These are the three yuge stories out of yesterday’s Yovanovitch tear jerker and a star is born

Loading

 

As the Trump coup proceeded yesterday some very key things arose from the pile of schiff that stank up the room. That dope masquerading as a news man Chris Wallace took the emotional bait set for him and the rest of the left wing media.

“if you are not moved by the testimony of Marie Yovanovitch today, you don’t have a pulse.”

Wallace’s job is not to be “moved.” This is also what the rest of the stooge media focused on- a shiny object to distract from what were to be the most significant discoveries of the day. Yovanovitch was the day’s Gossip Girl.



But once you wiped away the liberal tears blinding you there were really important stories to be seen.

One

Yovanovitch is forced by Chris Stewart to admit she knows nothing of any Trump crimes

Stewart: “I would now feel compelled to ask you, Madam Ambassador, as you sit here before us, very simply and directly, do you have any information regarding the president of the United States accepting any bribes?”

Yovanovitch: “No.”

Stewart: “Do you have any information regarding any criminal activity that the president of the United States has been involved with at all?”

Yovanovitch: “No.”

Two

She disclosed that the obama administration knew about the corruption Hunter Biden was engaging in and they prepped Yovanovitch for that:

The Obama administration was so concerned about Hunter Biden’s job on a Ukraine energy giant’s board of directors that it prepped Marie Yovanovitch about the issue before her 2016 Senate confirmation.

In response to questions from Republican counsel Stephen Castor, the ousted former US ambassador to Ukraine testified at the House Intelligence Committee’s second public impeachment hearing on Friday that she had been informed about the lucrative gig the son of Vice President Joe Biden had landed with Burisma.

“As I said, I arrived in August of 2016, several months before the elections and several months before President Trump took office. And it was not a focus of what I was doing in that six-month period,” she said.

Castor pressed her on why she took no action after learning of Hunter Biden’s post, which paid him as much as $50,000 a month despite his lack of relevant experience.

“We — I was aware of it, because as I told you before, in the deposition, there had been a — in terms of the preparation for my Senate confirmation hearings for Ukraine, there was a question about that and a select answer,” Yovanovitch replied.

“So I was aware of it, yes. My understanding from newspaper accounts is that he just recently left, in 2019. I never met him, never talked to him.”

Three

The investigation into Burisma corruption was not closed as Biden and democrats have been falsely asserting:

Former Ambassador Marie Yovanovitch, one of the star witnesses of the Democrats’ impeachment inquiry, on Friday undercut the defense Joe Biden and his allies have been making about the firing of Ukraine’s top prosecutor.

Yovanovitch, a self-described anti-corruption expert who most recently served as U.S. ambassador to Ukraine between 2016-2019, told the House Intelligence Committee there was an open probe into Burisma Holdings when Joe Biden demanded the firing.

So it is pretty clear not that Joe Biden did engage in a quid pro quo to shut down an investigation into his son.

A star is born- Elise Stefanik.

She was brilliant despite Adam Schiff’s persistent efforts to stifle a woman from speaking

https://twitter.com/EliseStefanik/status/1195396189824409600

https://twitter.com/PattiaGarder/status/1195702970945548289

Stefanik pounded Schiff with his own mendacity:

“Since the Chairman has gaveled out all of my colleagues with their unanimous consent, I am going to read for the record many of the chairman’s comments in September of the importance of hearing from the whistleblower,” she began.

“Again Ambassador, thank you for your patience, thank you for your service. But since we haven’t been able to conduct ourselves in normal procedures, I’m just going to use the five minutes for this,” she continued.

“September 29 in the Wall Street Journal: ‘The whistleblower at the center of the impeachment investigation of President Trump will testify in the House very soon.’ This is a quote by the chairman,” Stefanik noted.

USA Today September 29: ‘Talking with ABC News This Week, Schiff, the Democrat who chairs the House Intelligence Committee, said the whistleblower would testify very soon and the only thing standing in the way was getting security clearances for the attorney representing the whistleblower so they could attend the testimony,” she continued.

“From Vox September 29: ‘Rep. Adam Schiff said Sunday the whistleblower at the center of a growing scandal surrounding President Donald Trump will testify before the House Intelligence Committee very soon,’” she added, continuing to read reports from outlets like CNN, the Washington PostHuff PostNew York Post, and Washington Times.

“These are all quotes from chairman Adam Schiff,” Stefanik reminded the room.

“I can keep going, but again. The chairman refused to allow us to put these into the record with unanimous consent, so I read those out,” she said, noting the importance of protecting whistleblowers from retaliation and firing.

https://www.facebook.com/EliseforCongress/videos/2521661791399688/

 

She was so effective and brilliant that liberals were crying that Stefanik peed in their coupcake

George Conway called Stefanik “lying trash”

She’s obviously damned effective and it’s killing them.

This is not working out the way Schiff and his henchpeople planned. As they say, sunlight is the best disinfectant.

0 0 votes
Article Rating
Subscribe
Notify of
14 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments

Wait… are these liberals trying to INTIMIDATE Stefanik? Are they attacking her because she is a strong woman?

When she was reading those quotes of Schitt, he looked like someone called him about naked pictures of HIM instead of Trump.

Only in the Democrat echo chamber are things going well for them. They merely look like the desperate idiots they are.

Dems attacking the truth again?

Elise Stefanik is getting her first serious exposure to a national audience. It is not going well for her. Lies, deception, and worse. Not a good person.

— Norman Ornstein (@NormOrnstein) November 16, 2019

Hey Norman your mother wants you, Norman get away from Elsie’s shower Norman, NORMAN, NORMAN!

Seriously, I had to look this dude up,
Norman “Norm” J. Ornstein is an American political scientist and resident scholar at the American Enterprise Institute, a Washington D.C. conservative think tank. He is the co-author of It’s Even Worse Than It Looks: How the American Constitutional System Collided With the New Politics of Extremism.
Conservative? Aww hell no he isnt IMO.
Norman was too busy adjusting his grey wig to notice Schiff stuffing his buggy eyed face in front of every camera and giving the starving resistors a bit of bait?

When this started I was a little down in the dumps, not because I feared it persay but because I’m sick and tired of the resistance. Then I remembered and old saying, it’s always darkest before the dawn, I suspect the sun is about to rise and a lot of people in the dem party are going to have egg on their faces!

@Vernon: Be Strong, Vernon.
Remember that, when he was growing up, Donald Trump spent 20+ formative years in the pews at the church presided over by Rev Norman Vincent Peale.
Why does his name ring a bell?
He wrote, “The Power of Positive Thinking.”

It stayed on the New York Times bestseller list for 186 consecutive weeks, and according to the publisher, Simon and Schuster, sold around 5 million copies.
Read anything Donald Trump has written and see how he was shaped by Peale.
And that’s a good thing.
Peale taught us that we do not have a “breaking point,” and that we have to power to turn things around ourselves.

@Nan G: What provides me strength is the repeated times the Democrats have lied… BLATANTLY lied to promote their attempts to remove Trump from office. People lie when they don’t have facts on their side. It’s why the Democrats need the lying, corrupt liberal media to present their lies as if they were actually truth. If Democrats THOUGHT they had a legitimate reason to impeach Trump they would be using those legitimate reasons instead of damnable lies.

We may have found our president after Trumps 2nd term..

I know from this alone, this may be how the next 8 years after trump goes..

Elise Stefanik acknowledges that human activity is a factor driving climate change and criticized Trump’s withdrawal from the Paris climate agreement, which she supports. She opposed Trump’s travel ban. She voted against the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act. She supports legislation to restore Obama’s Net Neutrality Act, and voted in favor of the Equality Act that prohibits discrimination “on the basis of the sex, sexual orientation, gender identity, or pregnancy, childbirth, or a related medical condition of an individual, as well as because of sex-based stereotypes.” Apparently opposing the impeachment investigation is sufficient to allow many other things to be overlooked.

@Greg: Schiff is a complete shitbird yet because he stokes the impeachment insanity and pisses on the Constitution, you love him.

“Four more years” may wind up being a crowd chant demanding that Trump get a longer prison sentence.

Is this not the guy who told his followers that, if elected, he would see Hillary Clinton in jail? Maybe he meant she’ll visit him.

@Greg: We certainly hope she wouldnt visit him in jail, Epstien didnt commit suicide.

@Greg:

“Four more years” may wind up being a crowd chant demanding that Trump get a longer prison sentence.

Ooooo! Why? What did you hearsay?

You seem to disremember that in Trump’s inaugural speech, he suggested everyone put all their difference aside and work for the betterment of the country. Democrats rejected that, overcome by their crybabyism.

I guess you’ve got nothing to say about Stefanik’s positions mentioned in post #7.

@Greg: If she did t have so much ethics, she could almost be a Democrat.

@Greg: #12 maybe cause it has nothing to do with the subject?