I told you so.
Part of Obama’s “fundamental transformation” of America is to not only marginalize the white race, but now it’s clear that he means to make whitey pay.
I wrote about it here
The Tea Party is a threat to national security, the GOP is a threat, the NRA is a threat, returning vets are a threat. And every one of them is racist. Just ask Eric Holder and Barack Obama. Thus it is critical to be sure they lose their voices in the electoral process in this country. Barack Obama will have then made good on his promise to fundamentally change the US.
Tom Perez is a liar. His view is that whites are not entitled to the same Constitutional protections as other races. His goals are to import millions of latinos, share your prosperity with them and marginalize the white race in this country. This is all part of the Obama Fundamental Transformation of the United States of America.
Obama is flooding the country with illegal aliens and blocking their deportation. Since 9-11, Muslim immigration has exploded. The FBI can’t keep up. Illegals are killing Americans routinely and we can’t get rid of them.
Now Obama plots to make the lives of Caucasians in America miserable.
Unbeknown to most Americans, Obama’s racial bean counters are furiously mining data on their health, home loans, credit cards, places of work, neighborhoods, even how their kids are disciplined in school — all to document “inequalities” between minorities and whites.
This Orwellian-style stockpile of statistics includes a vast and permanent network of discrimination databases, which Obama already is using to make “disparate impact” cases against: banks that don’t make enough prime loans to minorities; schools that suspend too many blacks; cities that don’t offer enough Section 8 and other low-income housing for minorities; and employers who turn down African-Americans for jobs due to criminal backgrounds.
Big Brother Barack wants the databases operational before he leaves office, and much of the data in them will be posted online.
This information will serve as the fuel for endless litigation against white people in the US:
Count on a flood of private lawsuits to piggyback federal discrimination claims, as civil-rights lawyers use the new federal discipline data in their legal strategies against the supposedly racist US school system.
Even if no one has complained about discrimination, even if there is no other evidence of racism, the numbers themselves will “prove” that things are unfair.
Such databases have never before existed. Obama is presiding over the largest consolidation of personal data in US history. He is creating a diversity police state where government race cops and civil-rights lawyers will micromanage demographic outcomes in virtually every aspect of society.
The first black president, quite brilliantly, has built a quasi-reparations infrastructure perpetually fed by racial data that will outlast his administration.
Obama plainly said that he intended to “fundamentally transform” the United States. Without question it his goal to reduce Caucasians to a minority and sharply diminish their influence while wringing from them every bit of cash possible and elevating the presence of Islam in America. Allen West:
“This is my clear and succinct message to white Americans. How long will it be before ‘you people’ realize you have elevated someone to the office of president who abjectly despises you – not to mention his henchman Holder. Combined they are the most vile and disgusting racists – not you.”
@Rich Wheeler: Didn’t realize you were a vegan.
I had a homemade veggie sandwich today……homemade 21 seeded bread, avocado, alfalfa sprouts, tomato, cucumber, red onion, lettuce…..all homegrown in a small side garden of raised beds (because of the rabbits).
But I’m planning local raised lamb tomorrow. (Native Ute owned ranch)
And local raised beef steak day after that. (Asian owned ranch)
Sometimes I let other people have all the fun of hunting them and/or killing and cleaning them.
Although a local shooting on our block in LB, Ca., was a big motivator to leaving CA, it was the ambient noise of the neighborhood that was really getting on my nerves.
Add to that the now-legal chickens and goats (as long as they are at least 10 FEET from your neighbor’s property) and the noise was only bound to get much worse.
It was already as high as the sound of an airport at times.
Well, you’ve more than consumed your allotment of Obama Kool-Aid, haven’t you? The numbers put out by [left leaning] Pew are the bogus numbers the Administration is trying to convince morons like you are true. They are not. The Obama administration counts even those illegals who set one foot into the Rio Grande and are turned back by the Border Patrol, counting them as “deportations” when that has never been done before. It’s all so the bean counters can make Obama look tough on illegal immigration as he releases felon illegal aliens into our communities who go on to murder Americans.
“Jeh Johnson, President Obama’s new secretary of the Department of Homeland Security, this week admitted that “a very large fraction” of deportations aren’t really that but instead “turn-backs” at the border.
During questioning on Capitol Hill, Johnson confirmed that his agency’s use of border security metrics inflate the reported number of deportations of illegal immigrants – statistics for which Obama takes heat from the left even though true deportations actually are down sharply.
“We managed to remove 368,000 people last year and my understanding is that 98 percent of those fit within our removal priorities,” Johnson noted Tuesday at a DHS budget hearing before the House Appropriations Committee (beginning at 1:50 in this video).
Seconds earlier, however, Johnson had conceded that “a very large fraction of that 368,000, and I don’t know the number offhand … are basically border removals, where they’re apprehended in or around the border” and are “in the country for a very short period of time.”
This prompted Rep John Culberson (R–Texas) to say that fraction tops 50 percent as he questioned DHS’s methods of calculating removals.
“Under the Obama administration, more than half of those removals that were attributed to ICE [Immigration and Customs Enforcement] were actually the result of Border Patrol arrests,” Culberson said. “They wouldn’t have been counted in prior administrations.”
“Right,” Johnson conceded, later also noting that “apprehension levels at the border have been going down recently.”
“So you really can’t actually use that number,” Culberson challenged, calling attention to Obama’s statement in 2011 that the deportation statistics are “deceptive” because “apprehending folks at the border and just sending them back” is “counted as a deportation.” He added:
“That’s never been done before in previous administrations. I know that the Bush administration never counted folks that were removed by the Border Patrol as being deported by ICE.”
Johnson’s remarks came on the heels of his appearance at another House hearing earlier this month during which Rep. Lamar Smith (R–Texas) blasted the Obama administration’s claims of record-breaking deportation numbers even though “turn-backs” at the border are included in the figure.”
But hey, you keep hollering “whoop, whoop, whoop” when it comes to Obama. It only shows that you will believe anything.
What you see regarding who I am, through the delusional leftwing blinders you insist on wearing, is as irrelevant as it is wrong. Trotting out the ridiculous “white privilege” nonsense, as you falsely characterize whatever success or affluence I may have as if it is solely the color of my skin that I have such, rather than the decades of hard work in which I have engaged, is arguably racist. Take up your bogus strawman inference with the Washington Post editorial page. The fact that Obama, as president, took it upon himself to politicize the deaths of 2 black hoodlums (Martin and Brown) whose personal decisions to act violently led to their deaths, while completely ignoring Kathyrn Steinle’s murder, sends a political message that white lives don’t matter as much as the lives of blacks.
@Greg: Greggie Greggie Greggie, I know you don’t share my opinion and I could care less because you and I will both have to answer for our choices in life. My point is if a woman wants, in my opinion, to commit murder she can because in our country she has a choice. But and this is where my rights should be just as important as any citizen in this country and protected by the Constitution at least up to this date is that I believe this is murder and I should NOT be forced to pay for it!! Just like I should NOT be forced to pay welfare for those who break my countries laws an enter my country illegally!! Your President and sadly mine has made every citizens life a little more at risk because of his failed policies and his belief we should allow 11 million illegals to be granted immunity and open our borders to those who can just walk across them. If you try and blame Republicans for lack of resources then your the fool based upon such waste!! Obola is a failed President and I do NOT support the idea of Sanctuary Cities that cost American lives!!
I can understand why people eventually come to the conclusion that there’s simply no point attempting to have rational discussions with people such as yourself. Basically, you’re no different than the Taliban. You just have a different set of inflexible positions and rules that everyone else must accept or be made to live by. You’ll talk about personal freedoms, the the limits are set by what you believe and what you think is proper.
You or I can define a 12-week-old fetus as we like. What matters is how the person who is pregnant defines it. In my opinion a person has a fundamental right to sovereign control over their own body. That includes a right to terminate a pregnancy. It’s that person’s body and that person’s moral decision. Period. Whether you or I approve is immaterial. Some people would mandate the protection of the rights of a “baby” from the moment of conception. Individual rights have to be defended from such people. It doesn’t matter how passionately they hold their opinions. That isn’t a measure of their truth, or of the weight they should carry in the public discourse. Suicide bombers passionately hold their opinions. That doesn’t make them right. It makes them fanatics.
Gregg on a rant again
Do I get to define who is legal to have sex with if I believe 12 is adult enough
That fetus isn’t human it’s just a thing that doesn’t feel pain
Does the fetus have any recourse if mom wants to do crack while pregnant because it’s moms body
What total bs
It’s just all about me, no responsibility but what their wishes are or how society can help them
Responsibility is not getting pregnant in the first place but the liberal argument is that people are too stupid to curb their lustful libidos
Blah blah blah
Yep the left turns everyone into needy children
Perhaps you should first explain how your hypothetical question about having sex with 12-year-old children relates to the assertion that a woman has a fundamental, inalienable right to exercise sovereign control of <em<her own body.
Your opinion that she looses this sovereign right owing to a failure to conduct herself as you deem proper is presumptuous bullshit. Who makes anyone accountable to you for failure to observe your rules?
Because it’s all about what liberals define as themselves
No morals other than what they decide is right for them .
They bear no responsibility for their actions but society does
If she doesn’t want to have a child she can damn we’ll take necessary precautions before hand using her own money or keep her legs shut
But no Gregg the liberal female bears no responsibility in killing her fetus because she was too irresponsible to do the right thing on the first place
By the way you want us to pay for said abortions and subsidize is through sharing medical costs but want us to shut up about it
Where’s our recourse Gregg
Very presumptive of you to lay this cost on us and then bitch about accountability
Blah blah blah no responsibility other than what you can get your neighbor to pay gor
If she has inalienable rights to her body why does anyone else have to support what she does or support what comes out of that body?
By your logic we are all condemned to indentured servitude.
Heartbeat within days.
Brain activity in 40 days
Obama: Economic Justice ‘Remains Our Great Unfinished Business’
Boom goes the dynamite
Complete lack of self-awareness glaringly displayed here vis a vis the pro-homogamy lobby going jihad demanding complete submission to their ideology, under pain of government fines and legal harassment.
Not that abortion is the original topic of this thread, but the “its her body to do with as she chooses” doesn’t hold water from a scientific standpoint, when she is choosing to terminate the unique and separate DNA-having developing human that is inside her uterus. The developing human that the butchers of Planned Parenthood crush in a manner to harvest their human organs for profit….
Listen carefully to this man:
He’s talking about how the Feds sweeten the deal (temporarily) so that small towns, rural counties and Northern states (like Minnesota) are tempted into accepting tens of thousands of immigrants who refuse to assimilate.
He’s warning of the high price tag which is only starting to come due locally.
He points out how many immigrants are being pushed into places you’d never imagine, like little towns in Minn. with many and varied bad consequences.
It isn’t that they are brown and Minn. was white.
It’s the forms of Islam they bring, the jihad, the attitude that not working, but living off the infidel is deserved because they are superior as Muslims.
@DrJohn: Tom won’t get it… Tom won’t allow himself to get it for, then, he will realize he is in the same boat as the rest of us (assuming Tom is white).
Assuming Tom is black, he is obviously relishing the moment of using the power of government to stomp down on those who, mostly, supported the elimination of that practice on others.
In Obama’s agenda, he ignores the fact that had it not been for some powerful white allies (allies that were not of HIS party), blacks could not have achieved their civil rights. All whites are lumped into the category of the wealthy land-owner enslaving the powerless. In the past, that was called bigotry, prejudice and racism.
A woman has a fundamental, inalienable right to exercise sovereign control over her own body. This is not a scientific principle. It’s a fundamental moral tenet. Without it, there can be no true social equality between men and women.
The state has no business compelling a woman to continue a pregnancy and give birth against her will. The state has no business becoming the instrument of any religion or church that would compel a woman to continue a pregnancy and give birth against her will. Not in America, at least.
@Greg: The woman had the choice you refer to is when she spreads her legs and becomes pregnant, at that point she made here choice. Now if another life is created she can choose to abort but why Greggie should others have to pay for it??
According to who? According to you, or to some preacher, or to some politician trolling for votes? Do you feel you need the help of the church and the state to keep your women in line?
Supporting the freedom to choose is not an endorsement of the particular choices people make. It’s an endorsement of the freedom itself. It establishes a line around an individual’s private life that the state or church may not cross. Some people don’t seem to want such an inviolable boundary to exist, even if it’s as close as a person’s skin.
So you think that only religious people are against abortion? That point of view only shows, once again, what a total idiot you are.
“There was a time when the lines seemed clearer and the slogans said everything. Pro-lifers were Jesus-loving Pope-followers with a passion for sticking rosaries on ovaries, and atheists were quick to respond with “Keep your theology off my biology!”
But then lines began to blur. Atheist and civil libertarian journalist Nat Hentoff said that “Being without theology isn’t the slightest hindrance to being pro-life.” Atheist philosophy professor Don Marquis declared abortion is “immoral” because it denies developing fetuses “a future like ours.” The host of CFI’s Point of Inquiry, Robert M. Price, author of books like Jesus is Dead and The Case Against the Case for Christ, called abortion “second-degree murder” on one of his podcasts.
Well, at least we still have the “Four Horsemen” safely in our ranks, right? Not quite. Even our beloved Christopher Hitchens considered “the occupant of the womb as a candidate member of society.” He also argued that “the unborn entity has a right on its side” and identified himself as involved with the pro-life movement.
What the heck are we atheists supposed to do with all our “Keep your rosaries…” stickers now?”
That was written by the president of Pro-Life Humanists.
Tell me, Greggie Goebbles, have you ever witnessed an abortion? Did it thrill you to watch a tiny human being being ripped from its mother’s womb? There’s an arm, oh, and fingers, Next the leg. Look at the tiny toes. How about that head? Isn’t that crush job great? Now it looks like a clump of cells. See how soft the skull was? Now you can’t tell the point where the eyes were from where the nose was. It’s dead now. Throw it in the trash can. You know, the one labeled “Medical Waste“.
What a pathetic excuse you are for a human being. Somewhere you lost your humanity for the cause of radical leftist agenda. I would say “shame on you” but you have proven too many times that you are incapable of shame.
Like I said before: you would have made a great Nazi.
In 1943, the Nazis made providing abortion services to any Aryan woman a capital offense. They would have loved your views.
A case of curious reversals.
And like the Nazis, your humanity is in the eye of the beholder. You view unborn babies as not human. The Nazis viewed the Jews, homosexuals and gypsies the same way.
So your view that an unborn human is not really human is no different than theirs. You just support the annihilation of a different sub-group.
Get better talking points, Gullible Greggie; you’re failing miserably, which you are wont to do with regularity.
Now, answer the question; have you ever personally witnessed an abortion? Or are you going to hide again pretending that it will go unnoticed that you continue to refuse to answer questions while you seem to think others should answer yours?
And why are you here so much? Do you not have a job, a hobby or a family? I would imagine you are a pretty lonely person since you post here so often. How sad.
@Greg: Greggie Greggie Greggie, what about the freedoms provided me under the Constitution? Please tell me why I should pay for a woman’s choice to murder her unborn child?
@Common Sense, #73:
You aren’t paying for abortions. The Hyde Amendment has specifically banned the use of federal money to fund abortion services for the past 38 years.
Abortions account for only around 3 percent of the women’s health services that are provided by Planned Parenthood. In some locations, it is the only readily available source of the other 97 percent of reproductive health care services it provides.
So exactly how does Planned Parenthood separate the 1/2 billion dollars they receive from the federal government via taxpayer dollars to make sure they are not using any of that money for abortions? Come on, Gullible Greggie, show what a tax genius you are by explaining that.
Then if they shut down their abortions operations, they are not really going to be hurt, are they? So why fight so hard to slaughter babies if they are not really benefitting financially?
Oh, that’s right; you don’t answer questions. Because you have to go to the internet do try to find one and when you can’t, you just move on.
You’re a pathetic joke.
If govt subsidizes planned parenthood than yes we are.
You can’t compartmentalize money it’s like saying no German Jewish tax dollars went to the death camps because it only accounted for 1.5 percent of tax revenue
What bs logic
That is why I call him Greggie Gobbels. He’s just a mouthpiece (albeit not a very intelligent one) for the far left.
Greggie is such a good little Nazi.
@Greg: Greggie Greggie Greggie, does Planned Parenthood segment their abortion payments from the government so the Hyde Amendment is properly administered?
I would guess they utilize a complex accounting tool known as arithmetic.
What are you arguing? That specific, individual dollars form a magical link of culpability between a particular taxpayer and a particular expenditure that he or she disapproves of? Pardon my saying, but that’s a goofy premise. Dollars paid in taxes become anonymous once they’re gone into the general revenue. The only way to sort them is arithmetically. They have no individual identity.
Private sector donations to Planned Parenthood are more than sufficient to cover the 3 percent of its budget that funds abortion services. You do realize that Planned Parenthood is a non-profit organization that receives private donations, I assume. Maybe you’re so busy hating the organization that you’ve never bothered to check.
First of all, no one says that anymore. Second, this link proves nothing but your inability to mount an argument in your own words. Seems par for the course since most of your posts are cobbled together from whatever you find floating around on Internet that you use to build a shaky argument for your foregone conclusion. Obama’s understanding of the history of African Americans is hardly radical. On domestic issues he is squarely in the liberal Democrat tradition and nothing he advocates would seem strange coming from Hilary Clinton or Elizabeth Warren or any number of liberal Democrats. Except of course, he’s black and that’s the thing you can’t get over and need to keep coming back to (well, that and his Muslim background). You’re just throwing sh*t at the wall hoping something will stick. I guarantee you would never in a million years put your real name behind garbage like this if you thought it would get back to a former African American colleague or patient.
So basically, you remain clueless.
Let me tell you how it works in the real world (not the world of humanist idealistic progressives): if you live in a house but have a garage out back that you use to run a charity, you don’t get to put donations to that charity in your household account. You also don’t get to guess what percentage of your light bill goes to the building used for the charity (a good way to get audited by the IRS). You have to be quite specific about what the expenses for the charity are.
Now, PP is a “charity” (a bastardization of the word if ever there was one). You claims they can separate out the money spend on abortion facilities. Since their buildings house not only the other services they provide, but the abortion facilities as well, how do they know what the portion of their light bill goes strictly to the abortion facility?
BINGO! Greggie. Once that money goes into the federal coffers, there is NO way to determine where they come from. And there is no way for PP to separate any funding/donations they garner to apply specifically to abortion services.
I know they are a 501(c)3 that should not be allowed to charge for their services (which they do) if they are a charity. Do you think the Salvation Army charges for their services?
If it were left up to me, I would shut down every PP building in the U.S. and I would start with their largest building which is located in Houston in Sheila Jackson-Lee’s district which is almost exclusively BLACK. So Congratulations, you’re supporting a organization who builds their largest clinics in black neighborhoods so they can continue with Margaret Sanger’s goal of eugenics by killing black babies.
How do you know? Have you polled all 314 million people in the U.S.?
There is hardly anything “traditional” about the progressive viewpoints of Hillary Clinton, Elizabeth Warren (fake Cherokee) or even Obama. They are so far from the “tradition” of FDR or JFK that the two previous Presidents would not recognize them as part of the Democratic Party.
No, Obama is a mulatto. His linage is just as much white as it is black. But like you, he decided there was power in the race card.
Pete, I find it sad that you’re such a rigidly close-minded ideologue, because I know that you’re also a very intelligent, articulate and (in some matters) very thoughtful person. You’re empathy is deep in certain channels and seemingly non-existent in others. In regards to Obama’s views on the current African American experience, and more specifically the experience of black males vis a vis those the State endows with lethal power, there is a premise and stated potential solutions. I don’t expect you to agree with Obama’s prescriptions for the problems, but you insists in denying the premise entirely, sticking to old right wing talking points. You are losing that argument, even on your side. The evidence is too overwhelming. Rand Paul and Rick Perry, to name two prominent Republicans, to their credit have both more or less granted that Obama’s basic premise is valid, while disagreeing, of course, on what to do about it. You are being left behind, Pete. When someone like you, who posseses the intellect some of these fellow commenters here will never have, refuses to objectively look at the same overwhelming evidence that Paul and Perry have contended with, and you still come down on the side of ignorance and intolerance, you seem – at best – a rabid ideologue. And at worst you’re allied with people who just hate black people. If Rick Perry can’t hide from the truth anymore, I fail to see how you can.
Yes, I did. And, don’t have a cow, man, but only old morons thought it was still a cool zinger.
Didn’t see your answer. Do you have any kids?
How many kids do you have, Tom?
I stated that they don’t spend more on the 3 percent of their total budget that goes toward providing abortion services than they receive from non-governmental sources. Hence, money they receive from governmental sources is not being used to pay for or subsidize abortion services.
See how that works? It’s a rudimentary exercise in logic—which may be an unfamiliar concept to you—and simple arithmetic.
That is true of all money going into federal coffers. Nobody’s personal tax dollars are marked for physical tracking purposes. The only possible indicator is whether other funds are received sufficient to cover abortion service costs. If there are more than sufficient funds from other sources—which is the case—no federal support or subsidy exists. If there were less than sufficient funds, Planned Parenthood would be in violation of the Hyde Amendment. We would rather quickly hear about it from the anti-choice side of the argument.
I do not. This isn’t relevant to my thinking. I like children. I worry about those of the future as well as the present. (Environmental concerns stem from that.) Generally speaking, children are far more worthy of our care, attention, support, and protection than adults. Children aren’t to blame for the screwed up state of the world or any of its evils. Adults, who should know better, are to blame.
Why do you care? let me guess, I’m a terrible parent if I don’t subscribe to your brand of race-based fear? Let me explain something to you. We don’t need to know who is white or black, married or single, who has a gay uncle or whose Aunt Myrtle was mugged. Just do your best to express your viewpoint without lying. That is least your readers should expect from you.
Why are you afraid to admit you have no kids?
So you have no kids either
Correct. I have not contributed to the 7-billion-and-rapidly-growing global population. I suppose that means that all of the taxes I have paid have benefited the futures of others.
It’s irrelevant. If I have kids does it change whether or not you can defend your premise? (Obviously not.)
Since you’re asking personal questions, why don’t you publish behind your full name?
It explains everything to me. You should asking yourself how I knew
How I knew you were wrong? Lol.
No govt entity should support any private charity for any reason.
Corruption is almost guaranteed and said charity becomes a funnel for funds for one party or the other
Still spewing the bs that because govt doesn’t 100 percent fund pp that the 3% they get doesn’t fund abortions and then the logic word is reared again
Well logic indicates your argument is weak and only those desiring of being bs’d or continuing the govt benefit express would believe it
Same type of logic p p is using to justify that because they are a non profit they haven’t actually violated the law in selling body parts.
Liberals believe their smarter than everyone else when their arguments show them to be envious perennial children trapped in an adults body taking no responsibility but believing it is their right to make you responsible for them
Exactly. You’re are proving my point, although you are not smart enough to realize it.
There is no way that PP can specifically state that certain dollars are targeted to specific services. Look up the word fungible.
But it doesn’t matter. PP is a heinous organization that believes that a woman should have the right to abort a child right up to the minute of natural delivery. If it is in the birth canal, a woman should still be able to abort it.
That is sick. And you are one sick puppy for agreeing with them. You tried playing the “religion” card, but then, I showed you the error of that thinking.
Still waiting on your answer: have you ever personally witnessed an abortion, Greggie Goebbels?
You seem to be confused. Freedom to choose places full responsibility directly on the person who makes the choice. To surrender choice is one way of avoiding a sense of personal responsibility.
There is no such thing as “certain dollars.”
So which neighborhood are you shopping in for your ocean front property?
Freedom to choose does not place responsibility on said chooser
Do they then get to choose who of their neighbors subsidize their medical care or the cost of their abortions
Does that show they are accepting responsibility or passing the buck our way
How bout us paying for their birth control
Yep the responsibility of their choice is boundless
By the way they are not surrendering their choice, they have the choice to
Pay for their own birth control
Pay for the choice or consequences of having sex
Pay for the cost of killing their child
Choose to participate in the bad behavior which gets them into whatever trouble their actions got them in
That’s freedom of choice
Making their neighbors pay is not a choice it’s tyranny
But since liberals accept no responsibility they are ok with
Imposing their tyranny onto someone else enslaving them to give up a portion of their productivity to be sharecroppers for the entitled
Under US law, unfortunately, the slaughter of the separate human in the womb is ” legal”, just as it was once “legal” under US law to own slaves. Neither legality is the least bit moral.
What is even more heinous, is that those with valid moral compunction against this holocaust are forced via US taxpayer funding, to pay for the killing of the ultimate innocents.