Sad conclusion… [Reader Post]

Loading

Gasden Flag

So I had about 325 miles to drive home Friday night, plenty of time to do a little pondering. Here’s what I have come up with… we better get ready for the battle of our lives, for our country. Before you liberals get your panties all in a wad, follow along for a few minutes, and I’ll tell how I have come up with this.

With days to go before Obama got elected in 2008, he made one of the few honest public statements he has ever made when he said he was going to fundamentally change this country. The libs didn’t listen. He also said he wanted a civilian security force as well trained and funded as our military. Again the libs didn’t listen. He won the election and began his mission. He appointed a ton of czars and advisers, making the obvious effort to circumvent the balance of power by ruling through regulation instead of governing by legislation. The libs didn’t notice. Congress didn’t seem to notice either, even though the Executive Branch began gaining weight and tipping the scales.

He nationalized two of the three car companies, then focused on the banks. Then he forced Obamacare upon us, who really knows what’s buried in that bill. The stimulus was next, and continues since our government is still running without a budget. He captured control of the energy industry after an unintentional drilling disaster which he turned, somehow, into a criminal act.

He arbitrarily decided to take us to war in Libya without any approval from anyone (more on that later) in direct contradiction to the Constitution. Nobody called him on that effectively, he basically said “we went ’cause I said so…” He put troops on the ground in North Africa without approval, nobody noticed. His gun control mission started a long time ago, and again he doesn’t answer for Fast & Furious, executive privilege? He passes a message to Putin about how much more “flexibility” he will have after the election. Again he capitalizes on yet another tragedy to push his disarming of America agenda (the Brit’s tried this here too, a couple hundred years ago), he knows an unarmed America cannot resist tyranny.

I don’t need to dive into Obama’s history very far to understand that even if he was born in the USA (I have my doubts), he was not raised as an American, he has made that clear. Neither was his wife, or Jarrett for that matter. So obviously, they don’t put any credence into our traditions and principles. And I know I have left out a lot of “accomplishments” by Obama and company, I have been just hitting the highlights.

And the key to this puzzle might be in Benghazi. Not just the way it ended, with the deaths of four Americans, but with the entire mission there. And what did he threaten 30 survivor/witnesses, and their families and friends with, to assure their anonymity and silence. I can’t think of any other “secrets” so well protected (other than Obama’s ultimate plan). For example, the Bin Laden mission, details leaked from day one; the computer attack on Iran and many other things that would have been kept from the public eye. Yet the entire situation in Benghazi is still a mystery. There lies the keys I believe, and the only reason I can think of for such successful secrecy is the possibility that probable cause exists for arrest on the charge of treason, at the highest level and downward. Has the White House turned into a cover for a Continuing Criminal Enterprise?

I have not applied conjecture or opinion into this conclusion, just looking at facts, indisputable facts. At the facts indicate to me we have a government in place that is directly and intentionally taking us away from the principles our country was formed upon; I understand a little more about how our forefathers felt leading up to the revolution.

0 0 votes
Article Rating
Subscribe
Notify of
351 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments

@John Galt:

Why am I being held responsable and or punished for what happened to Indians 75 years before I was born?

Why do you think Bees is holding you responsible or wanting to punish you for what happened to Native Americans 75 years before your birth?
Just asking for help with my confusion.

Richard Wheeler
didn’t I told you the INDIANS GAVE YOU AMERICA,
so they should get the number one job priority
and WHITES AND BLACKS ALONG WITH THE FELONS CAME TOGETHER,
SHARE THE NUMBER TWO PRIORITY, THE MEXICAN THE NUMBER THREE,
OTHER WAIT FOR THE AVAILABLE JOBS BALANCE

@retire05:
I would answer you, but you don’t have priority.
If you could provide proof of membership in some special sub-group and could supply me with proper documentation, I might be able to answer you. But at this point you have no special status as provided for by the constitution under the section on special classes of people. Look it up.

@ilovebeeswarzone:
It would be nice if a “balance” was still left.

@ilovebeeswarzone: Bees job priorities revised 1)Indians 2) A TIE between Whites, Blacks and Felons3)Mexicans 4) Others. Interesting

johngalt
did I ever give you trouble?
did I ever said a bad word to you?
why oh why do you want to put me in the box?
you are not being punish by standing in line for a job
behind the INDIANS, NO
YOU AND YOUR SON ARE LUCKY TO BE SECOND TO THEM, THIS IS A PRIVILEDGE FOR YOU,
THE INDIANS should be in CONGRESS , TAKING PART OF DECISIONS OF THE PEOPLE,
THEY HAVE BEEN GIVEN THE PRECIOUS TREASURE OF THIS AMERICA
BY THE GREAT SPIRIT, THAT IS THE LAND, THEY GAVE THEIR TREASURE CHEAP,
THE PEOPLE WOULD BENEFIT BY THEIR MENTALITY THEIR WISDOM,
WHICH IS MISSING in AMERICA, BUT YOU NEVER ASK THEM, THAT’S ALL YOU HAD TO DO,
TO OPEN THE DOOR OF THEIR SOUL.

Richard Wheeler
is in it fair enough?
yes it is

johngalt
congratulation for your 300 comment,
bye

Richard Wheeler
we will try for the 400,
okay it’s a deal.
bye

@John Galt:

I would answer you, but you don’t have priority.

Let me see if I understand you, John; you now have the authority to say who has piority when asking a question of you here at FA? When was that policy initiated?

If you could provide proof of membership in some special sub-group and could supply me with proper documentation, I might be able to answer you.

Proof of membership? In what? Do special sub-groups (what ever that is) now have clubs? Proper documentation? What kind of documentation? do you get a special certificate if you are part of a “special sub-group?”

But at this point you have no special status as provided for by the constitution under the section on special classes of people. Look it up.

OK. Remind me again what section it is in the Constitution that discusses “special classes of people.” Look up what?

Seriously, John, isn’t it a little early to be hitting the sauce because your post makes absolutely no sense.

retire05
I think he was relating to me having priority on who stand first in line to get a job,
you did not mention that you had those priority,
not the priority of who speak at FLOPPING ACES,
BYE

@ilovebeeswarzone:

Bees, reread post #305. Johngalt was responding to me, not you, telling me I did not have priority to ask him a question.

Maybe he’ll clear up the confusion.

johngalt
yes there would be a balance left ,
with the number one and two and three, creating more jobs for them

retire05
yes he was answering to you not me,
but it was about my comments stating my priority
of who stand first in line and second and third,
he also mention the CONSTITUTION STATING ABOUT PRIORITY ON STATUE OF PEOPLE,
HE DID NOT LIKE HAVING ME DIVIDE THE PEOPLE IN RANK OF GETTING JOBS,
SO WE HAVE THE ANSWER IN THE CONSTITUTION, I THINK IS NOT FOR WHAT I STATED
OF WHO IS 1OR 2OR 3,
THE CONSTITUTION , IS FOR EQUAL STATUE I THINK FOR ALL,
MEANING NO PRIORITY, THAT’S WHAT I UNDERSTOOD FROM johngalt answer to you.
hope he come back to straighten up my understanding and yours
BYE
retire he did not say “” :to ask him a question,””
he just said you did not have priority “point”
meaning [ like me]

EDIT: THAT’S JOHN GALT, NOT johngalt, 2 hours later,

retire05
now re-read your first answer ending with FA
YOU WILL FIND IT FUNNY NOW,
BYE

edit: that was for JOHN GALT, NOT FOR johngalt

@retire05: I believe J.G was being Facetious— A bit of levity tinged with sarcasm perhaps?

RETIRE05
I think johngalt is wounded by the arrow you send him,
with your angry answer,
bye

no this was JOHN GALT, NOT johngalt

Richard Wheeler
that is your way,
but not of johngalt, he is too correct to be sarcastic,
he has class above that.

Richard Wheeler
don’t stir up the coals in the stoves

@ilovebeeswarzone:

You could always be gracious and thank me, little bee.

SkippingDog
hi,
if I knew why I should thank you,
I would,
tell me why, will you?

Obviously, for adding some meaning and value to your otherwise barren and empty life. Isn’t that why you’re here?

SkippingDog
no, it’s not why I’m here,
and you don’t bring anything to my life,
so I don’t have to thank you.

Of course. Once the denial ends, the healing can begin.

SkippingDog
my antenna detect some nefarious intent, in your answer,
what is your problem?
oh yes that what’s his name viral spider virus, bother you,

@ilovebeeswarzone: Bees and Ret05 Plot thickens There are 2 JohnGalts on line. It fooled me. Actually I forgot. This is not the engineer,Navy Vet from Indiana. We’ll straighten it out.

Hard to believe there would be more than one teenage loser using the John Galt for their screen name. One of them probably got confused about the spelling of Holden Caulfield.

To all,

John Galt is not the same as johngalt. Please remember this in the future.

Thank you.

@SkippingDog:

Hard to believe there would be more than one teenage loser using the John Galt for their screen name.

Really?

@johngalt:

Really!

@SkippingDog:

Your immaturity is coming through loud and clear. No need to shout about it.

@johngalt:

Don’t tell me…. Your favorite movie is “V for Vendetta” and you have a Guy Fawkes mask that you like to wear.

Right?

Richard Wheeler JOHN GALT GOT US FOOLED,
ALL THE TIME I thought I had johngalt
and retire05 that’s why you too where confuse on the answer the other JOHN GALT GAVE YOU,
IT WAS HARD TO GRAB
JOHN GALT YOU HAD FUN WITH US DIDN’T YOU?YOU GOT RICHARD WHEELER WHO FOUND IT
JUST A COUPLE OF COMMENT AGO, AND RETIRE05 AND ME, IN YOUR POCKET
SHAME ON YOU but you had fun, that’s what count
NOW to johngalt, what did you take so long? did you had fun too?
bye

@SkippingDog:

You don’t know the first thing about me. But please, go ahead and continue to make an ass out of yourself.

@johngalt:

I know you are a very serious young man. Very serious….

retire05
we got mix up
check it up
it’s even funnyer now,
bye

@SkippingDog:

Well, you got one thing right, anyways.

Richard Wheeler
thank you for finding the puzzel we where in, they had fun on us,
it’s okay
we will get him, JOHN GALT, YES THAT KNOCK OUT ON MY NOSE?
IN THE BAR WHERE YOU GOT MAD AT ME, FEELING PUNISH
FOR THE 75 YEARS AGO INDIANS, THE BEST IS YOUR ANSWER TO RETIRE05,
THE SUBMEMBERSHIP
WE’LL GET YOU FOR THAT SOME DAY,
BYE

@johngalt:

Awesomely serious.

Richard Wheeler
JOHN GALT CAME IN ON , 299, 300, 302, 305, 366,
THE last of johngalt on 280
bye

it was fun to re-read it all with a different JOHN GALT

@johngalt: #330
Which one is the one I like? LOL

@MataHarley: #269

Over an out.

When I was being trained to used the military radio, the soldier training us said one of his pet peeves is that phrase. You NEVER hear it in the military. This is another example of the entertainment industry not checking stuff like that out enough.

The soldier explained that when you say, “Over”, that means you are done with what you are saying, and are ready to listen to the other person. When you say, “Out”, that means you are done transmitting and getting off of the radio. When you hear an actor say, “Over and out”, that means they are turning the conversation over to the other person, but that they probably won’t be listening, and might have turned the radio off.

Smorgasbord
he doesn’t come often, that’s why we did not make the difference,
no wander retire05 could not figure him out at one place, and yet we still went on
as if he was the johngalt,
it’s RICHARD WHO GOT HIM,
BYE

Bees Think we can promote some kind of duel between the 2 J.G.’s to get this post moving again? Skipping Dog can ref.

Richard Wheeler
you cannot promote that game because each player is
far away from each other,
I see you’re MARINE TACTICS,
GET THEM ALL TOGETHER, MAY THE BEST ONE WIN AND HE’S THE ONE WE WILL TAKE AWAY,

The listing that was used for this conversation by the Southern Poverty Law Center is not correct. They did a search on the net for all crimes that were related to Muslims. Some of these crimes were not even charged as hate crimes. Why do we label the victims by their race or religious beliefs if they are not white?

@asmallvoice: I’ll try to help you with your misunderstanding… just because a crime is committed by one race, creed or religious preference upon another who may be a different race, creed or religious preference, that does not necessarily fulfill the elements required to charge a hate crime. By the way, a hate crime is a separate but related charge to the original crime, a double-tap as you may. As for labeling of victims, on every police report there are specific boxes that get checked for ALL parties involved, be they victim, suspect or witness. The little boxes include race, sex, and other details. Most of the time, religion isn’t mentioned in a police report unless it is pertinent to the report / crime. I have a pretty good working knowledge of all that reporting stuff as a retired police detective who also did a fair share of crime analysis. Hope that answers your questions.

Scott in Oklahoma
thank you again for a great POST, ONE THAT WILL LIVE ON AND ON
what is said is very true and demand attention from the good PEOPLE to be warn of it,
BYE

1 5 6 7