Hey, let’s play connect the Hillary dots

Loading

hillary evil_smile

 

OK, here’s the game. I’ll supply you with a partial list of countries that donated to the Clinton Foundation. You get to locate them on the list of The Best and Worst Places for Women as posted by the Daily Beast.

The list is here.

Ready?

Algeria

Morocco

Saudi Arabia

Qatar

Haiti

Kuwait

Brunei

See what’s really important to the Clintons- women’s rights or money. OK? Go!

 

Golly, could it be she’d ignore the abuse of women in exchange for donations and steer foreign policy accordingly?

 

Is there any doubt?

0 0 votes
Article Rating
Subscribe
Notify of
22 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments

*Algeria

is a transit and, to a lesser extent, a destination and source country for women subjected to forced labor and sex trafficking.

Algeria does not fully comply with the minimum standards for the elimination of trafficking and is not making significant efforts to do so.
Religions:
Muslim (official; predominantly Sunni) 99%, other (includes Christian and Jewish) <1% (2012 est.)

*Morocco

is a source, destination, and transit country for men, women, and children who are subjected to forced labor and sex trafficking; Moroccan adults and children are exploited for forced labor and forced prostitution in the Middle East and Europe; some Moroccan girls recruited to work as maids experience conditions of forced labor, while some Moroccan boys experience forced labor when working as apprentices in the artisan and construction industries and in mechanic shops; women and children from sub-Saharan Africa and South Asia who voluntarily enter Morocco are subsequently coerced into prostitution or, less frequently, forced domestic service.

Morocco does not comply with the minimum standards for the elimination of trafficking. Morocco continues to lack a single comprehensive anti-trafficking law.

Religions:
Muslim 99% (official; virtually all Sunni, <0.1% Shia), other 1% (includes Christian, Jewish, and Baha'i), Jewish about 6,000 (2010 est.)

*Saudi Arabia

is a destination country for men and women subjected to forced labor and, to a lesser extent, forced prostitution; many men and women from Central Asia, the Middle East, and Africa.

Saudi Arabia does not fully comply with the minimum standards for the elimination of trafficking and is not making significant efforts to do so.

Religions:
Muslim (official; citizens are 85-90% Sunni and 10-15% Shia)

*Qater

is a destination country for men, women, and children subjected to forced labor.
Foreign female domestic workers are particularly vulnerable to trafficking because of their isolation in private homes and lack of protection under Qatari labor laws; some women who migrate for work are also forced into prostitution.
Foreign workers experience situations of forced labor, including debt bondage, delayed or nonpayment of salaries, confiscation of passports, abuse, hazardous working conditions, and squalid living arrangements.
Qatar is doubling their number of labor inspectors, closing some recruitment firms, and implementing anti-trafficking awareness campaigns; authorities identified some trafficking victims and provided them with shelter and other protection services; the government did not reform the exploitive sponsorship system, prosecute or convict any trafficking offenders, or rigorously enforce laws prohibiting employers from wage and passport withholding.

Religions:
Muslim 77.5%, Christian 8.5%, other (includes mainly Hindu and other Indian religions) 14%

*Haiti

is a source, transit, and destination country for men, women, and children subjected to forced labor and sex trafficking; many of Haiti’s trafficking cases involve children recruited to live with families in other towns in the hope of going to school but who instead become forced domestic servants known as restaveks; restaveks are vulnerable to abuse and make up a large proportion of Haiti’s population of street children, who are forced into prostitution, begging, and street crime by violent gangs; Haitians are exploited in forced labor in the Dominican Republic, elsewhere in the Caribbean, South America, and the US, and some Dominican women are forced into prostitution in Haiti; women and children living in camps for internally displaced people since the 2010 earthquake are at increased risk of sex trafficking and forced labor.
21% of all children between 5 and 14 are working as child laborers.

Religions:
Roman Catholic 80%, Protestant 16%

*Kuwait

is a destination country for men and women subjected to forced labor and, to a lesser degree, forced prostitution from India, Egypt, Bangladesh, Syria, Pakistan, the Philippines, Sri Lanka, Indonesia, Nepal, Iran, Jordan, Ethiopia, Ghana, Iraq, Lebanon, and Kenya.

Kuwait does not fully comply with the minimum standards for the elimination of trafficking and is not making sufficient efforts to do so; no efforts were made to prosecute or convict trafficking offenders using the 2013 anti-trafficking law or other laws addressing trafficking crimes; victim protection measures remained weak particularly due to a lack of proactive victim identification procedures and non-enforcement of the law prohibiting sponsors from withholding workers’ passports.

Religions:
Muslim (official) 76.7%, Christian 17.3%, other and unspecified 5.9%
note: represents the total population; about 69% of the population consists of immigrants (2013 est.)

*Brunei

has thousands of stateless people. These permanent residents and their families have lived in Brunei for generations but obtaining citizenship is difficult, owning land for them is illegal.

Religions:
Muslim (official) 78.8%, Christian 8.7%, Buddhist 7.8%, other (includes indigenous beliefs) 4.7%

The Clintons shame those of us grateful for being born in the USA.
By taking the cash of such horrid kleptocrats they put the lie to being even vaguely interested in women’s rights, human rights or the poor.

(All above quotes from World Factbook)

It can’t be doubted but it WILL be ignored.

but she has to pay her bills. when the clinton’s left the wipe house, he/she transfer over 29 million to AK. in two vans.

HEY !! these are all allies of the USA in its war on terror (except Haiti)
Nan seemed to have no problem with Bush (!&2) both invading Iraq to help Kuwait Saudi Arabia Qatar et.al. or unnamed Afghanistan. What binds the USA to these Islamic countries? Most often it is oil/gas. And fossil fuel companies are the main political contributors to which political party ?

@mos 8541: MOS 8541 could you cite a source that the Clinton’s shipped 29 million in a van to Alaska? That whole thing just seems too weird. How is it that YOU have this special knowledge of what the Clinton’s do?
Alaska ? wtf? Are you implying that Palin is involved? Your post is just too funny, it even calls into question your nic

@john:

HEY !! these are all allies of the USA in its war on terror…. etc etc

Apparently left wing blind partisanship is a brain fungus that eats away at the logic centers of the brain.

Heh. President Clinton. Get use to it losers.

@Msefgeee:

Heh. President Clinton. Get use to it losers.

So you are on record supporting a known liar that sells US influence to foreign entities and someone that would rather see an Ambassador killed than take politically unpopular actions. Got it.

@Bill: i’m on record as NOT supporting HRC for Prez
We all know of Bill’s inclination for the ladies
What the heck is in the water Conservatives are drinking–adulteres like Sanford,.Ensign,Vitter,and Gingrich–boys will be boys.
But how bout your Conservatives who LIKE BOYS–guys like Craig. Foley and now Hester. “Family value ” preachers like Swaggert and Haggard.
To name a few–your thoughts on this Conservative “gene”?.

@rich wheeler:

What the heck is in the water Conservatives are drinking–adulteres like Sanford,.Ensign,Vitter,and Gingrich–boys will be boys.

I guess they are adulterers like Kennedy, Kennedy, Kennedy, Edwards, Hart, Clinton, etc…. except, to our knowledge, none of the Republicans being naughty got anyone killed… then went on to continue a successful (in that he got reelected multiple times) political career.

Yet, what exactly does that have to do with selling US influence? Grasping at straws due to a weak field, like Hillary going after Rubio’s driving record, for God’s sake? How weak, frightened, paranoid and slimy is THAT?!? Particularly from someone who can’t even DRIVE a car (gets chauffeured everywhere… you know, a real person of the people) and someone who is herself mired in multiple deep scandals?

You may want us to believe you won’t support Hellary, but unless you back the Republican (which you have not the common sense to do), you WILL back Hellary.

Dr.J, “a partial list of countries “ — no kidding, partial list.

Just look at the deal that set Clinton and Giustra into the financial stratosphere. The multi-billion dollar deal they did in Kazakhstan, a nation under the iron fist of an opressive and ruthless dictatorship, under the full control of the military and Nazarbayev, . . . filled Clinton’s and Giustra coffers better than any deal either had ever done.

Not a soul on the “Street” didn’t know that as former President of The United States, Clinton’s business card opened any and all doors around the world that controlled valuable raw materials.

Guistra had made his money as a “Howe Street” (Vancouver) broker. He knew what he was doing when it came to flipping resource deals. Clinton didn’t have to do much, other than enjoy traveling in some of the best private planes money could buy, and indulging in whatever side benefits were made available to him PLUS adding hundreds of millions of dollars to his piggy bank called a “foundation.” It was brilliant. Almost.

Greed seems to have a way of pushing abusers into overdoing it, particularly when no one is questioning the game, or looking into it with diligent, inquisitive probes.

And that was only one deal, of many.

The absence of MORALS and PRINCIPALS that propped-up dictators in countries like Kazakhstan, enhancing their standing in their countries and on the world stage, plus making them even richer as they abuse their people, is applauded by too many on the left because they believe the END justifies THE MEANS.

You can connect your dots later and try to figure out how they led straight to the White House.

@James Raider: Kazakstan is your example? Borat should initiate a coup.

@Jeff D: Only a complete moron would elect a corrupt, proven liar, incompetent, money-whore to the Presidency.

@Bill: And that’s why Sarah Palin will never be POTUS—Thanks Bill.

@rich wheeler: Yeah, Rich. Right. Look, no amount of diversion is going to mask the fact that the Democrats have one huge joke of a field of candidates. Even the ignorant Palin-bashing can’t do it.

Perhaps you should try calling people racists? Don’t you think that always works?

@Bill: Why doesn’t Palin have the guts to take on HRC .Pls don’t use lamestream media excuse.
Bashing? lol You’re the best,

@rich wheeler:

@Bill: Why doesn’t Palin have the guts to take on HRC .Pls don’t use lamestream media excuse.
Bashing? lol You’ve the best,

Why are you worried about Palin? Why don’t you worry about why Hellary doesn’t have the guts to face the media? Is she afraid to get a question about the millions of dollars she took in from foreign governments and businesses, then granted favorable treatment and decisions to their interests? Is she afraid she’ll have to answer questions about why she knowing lied about the Benghazi attacks or did nothing to prevent them? Is she afraid she might be asked about her illegal email server and deleting emails without anyone other than her staff seeing them?

BULLETIN!!! Palin ain’t running. You’d best worry about the miserable array of nothing you have lined up against the Republicans if you want this liberal utopia of failure, debt and foreign policy disasters to continue.

@Bill: Repubs will once again self destruct in their circular firing squad. HRC is in— unless Webb decides to run.

I’ll say again Rubio (who the Dems do fear) / Kasich ticket has best chance of beating her—-albeit small.

@rich wheeler:

@Bill: Repubs will once again self destruct in their circular firing squad. HRC is in— unless Webb decides to run.

Once again, I would suggest you worry more about the big bag of nothing you have for candidates than what the wide array of competent choices the Republicans have to choose from.

Hellary is currently getting away with dodging the media and questions about her corruption, scandals and lack of any qualifying accomplishment whatsoever, but how will she be able to avoid facing questions if she wins the nomination and participates in debates? Avoid debates?

Liberals have no problem at all, as we have seen, electing an un-vetted, relatively unknown question mark to the most powerful position in the world. It remains to be seen if you are content with being afraid to demand the answers to pressing questions of improprieties before you elect your next President.

Webb has the chance of a fart in a whirlwind of ever becoming a Presidential candidate for Democrats as long as they lean as far left as they do. You liberals prefer celebrity over capability. If you seriously want Webb as a leader, the entire Democrat party has to drastically change its fabric.