10 Reasons to Hate Mitt Romney (Liberals Pay Attention)

Loading

1. Drop-dead, collar-ad handsome with gracious, statesmanlike aura, like every central casting’s #1 choice for Commander-in-Chief.

2. Been married to ONE woman his entire life, and has been faithful to her, including through her bouts with breast cancer and MS.

3. No scandals or skeletons in his closet. (How boring is that?)

4. Can’t speak in a fake, southern, “black preacher voice” when necessary.

5. Highly intelligent. Graduated cum laude from both Harvard Law School and Harvard Business School…and by the way, his academic records are NOT sealed.

6. Doesn’t smoke or drink alcohol, and has never done drugs, not even in the counter-culture age when he went to college. Too square for today’s America?

7. Represents an America of “yesterday”, where people believed in God, went to Church, didn’t screw around, worked hard, and became a SUCCESS!

8. Has a family of five great sons…and none of them have police records or are in drug rehab. But of course, they were raised by a stay-at-home mom and that “choice” deserves America’s scorn.

9. Oh yes…he’s a MORMON. We need to be very afraid of that very strange religion that teaches its members to be clean-living, patriotic, fiscally conservative, charitable, self-reliant, and honest (in full disclosure, many may or may not know that I am also a Latter-Day Saint – “Mormon” to some unfamiliar with our Church).

10. And one more point…pundits say because of his wealth, he can’t relate to ordinary Americans. I guess that’s because he made that money HIMSELF…as opposed to marrying it or inheriting it from Dad. Apparently, he didn’t understand that actually working at a job and earning your own money made you unrelatable to Americans.

BONUS 11. Gives millions of dollars to charity every year. How dare he waste that money on charity and church instead of giving it to the government in a time of great need.

0 0 votes
Article Rating
Subscribe
Notify of
229 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments

CJ
I’m very impress by MITT ROMNEY SPEECH AT THE VN.
A LONG SPEECH FULL OF HIS ACTIONS TO BE COMING, IF THE PEOPLE ELECT HIM,
he has the pride of AMERICA IN HIS CORE, HE RESPECT THE VALOR OF THE MILITARY AND THOSE AT WAR HE WILL SUPPORT AT THE BEST NOT THE LEAST, HE WILL RESTORE THE GRAND PLACE WHICH AMERICA HAS BEEN TO THE WORLD, BUT HE WON’T APOLOGIZE FOR ANYTHING AMERICA AS A UNIQUE COUNTRY CAN DECIDE AND BE THE SUPPORT FOR THOSE SUFFERING ELSEWHERE, HE WILL RESPECT OPENLY ISRAEL AS AN ALLY AND POLAND AND OTHER FRIEND’S COUNTRIES,HE WILL CONCENTRATE ON THIS AMERICA GREAT NATION TO PROVIDE JOBS AND FUTURE, AND SO ON AND SO ON,
FANTASTIC SINCERE PRESIDENTIAL SPEECH, THE WAY IT SHOULD BE, AND HE HAD MANY APLAUDS FROM THE VETS

C Andrew Scott
yes he did the best he thought would work,
but for a UNITED STATES THE BIGGEST OF THE WORLD AND THE ONE THE WORLD DEPEND ON
TO CORRECT THE WRONG, It very demanding and require many skills and ability and determination
and resolve and class, and more it take the right crew chosen by their strong ability
to succeed performing what is ask of them, not only security guards,
this is AMERICA THE TOP NOTCH OF THE WORLD, SOME FRIENDLY SOME ENVIOUS, SOME HATERS,
AND SO ON, IT TAKE THE BEST AMERICAN CHOSEN FOR ALL THOSE SKILLS, NOT LESS BUT MORE OF FOR A GIANT
and proud AMERICA which need space to take breathe

Regarding Romney: those are interesting notes about him, but certainly there’s nothing in that list to give us a reason to actually vote for him.

If you want to talk about Romney, then here are a few reasons to not vote for him based on what he stands for. As President, he would probably be an unmitigated disaster, for any of the following reasons:

1. He wants people to vote against their own self interests. He’ll push to increase taxes on the poor and lower taxes on the rich.
2. He wants to disenfranchise legitimate voters such as students and minorities, taking us back to the dark days before the Voting Rights Act.
3. He wants to increase spending on defense, promoting the military industrial complex, and promoting more wars at the expense of our youth who fight and die in those wars.
4. He would likely continue the Bush administration’s attacks on civil rights. Remember when, in the name of a Global War on Terror, the Bush Administration suspended habeas corpus, introduced extraordinary rendition, torture, and started to discuss domestic spying? Romney will continue that effort. It will truly be a “brave new world.”
5. He would do nothing to lower the national debt, allowing it to balloon out of control, which in the end will be far worse than tax hikes to reduce the debt. If anything he might actually increase government spending (i.e. on defense.)
6. He would promote ongoing corporate tax breaks, which will also add to the deficit, getting us closer to the brink, like Greece.
7. He would overturn Obamacare, slashing health care services while enriching insurance executives.
8. He would continue the “war on women.”
9. He won’t fight for minorities, the disenfranchised, the poor, the elderly, immigrants, or those in need. All of these are elements that work together to make or break a strong middle class. And it’s a strong middle class that makes a country strong.
10. He will, in the end, take this country down the wrong path entirely. No doubt about it.

After Obama’s State of the Union in 2011 Romney said:
[Obama] “needed to speak to two very big concerns that are on the minds of a lot of Americans.
One is, is he going to get more jobs in this country?
And the second is, can he cut back on the extraordinary overspending and deficits associated with government?”

Obama “is trying awful hard.
The problem is, he just doesn’t know what to do.
He is misguided, almost everything he’s done has been the opposite of what he hoped to accomplish.
Almost everything he has done in his first two years has made it more difficult for our economy to grow.
It’s been the most anti-investment, anti-jobs, anti-growth administration we’ve seen in a long, long time.
I’m inclined to make sure there is somebody in the race that really understands how the economy works and can get jobs back.”

During the 2011 debate in New Hampshire Romney said:
If you go back a few years to JFK’s time, the government at all levels–federal, state and local–was consuming about 27% of the US. economy.
Today it consumes about 37% of the US economy.
It’s on track to get to 40%.
We cease at some point to be a free economy.
And the idea of saying, we just want a little more, just give us some more tax revenue, we need that, that is the answer for America.
The answer is to cut federal spending.
The answer is to cap how much the federal government can spend as a percentage of our economy.
And the second part of the answer is to get our economy to grow, because the idea of just cutting and cutting and taxing more–I understand mathematically those things work, but nothing works as well as getting the economy going.
Get Americans back to work.
Get them paying taxes.
Get corporations growing in America.
And I’ll tell you, these kinds of problems will disappear.

At the Iowa Straw Poll Debate 2011 Romney said this:
There are really seven things that need to be done:

1. Make sure our corporate tax rates are competitive with other nations
2. Make sure that our regulations and bureaucracy works not just for the bureaucrats in Washington, but for the businesses that are trying to grow
3. Have trade policies that work for us, not just for our opponents
4. Have an energy policy that gets us energy secure
5. Have the rule of law
6. Great institutions that build human capital, because capitalism is also about people, not just capital and physical goods
7. Have a government that doesn’t spend more money than it takes in.

GREG
HOW DOES IT FEEL TO PLAY IN THE GUTTER, WITH OBAMA

@Greg:

2. (Romney) wants to disenfranchise legitimate voters such as students and minorities, taking us back to the dark days before the Voting Rights Act.

Yes indeed! There it is! It is the sad odoriferous demagoguery that facilitates election fraud in America. FDR built the New Deal in no small part based upon electoral and deep political corruption where its was to his advantage to do so. FDR’s political relationship with corrupt New Jersey Democratic political boss Frank ‘I-am-the-Law” Hague is illustrative. Boss Hague also long served as Democratic National Committeeman from New Jersey and as Vice-Chairman of the Democratic National Committee(! Our contemporary modern American welfare state was constructed in part upon a foundation of election fraud and deep political corruption. The political operatives in single party locales have incentive to commit voter fraud. The Welfare State incentivizes those who benefit from the status quo to look the other way when it comes to such corruption. To admit such corruption exists is to delegitimize the political-economic status quo. Stopping such corruption and voter fraud would upend to status quo to the degree that voter fraud shifts political power to those who are corrupt.

This ever ready aggi-prop about going back to the dark days before the Voting Rights Act is poisonous racialist character assassination. Romney not unironically is targeted because he is “White”. Such racialist character assassination of Romney can only be effective because he is “White”. And the corrupt status quo endures.

.

Mike O’Malley
yes, that corrupt voting habit put OBAMA THERE,
IT WAS SAID BY CREDIBLE PEOPLE IN THE KNOW,
I was so shock there was nothing they where willing to do
to make it back and correct it at the time, and the shame is that it was accepted unchallenged
by the winner and his crew. they knew what they had done, and are trying again this time,
that’s why the responsible for the votes are working so hard to correct it now, but ERIC HOLDER IS TRYING TO HOLD THEM,

@ilovebeeswarzone: it could be argued that voting corruption put GW Bush in office. we can go ’round and ’round about conspiracy theories, Bee.

let’s stick to the facts please.

@C Andrew Scott: @ilovebeeswarzone:

it could be argued that voting corruption put GW Bush in office. we can go ’round and ’round about conspiracy theories, Bee.

And Mr. Scott engages in Tu Quoque Fallacy.

He also misleads. Given the intense examination give by the MSM and by an independent CPA firm engaged by an anti-political corruption group to examine the 2000 Presidential recount it is a fraud on the public to suggest that the Republicans won the Florida 2000 vote by way of election fraud.

Secondly, while Mr. Scott may rue the outcome of the Supreme Court decisions in question they were and are well founded and legitimate decisions.

Thirdly, in the absence of those Supreme Court decisions the Florida Legislature would have sent Republican electors to the Electoral College. The result would have been the election of Bush-Cheney.

Fourthly, if the controversy had continued the 2000 presidential and vice presidential election would have been thrown into the House of Representatives (Republican majority) and into the US Senate (50R – 50D with VP Al Gore (D)). The result would have been a Bush-Lieberman Administration after out going VP Gore would have cast the deciding vote for Joe Lieberman as VP.

In each and every instance George W. Bush would have been elected president of the United States.

.

Indeed let’s stick to the facts and stop condoning and facilitating the conditions prerequisite to election fraud in USA.

Mike O’Malley
yes I heard it from an AMERICAN CONCERN ABOUT THIS NOVEMBER ELECTION,
WHERE HE LEARNED THAT ILLEGALS ARE BEING SENT SOME VOTING PAPER TO FILL UP COMING DIRECT FROM WASHINGTON, THEY SEND IT UNDER THEIR EXCUSE THAT PEOPLE DON’T KNOW
WHAT TO DO, SO THEY TEACH THEM ON THAT PAPER,
IF SOME ILLEGAL RECEIVE THAT THEY WILL TRY TO VOTE WHEN THE BIGGEST CROUD IS WAITING, AND WILL VOTE, AND IN 2008,
THERE WAS MANY DEAD PEOPLE VOTES PASS, AND THAT HAS BEEN SAID THAT OBAMA WAS SWEPT IN,
BY THE MOB ILLEGALY.

What? Romney doesnt have skeletons in his closet? WHATEVER!! What about his time as senator when he ran Mass. through the dirt, or the time he ran Bain Capital and screwed thousands out of employment. Or how about the fact that he is Mormon, raised on a compound (cult) thesse people believe that god sent a magic stone to John Smith and he was only able to read a magic gold plate in a magicians hat with the stones! http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Joseph_Smith WHAT DO YOU MEAN HES GOT THE SKILLS TO SAVE US!! HE USED TO BANKRUPT COMPANIES FOR PROFIT!! HE FLIP FLOPS ON EVERY ISSUE< EVERY ISSUE http://www.seacoastonline.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20120724/OPINION/207240349/-1/NEWSMAP stupid people! USE YOUR DAMN HEADS!!

@Mike O’Malley: you ar a dumb liar. DRUG MONEY FUNDS VOTER FRAUD? There have been NINE reports of voters fraud in the last election, NINE!!!!! CORPORATE MONEY FUNDS ROMNEY!!!

@shana koss:

You say I’m dumb? You say I’m a liar?

Yet you failed to read the article I linked for all to read Ms. Shana Koss.

I’ll quote with emphasis added:

“We believe that drug money did buy votes,” Kerry B. Harvey, U.S. attorney for the Eastern District of Kentucky, said of a separate vote-buying case.

He described a stunning vote-buying scheme that includes “very extensive, organized criminal activity, involving hundreds of thousands of dollars, and in many cases that involves drug money.”

Harvey has led a recent string of federal prosecutions exposing the widespread and accepted practice of vote buying in eastern Kentucky. The soft-spoken federal prosecutor, along with his team and state authorities, are waging a battle against what he characterizes as a vote-buying culture embedded in many of the communities for generations.

He says the problem is rooted in economic woes, which is why votes are routinely for sale. In that part of the state, jobs are scarce and poverty is high. Controlling local government means controlling jobs.

Read more: http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2012/07/25/drug-money-funds-voter-fraud-in-kentucky/#ixzz21vq9Fqls

.

A thoughtful literate Lady, would apologize, Ms. Shana Koss.

shana koss
wow, those lies you spit , you took it from the Democrates, THEY LIE ALL THE TIME TO KEEP YOU UNDER
THEIR CONTROL, HELL, THEY NOW WILL SAY ANYTHING TO MAKE YOU BELIEVE THEY ARE FINDING JOBS FOR ALL THE PEOPLE WHO ARE DESPERATE NOW, AND YOU BELIEVE THAT?
MITT ROMNEY IS CERTAINLY BETTER THAN OBAMA IN LEADERSHIP, FOR WHAT AMERICA NEED, WHO SAID HE IS A PERFECT HUMAN? ARE OBAMA A PERFECT HUMAN BEING?
HELL NO, HE IS NOT FIT FOR THE JOB, IT’S OBVIOUS TO SEE,
OBAMA DOESN’T EVEN HAVE THE BIRTH CERTIFICATE TO SHOW HE IS ELIGIBLE TO HAVE THE PRESIDENCY,
GET A HOLD OF YOURSELF,
DOES THE MORMONS BOTHER YOU? NO FOR SURE, THEY WHO CAN SHOW SUCH PATRIOTIC LOVE FOR AMERICA LIKE A MULTI HUNDREDS MORMON CHOIR
SIGNING TO AMERICA THEIR LOVE AND DEDICATION,
THOSE BEAUTIFUL TIMELESS PATRIOTIC SONG MADE IN AMERICA WHICH ARE THE PRIDE OF THE PEOPLE,

@ilovebeeswarzone: i have a question for you, Bee. just a question.

what makes you so certain the Republicans aren’t lying to you to keep you under control?

C Andrew Scott,
because the REPUBLICANS don’t go campaigning shouting any promises
which are not logic for the people to believe, they act more than talk and they have been blocked on every smart bills they are trying to pass by the DEMOCRATES AND OBAMA’S VETO.
check it up

No illogical campaign promises? Here’s what they’ve promised:

Once again, they’re going to cut taxes without raising deficits. The Miracle of the Free Market Economy will one again result in revenue increases even though taxes are slashed.

They’re going to provide a private investment Social Security alternative for younger workers without cutting benefits to current recipients or those nearing retirement age. Even though this will significantly reduce the FICA revenue stream that’s used to pay current recipients, it won’t increase general revenue deficits or raise the national debt.

They’re going to reduce total spending without reducing the defense budget. (We’ve got to be ready for the next off-budget war.)

Through a clever redesign of the tax system and the closing of loopholes they’re going to raise more money than before, while simultaneously cutting everybody’s taxes. Except for those who had very little money and paid no taxes to begin with. Rather than getting free handouts, those people will now be required to pay a fair share like everybody else.

None of this makes any sense. Maybe the sense is in the fine print that we haven’t seen yet.

GREG
DON’T WORRY, WITH MITT ROMNEY, YOU’LL BE FINE,
LESS STRESS FOR THE FUTURE OF AMERICA, EVERYONE WILL FINALLY HOPE TO GET A JOB AND PAY THEIR SHARE, BECAUSE THE COMPANIES WILL HAVE FAITH IN AMERICA NOT TRYING TO BLEED THEM,
THOSE COMPANIES ARE GOOD FOR THE THOUSANDS OF PEOPLE TAKING INTEREST IN THEIR BUSYNESS, BUT DISLIKE BEING TOLD HOW THEY SHOULD RUNN THEIR BUSYNESS, THEY HATE TO SEE THE UNIONS RUNN THEIR BUSYNESS, THEY ARE THE MAKER OF THEIR BUSYNESS AND DESERVE TO BE IN CHARGE OF ALL DECISIONS NOT DEPEND ON OBAMA AGENCIES TO DICTATE IF THEIR
NEXT MOVE IS COMPLIANT WITH THE GOVERNMENT THOUSANDS OF PAGES OF RULES,
THEY WILL FEEL FREE SO THEY WILL SPEND ON HIRING THEIR EMPLOYEES THEMSELVES NOT IMPOSE
BY OTHER. AND THE POOR WILL FINALLY BE HELP THE RIGHT WAY NOT HALF ASS WAY,
THEN ONLY THEN, YOU WILL UNDERSTAND THE DIFFERENCE

@Greg:

Once again, they’re going to cut taxes without raising deficits. The Miracle of the Free Market Economy will one again result in revenue increases even though taxes are slashed.

This is one of the biggest lies you have ever posted. The republicans, including Romney, want to reduce rates and close loopholes. That is not cutting taxes, that is reforming the tax code.
I haven’t read the plan on social security. I vaguely remember Bush’s plan and I’m guessing it follows the same guidelines. If so, then only part of FICA will be allowed for private investment. As for the FICA revenue, it is already reduced, Obama’s payroll tax holiday remains in effect. Don’t hear you bitching about that one. If Obama can reduce it 2% as a tax break, what’s wrong with allowing people to take the 2% and privately investing it?

They’re going to reduce total spending without reducing the defense budget. (We’ve got to be ready for the next off-budget war.)

I was for Rick Perry during the primaries. He wanted to audit every single federal agency, including the DOD. Romney has adopted some of Perry’s platform, and looking at all agencies is one of them. Incidentally, national defense is an enumerated obligation for congress under the Constitution; social security, medicare, Obamacare….not so much.

Through a clever redesign of the tax system and the closing of loopholes they’re going to raise more money than before, while simultaneously cutting everybody’s taxes. Except for those who had very little money and paid no taxes to begin with. Rather than getting free handouts, those people will now be required to pay a fair share like everybody else.

What? You read too much Mother Jones. If republicans raise taxes on anyone, it would break their pledge. The tax code needs to be reformed.
What’s Obama’s plan? Pay down the deficit by raising $850 billion over the next 10 years by taxing the rich? Brilliant!

From ABC News, Jerusalem, Jul 29, 2012: Romney Not Sure If He’s Paid Less Than 13.9% in Taxes

In an exclusive interview with ABC News’ David Muir to air tonight on World News, Romney was asked if there has ever been a year when he paid less than 13.9 percent, the rate he paid in 2010.

“I haven’t calculated that,” said Romney. “I’m happy to go back and look, but my view is I’ve paid all the taxes required by law.”

For 2010, a married couple filing jointly would have been required to pay 15 percent if they had taxable income of only $16,750.

Romney has so far released his 2010 returns and an estimate for 2011. Those two years are all Romney says he will release, arguing that no matter how many years he releases critics will always want more.

I think people would be happy enough with the past 5 years. So far he’s released his complete returns for no year.

@Greg:

For 2010, a married couple filing jointly would have been required to pay 15 percent if they had taxable income of only $16,750.

So? If a person is not making income, as in getting a paycheck for labor, there is no income tax. The dividends tax is 15%, with the right deductions, I’m sure that can get below 13%.
Do you use all your deductions Greg, or do you just leave some out because the government needs the money? Our tax system is no set up to tax wealth, it is supposed to help create it, (which it currently does not).
I read somewhere on here that you said you had a net worth of close to half a million. First, congratulations, not many people can manage their finances to accomplish that. But how would you feel if congress passed a new law and said that not only will you pay taxes on your income, but your net worth would be taxed as well?
There is a difference. You already paid taxes on your net worth once, why should you have to pay them again?

@ilovebeeswarzone:

THE COMPANIES WILL HAVE FAITH IN AMERICA

is that why Mitt Romney sent all those jobs to China (when he did or didn’t manage Bain Capital)? pure capitalism shows no patriotic loyalty. jobs went overseas, not because of “taxes” or “government”, but because of “profit”. jobs were going overseas because of the cheap labor, lack of union obstruction. the “job creators” don’t care about America…they care about money. that is the bottom line.

C Andrew Scott
hi,
I’M not too sure it’s that easy to come to a conclusion,
I do agree the UNIONS are a pain in the head for a successful
busyness owner, when they start to tell the COMPANY HOW TO RUN THEIR BUSYNESS,
AND HOW TO SHARE THEIR LEGITIME PROFITS WITH THE UNIONYZE EMPLOYEES,
WHO GET FAR MORE BENEFITS THAN THE COMPANY CAN AFFORD,
AND THAT IS NOT A PROBLEM OVERSEA, SPECIALY IF THE WORK DOES NOT EQUAL THE BENEFITS,
AND IF THE EMPLOYEES ARE ONLY HONORING THEIR UNION BOSS AND SPITTING ON THE OWNER OF THE COMPANY WITH AN ARROGANCE WE HAVE AS A PUBLIC CONTEMPLATE MORE THAN ONCE
DARING THE COMPANY TO FIRE THEM IF HE’S NOT HAPPY, RESULTING IN A BUNCH OF TUGS
WITH THEIR FAVORITE TOOLS BREAKING THE PLACE,
YES THAT IS A FACT TO RECOGNIZE, FOR A COMPANY ESPECIALLY WHEN THAT UNION HAS ELECTED HIS OWN PRESIDENT AND GIVE THE ONE A PURPLE SHIRT TO JOIN THE THUGS AND SHOUT LOUD WHAT IS GOOD FOR AMERICA FROM HIS COMMUNIST POINT OF VIEW,
THAT IS KEEPING THE COMPANY FURTHER AWAY THEN THEY WOULD LIKE AS AMERICANS WHO LOVE THEIR COUNTRY AND SEE IT SLIDE DOWN SLOWLY IN THE MUD UNTIL THE EARTH IS READY TO ENGULF IT IN THE ENTRAILS DEEP DOWN LOWER, AND COVER IT WITH A LAYER OF POISON EARTH TO PULVERIZE IT.
BYE

@C Andrew Scott: @ilovebeeswarzone:

LOLZ! Here below is a mindless repetition of long stale DNC talking points and demagoguery! It was Pres. Bush Sr. and Pres. Clinton who made outsourcing jobs to China possible by opening up trade with China. Outsourcing American jobs to China was a foreseeable and foreseen consequence of opening trade with Red. China. Outsourcing jobs to low labor cost and low tax China was US government economic and foreign policy from the 1990s. Not that Democratic politicians are willing to be honest about it! LOLZ!

is that why Mitt Romney sent all those jobs to China (when he did or didn’t manage Bain Capital)? pure capitalism shows no patriotic loyalty. jobs went overseas, not because of “taxes” or “government”, but because of “profit”.

After almost a quarter of a century of trade with China, Chinese labor cost are increasing and Chinese entrepreneurs and Chinese state owned companies have been become adept at creating their own jobs in export industries. Moreover the volume of outsourcing of jobs from the USA has been declining for a decade of so. The problem with outsourcing of American jobs to China and elsewhere has abated, except for those jobs and US business which are going overseas to escape the highest marginal corporate income tax rates in the developed world.

Three more points:
1) It has been the Obama Administrations energy policy to shut down the US coal industry, waive-off crude oil imports from Canada and to rely heavily upon solar energy equipment and rare earths imported from China. The jobs and industrial transfer that would result from that Obama government energy policies have potential to devastate American industry and jobs.

2) The horrible consequences of #1 above however are now being undercut by Bush-Cheney Administration energy policy which is now turning the USA into a low cost energy producer. US government subsidized Chinese solar energy out; and low cost fracked US natural gas in. This Bush-Cheney energy revolution is already beginning to revitalize US manufacturing.

3) Outsourcing of middle class American jobs pales by comparison to the impact of illegal immigration on US job market. Today around 13% of the working age population of Mexico is in the USA illegally taking millions upon million of jobs from Americans. The Obama Administration is doing everything it can to make sure that doesn’t change. Among the problems with outsourcing American jobs to illegal immigrants from Mexico is, unlike the situation with outsourcing to China, American workers lose their jobs and those very same Americans have to pick up the generous social welfare costs to keep those Mexican workers illegally but comfortably in the USA.

@Greg: @Aqua:

From ABC News, Jerusalem, Jul 29, 2012: Romney Not Sure If He’s Paid Less Than 13.9% in Taxes

No doubt because most of that income came from capital gains and dividends, earnings which are subject to heavy double taxation at the corporate level and also carry substantial risk of loss.

The standard corporate income tax rate in Red China is 25%. A special tax rate of 20% applies to small-scale enterprises, also a special 15% tax rate applies to state-encouraged new high-technology enterprises.

.

US corporate Federal income tax rates are as follows:
Taxable Income ($) Tax Rate
0 to 50,000 = 15%
50,000 to 75,000 = $7,500 + 25% Of the amount over 50,000
75,000 to 100,000 = $13,750 + 34% Of the amount over 75,000
100,000 to 335,000 = $22,250 + 39% Of the amount over 100,000
335,000 to 10,000,000 = $113,900 + 34% Of the amount over 335,000
10,000,000 to 15,000,000 = $3,400,000 + 35% Of the amount over 10,000,000
15,000,000 to 18,333,333 $5,150,000 + 38% Of the amount over 15,000,000
18,333,333 and up 35%

Mike O’Malley
wow, very well explained thank you,
yes ,one of the weakness for the young to find a job,
it should be them to take the jobs first by ALL THE RIGHTS GIVEN TO THEM AS AMERICANS
FIRST AND FORMOST,
WHAT A DISASTER FOR AMERICA FOR THIS TO HAVE BEEN ALLOWED TO HAPPEN BY THE OBAMA REGIME AND INTENT TO PUNISH THE AMERICANS, IS THAT WHY HE TOOK THE POWER?
TO GET BACK TO AMERICA FOR WHAT HIS AFRICAN FAMILY WAS TELLING HIM AS A YOUNGSTER
AGAINST AMERICA, IT’S SO OBVIOUS TO FEEL HIS DETACH INTEREST FOR ANYTHING CALL AMERICANS,
EVEN THE 10 COMMANDS ARE OUT OF PUBLIC SCHOOLS AND ANY CHRISTIAN ARE NOT ALLOWED TO PUBLICLY TESTIFY THEIR DEDICATION IN JESUS PUBLICLY IN A PRAYER OR A CITING OF THE BIBLE, IS IN IT ORDER COMING FROM THE OBAMA WHITE HOUSE? OUT OF WHAT DO THE YOUNG STUDENTS WOULD CALL IT, HATE ENVY FOR THE GREAT AMERICANS PROTECTORS OF ALL WHO SUFFER UNDER EVIL RULES, BUT LOOSING THEIR LIVES BY THE SAME EFFORT OF KILLING THE OPRESSORS, HOW CANNOT BE ENVIOUS IF YOU ARE ROOTED FROM ANOTHER COUNTRY WHERE THE 10 COMMANDS ARE NOT ROOTED, AND YOU END UP IN AMERICA AND PUT IN POWER WITHOUT THE ABILITY TO LEAD,
DOESN’T IT MAKE YOU HATER OF SEEING THAT SUPERIOR BREED OF HUMANS IN AMERICA,
BECAUSE YOU HAVE NOT BEEN ROOTED HERE, SO YOU CANNOT COMPREHEND THE CORE,
SO YOU ARE UNABLE TO LEAD THEM, SO YOU WANT THEM TO PAY FOR YOUR FRUSTRATION.
ALL YOUR AGENDA IS TO DESTROY THE PEOPLE OF THIS GRAND SUPER POWER OF THE WORLD.
EVEN WOUNDED AS YOU TRY TO HUMILIATE THEM, THEY REMAIN THE PROUDS WALKING TALL,
BECAUSE THAT’S WHO THEY ARE, AND NOBODY WILL CHANGE IT.

@ilovebeeswarzone:

Thank you beez.

Powers come and powers go. However when America passes from world scene expect things to get really nasty in the absence of effective Anglo-sphere leadership.

Regarding international trade though the way I see it is if say a Canadian company does a good job and can sell a good product in the US for a better price than say an Illinois business then I say let that Canadian company benefit Canadian workers and US consumers and investors in both countries.

Mike O’Malley
it is a truth un-denied, there are a special bond between our AMERICA,
which cannot be bend or broken, it’s felt in the soul deepen by many generations
bye

@ilovebeeswarzone: Bee…i so often enjoy your ridiculous rants.

DOESN’T IT MAKE YOU HATER OF SEEING THAT SUPERIOR BREED OF HUMANS IN AMERICA

as you often do…you cling to the First Amendment and Freedom of Religion, but only defend Christianity…and then make an ugly, ignorant, racist statement.

i am very glad you don’t live in the U.S. you do not deserve to touch this soil.

C Andrew Scott
that’s your opinion, you have the freedom to cite what you have in your mind,
as far as I’m concerned, you don’t fit in the profile I DESCRIBE of a true AMERICA LOVER,
YOU ARE LEANING TO MUCH ON THE SIDE WHICH THE BIG PROPAGANDA WORK
TO KEEP IT TWISTED AND ONE THAT IS SINKING IN THE MUD LOWER
EVERY TIME YOU EXPRESS YOUR MIND.
YOU ARE NOT IN THE GROUP I LEARNED TO ADMIRE SO MUCH FOR WHAT THEY BELIEVE OF AMERICA
NO MATTER THE BIG EFFORT FROM PEOPLE LIKE YOU TO TEACH THEM OF WHAT YOU LEARN
OF THE GLOBAL SOCIETY YOU FIND BETTER THAN THE ROOTED AMERICANS, YOU SOLD IN TO THEIR BELIEFS, STICK WITH THEM, THIS IS FREEDOM FOR YOU TOO. BUT
DON’T PICK ON ME OR OTHER FOR NOT LIKING WHO YOU ARE REPRESENTING EVERY TIME YOU SHOW UP .
I’M GLAD TO BE OF HELP, ALL YOU HAVE LEFT IS TO DIGEST THE POISON YOU SPIT TO ME

@ilovebeeswarzone: i don’t strive to be in the “group” of Americans you admire.

you represent a group of people i despise in this great nation. a group of closed-minded hypocrites who clings to the past. i’ve read between the lines of many of your illiterate posts, bashing non-Christians, non-whites, and non-Americans.

i do not admire you, Bee…i have pity for you.

C Andrew Scott
it’s your lost, not mine.
don’t pity me. I’m on top of you, with a great group of people you will never know,
the best AMERICA CAN FIND, THAT IS THE CONSERVATIVES OF THIS GREAT NATION,
UNMATCH FOR WITTS AND BRAIN POWER. THEY ARE MADE TO LEAD THIS AMERICA,
AND DON’T YOU FORGET IT, EVER

Bud Glory
you must have brought something bad, because you have been kept in the cyber space,
you don’t appear with your comment here,

@C Andrew Scott: @ilovebeeswarzone:

DOESN’T IT MAKE YOU HATER OF SEEING THAT SUPERIOR BREED OF HUMANS IN AMERICA

as you often do…you cling to the First Amendment and Freedom of Religion, but only defend Christianity…and then make an ugly, ignorant, racist statement.

i am very glad you don’t live in the U.S. you do not deserve to touch this soil.

I feel at home in Ireland as one might expect, but it struck me while visiting Ireland recently that I felt most at home in the University cities of Dublin and Galway where one will encounter multitudes of young Italians, Spanish and other foreign students among the Irish. Somehow it reminded me of home. Sure enough when I returned home I knew why. At home in the USA I was and am surrounded by fellow Americans from every ethnic and “racial” heritage in the world. Here I feel most at home. Traveling again weeks ago below the Mason-Dixon Line I encounter three young American members of the US Border Patrol in the heart of old-Dixie. They all had strong southern accents, the African American officer the least so. His “white” compatriot’s accent was stronger still, yet the deepest Johnny-Reb southern accent was spoken by a young American of Chinese ancestry.

If such a breed as are Americans is racial it is a race like no other outside of the Anglo-sphere.

Mike O’Malley
thank you, it tell of AMERICANS HOW SPECIAL AND UNIQUE THEY ARE AS ONLY AMERICAN,
one word tell more of this NATION, the other who are illegals should go back and use the right immigration laws, if not they broke the law,and should be returned in their country by force,

@ilovebeeswarzone:

You know Beez Canada has done a good job of welcoming immigrants from around the world too. 😉

BTW I expect that many of those younger “illegal” immigrants are going to turn out to good Americans one day.

@ilovebeeswarzone:

I’m on top of you

not so, Bee. you’re just “north” of me.

Mike O’ Malley
yes if they are under the real AMERICAN WAY, WITH THE FREEDOM TO ASPIRE AT ACHIEVING THEIR DREAMS OF SUCCESS FOR THEIR OWN AND FOR THE AMERICA,
BYE

C Andrew Scott
yes that is on top of you.

@ilovebeeswarzone: lmao. you need to lay off the Molson.

C Andrew Scott
no beer for me, I never like beer, only red whine only 2 glass only on special event gathering,

I never knew CJ was a Mormon. I’m one also and convert never to be ashamed. The Obama Regime is going to have a tough time smearing Mitt and Paul. I suggest they just pack it in along with all their Rump-Ranger buddies.
Mark your calenders…November 6th 2012…NOT election day…Correction day!

Hank Rockwell Jr
hi, I remember you have predicted the ROMNEY WIN LAST YEAR WAS IT?
AND YOU GOT IT, HOPE YOU MADE MONEY ON IT.
ARE YOU BRAVE ENOUGH TO PREDICT ROMNEY WIN THE PRESIDENCY,
AS I believe he will.
bye

@Mike O’Malley:

I was born in Jersey City where Frank Hague held sway. He was a pig. He held power in many ways, least of which was by manipulating who could vote and how many times they could vote. Cook County had nothing on Hudson County. Hague was a Democrat, but he enjoyed the lifestyle that only corruption could grant him. In the defense of liberty we should all resist the attempts of Republicans to prevent Democrats from voting.

@Hank Rockwell Jr:

Rump-Ranger buddies?

ilovebeeswarzone Oh yes. It’s been a bit difficult this time because all the prediction indicators aren’t in yet.
I was 100% sure on Mitt when I made the Primary prediction and now I’m going to stick out my neck once more. I predict that Mitt will get 320 electoral votes compared to Obama’s 218. Two University of Colorado professors have devised a model that has been correct since 1980 and they’ve selected Mitt.
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2012/08/22/university-of-colorado-pr_n_1822933.html
http://www.deseretnews.com/article/765598564/CU-forecasters-predict-a-Romney-presidency.html Everything is in for Romney/Ryan except for the Intrade market and I’m certain that they will follow suit after the GOP Convention and the debates.
https://www.intrade.com/v4/markets/?eventId=84326
Mitt and Paul are smart men and they will stay focused on the economy and the high unemployment figures.
We Mormons have a saying that I’m certain Mitt has learned well….”The dogs keep barking while the wagons keep rolling along”.
Have a nice day my friend.

Hank Rockwell Jr
Direct descendent of Porter Rockwell and damn proud of it.

@CJ: I’m happy for you. I’ve been a member ever since I was dipped back in 1957. However, I didn’t get active until I got back from Nam’ in 1971 and settled down with my wife of 40+ years. I was a wild child in my youth, MACVSOG and all that jazz. Life has been better for me since as I’m certain it has with you also.
Keep up the good fight. I enjoy reading your columns.

CJ
YES MITT ROMNEY IS BEST FOR A STRONG AMERICA WHICH IMPOSE BY CLASS AND DEMAND RESPECT FROM ALL TO BE SO PROUD OF THEIR PRESIDENT, LIKE IT WAS BEFORE.
ONE THAT CAN TALK PRECISELY WHAT HE MEAN TO FOREIGN COUNTRIES WHICH HAVE NOT HAVE THAT EXCHANGE OF INTELLIGENCE FROM THIS PRESIDENT WHICH IS NOT ABLE TO DEMAND OTHER THAN FEAR AND MISTRUST WITH HIS DOUBLE TALK TO LEADERS OF ALLIED COUNTRIES,
NOT WITH MITT ROMNEY, THIS TIME THEY WILL FEEL SECURE TO BE THE ALLIES OF THE MOST
IMPORTANT COUNTRY OF THE WORLD, WHY? BECAUSE THE MIGHTY MILITARY HAS HELP SO MANY COUNTRIES TO FIGHT THEIR ENEMIES, THEY DIED WHILE DOING SO AND WHERE DISABLED BY DOING SO, THEY ARE THE BENEVOLENT GIANTS, WHICH MITT ROMNEY ADMIRE SO MUCH, AND WILL SUPPORT THEM ALWAYS.