Right now Obama is Putin’s bitch.
Today Vladimir Putin is the strongest leader and the most powerful man in the world. Barack Obama has capitulated to Iran. World wide, he’s done. He’s left the building. He’s running out the clock. And he’s getting his ass kicked everywhere.
American adversaries sense Obama’s weakness and are flexing their muscles. Look at the headlines
95,000 Russian troops in massive military drill…
Flights Over Iraq and Iran Defy Obama Objections…
Russia positioning tanks at Syria airfield…
Face Off: China’s Navy Stalks U.S. Ship in South China Sea
US official: Iranian warships approach US Navy in the Straight of Hormuz ‘on a nearly daily basis’
Obama? Well, he’s “flummoxed” :
Russia’s recent military buildup in Syria has perplexed the Obama administration and left it in a quandary as to how to respond, complicating Washington’s efforts to both combat Islamic State extremists and assist moderate rebels trying to oust Syrian President Bashar Assad.Underscoring U.S. uncertainty about Russian President Vladimir Putin’s intentions, Secretary of State John Kerry on Tuesday placed his third phone call in 10 days to Russian Foreign Minister Sergey Lavrov, seeking clarity about Moscow’s moves, the State Department said. “Kerry made clear that Russia’s continued support for President Assad risks exacerbating and extending the conflict, and undermining our shared goal of fighting extremism if we do not also remain focused on finding a solution to the conflict in Syria via a genuine political transition,” the department said in a statement.
But hey, we’re spending $500 million for five Syrian soldiers
Obama: We have no strategy.
On top of that, Obama’s cooking the intelligence books to make things look better than they really are.
North Korea wants in on the fun:
NKorea warns it has restarted all nuclear bomb fuel plants
“North Korea should refrain from irresponsible provocation that serve only to aggravate regional tensions.”
China conducted a massive cyber attack on the US:
Massive Data Breach as Government Computers Are Hacked
Feds Feared Tens of Millions Impacted by OPM Hack, Internal Memo Says
Dick Clarke: Cyber Security Efforts Show ‘Almost Criminal Negligence’
Obama Hints at Sanctions Against China Over Cyberattacks
Hints. Strong letter to follow. He’ll likely send Neville Kerry to negotiate another capitulation.
Barack Obama has lost interest in foreign policy. Everything he has touched has turned to crap. Obama abandoned Iraq and ISIS filled the void. The proof is two-fold. One, Obama did leave a residual force in Afghanistan and two, Obama had to send Americans back into Iraq to try to prop it up, SOFA or not. Obama knocked over Gaddafi and now it’s a safe haven for ISIS and Al Qaeda. Bonus: 20,000 stingers went missing. If Obama has his way, the Muslim Brotherhood would rule Egypt. We can thank Sisi that they do not.
We’re adrift. We’re weakened. Unfortunately, Obama’s got lots of time to make it worse.
A year ago I said that this
would be Obama’s foreign policy for the next two years. And it’s come to pass. America was too arrogant. It needed to be knocked down a peg. He did it.
At one time the President of the United States was the most powerful man in the world. Obama has gotten what he wants- he’s Putin’s bitch.
You are a punk b*tch Dr j
You will not even use your own name
Putin ? His country is in deep recession contracting by close to 5%
Syria? As far as I and many others are concerned Tussia is more than welcome to get involved there. After the disastreous war of choice in Iraq Americans do not want. To be involved in that part of the world.
Obama fulfilled the terms of the SOFA that Bush was FORCED to sign by the leader he put into power, Maliki
Under Bush the right wing demanded everyone support the POTUS but since Ovama was elected they have consistently put partisan politics above the interests of our country
Under Obana the Dow almost tripled and gas is 2 bucks and unemployment is going under 5% ALL things that you never saw coming
Iran and the bomb?? Your the same ilk that lied to the USA. Saying that Saddam had WMD
Why is it that you aren’t over there in the Mideast yourself if you think someone should go and do something?
Drinking and posting don’t mix. Kind of early for that, isn’t it?
Support for the Iraq war in March 2003:
Should have stayed out
That means many on the left supported the war and many democrats voted to support it. We’ve documented their support here repeatedly. As it progressed the execrable democrats disavowed their own positions and ran away as fast as they could and left Bush holding the bag. Unlike them, he did not run away from his responsibility and he did win the war, which Obama admitted when he abandoned Iraq.
The one thing anyone can depend on liberals for is their undependability. They blow with the winds like so many dandelion seeds.
We’re on the edge of another bubble bursting. Unemployment is 5% because there’s no one left in the workforce. 94 million are OUT of it. “Obana” has raised the national debt to $18 TRILLION and it’s getting near GDP levels. I doubt you understand what that means.
The NY Times says there were lots of WMD’s in Iraq. Bush didn’t advertise it so Al Qaeda wouldn’t attempt to capture them. But you lefties seem too dim to grasp that concept. W never directed the spotlight on himself nor does he talk much about this. You lefties are blinded by the intensity of flashes that are always going off every time Obama snaps another selfie.
Years ago, I posted a reply here noting “Obama is in fact a soviet puppet” in every sense of the word. does one really care to argue that now when presented with the facts? And I ask that as to semi-sane folks, not the Gregs and so forth of the lefty world.
Hey John, a friendly reminder:
He just has no idea what to do…he has no plan…
@DrJohn: The date of the conference would be noteworthy.
The hypocrisy of proclaiming a the Right’s war on women, while the Left acts as if the enslavement and rape of Yazidi women either doesn’t exist or is top secret and can’t be mentioned in public. Of course all women in Europe and the US will face the sexual wrath of the Mohammedan invaders. In the camps of Eastern Europe they are already asserting their needs on Muslim women who lack male protection. I know it is racist to point out the truth and unmentionable obvious facts, but I don’t really care.
Indeed. September 5, 2014. When it was important to destroy ISIS. But we all know the value of Obama guarantees.
They’re “decimated” and “on the run.”
The same way they’ve gone after Al Qaeda. Yikes.
Obama’s been lying about pretty much everything, but when it comes to national security it becomes frightening.
After seeing how easy it is to make Obama and Kerry look like sissies, North Korea flexes their atrophied muscles and demands talks with the US before the girlie-boys leave office and the easy pickings are gone.
Is this administration familiar with the term, “Well, DUH?” Exacerbating conflicts is what Russia and China strive to do; it keeps us occupied while they increase their presence and influence around the world. Do they think Russia is interested in seeing Assad go? (well apparently I guess they do) What would make them think that?
And what are we now, genius? If Obama had not squandered the victory, we would be FAR LESS involved there than now. If the left would not fight an intelligent energy policy of increased domestic production, we would be involved there even LESS. At any time do you see just a tiny bit of how inept, anti-American policies damage the US and the rest of the world? Just a bit?
Folks like John are the same as the Africans who sold their brothers into slavery; the same as the Jewish people who secured their own lives for a few precious weeks by leading their brothers into the gas showers; the same as the existential rogues who trample women and children to death escaping the burning building while preserving their own lives; the same as those who look away instead of coming to the aid of the oppressed; the same as who shouted Crucify Him in the streets of Jerusalem. They will look for their reward only to be snuffed out like all those they betrayed.
We would still be there now, in force, and would likely remain there until we became unable to financially sustain a continuing occupation. We would be standing off Iran on one side, actively fighting ISIL on the other, and trying to hold down an escalating insurgency in Iraq itself.
Toppling Saddam Hussein was the easy part. Nobody ever explained how we could exit afterward, leaving a permanently stable region behind us. No one thought that far ahead.
I hate to say it, but Donald Trump is absolutely correct in his summation of what an abysmally stupid geopolitical move the invasion of Iraq was. There never was a rational exit strategy. The Status of Forces Agreement certainly wasn’t. It was a case of passing the buck to the next administration.
Nothing but trouble has come from that monumental blunder. The lasting damages to the United States have been enormous.
As I watched the Republican Debates last night, it was easy to imagine another wave of collective stupidity sweeping over the nation. The majority of contenders seem to have learned nothing at all from the Iraq War. We could easily be sucked into another such overseas disaster, with no more thought for what “victory” would entail than we had the last time. The greatest danger to us all as a nation is still ourselves.
Obama said it was stable. Those were pretty much his exact words.
Afghanistan is not the problem Iraq is. Any guesses why?
You don’t get it… you CAN’T get it.
Had we left 30,000 troops in Iraq, there would BE no ISIS in Iraq. Remember, they did not start out 100,000 strong with M1A1’s, Stingers and Humvees…. that happened because we were GONE. Had they dared to enter Iraq while our forces were there (and I doubt they would have), they would have been squashed like a bug, disgraced, demoralized and probably disbanded. They certainly would not have captured a refinery to yield $3 million a day to finance their terror.
The move into Iraq was not a calculated move to do anything but remove WMD’s; whether it is considered now a wise are stupid move is moot; it was the WMD’s that had to be secured, the UN was gutless and worthless (worried more about their bribes than fighting terror) and all most of the security council members worried about was there business deals.
You simply are not capable of understanding how an inept and naive idiot has screwed up the world… even when you had prior warning.
Of course there would be. It would be empowered as a part of the anti-occupation insurgency.
I’m afraid that you don’t get it: The forces that created ISIL are indigenous to the region. They’re deeply embedded in the culture and landscape. They’re part of the place.
Putin will rediscover this. The Russian memory seems to be as short as our own.
@Greg: ISIS started out a few thousand strong with no heavy weapons (before the graduated to JV), auch smaller American force would have irradicated them… easily. There would never have BEEN an ISIS as we know them today. They would have had no vast swaths of territory, no economic life, no string of victories… all of which parlayed into recruitment. No one would even know what ISIS is. Obama allowed this; he gave the sustinance.
ISIL, al Qaeda, al Shabaab, al Nusra, Boko Haram, Abu Sayyaf… They’re all different manifestations of the same brand of crazy. The crazy sprouts and grows wherever there’s local instability or a popular reason for an insurgency. If you occupy the regions where they’re indigenous, your very presence becomes their means to empowerment. I think they can ultimately only be defeated by the people whose lands and cultures they contaminate. If people aren’t sufficiently motivated to protect what’s their own, it doesn’t happen. You can’t make a gift of freedom. People have to understand what it is, and want it badly enough to fight for it themselves.
You’ve got to be careful who you help. Shall we assist the Ukrainian resistance against Russia and the Russian separatists? It sounds good. It seems necessary. And then you suddenly realize that you’re empowering the likes of the Azov Battalion. You give the Ukrainian government money or weapons, and you can’t really control who gets them.
Yeah, but since Obama *likes* being Putin’s Bitch, that doesn’t count.
I know the right is infatuated with this manly Russian midget. Obama, not so much.
Also relevant that Obama armed ISIL to go after Assad…. before they then invaded Iraq. This was AFTER Russia offered a deal to get rid of him (similar to Clinton being offered Osama Bin Ladin a couple years before 9/11)
As with Nazi Germany, had Hitler been stopped in the Sudetenland, his support would have crumbled. Every victory and every time he bested the Allies, his aura grew, along with his support. ISIS is no different; they have shown themselves to be better than Obama’s best efforts and their support grows with every victory and every time they showed there was no force to challenge them.
Certainly, simply unilaterally declaring them not worth the effort does not make them any less lethal.
I remember republicans ranting because the White House wasn’t arming the Syrian rebel factions quickly enough. They weren’t buying the Obama Administration’s explanation that weapons might fall into the hands of hostile factions.
Remember? Probably not. You seem to be able to conveniently forget whatever doesn’t play well with your narrative of the moment.
Presently the right seems to have two contradictory lines of bullshit going. The first is that Obama is at fault for arming ISIL; probably we should have supported Assad, or stayed out altogether. The second is that the war in Syria would be over, if only Obama had supported the Syrian rebels: Kasich: Syrian war ‘could be over’ if U.S. had supported rebels
Nor did I want that idiot Obama to push out Mubarak and Gadaffi. Nor did I want him to abandon Iraq. He and Clinton still are insisting that Assad go, aren’t they?
Who are they suggesting in his place?
Hmmm? The Muslim Brotherhood? ISIS?
Care to explain why Obama wants only to take down the leaders of secular nations while kowtowing to Islamic theocracies?
He wanted Mubarak out and wanted the Muslim Brotherhood in. Whisky Tango Foxtrot?
@Greg: I remember being opposed to ANY involvement because it was none of our business. Syria was a UN issue, not a US issue. As a member of the UN, we would participate in a UN resolution to do whatever, but in no way, form or fashion was there anything going on in Syria that concerned the United States. Or, Libya, for that matter. But, Obama was bound and determined to get involved.
In Syria, he calculated that his awesome persona would sway Assad and cause him to run, screaming like a little girl, from his palace. Somehow, Assad missed the memo of how awesome and fearsome Obama is and simply ignored him. Obama decided to go all in on a bluff and threw down his “red line” and, Assad, knowing precisely what kind of poker player he faced, called that bluff and Obama sought a way to fold without losing his stake. It wasn’t there.
Putin stepped in to “help” him out and Kerry and Obama jumped at the opportunity. Assad and Putin split up the pot and told Obama to go pound sand.
Welcome to bitch-dom.
OBAMA was pushing arming rebels and the faction of the right that supported it supported HIM. What they pushed was, “if you support them, then GET ON WITH IT!” Again, I disagreed with McCain and Graham and considered it none of our business.
The UN should be leading the way on these matters and this, Libya, Ukraine and ISIS are definitely matters the UN should be involved in. Sadly, I do realize that the UN is, in fact, worthless and only only acts as it relates to monetary remuneration for its leaders and business interests of its members. So, they ignore the terror ISIS spreads and spends its time supporting Palestinian terrorists and denouncing Israel.
i LIKE IT when morons post things like that thinking so small and not understanding much of anything but what the party line is… makes them putins biatch too.
of course anyone that sides with socialism voluntariliy and isnt in the party leadership is a moron by definition, and is treated by the party as such. Dont bother teling me something different tovarish, my family is from that system and i can spout more from memory than you know in total as to the subject
turkey, iraq, afghanistan, pakistan, and india, would make a buffer zone as putin called it. it would have prevented weapons and equipment in unknown quantities from traveling on land in trucks from russia, through the states that russia has take troops and control over, to their friend in iran and then from there to the middle east and africa… of course russia makes its money in raw materials and having the most wealthy raw material country put their stuff on the market would crush them..
russia sells a bit more military stuff than the us does, in a country with a gdp slightly more than indonesia has. IF the USA sold weapons at the same proportion as russia does, it would ahve to sell more than a half trillion a year, 600% more than what they do now.
russias two major economies is weapons, and raw materials. you dont get cars, computers, widgits, etc… just weapons and raw materials.
now… if you want black people in africa to have a life, maybe stopping weapons from getting from russia to africa might help, but you cant do that if the countries dont block it and unlike russia, you cant take them over… so you need a buffer the way satelite states of russia were and are a buffer that sheilds russia from attack by putting cannon fodder in front of them.
it has nothing to do with anything the left spouts… mostly cause the left ha deemed lying for the cause a goodness, and lying to use people a goodness. you only have to read the literature that your own side writes to know that… but how stupid is it to join a side that admits that lying, schemiing, andplaying people to make a dictatorship – then think they tell you the truth?
wake up tovarish… your ranting is emotional clap trap..
restricting weapon ownership to those that are bought, not captured, whose weapons are used in these states? you think that ethiopia has an ak47 factory? how about grenade launchers? think they make them there too? how about semtec? they are not using C4… are they? whose experts are always involved?
here is one for you? which side claimed to be using islam to break the west? who bragged that they made planes into bombs in their autobiography? who revealed in captured archives that they are the ones that funded and created the PLO? and who was it that the kgb created when they made araffat?
of course you konw nothing of that, any more than you realie that teh confederate flag would have flown over a democrat state and that it was democrats that wanted to secceed to preserve slavery, and that the horrors of the south were by democrats wanting to prevent people from voting republican… hey? you know those hoses and dogs that obama mentions, why dont he mention that it was a demograt bull connors that did that? why dont he mention that the draft riots had the unions of white men in the north murdering blacks because post war people were gonna take their jobs? which lion of the senate was known to be working with the kgb? which party had several individuals who were KKK m,embers serve in congress with a grand kleagle being celebrated in your lifetime? remember social jstice? i remember it when the nazi priest father coughlin was preaching it and marching with the socilaist nazi party from madison square garden and having meetings with the KKK in long island… how bout sangers speech to the ladies of the kkk?
you have a huge amount of history to learn.
better learn it before they make a slave out of you like they did in russia, china, hungary, latvia, estonia, lithuania, vietnam, n korea, romania, slovakia, czech republic, cuba, venezeula and more… ALL failures till they gave up marxism.
lets hear your real facts… bush was not forced to sign the sofa, and that was a decade ago, your man has been in the white house for that long and has accomplished what? iran the bomb, healthcare in tatters (Where i work), racism as high as when i was a kid, and all manner of hateful stuff… but since when was the left really about love as they were the people who starved people to death intentionally, worked them to death in the camps, loaded them into ovens, and a whole lot more in higher numbers than anything else in human history…
@Greg: I remember republicans ranting because the White House wasn’t arming the Syrian rebel factions quickly enough. They weren’t buying the Obama Administration’s explanation that weapons might fall into the hands of hostile factions.
and so the outcome was that some of our best weapons are now in the hands of those people, including abrams tanks, helicopters and so on.
and what for? to preserve assad and help russia build a presence… after all, obama has loved russia from the get go, the way a idiot fawns over their keeper…
your man didnt have enough common sense to pull out the equipment he didnt protect… and gave it to isis that way
ISIS Captures US Made M1 Abrams Tank After Ambush on Iraqi Army in Ramadi Area – Iraq
and what about his line in the sand? meaningless
and the reset button? a farce – maybe he shoudl ahve asked his mom or dad to translate for it rather than leave it to an incomptent woman whose husband cheated on her in the white house, who screwed up her state department job and wrote her thsis that marx was right while marrying a man who went to school in russia rather than serve his country…
@Billand Dr.j.: I agree Obama has seriously screwed up in Syria-should have armed rebels and bombed Assad–Taking out Ghadaffi was correct. Mubarek should have been left alone with failing health his time was limited. More troops should have remained in Iraq–Bush shares blame on agreement with corrupt Shiite leaders. Afghanistan should have been pursued more vigorously–Marines had em on the defensive then got pulled back.
War should be last resort but if you go–GO BIG.
Re politics As a former New Yorker I’ve always thought Trump a loud mouthed jerk–now I know it to be true–watch Jim Webb in Dem. debate–think he’ll surprise——-Semper Fi
@Greg: I know the right is infatuated with this manly Russian midget. Obama, not so much.
hey, moron, there is no such thing as “the right wing”, there is the left and then everyone else. this isnt france, so we nevr had left and right… and the whole hitler being on the right was stalins doing… ie. you can read about how the cpusa had such trouble changing gears when he did that.
so all your doing is labeling everything outside of communism as right and you imagine that freedom exists between two socalist totalitarianisms win wich one is focused on their own national country and places and the other is focused internationally… hitler was national, stalin was international.
they even had the same salute till russia chanegd it to the iron fist (in the velvet glove). the camps used to kill jews and others were signed by the last progressvie president over to stalin to be used… stalin killed jews too, because marx wants them gone as they wont give uptheir religion or culture for the sake of the party
The Right Opposition (Russian: Правая оппозиция, Pravaya oppozitsiya) was the name given to the tendency made up of Nikolai Bukharin, Alexei Rykov, Mikhail Tomsky and their supporters within the Soviet Union in the late 1920s. It is also the name given to “right-wing” critics within the Communist movement internationally, particularly those who coalesced in the International Communist Opposition, regardless of whether they identified with Bukharin and Rykov. Note that the designation “Right Opposition” refers to the position of this movement relative to the other Communist movements on the traditional spectrum. Relative to contemporary political centrism, the Right Opposition is still very firmly on the Left.
your just parroting stalins line and are too dumb to know thats what your doing… you think it has to do with hitler, but it doesnt, it has to do with anyone opposing state communism and the dictatorship creation!!!
The struggle for power in the Soviet Union after the death of Vladimir Lenin saw the development of three major tendencies within the Communist Party. These were described by Leon Trotsky as representing left, right and centre tendencies, each based on a specific class or caste. Trotsky argued that his tendency, the Left Opposition, represented the internationalist traditions of the working class. The tendency led by Joseph Stalin was described as being in the centre, based on the state and party bureaucracy, tending to shift alliances between the left and the right. The right tendency was identified with the supporters of Nikolai Bukharin and Rykov. It was asserted that they represented the influence of the peasantry and the danger of capitalist restoration
if you were from there, you would know this. but since you rely on peopel using you to tell you stuff, they conveniently leave out history your too incurious to look up… every leftist that uses those terms is a useful idiot and reveals it to party people. who uses terms they dont understand and spit like stupid? knowlegeable people who love freedom? nope, morons woh are no smarter than parrots and who believe liars who claim that their lives will be better once they have no choice, no rights, and no abiolity to change their station
It was further argued that these three tendencies (a working-class “left”, a bureaucratic “centre” and a peasant-oriented “right”) could be found in many of the major Communist Parties throughout the world. Indeed, a “left wing” which agreed with Trotsky and supported world revolution could be found in almost every section of the Communist International (Comintern), just as representatives of Stalinism and the idea of “Socialism in One Country” could also be found
bet this is all news to you… since you think right wingers are not socialists… duh. they ARE… as the international scene left no space for antyning but socialism
take a look at this picture from the period before stalin changed the labels for the idiots like you:
http://www.sovietstory.com/wp-content/uploads/2008/10/stalin-hitler.jpg (i would display it but its not allowed)
here are some pictures of soviet men turning jews over to the german SS
its the same freaking thing dummy… you will never see that your the same party as hitler and stalin and that hitler modeled his game after stalin and red terror… but why would you know history, you can just parrot the party line and pretend your brain cellls work
Stalin and his “centre” faction had initially allied with Bukharin and the Right Opposition in order to defeat Trotsky and the Left. However, once Trotsky was out of the way and the Left Opposition had been sidelined, Stalin turned on his former allies. Bukharin and the Right Opposition were, in their turn, sidelined and removed from important positions within the Communist Party and the Soviet government.
Bukharin was isolated from his allies abroad, and, in the face of increasing Stalinist repression, was unable to mount a sustained struggle against Stalin. Unlike Trotsky, who built an anti-Stalinist movement, Bukharin and his followers within the Soviet Union capitulated to Stalin and admitted their “ideological errors”. They were temporarily rehabilitated (though they were not returned to their former prominence, but kept in minor posts), only to be ultimately killed during the Great Purge trials.
now… if you want to talk facts, i can sit all day and let you know of the history you never bothered to learn.
why not read (at marxists.org)
Sergey Nechayev 1869
The Revolutionary Catechism
where do you stand in their heirarchy?
All revolutionaries should have under them second- or third-degree revolutionaries – i.e., comrades who are not completely initiated. these should be regarded as part of the common revolutionary capital placed at his disposal.
[people to be used who are never a real part of things but think they are]
The fourth category comprises ambitious office-holders and liberals of various shades of opinion. The revolutionary must pretend to collaborate with them, blindly following them, while at the same time, prying out their secrets until they are completely in his power. They must be so compromised that there is no way out for them, and then they can be used to create disorder in the State.
[thats you… use them and their hopes and desire, then you can get rid of them after things are finished]
and why do they like you greg?
Therefore, in drawing closer to the people, we must above all make common cause with those elements of the masses which, since the foundation of the state of Muscovy, have never ceased to protest, not only in words but in deeds, against everything directly or indirectly connected with the state: against the nobility, the bureaucracy, the clergy, the traders, and the parasitic kulaks.
they like you cause when your not told to shut up, you complain and dislike everyhthing about the life you have and share that dislike like a plague with others that drags down their moral. but once the party finishes and you are in a place even worse, they need you to shut up, which is why you then end up gone
Why should we have gotten involved in Syria? Why should we have worried about Qaddafi?
(side note: am I the only one that gets a different spell-check for Qaddafi each and every time I try to spell his name?)
Qaddafi had shown he would react to strong influence; after Bush took out Hussein, Qaddafi turned over a new leaf… which he flipped right back over when he faced Obama and got his number.
But, Syria and Libya were not threatening the US. Yeah, they murdered their own people, but that, as I said, was a UN responsibility and it was not likely to spill over into other countries, as ISIS is doing.
@Greg: I’m afraid that you don’t get it: The forces that created ISIL are indigenous to the region. They’re deeply embedded in the culture and landscape. They’re part of the place.
the forces your talking bout is the russians… dummy
they have even bragged about it!!!
Terrorism and the Soviet Union
Soviet secret services have been described by GRU defectors Viktor Suvorov and Stanislav Lunev as “the primary instructors of terrorists worldwide”
According to Ion Mihai Pacepa, KGB General Aleksandr Sakharovsky once said: “In today’s world, when nuclear arms have made military force obsolete, terrorism should become our main weapon.” He also claimed that “Airplane hijacking is my own invention”.
Ceausescu also claimed that using planes as weapons was his idea..
as to the continuing using islam after hitler and his grand mufti moments… its well established (but not on the left by the idiots) that russian leader expresed that millions of islamics could crush the west… (And since the communists have no trouble with mass murder when there is no US looking, post western outcomes would easily just exterminate them all once we wont stop them!)
the truth is that people like Osama bin laden were created by russia… and the rest is mostly disenformatzia like aids was created in the US labs (an admitted ploy to hide that the soviets were making anthrax weaponized like the kind that was mailed in the US and killed a number of people)
you really really should study history a lot more…
its much more interesting to talk to real communists than their dupes, as their dupes are not respected, and are being used and wont listen… but russian and chinese communists are much better educated, and know this same stuff and are much more interesting to talk to despite differences… unlike their moronic people pets they dont yell or use funny names or other wacko things the way their useful idiots do, as they dont have huge blanks in their minds to defend their egos from when pointed out!
you have TONS to learn greg… tons.
lets hope you get to learn it at your leisure in your home
and not by force in a camp when things change…
It is very telling that Flopping Aces has Zero (0) articles about the mass migrations of Muslims (like dispersed seeds) across Europe and illegal immigration into European countries.
Also, what Putin wants now it to protect Bashir Al Asad because he wants him to stay until later when he replaces him with his personal puppet and takes over yet another piece of the neighborhood.
Kudos to Trump who did not reply to a question that included the FACT that Obama is a Muslim. Silence speaks volumes. And Trump and millions of others are correct (read about it and see for yourself) about Obama the Muslim.
Furthermore, take most of all of the actions that Obama has taken that one after the other favor Muslims, OPEC, and ISIS (by Obama’s actions and inaction).
1. Steve Jobs was born an Arab (Syrian).
2. Is the current Syrian mass migration an Obama or Arab planned plot to spread or scatter Arabs (Muslim (Islamic) Syrians) throughout Europe? (I’m glad that today they are sending many of them back to Syria.)
3. Steve Jobs, who did NOT invent the iPhone* but helped market it, decided to name the voice search entity Siri (perhaps for Syria). Jobs was Syrian.
4. The Syrian refugees should be placed in a special DMZ in SYRIA to await peaceful negotiations and resolution to the refugee crisis and all of those who have fled should be returned. They want peace; they can have peace back in their homeland, Syria.
5. This mass migration may include not only refugees but also dormant terrorists and Muslims en masse entering and diluting the nature and cultures of European countries such as Germany, France, and others. It has already been stopped by many European countries.
6. It is correct for the European countries to not accept such masses of Syrians into their countries, for in 5 to 10 years the millions that are allowed to enter will become multi-millions.
7. Obama has played into this large scale plot by not providing military support to the Syrian rebels in Syria; thus a situation in which, through some perverted fomentation, Obama has caused the Syrians to leave Syria.
8. Obama, planned or through stupid ignorance, has caused this large scale calamity in Syria, Iraq, Afghanistan, and other Muslim countries to spread these people out like seeds throughout Europe. This mass migration should be controlled so as not to allow terrorists to infiltrate and to soon return the masses to their own countries.
9. It may soon be shown that Husein Obama is currently complicit with the Russians in exacerbating the situation in Syria.
10. It is Obama’s fault that Putin illegally took Crimean territory. It was Obama who refused to send troops in to Ukraine to stand up to Putin. It would have been an easy step because THE UNITED STATES (AS WELL AS RUSSIAN) have a treaty to protect Ukraine from attack or invasion since the Ukraine gave up the old USSR nuclear arsenals. More reason why leaders of many countries don’t see Obama and the U.S. nowadays as a worthy ally.
You’ll recall that Obama promised to help Putin after Obama was elected (ignoring or dragging his feet). And now more than ever Americans should expel Obama, impeach Obama for treason and many other unsavory and illegal actions unbefitting a law abiding, Constitution believing person.
FYI: It is my opinion that Steve Jobs has NEVER invented anything.
British designer, Jonathan Ive, (born February 1967) was also the principal designer of the iMac, titanium and aluminum PowerBook G4, MacBook, unibody MacBook Pro, iPod, iPhone, and iPad.
Telling? Why? FA is like a box of chocolates…
Perhaps you should spend a few minutes completing this simple, do-it-yourself diagnostic test and find your location on the political map. It isn’t a partisan test. It’s better than that. It determines your philosophical position. You actually have one, whether you know it or not.
@Greg: i’m Libertarian Left–in line and agreement with the great Gandhi. Thanks
Republicans were complaining loudly about Obama’s inaction and indecisiveness in Libya in the face of a mounting humanitarian crisis, right up until the point when he finally acted, when he was suddenly exceeding his constitutional powers by acting without first seeking the authority to do so from Congress.
More recently, his formal request to Congress for authority to use military force against ISIL has been pointedly ignored and any debate on the topic suppressed.
As a legislative body, republicans have become insane.
@rich wheeler, #35:
I hadn’t taken the test for a while. I’m still at top-center in the Left Libertarian quadrant. I suppose that explains why some of what Rand Paul said during the debate appeals to me, and why some of what Obama says occasionally doesn’t.
A couple of things. First, who among the Republicans pushed for this? Not all, to be sure. Mostly McCain and Graham. Most, like me, could not see why the US should be involved. Next, just because someone promotes a certain action does not mean or give permission to the President that they can then ignore Constitutional responsibilities.
What is most troubling is that the very thing Obama criticized Bush for, he has no problem committing himself.
Not me! Mata and I were consistent about the devil you know. Then again, Obama did nothing about the humanitarian crisis in Iran 2009.
And yet you can’t refute his claims.
@John: keep your head in the sand like an ostrich, you liberal Democrat