A Comprehensive Look at Who Created ISIS

Loading

Who is to blame for creating ISIS? Everyone seems to want to point fingers.

As the Pentagon and the Obama White House assert that ISIS is on the defensive and even as Ramadi falls into their hands; as Megyn Kelly’s simple question to Jeb Bush- who interviewed without a prepared answer for it- brings about a week-long gotcha game, it’s time to take a good hard look at a comprehensive study of just who or what created ISIS.

It really all boils down to this:

Islam.

0 0 votes
Article Rating
Subscribe
Notify of
53 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments

The Pentagon and the Obama White House assert that ISIS is on the defensive even as Ramadi falls into their hands….

Obama is interested in making sure the News covers ISIS in ways that makes his assertion that ISIS is on the defensive seem more true.

Stop using ISIL footage, Obama administration asks networks
U.S. bombing campaign has militants on the run, U.S. officials say.

Obama’s ”solution” to networks use of ”stock” footage from last summer’s ISIS push…..let us tell you what to show.
While Obama might be ignorant of why the Russians built their Potemkin Village so as to impress their ignorant Empress, our news media are not. This is a bridge too far, allowing government propaganda to pass as news reports on the networks.

As said above, the answer is ISLAM. Short concise and dead on!

As this is a brilliant analysis, one must assume Pam Geller and those who point out this irrefutable fact have also been correct.

Nanny G mentions Obama’s “ignorance. Make no mistake. The man is not ignorant of what is going on as to ISLA! He is dead set for it.

Wow that sure is a nice simple answer !!
Here is another answer to that question
Christians created ISIS
I am not going to believe the danger you all seem to feel so threatened by until high schools here in the USA begin changing ing their mascot names from The Crusaders to The Jihadists
If you are so concerned about Obama not doing something about ISIS. You should go over there and fight them
Why are no Christianists doing that in large numbers
When they are so disappointed in Obama ?

@Wordsmith:

Some frogs need the water to boil before they notice it’s getting hot.

Love the post

Islam is the correct answer as to who created ISIS. More specifically- radical Islam, something many fail to acknowledge exists. And who allowed those JVers, ISIS, to morph into what it has despite warnings from his intelligence community, the Iraqi government, and the Kurds?

Islam and American schools….Let’s see…
Baltimore MD:
Homework assignment,March 25, 2015, included quotes on Islam like the following.
(1) Allah is not the God of Muslims only. He is the God of all people and all creation.
(2) ”Muslims” means” anyone or anything that surrenders itself to the true will of God”. It states by this definition , that everything in nature (trees, animals, plants, etc.) are ”muslims”.

New York:
Muslim Women Present Facts About Islam To Briacliff HS Students
http://briarcliff.dailyvoice.com/schools/muslim-women-present-facts-about-islam-briacliff-hs-students
One nice bit of dawa, kitman and taqyiyya:
“The women explained the Koran tells women to ‘dress modestly,’ which is open to interpretation.”
(More accurately open to your OWNER’s decision regarding how you, as a female, will dress.)

Seattle, WA:
Umm Waqqas, a senior female Isis figure who reportedly helped recruit women to join the extremist group in areas under its self-declared caliphate, has been exposed as a student from Seattle. She is listed as a contact for recruits in a travel document explaining the best methods for reaching territories held by Isis in Syria.

Rhode Island:
Muslim wants $32K in student loan interest wiped out because sharia forbids interest.
“I am offering to pay off the original amount I owe,” Amir graciously offered. As for the rest, he wants his creditors to acknowledge that his “awareness and conditions have changed” since he accepted the loan.
“Can I get the interest wiped out and close this account and case with just paying the original amount borrowed?” Amir asked.
An imam advised him that Muslims who choose to borrow with interest “are obligated to repay their entire debt and if they don’t they will prohibited from entering paradise when they die.”

Nationally:
The Muslim Student Association.
The MSA was founded in the United States in 1963 by members of the Egyptian-based Muslim Brotherhood. The Brotherhood seeks a global Islamic state and has spawned leaders of a series of Sunni terrorist groups, including al-Qaida, Hamas and the Palestinian Islamic Jihad.
The Muslim Brotherhood motto established by founder Hassan al-Banna is, “God is our objective, the Quran is our Constitution, the Prophet is our leader, jihad is our way, and death for the sake of God is the highest of our aspirations.”
MSA members remain faithful to Brotherhood ideology.

MSA alumni who went on to terrorist involvement are:
Anwar al-Awlak
i, an influential American-born al-Qaida cleric who recruited a series of homegrown jihadists before being killed by a U.S. drone strike;
Aafia Siddiqui, convicted of attempted murder and assault on U.S. officers and employees in Afghanistan;
Zachary Chesser, convicted of attempting to provide material support to the Somali terrorist group al-Shabaab and soliciting attacks on “South Park” producers for an episode in which the prophet Muhammad was shown in a bear suit;
Jesse Morton, convicted with Chesser of threatening the South Park producers with murder;
Adam Gadahn, an al-Qaida spokesman who is on the FBI’s Most Wanted List for treason and material support to al-Qaida;
Waheed Zaman, who was convicted of plotting to blow up transatlantic flights;
Adis Medunjanin, who is awaiting trial for plotting to bomb New York subways;
Ramy Zamzam, who was convicted in Pakistan of conspiring to carry out terrorist attacks;
Omar Hammami, who was indicted on charges of providing material support to al-Shabbab and is designated by the U.S. Treasury Department for his terrorist connections;
Muhammad Junaid Babar, who pled guilty to his support to al-Qaida; and
Syed Hashmi, who pled guilty to providing material support to al-Qaida.

Still allege that Islam is not making inroads into our schools?
Only someone ignorant can say such a thing.

ISIS and al Qaeda were not in Iraq until we invaded the country, eliminated its government, and dismantled the military force that was keeping them out. That government and its military were also serving as a regional check against Iran.

I guess we didn’t think much about that, even though our own intelligence agencies were warning our leaders of the dangers. It was necessary to ignore all of that and invade and occupy a nation that hadn’t attacked us, and had no capacity to do so, because ( fill in the blank ).

Writing in the word Islam actually makes about as much sense as writing in flying monkeys. It makes as much sense for the average Muslim to blame everything on Christianity. Doing either is just a simple alternative to thinking about more difficult issues. It’s falling back on dividing the world into Us and Them, which has been a source of trouble since the beginning.

@Greg: http://www.coxandforkum.com/archives/000360.html
The staff [of the 9-11 Commission] seems to be saying: “they appear to have cooperated but….”
The cartoon is priceless.

@Greg:

ISIS and al Qaeda were not in Iraq until we invaded the country, eliminated its government, and dismantled the military force that was keeping them out. That government and its military were also serving as a regional check against Iran.

Wrong, silly and weak. Well, except for ISIS not being there. They were not there until Obama pulled all US troops out of Iraq, weakened the US to the point where all regional nations look to Iran for protection and made such a silly, stupid looking fool of himself with his silly little “red line” head fake.

ISIS is definitely Islamic, but Obama breathed life into its dominance of Iraq and beyond.

But, al Qaeda was in Iraq before the war. Even CBS and NBC reported it so.

Obama is either the most stupid individual to ever occupy the White House or is intentionally allowing dangerous regimes to gather power and deadly capabilities. Which is it, Greg?

There is no credible evidence that al Qaeda had any sort of operational presence in Iraq before the war.

There is no evidence that any collaborative efforts involving the Iraqi government and al Qaeda existed.

ISIS evolved into what it is today because of the U.S. invasion and occupation of Iraq. We gave them a cause that allowed them to recruit thousands of jihadist fighters, and created a power vacuum for them to fill that didn’t previously exist.

That screwed up situation was then handed off to Barack Obama by the Bush administration, after quickly tacking on a timetable for troop withdrawal on their way out the door.

@Greg:

There is no credible evidence that al Qaeda had any sort of operational presence in Iraq before the war.

There is also no credible evidence that al Qaeda had any sort of operational presence until Obama removed all the US troops out of there. It’s Obama’s fault.

@Greg:

What a silly, inaccurate assessment.
ISLAM is the foundation of all terrorism, regardless of how it morphs into variously labelled groups. The twin towers were attacked TWICE before we ever invaded Iraq and Afghanistan. Muslims have been raiding and attacking since ol Mo started the group, and muslims attacked the US from the birth of our nation, without any provocation whatsoever. Sanctions and No Fly zones for years did nothing to stop Hussein, only the invasion did that. It was the idiotic premature removal of US and coalition forces from Iraq that gave birth to ISIS.

@Pete, #13:

What a silly, inaccurate assessment.

What I said was this:

There is no credible evidence that al Qaeda had any sort of operational presence in Iraq before the war.

There is no evidence that any collaborative efforts involving the Iraqi government and al Qaeda existed.

That’s not an assessment. It’s a statement of fact.

Al Qaeda and ISIS were able to move into Iraq because we removed the government and dismantled the military forces that were keeping them out. We simultaneously removed Iran’s biggest military worry. And then the administration that committed these geopolitical blunders locked us into a withdrawal timetable that could not be unilaterally altered.

That’s also a statement of fact.

The right is hellbent on blaming the whole thing on Obama to divert attention from their own bungling incompetence. They won’t take a bit of responsibility for the consequences of their own actions. It would be crazy to put people who have apparently learned absolutely nothing from their mistakes back in power.

@Greg:

According to Iraqi documents, Hussein had extensive ties to al Qaeda prior to 9/11
http://www.weeklystandard.com/Content/Public/Articles/000/000/014/889pvpxc.asp

No Iraq ties to al Qaeda, intelligence failures under Clinton, dispute blame of Bush for 9.11, war with Iraq

DoD Inspector General Report Destroys Claims of Pentagon Intel Manipulation

Zarqawi in Iraq before war
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1986706/posts

You might also check out the various links to Congressional reports of the war. Perhaps what you are convoluting is your own left wing accusations of Iraq being involved in 9/11 or other such stupidity. However, they absolutely was definite proof of al Qaeda in Iraq and of Iraqi WMD’s.

ISIS evolved into what it is today because of the U.S. invasion and occupation of Iraq.

Nope. Stupid, silly and weak again. ISIS evolved from a vacuum of power in the region, created by Obama kicking Qaddafi out of Libya (when he posed no threat to the US), weakening Syria (when they posed no threat to the US) and pulling all US forces from Iraq and the region. As long as there has been radial Islamists, ISIS has existed; Obama paved the boulevard for them to roll across the region on.

Al Qaeda and ISIS were able to move into Iraq because we removed the government and dismantled the military forces that were keeping them out.

Wrong again… you are on a roll, Greg. True, we did that. But, we were not going to leave until they had a strong government and a capable military. Obama decided the time to leave what when he needed headlines and the current dire situation arose from that selfish need.

You will not admit Carter failed the economy because outside factors influenced it. You will not admit Reagan turned that economy around with the same factors in place. You will not admit it was not “Bush economic policies” that caused the 2007 recession (because you would have to identify them to name them), but instead blame Bush for the collapse. You will not blame Obama for failing to meet his promise of turning the economy around in 3 years and, though he brags about all the accomplishments of HIS in the economy, blame him for being responsible for the lowest labor participation rates in decades, the weakest recovery in history or that most of the new jobs are part time jobs. In other words, even when the evidence is clear and undeniable, you will ALWAYS cling to ideology rather than admit facts.

Obama personally and almost single-handedly squandering a victory in Iraq and opening the door to ISIS is no different. The one any only question is, did he do it purposefully to allow the spread of radical Islam or is he just that stupid?

@Greg:

You can try to camouflage the essence of Al Qaeda and ISIS all you want, Greg. The bottom line is they are MUSLIM TERRORIST groups that did not gain such power until AFTER Obama pulled our troops out of Iraq. THAT is a fact. We know for a fact that Iran was supporting Al Qaeda and the Taliban against US forces in Afghanistan and Iraq, including specifically training terrorist vermin in the design of shaped charges, and supplying the materials needed to make IEDs. We were briefed on this during all of my deployments to Iraq and Afghanistan. So Obama trusts them and wants sanctions lifted while the Iranians are working on nuclear weapons? Pardon my complete lack of trust and confidence in the pro-muslim sympathizing idiot in the Oval Office.

Taliban…Al Qaeda..Boko Haram…ISIS….the labels do not hide what they are, Greg, no matter how twisted your mental gymnastics try to deflect the very essence of the issue. Muslim terrorism has existed since the birth of this 7th Century satanic death cult, and no amount of leftist propaganda will erase that fact.

The US was not attacking the Taliban until AFTER they gave safe haven to bin Laden after 9/11, and refused to turn him over.

The US led a No Fly zone interdiction and held sanctions against Hussein from 1991 until the 2003 invasion…and despite that 12 years Hussein did not stop his support of muslim terrorism. There was no ISIS in Iraq until AFTER Obama stupidly removed US troops.

The newly born US did NOTHING to the muslim Barbary pirates, but the terrorists attacked US merchant ships until our country agreed to pay the jizyah. We had to send the US Navy and Marines to Tripoli to stop those muslim attacks.

Do not fool yourself into believing the nonsense that muslims would be our BFFs if we would simply stop supporting Israel, and if we would let these vicious thugs set up their new caliphate. Taking them at their own words, the koran clearly states there will be no peace until all other religions are destroyed and only islam remains.

Obama’s foreign policy is a complete failure. The recent summit, where the King of Saudi Arabia chose instead to go visit the Queen of England and go to a horse race rather than waste time with the incompetent narcissist at Camp David, would have been shrieked across headlines and news shows had such indifference been shown during a republican’s term in office.

Our allies do not trust us, nor look to us for leadership. Our enemies do not fear us, because they can clearly see that when leftist morons are in power, there is no will to do what is necessary for the best interests of the US.

Islam is always the aggressor. You can continue to wear the mantle of the dhimmi all you want, Greg, but your ridiculous notions of “facts” doesn’t fool anyone with more than 2 functioning neurons.

Interesting..why is my comment at 15 “awaiting moderation”? Is this a new feature for all comments, or because I referred to islam as a 7th century satanic death cult?

Hmmm…seems so…let’s test that by not using the phrase….

People like Greg mistake the fact that such closed societies (or cultures) as Islamic terror groups are make getting definitive proof of anything they are infiltrating very difficult, if not impossible.
It is more like studying the wind: you must carefully watch the EFFECTS because you cannot see the causes.
We have no one on the ground who can tell us when and where Boko Haram, al Qaeda, ISIS or any of the many other terrorist Muslim groups are going to hit next.
But we can watch where they HAVE already hit and what weapons they have used, where their dead were born etc., and get a good idea about where they have been holing up.
Saddam Hussein had a long standing habit of rewarding (~$25,000.00) the families of dead Hamas fighters in Gaza.
Weapons from Saddam’s huge stockpiles would be found on the bodies of dead terrorists of many stripes.
This was well before the Baathists melted back into the general population with our invasion in Iraq.
We’re only this week waking up to the fact that George Soros (through an action fund) paid ($5,000/month) white communist leaders who kept the Ferguson protests going for so long. Saddam Hussein was famously abusing his ”Oil for Food” programs as exposed by investigative reporter, Claudia Rosette.
He used the cash to stockpile and arm those who could fight on the ground because he was under an effective no-fly restriction that prevented him doing it himself.
Part of those arms went to enemies of the Kurds no matter who they were, even al Qaeda.

@Pete:

There was no ISIS in Iraq until AFTER Obama stupidly removed US troops

In neither of my two tours in Iraq did I ever hear or read about ISIS and I read the intel reports on an almost daily basis in order to better assess the threat before going outside the wire. Apparently the know-it-all lefties who were thousands of miles away had better intel sources.

@another vet: Well, that was the history that was in place at that point in time. You will have to check back after the left has re-written it and written all the left wing failures out of it. You may find it quite a bit different.

Caution: Objects in mirror may be far different than they actually were before liberals took power.

@Bill: That is one thing that they are quite good at- rewriting history. They usually start rewriting it as soon as it happens like, “Hands up, don’t shoot.”

@Redteam: It’s Obama’s fault no it’s Bush’s fault–Obama’s -Bush’s—ODS–BDS—–

” We must all hang together or assuredly we will hang separately.” Benjamin Franklin
Semper Fi

@Bill, #15:

A paragraph from the Joint Forces Command’s contracted study, quoted by the Weekly Standard:

“Because Saddam’s security organizations and Osama bin Laden’s terrorist network operated with similar aims (at least in the short term), considerable overlap was inevitable when monitoring, contacting, financing, and training the same outside groups. This created both the appearance of and, in some way, a ‘de facto’ link between the organizations. At times, these organizations would work together in pursuit of shared goals but still maintain their autonomy and independence because of innate caution and mutual distrust. Though the execution of Iraqi terror plots was not always successful, evidence shows that Saddam’s use of terrorist tactics and his support for terrorist groups remained strong up until the collapse of the regime.”

It would really be interesting to know how much a 1,600 page dissertation that can be summed up with such a paragraph cost U.S. taxpayers, many of whom likely have better analytical reading skills that the people who contracted it.

The paragraph is not stating that there was Iraq/al Qaeda cooperation. It’s stating that there was sometimes an overlap of their interests and activities.

“This created both the appearance of and, in some way, a ‘de facto’ link between the organizations.”

The appearance of a link? That was in some way de facto?

This is ridiculous. Maybe they should have just come right out and said Hey, we went through all of this stuff with a fine toothed comb, but couldn’t find any definitive evidence of cooperation between Iraq and al Qaeda. They did sometimes had common interests and objectives, however. Of course anyone who has kept up with the news over the years in question could have told them that, without an expenditure of several million dollars to analyze documents and crank out a 1,600 page report.

Maybe this sort of thing is why the Joint Forces Command was eliminated as a cost saving measure.

The Weekly Standard goes on to list a number of suggestive items from the report, none of which actually establishes an operational link between the Saddam Hussein regime and al Qaeda. It should go without saying that people who support the same causes aren’t necessarily working together, or necessarily even doing so with the same objectives. For example, the United States is supporting forces that are attempting to drive back and destroy ISIS. So are the Iranians. That doesn’t mean than the leaders of the United States and Iran are good buddies. They just happen to share a common objective. Rush Limbaugh encouraged people to vote for Barack Obama in a number of state primaries because he didn’t want Hillary Clinton to become president. The fact that he shared a common objective with Obama supporters for a time doesn’t mean he was working with them toward a common goal.

Bill, John and Greggie. In horse racing terms we call that a losing trifecta. As i’ve said n the past, its important to here all sides, especially those who are so lost in their ideology they become blind to fact or worse truth.

The answer is easy. Much to the chagrin of paid tools that supply the narcissistic stupidity fodder here; It has nothing to do with America. Nor, was it “christiansism, ” nor even flying monkeys. Google the leader, and find that Wiki-pedia pretty much settles the question of WHO: Abu-Bakr al-Baghdadi. The feller’s birthplace, spiritual affiliation and CV are well covered. As a bonus, the entry concludes with a statement from the caliph clarifying the misconceptions of the pacifistic nature of this faith .

//@Greg: NOW you are looking for cooperation… what you actually stated was that there was NO al Qaeda in Iraq before the war. Al Qaeda was most definitely in al Qaeda pre-war and pre- 9/11. Hussein’s military attache’ met with al Qaeda and discussed cooperation.

It was the presence of WMD’s and the prospects of cooperation that necessitated the UN sanctions and, ultimately the war.

@rich wheeler:

It’s Obama’s fault no it’s Bush’s fault–Obama’s -Bush’s

you were correct the first time: It’s Obama’s fault.

@Wordsmith: One wonders, before the advent of Barack Obama, why it was so important to make sure Bush was blamed for 9/11, Iraq and no WMD’s? I understand the current attempts to blame ISIS on Bush, for there is plenty of Obama failure that needs shedding and liberals are always all too happy to place blame everywhere but where it belongs. But the accusations, lies, continued lies even after the facts are available and the blaming goes back to one simply, visceral trait: hatred.

@Bill: “hatred” you say.
That spewed by reactionaries against our current Prez.is unprecedented–at least since the South’s treatment of Lincoln.

Bill,

My apologies as to my last post and including you in my comment. I looked at something completely backwards (in other words I somehow do not know how to read names on posts or whatever while watching my Blackhawks get their hinies beat at the same time) when I wrote that. as to equating you to Greg and John.

As to the “hatred”, ” That spewed by reactionaries against our current Prez” directed at Obama as per rich Wheeler? How can one not hate someone who in his every action and thought appears to be the” enemy from within” that Kruschev and more predicted would destroy us? This goes way beyond ISIS. It in fact goes to the very core of what is a traitorous cancer in the White House.

Yes, ISLAM created ISIS as Wordsmith contends. But let’s not in anyway omit the ignorant complicity of our so called President in his role as “leader of the Free World” One can sure as hell state he has done anything but lead anyone or thing other than open support for hard core Socialism and worse in pushing the fall of our country and her ideals. the march for those aiding Islamic revolution or worse as well as his complete ignorance of the genocide being committed by these savages

@rich wheeler: You must have been asleep from January, 2001-January 2009.

@another vet: Asleep–how so? My point is the hatred of Bush and Obama from the “loyal minority” re radical left and right, is in my eyes, equally distainful.

@rich wheeler

: at least since the South’s treatment of Lincoln.

We did not treat Lincoln badly that is just a rumor started by the Yanikees. I remember, don’t you?

@Redteam: Sure they did lol

Wacky Waco What’e in the water?? down there?

@rich wheeler: Your exact comment. Please point out where you mentioned Bush:

That spewed by reactionaries against our current Prez.is unprecedented–at least since the South’s treatment of Lincoln.

If history serves me correctly, Bush fell between Lincoln and Obama.

@another vet: PLS SEE MY #23 AND #34 Would you agree?

BTW I consider you more balanced than RT.

@rich wheeler: Yeah, hatred. The reaction to Obama’s mismanagement of the entire country is NOTHING compared to how Bush was treated from the day he was inaugurated. Bush didn’t have the benefit of trying to claim everything was racist when criticized, either.

@Bill: WITH Bush many felt he did not win legitimately–hanging chads in Fla. and of course losing the popular vote–many didn’t even know the workings of the E.C. He also displayed substantial arrogance in claiming victory.
With BHO the elephant in the room was the fact there were many racists who could not accept a Black man in The White House.
Our country is divided and extremists on both sides make the most noise.

We need a leader and a healer Jim Webb for PREZ. Semper Fi

@rich wheeler: I agree with 23. and 34. but disagree with 31. When I start seeing movies made “exploring” what would happen if Obama is assassinated, then there may be some merit to it. The hatred for Bush 2 was far more rancid.

As for Obama specifically, as has been detailed here numerous times before, he has demonized everyone who doesn’t hold his views. When someone comes out telling his supporters to bring a gun to a knife fight, or how he needs to kick someone’s ass, or tells supporters to “get in their faces”, or calls people who disagree with him the enemy, what do you expect people to do? Roll over and play dead to his bullying? Of course he’s going to be hammered. If he wasn’t so divisive, the animosity towards him would probably be much less severe.

Obama is a poor leader who whines and cries when he doesn’t get everything his way. Look back at the last four Presidents. They all had to work with a Congress that was partially or fully controlled by the opposing party. Did they whine and cry? No. They worked with the other Branch just like it’s supposed to be. And some of their biggest successes came about because of it. Some examples- Clinton with welfare reform and deficit reduction. ‘W’ with the Post 9/11 GI Bill and TARP 1. If Congress doesn’t give Obama everything he wants, he simply whips out the pen and uses Executive Orders. Our government isn’t supposed to work that way.

@rich wheeler:

WITH Bush many felt he did not win legitimately–hanging chads in Fla. and of course losing the popular vote–many didn’t even know the workings of the E.C. He also displayed substantial arrogance in claiming victory.

The only reason it was even close in Florida is because Democrat election officials had disqualified many absentee ballots for servicemen and women overseas; a vote that usually goes heavily Republican. And, was Bush’s claiming of victory (why wouldn’t he?) worse than Obama’s arrogant “Office of the President-Elect” seal he had struck?

The vast majority did not loose confidence in Obama until he started enacting his agenda, contrary to what he promised he was going to do. Handing Republicans the “elections have consequences, I won, you lost” ultimatum did not do much to encourage bipartisanship and cooperation. His bogus “stimulus” reward for campaign supporters also eroded support. The absolute travesty of the passage of Obamacare, both in process and content, revealed beyond any doubt how far left and how dishonest Obama was going to be.

Don’t hand me that “many racists who could not accept a Black man in The White House.” crap; that is nothing but a worn-out excuse for failure.

@Bill: Bill If you don’t believe racism still exists in America–particularly in the Deep South– then I’m gonna have a hard time following most of what you write..

@rich wheeler: And it exists in the North and amongst your party as well. In 2012, one of your diehard dems, who likes to call people who didn’t vote for Obama “racist”, told me when Herman Cain became the Republican front runner that “it looks like we are going have a choice between two n*****s for President.” I told him I had no problem whatsoever voting for Herman Cain who was more black than Obama. This person must have been very conflicted because he voted for Obama twice despite being one of the biggest racists I know.

@rich wheeler: Did I happen to make the claim that racism no longer exists? I never even claimed racists don’t hate Obama because of his skin color.

However, if you think that is the only issue anyone that cares about the health and future of this country has with Obama is his pigmentation, you are a bigger idiot than I could possibly imagine.

@rich wheeler:

BTW I consider you more balanced than RT.

What? do you realize I can stand on a basketball with one foot.

@rich wheeler:

Wacky Waco What’e in the water?? down there?

I heard that some loonies from Gayfornia rode over and got their butts kicked.

@rich wheeler:

healer Jim Webb

Jim Who? is he that guy with a harem? Are they all women or are some of them transgender?

@rich wheeler:

Bill If you don’t believe racism still exists in America–particularly in the Deep South

Most of the racism in the US is in a region that goes approx from Boston to Chicago, especially including Detroit. Southern Gayfornia is also permeated with it.

Anyone else having trouble with the numbering system? My number 94 used be something like 43.