There was a movie in 1971 called “The Panic in Needle Park” starring Al Pacino.
A couple loves heroin as much as they love each other in Jerry Schatzberg’s grim drug drama. After an illegal abortion at the behest of her faithless lover (Raul Julia), lost innocent Helen (Kitty Winn) finds solace with small-time crook Bobby (Al Pacino), a regular in Manhattan’s “Needle Park.” As Bobby shows her around his Upper West Side world, the two become inseparable. When Helen realizes that Bobby is a full-blown junkie, she joins him in addiction, and their downward spiral begins in earnest. Weathering overdoses, prostitution, betrayals, and a “panic” after a major bust, the pair manages to stick together, the habit sealing their fate.
I thought I might call this post “The Panic in IC Park” but I realized that the allusion might not find much familiarity but the IC is indeed panicking. The finger pointing has begun.
A high-level dispute over which senior government officials pushed the unverified Steele dossier amid efforts to surveil the Trump campaign has broken out into the open again, after it emerged that Attorney General William Barr appointed a U.S. attorney to examine the origins of the Russia investigation and determine if the FBI and DOJ’s actions were “lawful and appropriate.”
Sources familiar with the told Fox News that a late-2016 email chain indicated FBI Director James Comey told bureau subordinates that then-CIA Director John Brennan insisted the dossier be included in the intelligence community assessment on Russian interference, known as the ICA.
Fox News was told that the email chain – not yet public — referred to the dos sier as “crown material,” but it was not clear why this apparent code was used. On Tuesday night, former GOP Rep. Trey Gowdy said on Fox News’ “The Story with Martha MacCallum” that “Comey has a better argument than Brennan, based on what I’ve seen.”
But no, says the CIA, it’s Comey’s doing
But in a statement to Fox News, a former CIA official put the blame squarely on Comey.
“Former Director Brennan, along with former [Director of National Intelligence] James Clapper, are the ones who opposed James Comey’s recommendation that the Steele Dossier be included in the intelligence report,” the official said.
I can remember when John Brennan was bragging about how he instigated this investigation. He claims to have gotten the ball rolling:
“I encountered . . . intelligence that revealed contacts and interactions between Russian officials and U.S. persons involved in the Trump campaign,” Brennan said, adding that he did not see conclusive evidence of collusion but feared that Trump associates were wittingly or unwittingly being used to advance the interests of Moscow.….Brennan testified that he was disturbed by intelligence that surfaced last year showing a pattern of contacts between Russian agents or representatives and people with links to the Trump campaign. “That raised concerns in my mind,” Brennan said….With that remark, Brennan appeared to identify the point of origin of the FBI investigation that began in July — the first time a U.S. official has provided insight into what prompted the bureau probe.
Yet to the time he left office he had seen no evidence of collusion. Despite that, Brennan ramped up his accusations to “treason” level. More:
“I wanted to make sure that every information and bit of intelligence that we had was shared with the bureau [FBI] so that they could take it. It was well beyond my mandate as director of CIA to follow on any of those leads that involved U.S. persons. But I made sure that anything that was involving U.S. persons, including anything involving the individuals involved in the Trump campaign, was shared with the bureau.”
He never warned Trump. He never asked Trump about it. No defensive briefing. He wanted Trump taken down. Period. Trey Gowdy suggests that Brennan is more peril than is Comey. He is probably correct.
The declassified January 2017 report determined Russia had ordered an “influence campaign” to help Trump get elected in 2016. There is no mention of the dossier, compiled by British ex-spy Christopher Steele, which contained salacious and unverified claims about Trump’s ties to Russia. It was used by the FBI to obtain a series of Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act warrants to wiretap one-time Trump campaign adviser Carter Page.
There have been reports, including by veteran journalist Bob Woodward, that the dossier was included in an early draft of the assessment. Sen. Rand Paul, R-Ky., said in March he was told Brennan “insisted” the dossier be included in the report. “BREAKING: A high-level source tells me it was Brennan who insisted that the unverified and fake Steele dossier be included in the Intelligence Report … Brennan should be asked to testify under oath in Congress ASAP,” Paul tweeted.
James Baker is “nervous” that IG Mike Horowitz will find “mistakes.”
“The inspector general is looking at everything we did,” Baker said on CNN. “If the IG usually finds mistakes that we made, so I expect him to find mistakes this time.”
Baker said last week at an event in Washington, D.C., that he took a leading role in overseeing the FISA warrant applications to obtain the authority to spy on Page. Baker said on Monday he does not believe there was any intent from the people he worked with to do “anything wrong or illegal,” including politically motivated spying.
The panic is not limited to the former IC community. The media is becoming totally unglued.
Dingbat Nicole Wallace says Bill Barr watches too much Hannity:
During an interview with former CIA Director John Brennan, MSNBC host Nicole Wallace asked why Attorney General William Barr described the FBI’s surveillance of the Trump campaign as “spying” and suggested the top law enforcement official may have “watched too much Sean Hannity.”
“Who uses the word spying to discuss authorized lawful surveillance on a counter-intelligence probe, other than Sean Hannity?” Wallace asked Brennan — riffing on the top Fox News host’s ardently pro-Donald Trump coverage.
Chris Matthews was tingling about Trump was trying to destroy the FBI
“Congressman, it’s an embarrassment to have an Attorney general who looks like a Roy Cohn, a guy who will do anything to defend the president and now has become his hitman. Not only will he play defense, he’s out to destroy the government, the FBI, everything in order to cover the tracks of the president. What do you make of this guy and how can you stop Barr from doing what he’s out to do now, destroy the FBI?”
Jeff Toobin warned darkly about the chilling message Barr is sending
CNN’s Jeffrey Toobin said tonight that Attorney General Bill Barr assigning a U.S. attorney to oversee the investigation into the origins of the Russia probe sends a “chilling message.”
“Think about the chilling message it sends to career non-political people in the FBI and the Justice Department,” he told Anderson Cooper. “What it means is if you defy the president’s wishes, his political appointees like the attorney general, they won’t initiate one investigation, they won’t initiate two, three investigations of you for doing your job.”
He called this a “completely unnecessary” investigation that’s going to be “harassing people” for doing their jobs.
Lawrence O’Donnell was apoplectic about Lindsey Graham doing his due diligence:
“Lindsey Graham is an obstruction of justice. This is clearly witness tampering. Lindsey Graham could be disbarred as a lawyer for that. And by publicly tampering with a Senate witness, Lindsey Graham violated his oath of office. In any previous Senate, the Senate Ethics Committee would begin an investigation of Lindsey Graham today that would very likely lead to his expulsion from the United States Senate. Something very serious has happened to Lindsey Graham and we don’t know what it is. Something deeply disturbing has happened to Lindsey Graham, and we don’t know what it is.”
” China Joe” Biden called Trump an “illegitimate” President.
Best of all, that hopelessly biased idiot Chuck Todd demanded to know why democrats hadn’t begun lynching Trump:
Todd really wanted to know when “Democrats [were] going to try to take control of this situation”. He even slammed the judgment of prominent Democratic leaders. “[I]t seems as if congressional Democrats didn’t — I think that Speaker Pelosi and frankly Chairman Cummings and Chairman Schiff and Chairman Nadler all thought, ‘you know, they’ll eventually cooperate, they’re not going to do this.’ Oh, yes, they are,” he mocked.
Democratic strategist Basil Smikle tried to assure Todd that congressional Democrats had everything under control and were just trying to be methodical. But Todd wasn’t buying it.
And the key line:
“I understand the larger picture is we’re trying to do our job holding the executive branch accountable. Pick one,” he snapped after reading off the laundry list of probes and subpoenas one more time. “You got to prioritize. I – I – this is a fight. Does [Pelosi] need to prioritize this?”
“We’re trying to do our job”
That’s a clear admission that PMSNBC is an arm of the DNC.
That other ditz AOC is calling for Lindsey Graham to resign.
Fat boy Nadler is calling Barr a “liar.”
I remember Schumer saying things like this weren’t smart because the IC could get back at you six ways from Sunday. Well, so can the Attorney General of the United States.
Comey is taking shots at Rod Rosenstein.
Former FBI Director James Comey described deputy Attorney General Rod Rosenstein as not having “strong character” Thursday while appearing on a CNN town hall telecast.
“I think people like that, like Rod Rosenstein, who are people of accomplishment but not real sterling character, strong character, find themselves trapped. And then they start telling themselves a story to justify their being trapped which is, ‘Yeah, he’s awful but the country needs me,’” Comey told host Anderson Cooper.
Rosenstein has returned the fire.
Rod Rosenstein unloaded on former FBI Director James Comey in remarks to the Greater Baltimore Committee (GBC) on Monday evening, slamming Comey’s turn as a “partisan pundit,” reiterating that he deserved to be fired, and faulting him for trampling “bright lines that should never be crossed.”
Rosenstein formally stepped aside as deputy attorney general two days ago. His speech specifically took aim at Comey’s comments earlier this month implying that Rosenstein and Attorney General Bill Barr lacked the “inner strength” to “resist the compromises necessary to survive Mr. Trump.”
In what can only be described a colossal failure to grasp irony Adam “Schitt” said campaigns should not be able to get foreign help.
You know, like employing a British spy to collect Russian propaganda and use foreign opposition research to secure a FISA warrant. This is the first time it’s ever happened.
Or how about flying a campaign staff member to a foreign country so you could use the CIA to spy on him?
While at first I am tempted to become angry at these idiocies I avoid it. As we approach the end game the cacophony will grown even louder. It will be amusing to see Brennan “frog marched” into prison for treason and Comey locked up for perjury. He can share a cell with McCabe.
This is a glorious time. The irony is that in trying to overthrow a duly elected President of the United States, they will have guaranteed Trump’s re-election.
They are all getting the bus schedule so they can throw each other under it.
The message would be, “Don’t run a coup on the duly elected President of the United States nor any other government official.”
This is developing like the climate change scam. Warming has ceased; soon cooling will be evident. This is causing panic among those pressing the climate change get-rich-scheme because soon the scam is going to be obviously apparent.
So, too, will the scheme to “get” Trump. Collusion failed. Obstruction is rapidly failing. The coup is unraveling and exposing itself. The left is desperate to try to complete their mission and their volume will continue to rise the closer we get to full exposure.
I really expected these traitors to get away with it. Too much swampiness. I am starting to believe I may have been mistaken now that Barr and Durham are on the job. If President Trump and his allies can clean out just a few departments in DC, it will be a start. Here’s to hoping!
The leftist media will provide cover for as long as possible. Then, the assassination attempts begin. The left does not surrender. This is going to go very ugly very quickly. It is a life or death struggle, but most on the right are oblivious. Trump is aware, however. Read his tweets. Hopefully, the left loses this war on America.
@Bookdoc: Any trials would have to avoid leftist courts which rule according to their ideology instead of the law.
Comrade Baker ratted out Comrade Comey yesterday and said they were worried about him blackmailing Trump. It says something about Comey if that’s what his comrades thought of him. The indictments haven’t even started and they’re already turning on each other. This is going to be FUN.
@another vet: My bet is Comey went into blackmail when it failed they decided to call what they think is a bluff. They never checked 1 detail in the blackmail material. Suddenly they have a POTUS that is not in their control, or a one world order swamp thing. They begin to pull out every stop to destroy, major problem an armed citizenry, they know how much fraud there was in the election they cant win a civil war, Greg only has 1 rusty hand gun and maybe 1 box of ammo, has never been to the range….oh crap.
@kitt: Also, Trump doesn’t care what the media says or his “legacy” being defined by them; his legacy will be the balance sheet of his accomplishments and he is striving for success.
He also fights back.
@Deplorable Me: Being praised by the media or attacked by the media never ever added a dime to the bottom line. They have no idea where he is headed cause it isnt political.
Having people look at the trade deals that are effectively gutted American middle class with an eye for business and bottom line, thats never been done he is an idiot as we have heard.
When Mc Donalds is a career things have near bottomed out.
The new notes from the State Dept that were hidden are very interesting.
Did Steele write the dossier or did Glen Simpson? The Russians knew they were being spied on they most likely have 2 phones one to feed disinformation with and one they can freely chat on.
Cant trust Wray or his second in command
Mr. Abbate most recently served since December 2016 as the executive assistant director for the Criminal, Cyber, Response, and Services Branch, with responsibility for overseeing all FBI criminal and cyber investigations worldwide, international operations, critical incident response, and victim assistance.
I wonder that when all of these criminals are fully exposed and those they did or tried to destroy know who they are and how they did it, will there be civil suits? It is likely to be apparent that various news sources had been in collusion with these criminals. Will they also be liable and subject to a civil suit? There may be a lot of people who thought they would retire on a fat government pension who will need to rely on Social Security. Maybe these people will not need their pensions while working for the government making prison furniture.
@Randy: Look at the Whitey Bulger case they sue the tax payer not the agents. The agents that keep innocent men in prison to their deaths, to cover up FBI agents on the take.
If they were personally responsible Andrew Weissmann would not have been choosing who was on the Mueller inquisition team. He would have been disbarred.
@kitt: That is true, but there may be attorneys in line helping them make the bad guys pay, too! Also, can not a case be made for treason? That could mean execution or life in prison, or life in GITMO.
@Randy: Without personal accountability they forge ahead ruining innocent people to cover for themselves or others in the ABC world. Its the same with the government agreements with big pharma they can make vaccines that only their own testing show safe and effective with no way the person damaged can go after the perp, just the government. I am shocked with the new Monsanto and Bayer settlements, how many had to die before that happened?
“Slander” laws don’t apply to personalities like the President, Senators or Congressmen. It is free rein to slander them all the talking heads want. They hide behind the First Amendment and just say “Ooops” and move on to the next thing they want to slander someone with.
There has been a couple of actors that sued publications for slander and won but only because the slander was so outrageous that it was undeniable and it prevented the litigant from earning a living. Slander cases have to prove “financial” harm such as a loss of a job or contract due to untrue slander.
@retire05: I am not concerned with slander. These people caused considerable financial loss to many people through deliberate false statements. It is more of a suit through the RICO act. People can live with slander, but forced bankruptcy by deliberately conspiring with criminals to do others harm is something different. A good attorney should be able to show that the criminals who leaked classified information to specific news sources who in then published the information to support the criminal action initiated by the leaker intended harm that is not slander.
@Randy: Better find a great constitutional lawyer
Normally its taxpayers who foot the bill and the government dog keeps his job or is reassigned.
Gradually we are working up to the big question of, “What did Obama know and then did he know it?” Looking back on statements Trump made about how the fix was in for Hillary, I am beginning to wonder, “What did Trump know and when did he know it?” Perhaps he was on to their little game and would have blown the whistle should the demokrats have been able to get out the illegal vote in other parts of the country the way they did in California and he would have lost.
He did come here shooting his mouth off to people who served in Afghanistan and told them how easy it would have been to go into Tora Bora and get OBL. Maybe he’ll get a chance to put his money where his mouth is and demonstrate his military “expertise” for real.
@kitt: To be protected from suit as a government employee, the employee must be working under his job description. Every employee has one. If the suit is a result of illegal activity by the employee, they are not covered by the government and must seek their own legal council This is part of the Gonzales Act. I doubt that any government employee who is convicted of a crime has been abiding by his job description. If a media company or a member of the media conspires with a criminal who use to be a government employee, it is likely they can be sued under the RICO act along with the criminal government employee .
@Randy: I would love to see them sued to a penniless busted broke homeless beggar on the poop filled streets of San Francisco.
@another vet: Before they get to O or Stinky expect a plane crash, heart attack with a stangely placed pillow, suicide without a gun etc.
@kitt: Or a private jet with them all on it going down in the ocean with no trace; then they can sneak off to Argentina with the other old Nazis.
Steele revealed back in October, 2016, that his sources for his dossier were two high level Kremlin intelligence operatives close to Putin. Was this information not available to Mueller? Would this look, to Mueller, like Putin “preferring” Trump as President or helping Trump win the election?
More and more, the entire Mueller work is looking like just another spoke in the wheel of the coup. Mueller could have know about this very early in his “investigation” that it was all Democrat/Russian collusion to adversely affect the outcome of the election… or damage Trump’s Presidency, but he chose to maintain the charade orchestrated by the Democrats… and the Russians.