USPS- The new Russian collusion hoax

Loading


 
You knew we weren’t going to get through this election without some cockamamie democrat conspiracy theory, right? In 2016 it was Russia, Russia, Russia. Today democrats are going postal.



“To watch this postmaster general destroy the postal service under Trump’s direction and to watch Mitch McConnell do nothing to try to stop that, and by the way, or anybody in the Republican senator caucus stop him other than just give lip service, is disgusting,” Tester declared. “I’m going to tell you if these guys have their way, they will destroy the postal service. They’ll do it because they don’t want people to vote, which is bad enough. But in the process, it’s going to hurt rural America in a big, big way and hurt rural states like Montana in a big, big way. And that’s why we’ve tried to point out to folks all around the state of Montana and the country that the postal service is important. And that we ought to make sure the postal service is around for this election and for a long time after this election. And to see what postmaster DeJoy has done is absolutely disgusting. And certainly not the right direction this country needs to be going in.”

Tester was never the sharpest tool in the shed. But he wasn’t the only one. The King of the Climate Con Men weighed in

Well, yes we have. In 2016, to be exact, when Rex’s photo was taken

Thieves raiding Valley mailboxes prompt Postal Service to take action

Turns out that fishing, or stealing mail, has become so common that postal officials have been retrofitting boxes around the San Fernando Valley and other areas to make them more tamper proof, said Richard J. Maher, spokesman for Post Office operations in Los Angeles and Orange counties.

No one was bothered about that in 2016. Similarly, no one was bothered when obama said this in 2009:

https://twitter.com/EddieZipperer/status/1295015662704832514

Trump is stealing mail boxes, say democrats!

Uh sorry, no

Source

This from the USPS itself- in 2016!

Mail collection boxes are practically as American as apple pie. They also seem to be disappearing as quickly as mom’s homemade apple pie.

Nationally, the number of collection boxes declined by more than 12,000 in the past 5 years. Some customers have complained the U.S. Postal Service has gone too far and removed too many collection boxes in neighborhoods. They’ve also questioned whether this effort is saving USPS money in the long run.

It’s a tough balancing act for the Postal Service. Some collection boxes are barely used and are expensive to maintain. On the other hand, mail collection boxes are a visible representation of the Postal Service to the American public, and their disappearance has been noted. They also are reliable, secure, and convenient receptacles for mail.

As part of its efforts to keep its collection infrastructure proportionate to customers’ needs at a reasonable cost, the Postal Service has eliminated underused collection boxes that on average receive fewer than 25 pieces a day; it has also added collection boxes where they are convenient for customers.

Our recent audit report looked at the Postal Service’s collection box removal process in the Eastern Area and found that it was not effective. While the area and its 10 districts have procedures for removing and relocating collection boxes, they were not consistently followed.

For the record, Trump is not “attacking” the USPS or starving it. Byron York:

The Postal Service has lost money for a very long time. In fiscal year 2019, it had operating revenues of $71.1 billion and operating expenses of $79.9 billion, leaving it with a deficit of $8.8 billion. At the moment, Postal Service officials have told Congress, it has about $14 billion in cash on hand, putting it on the road to fiscal insolvency (without further aid) in late 2021.

In the Coronavirus Aid, Relief, and Economic Security Act, or CARES Act, the $2 trillion relief measure passed in March, Congress gave the Postal Service a $10 billion borrowing authority. After the bill became law, there were negotiations between the Postal Service and the Treasury Department on the terms of the borrowing; a deal was announced in July. The ability to borrow $10 billion, the postmaster general said, would “delay the approaching liquidity crisis.”

That was all the aid for the Postal Service in the CARES Act. Completely separately, the bill also gave $400 million to something called the Election Assistance Commission for distribution to states to “prevent, prepare for, and respond to coronavirus, domestically or internationally, for the 2020 federal election cycle.”

In May the House passed the so-called “Heroes Act”

The House HEROES Act would give $25 billion to the Postal Service in what is essentially a bailout. The bill mentions nothing about helping the Postal Service handle the upcoming election or any other election. Indeed, the only stipulation at all placed on the $25 billion is that the Postal Service, “during the coronavirus emergency, shall prioritize the purchase of, and make available to all Postal Service employees and facilities, personal protective equipment, including gloves, masks, and sanitizers, and shall conduct additional cleaning and sanitizing of Postal Service facilities and delivery vehicles.” If the House Democrats who wrote and passed the bill intended the money to be spent specifically for elections, they did not say so in the text of the legislation.

Ryan Saavedra

The notion that Trump is not funding the USPS is not true. The Trump administration agreed on July 29 to loan the USPS “$10 billion in emergency coronavirus relief funding,” The Washington Post reported, adding that the money is “a crucial injection of cash that postal officials say will keep the debt-laden agency solvent for at least another year.” In exchange for the money, USPS will provide the Treasury Department “copies of its 10 largest ‘negotiated service agreements,’ or contracts with high-volume third-party shippers such as Amazon, FedEx and UPS.” The goal, Treasury Department Sec. Steve Mnuchin explained, is “to fulfill the President’s goal of establishing a sustainable business model under which USPS can continue to provide necessary mail service for all Americans, without shifting costs to taxpayers.”

Read the whole thing for the rest of the left wing lies.

In short, dems are full of sh*t as usual and are looking to create the next Russian collusion hoax.

BONUS

0 0 votes
Article Rating
174 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments

I am afraid the mailboxes will go the way of phone booths https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jsUHq5eRghE

Aside from causing problems, then leaving them behind, Democrats are good at only one thing: making excuses.

Dr John, it certainly took you awhile to defend Trump’s sabotage of the USPS in which again, some elderly or diabetic person somewhere will likely die as a result, even though he’s once again admitted this sabotage is for his own personal political gain.

Once again, the Trump defenders went through the steps of deny, spin, and hoax.

I’ll ask again but understand the reality of the Trump cultists: is there anything Trump could do or say that you’d denounce? Anything regardless of how evil or unconstitutional? Or is it that a Trump action just changes that evil to good and unconstitutional to constitutional?

@Ronald J. Ward: Can you tell us more about this sabotage?
Allowing 10 billion (with a B) in loans?
Its actually democrats sabotaging efforts to create a self supporting business model that will ensure service long into the future. Should have been done long ago, but if Trump can fix it or slow the bleeding, thats evil.

@Ronald J. Ward: What about Obama’s sabotage of the USPS? He started it long ago. Trump has done no such thing.

If Trump were to make a string of openly racist comments, I’d denounce it. If Trump picked a socialist that had accused him of racism and rape to be his VP, I’d denounce it. If Trump would not openly denounce widespread political terror, I’d denounce it. If Trump tried to politicize COVID19 deaths, I’d denounce it. If Trump used the power of the federal government to attack his political opponents, I’d denounce it. If Trump took taxpayer money to give to enemies of this country, at home and abroad, I’d denounce it.

In other words, if Trump acted like a Democrat, I’d denounce it. Question is, why don’t YOU denounce it?

@Ronald J. Ward: Is there anything Trump could do right you wouldn’t distort into a negative?

You offer nothing and do nothing except give Trump more votes.

@Deplorable Me:

If Trump were to make a string of openly racist comments, I’d denounce it.

No you wouldn’t. You’re a goddamn liar. A Trump sucking, goddamn liar.

And no, I’m not angry or even upset. It’s just that you’re a Trump sucking, goddamn liar. I’ve pointed out your head in the ass allegiance to you and your clones repeatedly and you’ve proven it repeatedly. And you’re even doing it on this subject.

Trump is intentionally sabotaging the USPS and you are defending him. It doesn’t matter what proof is out there, if he admits it, brags about it, steals the election with it, or people die as a result. You will defend it. You are defending it.

If Trump ordered the slaughter of all black people earning less than $75K a year in order to eliminate our racial problems while admitting it helps his reelection, you and your ilk would ultimately defend him. To say otherwise would be another goddamn lie.

@Ronald J. Ward: No, as has been clearly shown, YOU are the damnable liar. You asked what he would do for me to denounce it and I stated if he did the things YOU approved so enthusiastically of.

How is Trump “sabotaging” the USPS? You can clearly see the USPS has been a disaster for years. Trump is trying to fix yet another mess Obama incompetently left behind.

Not only are you angry that your ideology is such a failure, you are a butt-hurt crybaby.

@Ronald J. Ward:

Trump is intentionally sabotaging the USPS and you are defending him. It doesn’t matter what proof is out there

I have asked for any proof, just because Vox and other outlets of mindless liars say so does not mean it is true. Give me the quote made by Trump where he admits the sabotage or STFU.
You make such inane accusations without a stitch of proof.
Seems you work yourself up to the point where you believe the propaganda and lies told on MSM without the mind to look them up for yourself.
The USPS couldnt deliver all the absentee votes for the Fox River Valley a population of about 500K how can they be trusted with the entire Nation of random ballots not requested?

@Ronald J. Ward:

You’re a goddamn liar. A Trump sucking, goddamn liar.

It’s just that you’re a Trump sucking, goddamn liar.

You have offered nothing. You simply proffer an opinion that you seem to think in order for it to have credence, you need to be profane and insult your opposition beyond all norms.

You only prove that you are a foul mouthed, loud mouthed left winger with no credibility.

Trump is intentionally sabotaging the USPS and you are defending him.

How so? By you believing all the crap put out by the Democrats with no actual proof? Oh, yeah, the truck with all the mail boxes in them, right? Never mind that mail boxes are routinely switched out when they get so damaged, or aged, that they either need refurbishment or replacement. Perhaps you would like to explain why, in my small town, there is only ONE mail box? You see, all the other mail boxes were removed during the Obama administration so if someone need one, they have to go to the Post Office. Guess you want to blame that on Trump, as well, right?

If Trump ordered the slaughter of all black people earning less than $75K a year in order to eliminate our racial problems while admitting it helps his reelection, you and your ilk would ultimately defend him. To say otherwise would be another goddamn lie.

See, you cannot seem to comment without the use of profanity and slandering someone politically opposite of you. If you can’t control yourself on a public forum, I can only imagine what a trash mouth you have at home. And while you are shouting hypotheticals, maybe you can give us examples of what the Obama/Biden regime did for black Americans?

But please, keep it up. I’m sure anyone who is straddling the fence in this election is going to say “Yeah, that’s the guy whose team I want to be on.” NOT!!!

@retire05:

It’s rather remarkable (yet not surprising) that after all this time of silence from the Trump enablers while the USPS has been in blaring headlines for weeks, that Congress is even returning, that now with the cards plainly on the table, you’re actually making an argument that Trump isn’t directly or indirectly sabotaging the USPS?

It has to be that either you are totally unaware of the argument or that this is the defense you chose to use to defend Trump.

I suppose that in a few weeks from now, you’ll be needing proof of tody’s thousand-page bipartisan report released by the Senate Intelligence Committee which said the Trump administration obstructed its investigation with “novel claims” of executive privilege, even if in the meantime he admits to it as well?

@Ronald J. Ward: Begone proofless one, Pelosi politcal stunts do not impress anyone but idiots.

@Ronald J. Ward

Still waiting for a tiny sliver of evidence.

@Ronald J. Ward: We are all well aware that you have been indoctrinated with yet another hoax.

Your understanding of the situation is both flawed, partisan, and ompletely dismissible.

There is no argument. You are part of a Cult, The Cult of TDS.

Give me someone better to vote for, and will.

@Ronald J. Ward: Perhaps instead of having a Trump Derangement support group called a DNC convention the Democrats should play this not Michelle Obama lies

@Ronald J. Ward:

It’s rather remarkable (yet not surprising) that after all this time of silence from the Trump enablers while the USPS has been in blaring headlines for weeks, that Congress is even returning, that now with the cards plainly on the table,

What is remarkable to me is that San Fran Nan has ordered the House of Representatives back in session to deal with a made up crisis while Americans are still out of a job and 20% of American families are having trouble keeping food on the table. Where has she been all these years on the disaster that has been the USPS for decades? And why do you refuse to address that the removal of mail boxes was under Obama, not Trump? What exactly is it you think President Trump is doing to the USPS that doesn’t need to be done? Be specific. I know that’s hard for you, but you can at least try.

you’re actually making an argument that Trump isn’t directly or indirectly sabotaging the USPS?

You see, AJ/Ward, I don’t believe any of the left wing media that serves as nothing more than a campaign committee for the left.

I suppose that in a few weeks from now, you’ll be needing proof of tody’s thousand-page bipartisan report released by the Senate Intelligence Committee which said the Trump administration obstructed its investigation with “novel claims” of executive privilege, even if in the meantime he admits to it as well?

I haven’t had time to read the entire report so, unlike you, I will reserve judgement until I do.

@retire05: People like AJ aren’t going to confront anyone face to face.

@QDaddy: Old AJ ain’t exactly into providing evidence to back up his lies.

@Ronald J. Ward: Why are all your scenarios of things that would cause supporters of Trump to reject him wild, crazy events that would never happen? No, I can safely say without fear of having to eat my words that if Trump started killing people, I would not support him. If he nuked NYC, I would turn on him, too.

Do YOU denounce the Democrats that forced sick people into nursing homes, spreading COVID19 and killing thousands of elderly? Do you denounce the media silence on a black man executing a 5 yr old white boy? Do you denounce the left wing terror assaulting so many Democrat cities? Of course you don’t; it’s the foundation of your ideology.

@Deplorable Me: @kitt: @QDaddy: @Nathan Blue: @retire05: , and any unmentioned sockpuppet,

In another remarkable move, DeJoy announced he’s canceling service reductions, reinstating overtime hours and ending the removal of mail-sorting machines and public collection boxes, and will forego planned price increases.

If these weren’t sabotaging tactics and were needed, why is he reversing course? And shouldn’t he be promptly escorted to the door for what was an obvious screw-up (assuming you don’t like the word “sabotage”)? Or was it good thing and now he wants to go back to the bad?

Hoax? No more than COVID-19 is a hoax. File under “The sleazy bastids didn’t get away with it.” (But thanks for tipping your hand, boys, so everybody had a clear demonstration what you’ll try to get away with.)

August 18, 2020 – Postal Service backs down on changes as at least 20 states sue over potential mail delays ahead of election

Embattled Postmaster General Louis DeJoy reversed course Tuesday, saying that all changes being made to the Postal Service would be suspended until after the November 3 election, just as 20 Democratic states announced plans to file federal lawsuits.

DeJoy said that some of the deferred decisions mean that retail hours at post offices will not change, mail processing equipment and blue collection boxes will remain in place and no mail processing facilities will be closed.

At least 20 Democratic attorneys general across the country are launching a multi-pronged legal effort to push back on the recent changes that disrupted mail delivery across the country and triggered accusations that Trump and his appointees are trying to undermine mail-in voting.

The Democratic attorneys general plan to argue that DeJoy is illegally changing mail procedures ahead of the 2020 election as the Post Office braces for an unusually high number of mail-in ballots as voters look to avoid casting ballots at polling centers where they could potentially contract the coronavirus.

DeJoy “acted outside of his authority to implement changes to the postal system, and did not follow the proper procedures under federal law,” according to a statement from Washington state Attorney General Bob Ferguson.
The USPS and DeJoy have maintained that the changes are intended to improve the agency’s dire financial situation. DeJoy also rejects accusations that he made these changes at Trump’s behest.

At least two lawsuits are being filed Tuesday. One led by Washington state will be joined by Colorado, Connecticut, Illinois, Maryland, Michigan, Minnesota, Nevada, New Mexico, Oregon, Rhode Island, Vermont, Virginia and Wisconsin.
Another group of state Democratic attorneys general are filing a similar lawsuit in a Pennsylvania federal court. These states include California, Pennsylvania, Massachusetts, Delaware, Maine and North Carolina.

California Secretary of State Alex Padilla said following the announcement that his office “will continue to monitor for any signs of disruption to service,” and urged USPS to permanently back off on the changes.

“It is not enough to merely suspend operational changes, they need to be reversed. There should not be cuts to postal service, particularly during this pandemic,” he said in a statement.

DeJoy “felt the heat. And that’s what we were trying to do, is to make it too hot for them to handle,” House Speaker Nancy Pelosi, a California Democrat, said at event hosted by Politico.

Pelosi also said Tuesday that the Postal Service legislation Democrats are set to introduce soon will include their initial $25 billion ask, as CNN reported Monday, along with Rep. Carolyn Maloney’s bill prohibiting operational changes, which the speaker said is still necessary even after DeJoy’s announcement.

“I don’t want to give the Republicans any reason to vote against this, because we want this to become law,” she said. “We want the President to sign it.”

The Postal Service is facing intense scrutiny from congressional Democrats, who announced earlier this week that they’re ramping up their probe into what they call “recent, sweeping and dangerous operational changes at the Postal Service that are slowing the mail and jeopardizing the integrity of the election.”

DeJoy is set to testify before a Senate committee on Friday and the House Oversight Committee next week.

Trump and other Republicans have been railing against mail-in voting, baselessly asserting that it will lead to voter fraud, with the President saying last week that he opposes much-needed funding for the United States Postal Service because he doesn’t want to see it used for mail-in voting this November.

There is not widespread voter fraud in US elections, and nonpartisan experts say neither party automatically benefits when states expand access to mail-in voting.

It could certainly make a difference this time. Polls taken in May indicated that around one-half of all eligible voters intended to vote by mail this year; twice as many Democratic voters as Republican voters stated that they intended to do so. That’s the reason for the attempt to sabotage timely processing and delivery. It could easily hand the election to Donald Trump.

@Greg: Before this Post Master General took office the previous guy said all 14 days for mass mailings 7 days to deliver and 7 days to return. this guy repeated the warning. Its a crappy way to sabotage the election if 2 PMGs give a far in advance warning.
How many of these changes were from the last guy?
https://about.usps.com/newsroom/national-releases/2020/0818-postmaster-general-louis-dejoy-statement.htm

By the way, regarding Russia:

August 18, 2020 – Bipartisan Senate report details Trump campaign contacts with Russia in 2016, adding to Mueller findings

It’s a new bipartisan Senate Intelligence Committee report. Should anyone have forgotten, that means the committee chairperson is a republican.

The Senate Intelligence Committee released Tuesday the most comprehensive and meticulous examination to date explaining how Russia interfered in the 2016 presidential election and the Trump campaign welcomed the foreign adversary’s help, revealing new information about contacts between Russian officials and associates of President Donald Trump during and after the campaign.

In several key ways, the committee’s counterintelligence investigation goes beyond the findings of former special counsel Robert Mueller released last year, as the Republican-led Senate panel was not limited by questions of criminality that drove the special counsel probe.
Among the key findings:

That then-campaign chairman Paul Manafort was working with Konstantin Kilimnik, a Russian intelligence officer, and sought to share internal campaign information with Kilimnik. The committee says it obtained “some information suggesting Kilimnik may have been connected” to Russia’s 2016 hacking operation and concludes Manafort’s role on the campaign “represented a grave counterintelligence threat.

That Trump and senior campaign officials sought to obtain advance information on WikiLeaks’ email dumps through Roger Stone, and that Trump spoke to Stone about WikiLeaks, despite telling the special counsel in written answers he had “no recollections” that they had spoken about it.

That information offered at the June 2016 Trump Tower meeting “was part of a broader influence operation” from the Russian government, though there’s no evidence Trump campaign members knew of it. Two of the Russians who met with Donald Trump Jr., Jared Kushner and Manafort had “significant connections” to the Russian government, including Russian intelligence, and Russian lawyer Natalia Veselnitskaya’s ties were “far more extensive and concerning than what had been publicly known.”

That Russian-government actors continued until at least January 2020 to spread disinformation about Russia’s election interference, and that Manafort and Kilimnik both sought to promote the narrative that Ukraine, and not Russia interfered in the 2016 election.

That Russia took advantage of the Trump transition team’s inexperience and opposition to Obama administration policies “to pursue unofficial channels,” and it’s likely that Russian intelligence services and others acting on the Kremlin’s behalf exploited the Transition’s shortcomings for Russia’s advantage.

That the FBI may have been victim to Russian disinformation coming through intelligence sources such as the Trump dossier author Christopher Steele.
And that campaigns, political leaders and other influential Americans must be even more diligent in the future not to fall victim to Russian interference, given the extent of Russia’s efforts and successes to reach campaign operatives in 2016.

@Greg:

It could certainly make a difference this time. Polls taken in May indicated that around one-half of all eligible voters intended to vote by mail this year; twice as many Democratic voters as Republican voters stated that they intended to do so. That’s the reason for the attempt to sabotage timely processing and delivery. It could easily hand the election to Donald Trump.

I love that “governing by polls” technique you seem to be in love with.

The Dems will lose. They need an excuse post election. Mail in ballots are a way to make sure people think “Trump didn’t really win” by holding up results, or whatever the latest hoax is.

Why do you bother posting here? It does nothing, and the simple message of the Left which you parrot, “shut up” is all you offer those you disagree with.

The only reason you post here is tell non-Leftists to “shut up”. That’s your only argument.

Not on my watch.

This video exemplifies what Democrats are truly afraid of: losing their slave-master’s hold on the black vote.

@Greg:

Bipartisan Senate report details Trump campaign contacts with Russia in 2016, adding to Mueller findings

Weissman was fully briefed before the Muller probe, he knew the Steele dossier was crap and who paid for it he knew the warrants were fraudulently obtained.
They used police state tactics to spy on an opposing campaign. The operation was directed from the White House Biden knew, thank heavens Obama was directing or they might have got it right, that guy screwed up everything he touched.
Manafort dealing with Podestas he is in jail Mueller shouldnt have let the Podestas loose, they closed up their lobbying company, or we would find out how many enemies those traitors assisted in trying to blow up the Republic. Im sure they took the Hilliary route and destroyed all the evidence.
Has nothing to do with the worst saboteurs ever giving months warning for mail issues.

@Ronald J. Ward:

If these weren’t sabotaging tactics and were needed, why is he reversing course?

To shut up the screaming crybabies?

Oh… sure it’s just a minor oversight, but you kind of forgot to answer my questions… again. I answered yours. Answer mine.

@kitt, #24:

That’s not what the Senate Intelligence Committee concluded. Among other things, they concluded that Paul Manafort, Trump’s then-campaign organization chairman, “represented a grave counterintelligence threat.” That’s a clear and unambiguous statement.

I don’t know how anyone can read that, and then imagine that the investigation that followed was in any way unjustified. Failure to investigate would have been nothing short of criminal negligence.

More bullshit from greg

@July 4th American:

More bullshit from greg

Correct. It’s not as if he read the entire thousand page report. He relies on XiNN for his information.

The conclusions aren’t mine. They’re those of the Republican-led Senate Intelligence Committee.

@Greg: Doesnt change he fact that the Podestas dealt with the same people in the same way, were allowed to file after the fact and were not investigated Hilliary actually met with Putin on many occasions, and promoted a Russian silicon valley. If we are looking for Russian connections and contacts also favors done, a total lack of security and violations of espionage acts the Democrt candidate was the one to investigate.

@retire05, #28:

Correct. It’s not as if he read the entire thousand page report.

Here’s a link to the full report. Have at it. The findings are summarized at the front by the committee panel itself, immediately following the table of Contents.

As Michelle Obama observed last night regarding Donald Trump, “It is what it is.” That’s so whether you pretend it isn’t or not.

@retire05: How can you stop laughing long enough to reply to greggie the rock? His comprehension of the written language requires much interpretation for him to understand the simplest comments.

Trump was exonerated with respect to Russia. That is why they had to come up with the Ukraine hoax

@Greg: Before the evidence the Democrats kept hidden was released. Then, not only did we discover the truth, but we discovered what slimy liars Democrats are.

Michelle is an America-hating, lying racist, so her views are not to be taken seriously.

@Greg:

Here’s a link to the full report. Have at it. The findings are summarized at the front by the committee panel itself, immediately following the table of Contents.

I don’t need the link. I already have it bookmarked. It seems to elude you that I was referring to the blatantly obvious fact that YOU have not read the report, relying on what XiNN says. And if the summary at the beginning of the report is all we needed, why bother releasing a thousand page report to the public?

As Michelle Obama observed last night regarding Donald Trump, “It is what it is.” That’s so whether you pretend it isn’t or not.

Well, not really;

AP– “Michelle Obama assailed President Donald Trump on Monday for ripping migrant children from their parents and throwing them into cages, picking up on a frequent and distorted point made widely by Democrats.

She’s right that Trump’s now-suspended policy at the U.S.-Mexico border separated thousands of children from their families in ways that had not been done before. But what she did not say is that the very same “cages” were built and used in her husband’s administration, for the same purpose of holding migrant kids temporarily.

A look at her remark in the keynote address at the opening night of the remote Democratic National Convention:

MICHELLE OBAMA, on Americans: “They watch in horror as children are torn from their families and thrown into cages.”

THE FACTS: The reference to cages is misleading and a matter that Democrats have persistently distorted.

Trump used facilities that were built during the Obama-Biden administration to house children at the border. They are chain-link enclosures inside border facilities where migrants were temporarily housed, separated by sex and age.

At the height of the controversy over Trump’s zero-tolerance policy at the border, photos that circulated online of children in the enclosures generated great anger. But those photos — by The Associated Press — were taken in 2014 and depicted some of the thousands of unaccompanied children held by President Barack Obama.

When that fact came to light, some Democrats and activists who had tweeted the photos deleted their tweets. But prominent Democrats have continued to cite cages for children as a distinctive cruelty of Trump.”

When are you going to learn that the left lies to you? Well, you probably won’t since you are an idiot.

@Deplorable Me: Mooch Michelle the lying B, how children are put in cages where was he when his “partner” was doing it, was he ever to the border to see the kids? Ever once? Or did she organize the protests they had when Don was getting them all beds, lets boycott the bed manufacturer.
It is unprecedented that a former first “it” would go on a national forum and trash the President he has no class at all, a cow and no designer on the planet could make “it” look as graceful or elegant as our feminine sweet Melania, 5 languages a real American dream.

@July 4th American, #33:

Trump was exonerated with respect to Russia.

That’s what Trump and his toadies told you. That’s not what Robert Mueller or his report said. Robert Mueller, testifying before Congress:

“We did not address ‘collusion,’ which is not a legal term. Rather, we focused on whether the evidence was sufficient to charge any member of the campaign with taking part in a criminal conspiracy. It was not.”

“The president was not exculpated for the acts that he allegedly committed.”

Mueller, responding to questions before Congress on July 24, 2019:

Nadler: Director Mueller, the President has repeatedly claimed that your report found there was no obstruction and that it completely and totally exonerated him. But that is not what your report said, is it?

Mueller: Correct, that is not what the report said.

Nadler: And from reading from page 2 of volume 2 of your report that’s on the screen you wrote, ‘If we had confidence after a thorough investigation of the facts that the President clearly did not commit obstruction of justice we would so state. Based on the facts and the applicable legal standards, however, we are unable to reach that judgment.’ Now, does that say there was no obstruction?

Mueller: No.

Nadler: In fact, you are actually unable to conclude the President did not commit obstruction of justice, is that correct?

Mueller: Well, we at the outset determined that we — when it came to the President’s culpability we needed to — we needed to go forward only after taking into account the OLC opinion that indicated that a president — a sitting president cannot be indicted.

Nadler: So the report did not conclude that he did not commit obstruction of justice? Is that correct?

Mueller: That is correct.

Nadler: And what about total exoneration? Did you actually totally exonerate the President?

Mueller: No.

Nadler: Now, in fact your report expressly states it does not exonerate the President?

Mueller: It does.

@Greg: Disclaimer: No Russians were harmed in the making of this coup.

Colin Powell is speaking during tonight’s installment of the televised Democratic Party Convention, crossing party lines and endorsing Joe Biden for president.

Michelle Obama didn’t “trash” anyone. She clearly told the American people what she believes to be true, and reminded them that they have a responsibility to the nation. Donald Trump is the one who trashes anyone and everyone. Apparently he serves as a role model for many of his supporters. Hopefully he isn’t serving as a roll model for America’s children, or for any future presidents.

@Greg: Note to you and idiot Nadler: Mueller did not set out to exonerate Trump. He set out to convict Trump… of something . So, not being able to do that, Trump IS exonerated. Nadler doesn’t even know what violence is.

Oh, and the Senate report you referred to? NO collusion there, either. But lots of FBI shenanigans.

@Greg: She lied her ass off didnt mention the VP pick because her poorly written speech was written and taped long ago. Like she has been near any grocery store to see people without masks. She sits in one of her mansions moochin’ her life away. Having the help clean up after the dog, she is to lazy to walk. Nothing but an ignorant entitle cow who did nothing as first ladty to keep roaches, ants and mice out of her temporary home, they may have arrived in her baggage.
Total lack of grace and manners doesnt even know how to accept a gift from Tiffanys from a real first lady.

Note to you and idiot Nadler: Mueller did not set out to exonerate Trump. He set out to convict Trump… of something .

He most definitely DID NOT set out to convict Trump. Charging Trump with anything was off limits from the start. Mueller was bound by the DoJ Office of Legal Counsel’s clearly stated opinion that a sitting president cannot be charged with any crime. He was tasked with conducting a full investigation that couldn’t result in any charges against Donald Trump.

That restriction is cited in Part 2 of his report which considered obstruction of justice, and actual statutory crime. There were multiple clear instances of it, but Mueller could do nothing other than document the circumstances.

@kitt. #41:

Listen to yourself.

@Greg: She most certainly did. She lied about Trump putting “kids in cages” when it was her incompetent husband that did it. She’s a liar, but she wouldn’t be speaking at the DNC if she wasn’t.

Prosecutors don’t exonerate. They wanted something . Hell, they knew before they started there was no collusion or anything else you want to call it. They failed because Trump has committed NO crimes.

Powell didn’t vote for Trump last time, no loss.

I’ve got an idea what your real problem with her likely is. It seems to be common but unspoken among the Trump crowd.

@Greg:

Colin Powell is speaking during tonight’s installment of the televised Democratic Party Convention, crossing party lines and endorsing Joe Biden for president.

Whoo-pe-do. Except Colin Powell has been a Democrat for a long time. Not a Republican. When you vote for a Democrat candidate for president, as Powell did in both 2008 and 2012, you’re a Democrat even if you call yourself a rainbow encircled unicorn.

Michelle Obama didn’t “trash” anyone. She clearly told the American people what she believes to be true,

Well then, the Mooch is clearly delusional and Barack should probably get her some mental help. One thing she clearly is….a hater. She dislikes white people with her whole being. Read her thesis.

As to Mueller; he clearly was a figure head with his “investigation” being run by the crooked and evil Andrew Weissmann. It was also clear in Mueller’s testimony that his mental faculties have diminished. I actually felt sorry for him.

Collin Powell is a traditional conservative republican. Donald Trump is not.

@Greg: Um… he voted for Obama over McCain. He voted for Obama over Romney. Cmon, man!

@Greg: Waasa matter you are too used to hearing fawning empty lies about mocchie. She did slip into the truth on this Vote ‘like our lives depend on it’ Not so much hers but Barrys as treason is a death sentence.
She earned my dislike, her First time to be proud statement, her living in a house built by slaves and ignorant racist remarks she cant help but blurt out of her hateful ungrateful lips. She is an ugly person inside, hateful forgetting she had set a trend to bring a gift for Mrs Bush on the same occasion that Melania tried to give her one.

1 2 3 4