregularity” states don’t stand out.

Where things are interesting is when considering race. The most densely White and the most densely non-White counties shifted to Trump nationally, in part thanks to shifts in states that backed Trump. It also holds true in Biden’s best states, thanks to Trump’s better-than-2016 performance in some cities such as New York City.

But there’s nothing exceptional about the “swing states.” There’s no obvious pattern showing that particular places overdelivered for Biden in any particular way.

Of the 1,495 counties where the margins for Biden improved relative to Clinton’s margins in 2016, more than half were in states that voted for Trump. About two-thirds of counties in non-swing blue states shifted to Biden, as did 58 percent of swing-state counties. About 4 in 10 counties in red states did.

The burden of proof here lies with Trump and Navarro, the ones claiming fraudulent activity for which they have presented no credible evidence. The key word there is “credible,” of course — they’ve presented lots of evidence that is the electoral equivalent of shadowy photos of the Loch Ness monster. Navarro’s report is the functional equivalent of one of those shows where ghost-hunters bring various homemade electronic devices into abandoned townhouses before declaring authoritatively that the photo they took of a dust mite is, in actuality, a poltergeist.

And if you don’t believe me, allow me to prove my credentials: Navarro finds my analysis so reliable that he cites it in his report.

Put another way, Americans seeking dubious or debunked information are only able to find it from outlets willing to publish and air dubious and debunked information.

And that is absolutely true if people rely on Philip Bump for actual fact based opinion, not his left wing jaded opinion.

Of course, Ward/AJ finds a “journalist” who supports the left wing to prove that a conservative is wrong. Add Bump to Duranty, Lippmann and Cronkite. Give readers opinionated articles to sway the readers opinion.

If Ward/AJ was honest, which he’s not, he would admit that Bump is nothing more than a less flamboyant Jim Acosta.

@Ronald J. Ward:

One has to wonder if you seriously expect the likes of Peter Navarro to be taken seriously of if you delight in seeing how divorced from reality you are in your alternative world.

What is required to NOT take him seriously is to first prove he is wrong. For instance, 66,700 illegal votes cast by underage voters in Georgia should be pretty easy to disprove. Why won’t anyone do it? Mail in votes that were never folded and put in envelopes (and thus, never mailed) should be pretty easy to disprove. Why won’t anyone do it? I stand ready to see any of it actually disproved, but I don’t accept a long, drawn out dissertation of “Oh, that’s just crazy talk” as in any way lowering suspicions.

People that come forth and testify that they never requested a mail-in ballot and never voted by mail even though there was a mail-in vote in their name cannot be refuted. Likewise, when dead people voted, it is irrefutable that they shouldn’t have. How DO dead people vote? How is that accidental or, as you prefer, “taken out of context”?

The longer the accusations of election fraud is allowed to stand without an intelligent response, the stronger accusations become. I know YOU readily and happily accept anything you are told, as long as you already believed it to be true. I’m not so anxious to make myself ignorant.

So, I will continue to view Grampa Grope Asterisk Beijing Obiden as an illegitimate piece of shit. Likewise, every day I will criticize and insult him and point out his failures, just as you all did Trump, never acknowledging his successes and harshly criticizing every mistake (and making them up when there are none). You can continue lying to defend your liberal failures.

@Deplorable Me:

What is required to NOT take him seriously is to first prove he is wrong. For instance, 66,700 illegal votes cast by underage voters in Georgia should be pretty easy to disprove. Why won’t anyone do it? Mail in votes that were never folded and put in envelopes (and thus, never mailed) should be pretty easy to disprove. Why won’t anyone do it? I stand ready to see any of it actually disproved, but I don’t accept a long, drawn out dissertation of “Oh, that’s just crazy talk” as in any way lowering suspicions.

Because you are moving the goal post of reasonable logic and what determines the winner from the loser. You don’t get to change the norms of reasonable thinking by creating a rule that says unhinged and wild conspiracies from sore losers have to be disproven or else the sore loser wins.

The clear winner of a foot race can’t be disqualified because he cannot disprove his losers claim that he reached up and grabbed a chunk of the moon and hit him in the head with it-rigging the foot race. The burden of truth lies on the loser making the absurd and ridiculous claim. Likewise, if the 67K underage votes or mail in complaints had merit, it is up to those making the charge to validate their claim.

@retire05: Of course I knew you’d cling to the ridiculous claim of anyone and everyone Trump has told you to reject that you would reject.

CNN, ABC, NBC, CBS, WAPO, NYT, and so on credibility arguments come solely from a president who acknowledged on a live TV interview that “I say that because I need to discredit you so that when you say negative things about me, no one will believe you.” On the other hand, Conway, McEnamy, Rush, Hannity, Fox News, Newsmax, and most of the rabidly hack sites sited on here are propaganda outlets intended solely to spread disinformation and lies.

And the gulibles swallow it whole on a daily bases, even to the point that they insist what never happened must be disproven and that facts and data are not allowed as they will only accept from you what they’ve already told you they won’t believe.

It is truly a spectacular site to behold.

@Ronald J. Ward: Your Bump guy:

The burden of proof here lies with Trump and Navarro, the ones claiming fraudulent activity for which they have presented no credible evidence. The key word there is “credible,” of course — they’ve presented lots of evidence that is the electoral equivalent of shadowy photos of the Loch Ness monster.

Wrong the burden of proof lies with he election officials. Prove Biden won lay out the 80 million valid legal votes.
We know that against federal law these machines were connected to the internet.
We have suspicion thats enough, above that thousands of witnesses, even illegal activity caught on security cameras. 93% error rate of tabulators in that same state, in MI 68% error rate.
You and Bump on the head are wrong.
If the GOP thinks we will settle for lay down roll over representatives they have a primary problem.

@Ronald J. Ward:

The clear winner of a foot race can’t be disqualified because he cannot disprove his losers claim that he reached up and grabbed a chunk of the moon and hit him in the head with it-rigging the foot race

That’s what we said to Hillary…

…you dumbf*ck.

“…accuse your enemy of doing what you got caught doing in an effort to obscure the truth…”

Glad to see Trump destroying the Democrats, day by day.

They’ve been violating the Constitution for far too long.

Time to put this Leftist insurrection down for good.

@Nathan Blue:

Hillary conceded within hours so it’s as usual, unclear what to make of whatever in the hell you’re talking about.

@retire05:

Ever notice how Ward/AJ demonizes his adversaries by calling us names?

@Nathan Blue:

you dumbf*ck.

@Nathan Blue:

Glad to see Trump destroying the Democrats, day by day.

Trump came in with a solid GOP majority in both chambers.

Trump leaves with Dems holding both chambers as well as the Executive Branch.

Again, you say the most silliest of things.

@Ronald J. Ward: You’ll do just about anything to avoid addressing the point, won’t you? 66,700 illegal underage votes is substantial; it turns the state. Why not determine if that is fact? There’s only one reason not to; you fear the truth.

When it’s the truth, it ceases to be a theory, conspiracy or otherwise. You gleefully supported Russian collusion, though it barely made it to theory status; it was always nothing more than opposition research, lies for ads. But you gobbled it up and regurgitated it whenever possible. Yet now you want to convince someone you don’t entertain conspiracies? You don’t entertain FACTS.

Hillary conceded within hours so it’s as usual, unclear what to make of whatever in the hell you’re talking about.

She STILL says the election was illegitimate. So did you. So did most Democrats. They contested it in Congress even though they had NO proof of ANY fraud.

Trump has 49% approval, as of the 12th. Did the Democrats get Dominion to put together Biden’s poll? Everyone just feels sorry for him, like a dumb dog.

Everything the Democrats have accomplished has been through fraud and the evidence proves it. PROVES it. Pretending YOU don’t see it doesn’t change the knowledge of anyone else.

Biden is so popular it takes 21,000 troops to protect his little party from The People. Fearing the people means the people didn’t elect him.

@Ronald J. Ward: As I said, parroting disinformation is not a cogent argument. Non-Leftists claim the media is merely a Party-run media for the Democrat Party and their minority of the population.

Thanks for proving that claim.

All that manufactured “Everybody thinks…”

Laughable.

Trump has a higher approval than Obama, his lowest unemployment rate is higher than Obama’s AVERAGE.

A new poll? Seriously? Designed to cover the Democrat Party’s authoritarian aims by saying “no no, TRUMP is the authoritarian.”

You’re pathetic.

Trump is one the best Presidents ever, by objective fact and verifiable numbers.

That’s why losers like you can’t stand him. He’s what you’ll never be. What non-Presidents like Biden will never be: competent.

But good luck with the coup. You’re going to need it.

Meanwhile, the majority of Americans are waiting to see if Democrats are stupid enough to install the loser of the election.

Trump will squash these traitors, most likely. They are SO scared of what he’s releasing, hence the second hoax impeachment.

GLAD TO SEE TRUMP DESTROYING DEMOCRATS, DAY BY DAY.

@Ronald J. Ward:

Hillary conceded within hours so it’s as usual, unclear what to make of whatever in the hell you’re talking about.

Because she lost a fair election, you stupid tw*t.

Yes. You deserve names because either a) you are pretending to be dumb, or b) you are dumb.

Trump is a good President, and he’s been attacked by a illegitimate cabal of Marxist politicians and fascist corporations.

He did things the Democrats promised, but never delivered on.

Now, dumbf*cks like you don’t even understand what you’re doing in your Cult-induced stupor.

Biden is not the President. He will never be recognized by anyone with a brain.

He’s not my president, and he’s not your President…because he’s not THE president.

You have to win elections for that. Not have a rigged computer system or paid “poll workers” to switch votes because Mark Zuckerberg paid them to.

I’d get out of the country while you can, traitor. We don’t want you here.

Michael Cooke: This is a wake up call for Republicans. Can you deal with clarity and truth? This guy is pulling no punches. Do you have the courage to listen to him?

@Greg: I dont use facebook its an anti-American censorship platform., I never heard of that freak does he have the ballots, the proof can he obtain the ballots?
Perhaps you can summerize as I dont like to give Zuckerberg any clicks.
The elections boards dont have the proof of a legally won election or we would already have it.

@Nathan Blue: Good luck with that complete idiot that could not win with popular vote but had to use massive fraud to win. He won’t be able to carry 21,000 troops with him everywhere he goes and they won’t fit in his basement.

No one needs a Facebook account to watch the video—only sufficient courage to hear what a highly articulate critic of the Trump phenomenon has to say. I would suggest that anyone who is afraid to hear it is either fully indoctrinated to the point where they no longer have freedom of thought, or must have repressed doubts about the truth of their own position already. Truth, after all, can withstand being challenged. Lies cannot. No Facebook login is required.

@Deplorable Me, #70:

Listen to yourself.

January 15, 2021
Statement
By Thomas Lifson

We received a lengthy letter from Dominion’s defamation lawyers explaining why they believe that their client has been the victim of defamatory statements. Having considered the full import of the letter, we have agreed to their request that we publish the following statement:

American Thinker and contributors Andrea Widburg, R.D. Wedge, Brian Tomlinson, and Peggy Ryan have published pieces on http://www.AmericanThinker.com that falsely accuse US Dominion Inc., Dominion Voting Systems, Inc., and Dominion Voting Systems Corporation (collectively “Dominion”) of conspiring to steal the November 2020 election from Donald Trump. These pieces rely on discredited sources who have peddled debunked theories about Dominion’s supposed ties to Venezuela, fraud on Dominion’s machines that resulted in massive vote switching or weighted votes, and other claims falsely stating that there is credible evidence that Dominion acted fraudulently.

These statements are completely false and have no basis in fact. Industry experts and public officials alike have confirmed that Dominion conducted itself appropriately and that there is simply no evidence to support these claims.

It was wrong for us to publish these false statements. We apologize to Dominion for all of the harm this caused them and their employees. We also apologize to our readers for abandoning 9 journalistic principles and misrepresenting Dominion’s track record and its limited role in tabulating votes for the November 2020 election. We regret this grave error.

@Greg: Bullshit.

and

@Ronald J. Ward: Bullshit.

@Ronald J. Ward, #73:

So, American Thinker is publicly acknowledging that they published lies about Dominion, and are apologizing for doing so.

Maybe people should think about that for a while.

@Greg:

They are publicly admitting they published multiple lies from multiple writer contributors on multiple occasions.

Granted, they do so to save their own hide as advised by their lawyers but had they had a leg to stand on, they’d never had tuck tail in such a manner.

This is a blaring example of why team Trump could only repeat and promote their lies publicly rather than presenting them in a court of law.

@Greg: Ok thought about it, Deep china pockets and crooked lawyers.
Machines were connected to the internet, found to be 93% inaccurate in the GA election.

the Crime family https://www.finance.senate.gov/imo/media/doc/2020-11-18%20HSGAC%20-%20Finance%20Joint%20Report%20Supplemental.pdf

Michigan judge orders AG to release forensic evidence of the 68% error rate and vote changing of Dominion machines.

MI Judge Orders Dem Sec of State To Release All Communications With Dominion, Facebook, Apple, Amazon and Google

Let’s see the evidence.

@Deplorable Me:

What Comrade Greggie gave you from American Thinker was the letter that Dominion Voting Systems demanded they publish. So they did. Here is the article in its total content:

https://www.americanthinker.com/articles/2020/12/2020_election_integrity__a_snapshot_showing_where_we_stand_now.html

@Greg:

Listen to yourself.

Biden is a false President. He won’t last long.

Our elections are more important than any one candidate.

If the fraud showed the election went for Trump, it would still be illegitimate.

Biden won nothing, and you’re supporting a Marxist state without any power.

@Ronald J. Ward:

They are publicly admitting they published multiple lies from multiple writer contributors on multiple occasions.

@Greg:

So, American Thinker is publicly acknowledging that they published lies about Dominion, and are apologizing for doing so.

Maybe people should think about that for a while.

When you start admitting to the massive media fraud and censorship, lies, and disinformation from a Party-run media complex.

I didn’t vote for CNN….or the American Thinker.

Your point is illogical, and proves nothing….beyond you think the Truth is whatever is printed by corrupt media outlets.

F*cking idiot.

The good news is this: Trump voters represent people who “do”. They work, many are successful business people, and all are simply for America as it stands: a Constitutional Republic. More POC support Trump than any non-Democrat ever.

Trump is irrelevant. The silly farce that f*ckstains like Ron/AJ blather on about a mindless cult are out of fear. He and they know they’ve lost any moral higher ground they might have had.

Democrat voters are those who “can’t”. They are godless, usually, blame others for their problems, and need a straw man for everything. They believe, like Nazi’s, their cause is just. But…they have nothing but a child-level sense of morals and ethics.

Dems censor gays, blacks, and anyone who doesn’t bend the knee.

greg and Ron/AJ know they are wrong..that’s why they are pushing.

@retire05, #79:

I didn’t post the letter. Mr. Ward did. The statement you have linked is the one that he posted, verbatim. It was published by American Thinker and serves as their own public acknowledgment of the truth of what Dominion has stated: that the accusations American Thinker published alleging fraud on the part of Dominion were complete bullshit.

What I posted was a link to This is a wake up call for Republicans, on the theory that when a building is on fire it might be helpful to point out the Fire Exit.

@Greg:

I didn’t post the letter. Mr. Ward did.

Sorry, you Communists all look alike to me.

The statement you have linked is the one that he posted, verbatim.

But the statement was only part of the entire article, which obviously you did not read.

It was published by American Thinker and serves as their own public acknowledgment of the truth of what Dominion has stated: that the accusations American Thinker published alleging fraud on the part of Dominion were complete bullshit.

Wrong, Commie scum. Dominion Voting Systems demanded American Thinker publish what Dominion told them to publish. American Thinker complied. American Thinker did not, any where in the article, say they were wrong. What do you not understand about this statement:

Having considered the full import of the letter, we have agreed to their request that we publish the following statement:

Where does AT say that they agree with the statement Dominion demanded they publish?

You really are a mental midget, aren’t you? Just another useful idiot for the Communists.

@Greg:

that the accusations American Thinker published alleging fraud on the part of Dominion were complete bullshit.

This is hardly and exoneration of any wrong doing by Dominion.

“Complete bullshit” is you ignoring Democrat corruption and the MOUNDS of false and fraudulent stories written and published by CNN/NYT/WAPO/etc and then pretending the pressured release by the American Thinker suddenly erase the real and true evidence of Dominion’s part in the sham elections the majority of American’s don’t acknowledge.

@retire05:

You really are a mental midget, aren’t you?

I always think of him during this scene.

@retire05:

You really are a mental midget, aren’t you?

I’m not a delusional member of a populace personality cult, so maybe the answer to that question would be No.

@Nathan Blue:

…and then pretending the pressured release by the American Thinker suddenly erase the real and true evidence of Dominion’s part in the sham elections the majority of American’s don’t acknowledge.

There is no such evidence. If there were such evidence, American Thinker wouldn’t need to retract anything about Dominion. The pressure results from the fact that they printed lies about Dominion, and now they’ve been called out on it. Freedom of speech doesn’t include a right to slander without any possibility of legal consequences.

@Greg:

I’m not a delusional member of a populace personality cult,

Yes, yes you are, and were. Obama voters were “cult” like to the enth degree. You still worship He Of No Achievement.

Since you are so fond of YouTube, here you go:

@Greg:

If there were such evidence, American Thinker wouldn’t need to retract anything about Dominion.

What a f*cking idiot you are. AT didn’t retract anything. They published the demand statement of Dominion Voting Systems, the voting system created specifically for Hugo Chavez and now used in many states.

You need to go get your money back from your internet law school.

You need to get control of your own brain back from Donald Trump for the sake of your own mental health. Whether you do or not doesn’t actually affect me one way or the other.

@Greg:

You need to get control of your own brain back from Donald Trump for the sake of your own mental health. Whether you do or not doesn’t actually affect me one way or the other.

That’s it? That’s you ever so intelligent response? No praise for the Obama Pimpf?

Yep, that’s it. You expected a game of ping-pong?

@retire05: Well, I’m not so sure. What that is is the original article with an update, them caving to Dominion. However, the the letter of submission aside, it does not address the machines being manipulated outside the purview of Dominion (Poulos’ declaration he would make sure Trump wouldn’t win notwithstanding), being connected to the internet, the inexplicable error rate or any other factor.

Yes, yes you are, and were. Obama voters were “cult” like to the enth degree. You still worship He Of No Achievement.

Notice that it was Obama cult members that were teaching tiny children to chant Obama propaganda. It is liberal universities that indoctrinate students. Liberal media that indoctrinates people with a barrage of lies. The left viciously attacks women and minorities that are expected to be their cult members but aren’t. Not Republicans. Not conservatives. Not Trump.

@Nathan Blue:

The silly farce that f*ckstains like Ron/AJ blather on about a mindless cult are out of fear. He and they know they’ve lost any moral higher ground they might have had.

Well, that’s a leftist thing. They have to vilify their enemies. We’ve clearly seen for 4 years they are driven by hate. They have to have hate. It was the same in Nazi Germany. Much of the population was anti-Semitic and had been for centuries. It was easy for the Nazis to manipulate the weak minded by focusing all their hatred on the Jews and making them the source of all the problems. No different with these guys.

@Greg:

There is no such evidence. If there were such evidence, American Thinker wouldn’t need to retract anything about Dominion.

The evidence is suppressed. A judge in Michigan has ordered the information released. For some reason, it take a judge to FORCE Democrats to release information that proves they didn’t cheat. Does that make sense to you? It doesn’t make sense to me.

You need to get control of your own brain back from Donald Trump for the sake of your own mental health. Whether you do or not doesn’t actually affect me one way or the other.

It’s certainly clear Grampa Grope doesn’t have anyone’s brain. But, once again, you are way off base, trying to explain something you have no concept of. Trump believes in and supports America. Americans think the same way. Lots of people have SAID that, but Trump up and PROVED it.

Obama didn’t think that way. Hillary didn’t. Biden simply can’t think, but he is surrounded by people who don’t think that way. They are currently winning and they may win, but don’t expect people that love this country to EVER think like they do. EVER.

@Ronald J. Ward: Ronnie, there’s not going to be an impeachment trial.

@Redteam:

@Ronald J. Ward: Ronnie, there’s not going to be an impeachment trial.

Well, I hadn’t heard but golly gee, if you say so.

@retire05:

Wrong, Commie scum. Dominion Voting Systems demanded American Thinker publish what Dominion told them to publish. American Thinker complied. American Thinker did not, any where in the article, say they were wrong. What do you not understand about this statement:

American Thinker and contributors Andrea Widburg, R.D. Wedge, Brian Tomlinson, and Peggy Ryan have published pieces on http://www.AmericanThinker.com that falsely accuse US Dominion Inc., Dominion Voting Systems, Inc., and Dominion Voting Systems Corporation (collectively “Dominion”) of conspiring to steal the November 2020 election from Donald Trump. These pieces rely on discredited sources who have peddled debunked theories about Dominion’s supposed ties to Venezuela, fraud on Dominion’s machines that resulted in massive vote switching or weighted votes, and other claims falsely stating that there is credible evidence that Dominion acted fraudulently.

These statements are completely false and have no basis in fact. Industry experts and public officials alike have confirmed that Dominion conducted itself appropriately and that there is simply no evidence to support these claims.
—-Thomas Lifson, Editor and Publisher of discredited and fake news AmericanThinker

@Ronald J. Ward: What statements exactly has AT made, the demand letter is vague and appears to have been released only to avoid lawsuit.
noun
the act of retracting or the state of being retracted.
withdrawal of a promise, statement, opinion, etc.:
I see no statement or reported item retracted at all, do you?

@Greg:

You need to get control of your own brain back from Donald Trump for the sake of your own mental health. Whether you do or not doesn’t actually affect me one way or the other.

And you need to be thinking about the best way to exterminate non-Leftists. If you don’t, silly things like facts and logic will continue to take down weak-thinking trolls like you.

The Dominion fraud is real, and part of bigger scam. Just because one news outlet (who I’ve never even heard of before) takes down a story does not erase the evidence.

But good luck with that “there’s no evidence” shtick. The Germans tried that..until the Allied marched into the first concentration camp.

Democrats cheated, and ended out democracy. If Biden is installed, he’s a dictator, not anything else.

@kitt:

Yeah, I get that AT’s admission of reporting fake news and flaming conspiracy theories was to prevent a lawsuit. Maybe this was because they knew there was enough credible evidence to hold them liable?

Not sure what you read when you read but the AT admission and apology is blatantly explicit and leaves no room for alternate interpretation.