Posted by DrJohn on 14 December, 2019 at 6:48 am. 124 comments already!




“There must never be a narrowly voted impeachment or an impeachment supported by one of our major political parties and opposed by another.”

– Jerry Nadler.

“Impeachment is a very serious matter. If it happens it has to be a bipartisan initiative.” 

– Nancy Pelosi

“In the absence of very graphic evidence, it would be difficult to get the support in the Senate needed to make an impeachment successful. Again, my feeling is let’s see what Bob Mueller produces. But the evidence would have to be pretty overwhelming.”

– Adam Schiff

If you ever needed proof that democrats were lying hypocritical dogs, there it is.

democrats have voted to send two whiny, small, narrow articles of impeachment to the full House for a vote. It’s the lamest case in the history of the US:

So that’s it? That’s all there is? After all the talk of obstruction of justice, collusion with Russia, bribery, extortion, profiting from the Presidency, and more, House Democrats have reduced their articles of impeachment against President Trump to two: abuse of power and obstruction of Congress. Honey, we shrunk the impeachment.

Democrats on the Judiciary Committee will vote as early as Thursday on the text of the two articles they unveiled Tuesday, and then they will rush it to the floor next week. It’s enough to suspect that Democrats understand they are offering the weakest case for impeachment since Andrew Johnson, that the public isn’t convinced, and so they simply want to get it over with.

There was not a single fact witness in the last two days. in fact, there was’t a single witness. It was, Louie Gohmert said, a “kangaroo court.”

“America needs to hear from the witnesses. And we didn’t get to hear from them here. This was a kangaroo court.”

It’s so lame that democrats want to impeach Trump for being too tall.

It’s a lot more than that. It’s gone from a fishing expedition that came up empty to a full blown coup.

A full array of government resources were used in attempt to frame the President.

3. Regarding the FBI’s actions in surveilling Trump campaign associates, it was a “travesty” and there were “many abuses.”

4. From “day one,” the FBI investigation generated exculpatory information (tending to point to the targets’ innocence) and nothing that corroborated Russia collusion.

5. It’s a “big deal” to use U.S. law enforcement and intelligence resources to investigate the opposing political party, and I cannot think of another recent instance in which this happened.

6. Evidence to start the FBI’s investigation into Trump associates was “flimsy” from the start and based on the idea that Trump aide George Papadopoulos expressed he may have had pre-knowledge of a Democrat National Committee computer hack. However, it was actually just an offhand barroom comment by a young campaign aide described merely as a “suggestion of a suggestion, a vague allusion” to the fact that the Russians may have something they can dump. But by that time, May 2016, there was already rampant speculation online and in political circles that the Russians had hacked Hillary Clinton’s emails in 2014 and that they might surface. So the idea that Papadopoulos’s comment showed pre-knowledge of the Democratic National Committee hack and dump “is a big stretch.”

The rest of the lists is at the link. Fortunately, it failed.

democrats and their henchmen in the left wing media have been hammering Trump and the GOP with lies non-stop for three years. The IG report has handed them their heads and shoved their egos up their backsides.

Thus the need to impeach, despite an absence of evidence or facts. Still, it gets worse. democrats mean to nullify the next election. They mean to take the election away from the voters.

Nadler:  “We cannot rely on an election to solve our problems, when the president threatens the very integrity of that election.”

Pelosi: “The weak response to these hearings has been, ‘Let the election decide.’ That dangerous position only adds to the urgency of our action, because POTUS is jeopardizing the integrity of the 2020 elections.”

They are telling the American people that they do not trust them. They know Trump cannot be beaten fairly and have resorted to this unconstitutional chicanery in an effort to smear Trump sufficiently that America won’t reelect him.

Not. Gonna. Work.

By the way, there is no Constitutional allowance for removing a President for a crime not yet committed.

democrat desperation grows by the second. Make no mistake. This is now a coup.  democrats are committed to preventing America from having its rightful and Constitutional voice in the next election.

That’s real obstruction. That’s real abuse of power. They must not succeed.

It’s not Trump assaulting the Constitution. It’s the democrat party.

0 0 votes
Article Rating
Would love your thoughts, please comment.x