As more damaging information about Hillary Clinton surfaces, liberals aren’t interested. Not only are they disinterested, they seem to harden their position on her, regardless of how bad that information is.
And that’s scary.
It reminds me of Jim Jones. Ironically, Jim Jones was a cult leader and -ready for it?- a community organizer and Marxist who also believed in “spreading it around.” Among his early friends were George Moscone, Walter Mondale and Rosalynn Carter. Willie Brown and Jerry Brown hailed Jones at a testimonial for Jones in 1977. During the testimonial Willie Brown praised Jones, saying Jones was
“what you should see every day when you look in the mirror in the early morning hours… a combination of Martin King, Angela Davis, Albert Einstein… Chairman Mao.”
Harvey Milk wrote to Jones, saying
“Rev Jim, It may take me many a day to come back down from the high that I reach today. I found something dear today. I found a sense of being that makes up for all the hours and energy placed in a fight. I found what you wanted me to find. I shall be back. For I can never leave.”
Jones was the darling of the left- at times hosting such notables as Angela Davis.
Jim Jones had rabid sycophantic supporters who could not be persuaded by logic. Eerie, no?
Over the last day two articles have caught my attention for different reasons and then I noticed what they had in common.
I linked to one of them in the MW section. At Dvorak.org Marc Perkel, who claims to be an email expert, asserts that Hillary emails could easily have found themselves in the hands of anyone at the spam filtering site she used:
While it was at MxLogic it could be read, tapped, archived, or forwarded to anyone in the world without anyone knowing.
This would be both careless and cavalier and Perkel clearly knows Hillary dodged the rules.
The bottom line – none of this would have happened if she had just played by the rules.
Yet where does that leave Perkel? You know it.
If she’s the candidate I would still vote for her in the general election over any Republican.
Then there’s Dan Metcalfe, who claims to have run the government FOIA. He wrote an article in which he says Hillary’s email defense is “laughable.”
But having spent a quarter-century at the forefront of the government’s administration of the FOIA, including its transition to electronic records and its involvement in so many Clinton administration “scandals du jour,” I know full well that both what Secretary Clinton arranged to do and what she now has said about that are, to put it most charitably, not what either the law or anything close to candor requires. At a minimum, it was a blatant circumvention of the FOIA by someone who unquestionably knows better and an attempted verbal “cover” of the situation (if not “cover-up”) that is truly reminiscent of years past.
OK, so Hillary’s dishonest. We agree. And yet again…
And I say that even as someone who, if she decides to run for president and is the Democratic nominee, will nevertheless vote for her next year.
If you ever wondered why it takes years to get a simple FOIA request fulfilled….
I find much wrong with Hillary. I don’t think she’s ever accomplished a thing on her own. Everything derives from her marriage or her gender but there’s more and it’s worse. She knew the Benghazi attacks had nothing to do with video. Despite that she leaned over the caskets of the returned dead and swore to the parents who lost their children that she’d prosecute the video maker. I cannot tell you how contemptible I find lying to the parents of dead children. It’s beyond bad- I think it’s evil.
Back in 2007 Hillary bashed Dick Cheney for secret email accounts and said that having “secret” accounts was “shredding the Constitution.” She set a standard and then she violated that standard. By her own standards she “shredded the Constitution.” She knew better and chose to “shred” the Constitution.
And we haven’t even gotten to her taking money from countries that oppress women and gays. And we haven’t gotten an answer to whether she was soliciting money from the countries while SoS.
This is not a good person. This is not a nice person.
They’ll still vote for her. Hillary could beat a child to death with a hammer live on Kelly and Michael and they’d still vote for her. And if Hillary told them to drink the Kool-Aid, you know they would do it for her. In a second.
Hillary Clinton is not a candidate. She is a cult.
Welcome to Hillarytown.