Look who is siding with North Korea over the President of the US

Loading


 
Trump delivered an excellent speech to the UN yesterday. It’s quality can be judged on the Liberal Indignation Meter and it pretty maxed out. The response to Trump’s speech was mostly dimwitted and unsurprising but some of the response was very disappointing. No one expected Iran, Venezuela and North Korea to look favorably upon the speech and they did not.

Left wingers hated the speech. Their hatred of Trump impaired their memories and thought processes. Politico chose to defend Kin Jong Un:

Lester Holt sympathized with Iran:

The Trump administration representatives, President in New York, and they are putting Iran essentially in the same basket as North Korea, portraying both countries as a threat to stability and peace and calling on the world to act. How do you feel when you hear Iran and North Korea spoken about in the same breath?

Holt failed to bring up a lot of things in his interview with Rouhani:

And much like the North Korea’s “Rocketman,” as President Trump calls Kim Jong-un who is known for bombastic statements, Iranian lawmakers recently chanted “death to America” on the floor of their parliament. Rouhani himself has been quoted touting his country’s “nuclear victory,” something Holt’s meager reporting failed to bring up but NBC managed to cover once before.

It’s not surprising that Holt would blatantly omit damaging information about the Iranian government. For many months, NBC Nightly News had refused to report on any hostile actions by the Iranian Revolutionary Guard that put U.S. sailors at risk in the Strait of Hormuz.

No, this was all about making Trump look bad. Now we come to the liberal media stricken with Alzheimer’s.

But the Hyperventilation Award goes to Terry Moron, er, I mean Terry Moran. First it was this:

“The words ‘totally destroying’ a nation of 25 million people, that borders on the threat of committing a war crime,” Moran told George Stephanopoulos.

And then it was this:

This is where liberals go right off the rails. So sodden with hatred as they are, they suffer memory loss and diminished mental function. You know how I’ve said that liberal history began the day Trump was elected?

A “war crime.” “Terms that no world leader has ever used.” Let’s check on that. Here’s Bill Clinton on North Korea:

But back in 1993, President Bill Clinton gave perhaps an even starker warning to North Korea. In a trip to Seoul, South Korea, Clinton said that if North Korea gained and used a nuclear weapon “we would quickly and overwhelmingly retaliate.”

“It would mean the end of their country as they know it,” he said, according to a New York Times report at that time.

And it sure wasn’t all that long ago when Barack Obama uttered:

Mr Obama gave warning of the possible consequences. “We could, obviously, destroy North Korea with our arsenals,” he told CBS News.

Those sure sounds an awful lot like what Trump said, the difference being that Trump said it and not a democrat.

The problem here is that liberals are used to obama going to the UN bashing the US and apologizing for the US while globe trotting in Muslim nations and the love it. They’re used to obama bowing to Saudi kinds and groveling to Iranian leaders and sending them billions in cash. All this US-first stuff eats at them. The little fat Rocket Boy has been threatening to destroy the US for some time

A spokesman for NK’s ruling party said: “Through the two successful ICBM test-launches the DPRK has put the whole U.S. mainland in its striking range and clearly showed that it can turn the American empire into a sea in flames through sudden surprise attack from any region and area.

“Whatever means and methods the U.S. may employ, they will never work on the DPRK. The U.S. fate is in the hands of the DPRK.

“If the US and south Korean warmongers persist in reckless action in disregard of our repeated warnings, we will decisively take a strong retaliatory step.”

Meanwhile, an editorial run in one of Korea’s state-run newspapers described the US as a “war merchant living on human blood,” while the official newspaper said the US “would meet horrible nuclear strike and miserable and final ruin” in the event of an attack.

And liberals love it because they hate the US almost as much as Rocket Boy.

The other night the European Foriegn Minister said “We never talk about destroying countries.” All the sanctions the UN has enacted against North Korea have failed and the UN has pretty much thrown in the towel, so maybe it’s time for someone to talk about destroying countries that threaten the US. I suspect that Kim i looking to extort Trump the way Iran extorted obama, but that’s  not going to happen.

There may not be a good answer to this dilemma, although I think it hinges on Russia and China. Neither wants to see a war because both have much to lose. It would definitely be in China’s interest in particular to enable a decapitation action in North Korea and bring some sanity to the regime. In the meanwhile, it’d be nice if democrats and the liberal media weren’t siding with North Korea.

0 0 votes
Article Rating
Subscribe
Notify of
35 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments

Trump delivered an excellent speech to the UN yesterday. It’s quality can be judged on the Liberal Indignation Meter and it pretty maxed out.

.

That statement speaks volumes of the conscience of a Trump licker. The louder the disapproval of the left, the more “excellent” and representative of “quality ” the policy or proposal is. Period. End of story.

We all knew Trump was a serial lying, self proclaimed vagina grabber, con man, egomaniac, wage stealing, racist long ago. Now, all these attributes are “excellent” and of “quality” to folks like Dr John because a certain group of people find them appalling.

It was nice for the President to hint at what would happen, IF the US or her allies were attacked. He did not hint at an attack with no cause.
Repeated rewarding the Supreme Eater of NK with aid has taught him if he tosses a fit he gets stuff. Now we are stuck with a spoiled manchild, yes the commies are on his side, but its time for a little tough love.

@Ajay42302:

The louder the disapproval of the left, the more “excellent” and representative of “quality ” the policy or proposal is. Period. End of story.

True. Because the left has lost all semblance of caring for or defending the United States but are obsessed with their butt-hurt over having the Hillary rug yanked out from under their whiny feet.

We all knew Trump was a serial lying, self proclaimed vagina grabber, con man, egomaniac, wage stealing, racist long ago.

Oh boy, let’s add MORE to the list of questions the lying coward AJ is afraid to address:

What is your substantiation for calling Trump a racist?

Does Hillary dropping N-bombs make her a racist (and, by extension, all of her supporters)?

Is ANTIFA committing violence?

Shouldn’t the left be demanding Yale University change its name because Elihu Yale was a slave trader and the school was built with support from slave traders?

Tell us of how Trump “breached the Constitution”.

Why do liberals get to make vile, unsubstantiated accusations in media but conservatives get fired if they voice a non-liberal opinion?

How is questioning Obama’s demonstrably dubious birth records racist?

Are immigration laws expected to be enforced?

Who is justifying “mass murdering people not of their heritage”?

Who has ever asserted that “all Hispanic and Latinos are murders, rapist, and drug dealers”?

When did Trump ever grab anyone’s vagina and who was it?

What did Trump lie about?

Whose wages did Trump steal?

What is the nature of Trump’s “con”?

The left is characteristically siding with enemies of the country. It’s what they do and it’s how Obama governed. The US was evil and oppressive and had to be degraded before other world powers. Obama trusted Russia, China and Iran more than he trusted the good of the United States. Trump makes clear those days are dead and gone and this, of course, infuriates the left, aligning them more closely with communists, terrorists and aggressors.

Oh, the company you keep, AJ.

So, Clinton & Obama threatened the exact same thing.
Good.
I recently watched Josef Stalin being wildly applauded by all his crowd.
The dictator, like KJUn, demanded complete loyalty.
The men & women in his crowd were so afraid to be the 1st one to stop clapping that he kept a buzzer on his podium to tell them it was OK to quit now.
Stalin casually got his papers in order and poured himself a glass of wine while the clapping continued.
Finally, he was ready to speak.
He hit the buzzer & the clapping quit suddenly.

Lots of rock bands don’t get that much wild applause before they do an encore!
KJUn has spies everywhere.
When his father died NK people had damned well cry all the time. & they did. Scared not to.

So, yeah, the entire country probably has to be destroyed.
You can’t tell apart the real loyalists from the pretend criers.
It’s the only way to be sure this nightmare ends on that penninsula.
Some of these people really think their leader is a “living god.”

All these people are traitors the demacratic party are all traitors the news media lie 24/7 the Useless Nations is full of traitors and despots who treat their people worst then trash and that sawed off the pipsqueak in North Korea their just as bad as with Castro and Chavez as well as Arafat who got standing ovations from these UN Wtetches

@Bill… Deplorable Me:

From your very admission, it’s “true” that “the louder the disapproval of the left, the more “excellent” and representative of “quality ” the policy or proposal is. Period. End of story.” I mean, you said that.

From your very statement and in agreement with Dr John,, something advocated by the right cannot be wrong or bad or have flaws if the left complains loudly.

From your very words in black and white on this page along with that of Dr John, the disapproval of the left is your gauge or meter of how “excellent” or of the “quality” of a republican policies or actions.

So leading back to your questions (most of which I’ve answered repeatedly), my answers would be irrelevant- not because of the validity or lack of in my response, but your admitted prejudice that it can’t be weighed on its merits but rather if I’m for or against. That and the fact that you are no more than an insignificant troll with an obvious mission of distracting or derailing the conversation in order for Dr John et al to save face from their spectacularly failed argument.

But I’m no stranger to your type as it isn’t unusual for a resident troll like yourself to become obsessed with me at such rabid and unhinged sites.

@Nanny G: Well, they are all pretty well indoctrinated. Like our corrupt media aspires to be, N. Korea only has a state controlled media that tells its people only what the government wants them to think. There is no alternative and it is important for Un to have the threat of the aggressive and imperialistic United States to keep his hungry, wretched people behind him and unified. This is what the left aligns themselves with all because they got their widdle fewwings hurt when the worst candidate in history lost.

@Ajay42302:

From your very admission, it’s “true” that “the louder the disapproval of the left, the more “excellent” and representative of “quality ” the policy or proposal is. Period. End of story.” I mean, you said that.

So? I mean, look who you align yourself with… a North Korean dictator that kills people with anti-aircraft guns when they disagree with him. Someone that starves his people so he can have a nuclear blackmail weapon. Someone that lies constantly. YOU favor HIM over America. That’s YOU.

From your very statement and in agreement with Dr John,, something advocated by the right cannot be wrong or bad or have flaws if the left complains loudly.

Can you tell me when this has not proven to be true? I wouldn’t go so far as to say it is 100% accurate, but you whiny leftists have yet to take a truthful, honest stance on anything that would benefit the nation. Let’s look at history. Trump wins the election, you bitch and lie. Trump improves the economy, you bitch and lie. Trump restores US respect and authority around the world, you bitch and lie. Trump gets a unanimous vote against N. Korea, you bitch and lie. Trump gives the most resounding pro-world peace speech before the UN, you bitch and lie. Trump does a great job responding to natural disasters, you bitch and lie. Trump donates a personal $1,000,000, you bitch and lie. See a pattern yet?

So, if the crybaby, loser left has an instant, visceral, anti-Trump, anti-American reaction to something, there is a very high probability that it is good for the United States and the majority of Americans. Because losers like yourself oppose the things that make life better for more; cheap energy, personal protection, civil discourse, fair elections, freedom of speech, national security… then when you whine, cry and stamp your feet, that usually indicates there is something good for the nation nearby.

So leading back to your questions (most of which I’ve answered repeatedly), my answers would be irrelevant- not because of the validity or lack of in my response, but your admitted prejudice that it can’t be weighed on its merits but rather if I’m for or against.

No, you don’t answer the questions. No, you haven’t answered the questions. It’s why they repeatedly get asked and re-asked. You run from them, whining and crying, like a little girl, in a most cowardly fashion. But, here is your opportunity for redemption:

What is your substantiation for calling Trump a racist?

Does Hillary dropping N-bombs make her a racist (and, by extension, all of her supporters)?

Is ANTIFA committing violence?

Shouldn’t the left be demanding Yale University change its name because Elihu Yale was a slave trader and the school was built with support from slave traders?

Tell us of how Trump “breached the Constitution”.

Why do liberals get to make vile, unsubstantiated accusations in media but conservatives get fired if they voice a non-liberal opinion?

How is questioning Obama’s demonstrably dubious birth records racist?

Are immigration laws expected to be enforced?

Who is justifying “mass murdering people not of their heritage”?

Who has ever asserted that “all Hispanic and Latinos are murders, rapist, and drug dealers”?

When did Trump ever grab anyone’s vagina and who was it?

What did Trump lie about?

Whose wages did Trump steal?

What is the nature of Trump’s “con”?

So, how does it feel to be the opposite of what is good for America and Americans? How does it feel to be clearly identified as someone that would stand with Kim Jong Un against the President of the United States?

@Bill… Deplorable Me: AJ coming out for the commies not a shock, his super genius stategy, name calling lol.
Dont ask him to reason, the Lucifarian theology does not teach that. They are not here to make the world a better place, mostly childless, like the EU elites.

@DrJohn:

You conversing with your blow molded mini-DJ to invoke debating skills compliments the satire of what you pretend to be political punditry.

The fact that North Korea is a clear and present danger doesn’t mean that Donald Trump isn’t another sort of clear and present danger. It’s our great misfortune that we’ve got to deal with both problems at once.

@Greg:

The fact that North Korea is a clear and present danger doesn’t mean that Donald Trump isn’t another sort of clear and present danger.

Explain how clearly stating what will happen should a piss-pot dictator unwisely provokes a gentile giant with awesome powers is “dangerous”? Isn’t the SAFE thing to make the consequences clear?

What is dangerous is showing weakness, naivete’ and indecision, as Obama seem to make it a point to display. So, aggressors who thought they had a clear path towards their conquests have to be wondering if Trump is another punk that makes bold claims, then runs away like Obama or does he really mean it, like Bush did? Someone will probably test that question and that won’t be good for anyone. But, thanks to Obama, most likely we will see it.

Trump is trying desperately to avoid it, but you leftists are doing all you can to goad such turds as Un into challenging him. Can’t you whiny leftists put your butt-hurt aside for just a little while and stand by the United States at a time when it is threatened by a little twerp with nuclear weapons?

@Ajay42302: Gee, AJ… I can’t help but notice that you avoided, again answering a single question, which are all the result of you making unsubstantiated claims. Maybe you missed them… listed… in bold type… so here they are… again.

What is your substantiation for calling Trump a racist?

Does Hillary dropping N-bombs make her a racist (and, by extension, all of her supporters)?

Is ANTIFA committing violence?

Shouldn’t the left be demanding Yale University change its name because Elihu Yale was a slave trader and the school was built with support from slave traders?

Tell us of how Trump “breached the Constitution”.

Why do liberals get to make vile, unsubstantiated accusations in media but conservatives get fired if they voice a non-liberal opinion?

How is questioning Obama’s demonstrably dubious birth records racist?

Are immigration laws expected to be enforced?

Who is justifying “mass murdering people not of their heritage”?

Who has ever asserted that “all Hispanic and Latinos are murders, rapist, and drug dealers”?

When did Trump ever grab anyone’s vagina and who was it?

What did Trump lie about?

Whose wages did Trump steal?

What is the nature of Trump’s “con”?

@Ajay42302:
President just threatened to ‘totally destroy’ another country and mocked its leader at UN. Just take a moment to reflect on that.
.
Isn’t this the same country that has been threatening to “totally destroy” us?
The one who fires missiles over our allies countries?
The one that openly threatens hotting Guam?
What was he supposed to do, tell him to be nice, or draw a RED LINE?

@Mongoose:

I agree that NK is a problem and it’s been my personal opinion that we’ve needed to take some action for some time but this isn’t some cut and dry bianary situation with an easy fix.

Trump’s bombastic rhetoric in my opinion, demonstrates to Japan and South Korea that Trump is as much of a danger as Kim Jong. A promise to wipe some 25 million people off the face of the earth, especially coming from someone perceived as unstable as Trump only concerns our allies (who will also be paying one hell of a price) more. It just doesn’t help.

Plus, such pressure put on Kim isn’t likely to force him to back down as reports already concur. And we’re even hearing from China saying Trump isn’t helping matters.And we’re hearing negative feedback from leaders around the world.

But that wasn’t my point. My point was that Dr John has become so rabidly partisan that his festering hatred forbids him from not only considering anything coming from someone not marching lockstep to his bigoted tune but that concerns coming from those he hates proves that Trump has to be correct. He and his bobbsey twin Bill seem to be more unhinged and illogical with each diatribe they post.

@Ajay/Hojay/Jjay42302:

We all knew Trump was a serial lying, self proclaimed vagina grabber,

Trump never said anything about grabbing a vagina. But it comes as no surprise that a lib would not know the difference

Hope you don’t mind me taking up some of the Jay names before you get a chance at all the rest of them.

@Bill… Deplorable Me:

Shouldn’t the left be demanding Yale University change its name because Elihu Yale was a slave trader and the school was built with support from slave traders?

And yet his slave trade was minor compared to the Brown that Brown Univ was named for . Brown now disputes that the univ was named for the slave trader, but his name was associated with the naming for well over the first 100 years. Only when it became a bad thing to be named after slave traders did Brown start to claim it was named for someone else entirely.

Can this be settled by a pissing contest? It’s hard to know who’s ahead, without a scorekeeper.

Maybe sanctions could work—assuming Trump has the nerve to cut off trade with China and see half the retail shelves in Walmart become empty. If he does that, I’m going to start taking him a lot more seriously.

Trump imposes new sanctions on North Korea, Kim says will ‘tame the mentally deranged U.S. dotard with fire’

@Ajay42302:

Trump’s bombastic rhetoric in my opinion, demonstrates to Japan and South Korea that Trump is as much of a danger as Kim Jong.

S. Korea and Japan are very pleased with Trump’s speech and his commitment to building support to bring N. Korea to terms. They are tired of weakness and appreciate strength and leadership.

European nations are going to sanction businesses dealing with N. Korea. Chinese banks are not going to conduct business with N. Korea. It is clear Trump means business and is not simply drawing Obama-red lines all over the place. Trump is leading.

My point was that Dr John has become so rabidly partisan that his festering hatred forbids him from not only considering anything coming from someone not marching lockstep to his bigoted tune but that concerns coming from those he hates proves that Trump has to be correct.

This is YOUR problem. The reason you can’t see the strategy and the progress is because your racist hatred won’t allow you to see it. You would then have to admit, to yourself, that everything you have been blathering was wrong and a lie. So, now that you understand that, you can answer these unanswered questions:

What is your substantiation for calling Trump a racist?

Does Hillary dropping N-bombs make her a racist (and, by extension, all of her supporters)?

Is ANTIFA committing violence?

Shouldn’t the left be demanding Yale University change its name because Elihu Yale was a slave trader and the school was built with support from slave traders?

Tell us of how Trump “breached the Constitution”.

Why do liberals get to make vile, unsubstantiated accusations in media but conservatives get fired if they voice a non-liberal opinion?

How is questioning Obama’s demonstrably dubious birth records racist?

Are immigration laws expected to be enforced?

Who is justifying “mass murdering people not of their heritage”?

Who has ever asserted that “all Hispanic and Latinos are murders, rapist, and drug dealers”?

When did Trump ever grab anyone’s vagina and who was it?

What did Trump lie about?

Whose wages did Trump steal?

What is the nature of Trump’s “con”?

@Greg:

Maybe sanctions could work—assuming Trump has the nerve to cut off trade with China and see half the retail shelves in Walmart become empty. If he does that, I’m going to start taking him a lot more seriously.

You don’t get it. China stands to lose a lot more than US trade if they do not control N. Korea more closely. This is why they have announced that if N. Korea provokes an attack against it, China will not interfere. China, of course, wants to maintain N. Korea as a distinctive thorn in our side, but that is becoming more and more difficult if Un continues to pursue his own agenda.

Diplomacy is worthless without the threat of force.

@Bill… Deplorable Me:

S. Korea and Japan are very pleased with Trump’s speech and his commitment to building support to bring N. Korea to terms.

Uh, like, on what planet do you speak of?

Oh wait, for you to rationalize that would mean I answer an additional quantity of off topic and distracting questions which even if I answered you would ignore and still demand I answer.

Opps! I just feed a troll. My bad.

@ABCDEFGHIJay42302: #15
Excellent idea.
Staking my claims before VayJay does.
Although I kind of like the last two…

@Greg: No, we don’t need a pissing contest. You are so far behind, a pissing contest will not do you any good

@PetercatJay-PeterJay-CatJay: Yeah, that CatJay rocks.

@Redteam, #22:

I believe Kim just called Trump’s “rocket man” with a “mentally deranged dotard,” and raised him by one threat to “tame him with fire.” This is getting serious. Maybe Trump should go after Kim’s haircut.

@Greg: Negatory, haircut is off limits. Not good to make fun of mental retardation.

@Ajay42302:

Oh wait, for you to rationalize that would mean I answer an additional quantity of off topic and distracting questions which even if I answered you would ignore and still demand I answer.

HEY! I think you are starting to catch on!

Yes, Japan and S. Korea appreciate the strength and leadership shown.

Now:

What is your substantiation for calling Trump a racist?

Does Hillary dropping N-bombs make her a racist (and, by extension, all of her supporters)?

Is ANTIFA committing violence?

Shouldn’t the left be demanding Yale University change its name because Elihu Yale was a slave trader and the school was built with support from slave traders?

Tell us of how Trump “breached the Constitution”.

Why do liberals get to make vile, unsubstantiated accusations in media but conservatives get fired if they voice a non-liberal opinion?

How is questioning Obama’s demonstrably dubious birth records racist?

Are immigration laws expected to be enforced?

Who is justifying “mass murdering people not of their heritage”?

Who has ever asserted that “all Hispanic and Latinos are murders, rapist, and drug dealers”?

When did Trump ever grab anyone’s vagina and who was it?

What did Trump lie about?

Whose wages did Trump steal?

What is the nature of Trump’s “con”?

These aren’t random questions, these are requests for verification of some of the lies you frequently roll out, at Daddy George’s request. So, get to answering.

@Bill… Deplorable Me:

Actually, I caught on to it long ago as you’ve tipped your hand many times. I’m a bit surprised you’d lay your cards on the table and literally admit your game strategy, that yes, my answers would be meaningless and you’d continue to ignore them only to repeat them again and again, proving that my accusations of you being an intentional planted distraction is your only function.

@Ajay42302:

Actually, I caught on to it long ago as you’ve tipped your hand many times.

You mean you’ve understood all along that when you lie and make inaccurate statements, you will be questioned on it? You’ve understood that when you ask stupid, pointless questions that even when you whine and stamp your cloven hooves, you aren’t going to get answers unless you provide the same courtesy? Then that means that, as I have said repeatedly, you don’t answer simply because you are a coward. Well, be that as it may….

What is your substantiation for calling Trump a racist?

Does Hillary dropping N-bombs make her a racist (and, by extension, all of her supporters)?

Is ANTIFA committing violence?

Shouldn’t the left be demanding Yale University change its name because Elihu Yale was a slave trader and the school was built with support from slave traders?

Tell us of how Trump “breached the Constitution”.

Why do liberals get to make vile, unsubstantiated accusations in media but conservatives get fired if they voice a non-liberal opinion?

How is questioning Obama’s demonstrably dubious birth records racist?

Are immigration laws expected to be enforced?

Who is justifying “mass murdering people not of their heritage”?

Who has ever asserted that “all Hispanic and Latinos are murders, rapist, and drug dealers”?

When did Trump ever grab anyone’s vagina and who was it?

What did Trump lie about?

Whose wages did Trump steal?

What is the nature of Trump’s “con”?

I’m a bit surprised you’d lay your cards on the table and literally admit your game strategy, that yes, my answers would be meaningless and you’d continue to ignore them only to repeat them again and again, proving that my accusations of you being an intentional planted distraction is your only function.

You don’t know when to quit, do you?

How did I indicate your answers would be meaningless?

What answer have you provided that has been ignored?

Do you get extra Soros-points for openly supporting Kim Jong Un over the United States?

@Bill… Deplorable Me:

You mean you’ve understood all along that when you lie and make inaccurate statements, you will be questioned on it

For starters, usually any response I make to you is actually intended more towards Dr John, Bigot Bob, or whatever writer might be at the time. You seem to be the go-between, their answer man, their kibitzing rodeo clown that draws attention away from their racial flame fanning and hyper-partisan nonsense.

So with that said, no my incredibly slow witted friend, that isn’t at all what I mean. What I meant was exactly what I’ve been saying and proving for months. Even in this very thread, we see above where you respond to my comment:

The louder the disapproval of the left, the more “excellent” and representative of “quality ” the policy or proposal is. Period. End of story.

You responded verbatim, “True”.

So as I’ve accused, it’s blind partisan hatred and pure ideological bigotry that this blog sells. It doesn’t matter if it’s right or wrong, if it does good or evil, but rather the volumes of “boos” from those on the left. As you said, that is “true”.

Again right here in this forum, in comment # 26, you confirmed that you have never had any intentions of acknowledging any answers I gave to your questions and that you would continue doing so regardless of my answers. I mean, there it is above where you said verbatim that I’m “catching on” to the fact that “even if I answered you would ignore and still demand I answer”.

So while most anyone of reasonable intellect already understood your role of distracting from the racism and vile hatred sold by of Dr John et al, here, what I really meant was that I was a bit surprised that you were naive enough to actually come right out and admit it.

But then, seeing how trump lickers are doing all they can to make the Trump violence promoting hatred become the norm (hell, we even saw Dr John go nuts the other day when a comic superhero stopped the mass murder of a group of non-whites from a deranged white gunman), it shouldn’t be all that surprising to see you too step up your game.

@Ajay42302:

Again right here in this forum, in comment # 26, you confirmed that you have never had any intentions of acknowledging any answers I gave to your questions and that you would continue doing so regardless of my answers.

You’ve never answered them. For instance, you once asked the incredibly stupid question if I would ever vote for Hitler and other dictators. At first, I merely acknowledged what an incredibly stupid question that was, but you took this as a dodge, so I answered that I would never vote for any of them. YOU wrote that I answered I WOULD vote for them. So, I answered YOUR question and you LIED. You DON’T answer any questions, and you LIE that you have.

You are a liar.

You ask questions and demand answers but run away from answering questions about false statements you make. You are a lying coward.

It is indeed an established and recorded fact that the clearer a policy is good for America, the more you crying, lying, sore loser liberals scream. Yes, absolutely, if liberals are supporting it, you had best examine how badly it damages US interests. If liberals are against it, take a good, hard look at all the benefits for Americans because the left are deathly afraid of Republican success.

As an absolutely PERFECT example, look to how you lying liberals show outrage at the leadership Trump has shown at the UN. I believed the speech was really good, but when idiot liars like yourself come out against it, it definitely confirms my accuracy.

You don’t answer because you are a cowardly liar. You’ve never answered any questions. Not a one. But, you can always change and stop being a coward. Answer the questions or admit you are lying and have no answers.

What is your substantiation for calling Trump a racist?

Does Hillary dropping N-bombs make her a racist (and, by extension, all of her supporters)?

Is ANTIFA committing violence?

Shouldn’t the left be demanding Yale University change its name because Elihu Yale was a slave trader and the school was built with support from slave traders?

Tell us of how Trump “breached the Constitution”.

Why do liberals get to make vile, unsubstantiated accusations in media but conservatives get fired if they voice a non-liberal opinion?

How is questioning Obama’s demonstrably dubious birth records racist?

Are immigration laws expected to be enforced?

Who is justifying “mass murdering people not of their heritage”?

Who has ever asserted that “all Hispanic and Latinos are murders, rapist, and drug dealers”?

When did Trump ever grab anyone’s vagina and who was it?

What did Trump lie about?

Whose wages did Trump steal?

What is the nature of Trump’s “con”?

How did I indicate your answers would be meaningless?

What answer have you provided that has been ignored?

Your argument, saying you answered questions when you and everyone else knows you never have, is stupid and weak. It is cowardly, which is your prime characteristic. You know you avoid answer questions, yet you think saying you have qualifies as having answered. But, I’ll respond to every post you make with the ever-lengthening list of un-answered… NEVER answered… questions. Until you do.

That is what a lying liberal coward has to look forward to around here.

I see some airhead Chelsea Handler wants to exchange Trump for that little pipsqueak Kim Un . There is just no cure for liberal stupidity

@Spurwing Plover: They loves them some Che, Mao, Stalin and Hitler. Might as well throw Un in there as well.

@Ajay42302: I wish it took effort to beat you in a debate. I wish it was a challenge…

…but it’s not.

Anything else, junior?

When we cut through the bombast, you have nothing but partisan tirades.

But keep squawking…that’s why the majority of Americans side with Trump…

You’re not even cognizant of the blood you’re trying to spill, are you? It’s a good thing saner, and wiser, heads are here to stop you, junior.

But you were saying?

@Nathan Blue: @Nathan Blue:

But of course, enter stage left with an appearance of throw-a-rock-and-run Nathan Blue to amplify Dr John’s new meme that my debating skills level somehow disqualifies my[pointing out the rancid bigotry, shear hatred, blatant dishonesty, and profound hypocrisy that he peddles on a regular basis.

The interesting thing is that Dr John doesn’t even debate but rather spews disgusting and racist screeds and relies on his trolls to protect- trolls who even admit openly that they have no intentions of debate but rather to derail the argument (see comment # 26). DJ even has off topic and distracting conversations with his trolls to escape from his failed narrative (see comment # 9). So I guess my question to Nathan would be: I’ve been expecting one of you, what took you so long?

As I mentioned to Bill’s admission of being no more than a kibitzing troll with no intentions of honest debate (again, see his admission in # 26), his constant tipping of his hand has been telling but I didn’t expect he’d put the cards on the table for all to see. As for Dr John and his debating accusations, well, looks like you’re the dealer with an obvious stacked deck. But of course, me exposing you and yours as argumentative frauds is nothing new.

@Ajay42302:

my[pointing out the rancid bigotry, shear hatred, blatant dishonesty, and profound hypocrisy that he peddles on a regular basis.

How are you “pointing out” any hypocrisy without substantiating your statements? I would add your accusation of “bigotry, shear [sic] hatred, blatant dishonesty and profound hypocrisy” but I have already asked those same questions, which you have run away from COUNTLESS times. But, for your benefit and to offer you yet another opportunity to shed your cowardly liar cloak, here are your questions to answer:

What is your substantiation for calling Trump a racist?

Does Hillary dropping N-bombs make her a racist (and, by extension, all of her supporters)?

Is ANTIFA committing violence?

Shouldn’t the left be demanding Yale University change its name because Elihu Yale was a slave trader and the school was built with support from slave traders?

Tell us of how Trump “breached the Constitution”.

Why do liberals get to make vile, unsubstantiated accusations in media but conservatives get fired if they voice a non-liberal opinion?

How is questioning Obama’s demonstrably dubious birth records racist?

Are immigration laws expected to be enforced?

Who is justifying “mass murdering people not of their heritage”?

Who has ever asserted that “all Hispanic and Latinos are murders, rapist, and drug dealers”?

When did Trump ever grab anyone’s vagina and who was it?

What did Trump lie about?

Whose wages did Trump steal?

What is the nature of Trump’s “con”?

How did I indicate your answers would be meaningless?

What answer have you provided that has been ignored?

Now, see if you can stop lying and running away long enough to answer some really simple questions.

@Nathan Blue: One can debate AJ into the ground while letting their brain take a nap. He is the worst of the left, spewing lies then running away from answering them with facts. I will continue to pursue him with is own lies until he either answers or disappears into the fog of leftist propagandists and starts receiving his pension from Papa George.