Posted by DrJohn on 26 September, 2019 at 6:23 pm. 16 comments already!


 
Anyone else remember when Schumer said that? It was prophetic. The IC has come for Trump.

Today was quite the day. It was entertaining watching Adam Schiff endeavoring mightily to get DNI Joseph Maguire to say what he wanted him to say but Maguire would have none of it. Schiff went so far as to try to get Maguire to violate Executive Privilege. Maguire frustrated Schiff at every turn. But for openers Adam Schiff fabricated a Trump conversation



This was all in response to a so-called “whistleblower” complaint. The complaint was called “credible” but it was not and here’s why

The whistleblower had nothing hearsay, i.e. no firsthand knowledge of anything. It also turns out that there are holes in the “whistleblower” complaints.

One:

Two:

And

These inconsistencies have been noticed

The complaint stated that Trump made a “specific request that the Ukrainian leader locate and turn over servers used by the Democratic National Committee (DNC) and examined by the U.S. cybersecurity firm CrowdStrike” — a request that does not appear in the declassified transcript of the call released by the Trump administration on Tuesday. Trump mentioned CrowdStrike, but did not demand the server.

And according to the whistleblower complaint, by mid-May, U.S. diplomat Kurt Volker sought to “contain the damage” from Trump attorney Rudy Giuliani’s outreach to Ukraine.

But a July 19 text message conversation from Volker to Giuliani, provided to Fox News on Thursday, showed that Volker had in fact encouraged Giuliani to reach out to Ukraine — even sending Giuliani a message reading, “connecting you here with Andrey Yermak, who is very close to President Zelensky.”

It is beginning to look like a hack job. Now about that whistleblower. He is a spy. For real.

WASHINGTON — The whistle-blower who revealed that President Trump sought foreign help for his re-election and that the White House sought to cover it up is a C.I.A. officer who was detailed to work at the White House at one point, according to three people familiar with his identity.

He was “detailed” to work at the White House. Hmmm.  Our friends at the Conservative Treehouse have a strong argument for the whistleblower being one Michael Barry.

JULY 2018 – A top intelligence official at the National Security Council (NSC) is reportedly leaving the White House.

Michael Barrysenior NSC director for intelligence programs, is leaving the council as part of national security adviser John Bolton’s major staffing overhaul, two government officials told the Daily Beast.

One source quoted in the report Tuesday said that Barry is leaving on “very good terms,” but that his departure will be a “tough loss.” Barry is reportedly returning to the CIA, where he served before joining the NSC. (link)

Gumming up the works is a report that the IC IG found “political bias” in the whistleblower:

A senior Trump administration official told Fox News late Tuesday that the administration will release a document showing the intelligence community inspector general found the whistleblower who leveled an explosive accusation against President Trump concerning his talks with Ukraine had indications of “political bias” in favor of “a rival candidate” of the president.

The whistleblower complaints are disintegrating. We want to know who detailed him to the White House. Now all we need to connect him to John Brennan and that will be that.

 

0 0 votes
Article Rating
16
0
Would love your thoughts, please comment.x
()
x