1. Drop-dead, collar-ad handsome with gracious, statesmanlike aura, like every central casting’s #1 choice for Commander-in-Chief.
2. Been married to ONE woman his entire life, and has been faithful to her, including through her bouts with breast cancer and MS.
3. No scandals or skeletons in his closet. (How boring is that?)
4. Can’t speak in a fake, southern, “black preacher voice” when necessary.
5. Highly intelligent. Graduated cum laude from both Harvard Law School and Harvard Business School…and by the way, his academic records are NOT sealed.
6. Doesn’t smoke or drink alcohol, and has never done drugs, not even in the counter-culture age when he went to college. Too square for today’s America?
7. Represents an America of “yesterday”, where people believed in God, went to Church, didn’t screw around, worked hard, and became a SUCCESS!
8. Has a family of five great sons…and none of them have police records or are in drug rehab. But of course, they were raised by a stay-at-home mom and that “choice” deserves America’s scorn.
9. Oh yes…he’s a MORMON. We need to be very afraid of that very strange religion that teaches its members to be clean-living, patriotic, fiscally conservative, charitable, self-reliant, and honest (in full disclosure, many may or may not know that I am also a Latter-Day Saint – “Mormon” to some unfamiliar with our Church).
10. And one more point…pundits say because of his wealth, he can’t relate to ordinary Americans. I guess that’s because he made that money HIMSELF…as opposed to marrying it or inheriting it from Dad. Apparently, he didn’t understand that actually working at a job and earning your own money made you unrelatable to Americans.
BONUS 11. Gives millions of dollars to charity every year. How dare he waste that money on charity and church instead of giving it to the government in a time of great need.
CJ
SUA SPONTE
HE ANDREW C SCOTT DID IT BEFORE AT THE POST ; TEBOW GET OF MY BACK,
HE WAS AN ASSHOLE THEN, AND STILL IS, DON’T WASTE YOUR PRECIOUS TIME ON A NUTCASE
JUST DUMP HIM
@ilovebeeswarzone: such language. is that how a good Christian is supposed to talk?
C Andrew Scott
yes, after following your comment, I get that required language that fits,
your arrogance.
@ilovebeeswarzone: whatever floats your boat…but i’d rather you live the life you preach and not make consolations when you see fit.
you might think i’m an “asshole” but i think it’s more that you refuse to even open your ears to the other side of the argument…EVER. you show me no respect…and demand all of mine.
i’m not asshole…anymore than you’re a nutcase. the truest difference between you and me: MY VOTE COUNTS.
(http://themoderatevoice.com/153994/quote-of-the-day-mitt-romney-told-olympians-they-didnt-get-there-alone)
hmmm? sounds awfully familiar?
i guess they have more in common than i thought.
@C Andrew Scott: It’s hard to have an intelligent debate with with those lacking it. But, I will humor you. Please point out exactly which diatribe of yours you’d like me to respond to. I got lost in your sea of ignorance.
@CJ: CJ, I think his last one should recieve the coveted golden “straw grasper” award….
@C Andrew Scott: blah blah blah…and yawn!
just because you don’t think Obama is attractive or educated. wait! weren’t those things you didn’t care about?
and as far as Mitt being a “leader”…are you referring to when the led Bain into the ground and jumped ship? hmmm? no thanks.
Hope you didn’t hurt your wrists typing that…Bwhahahhaha….Now get up off of the floor and go have a juice box..
@CJ: i feel your pain, CJ…i really do. it’s also hard to have a debate with someone (like yourself) that shows little to no respect for the other party.
my point all along was how hypocritical your little list was…and i’ve just provided you yet another reason why Mitt is no different than Obama…except he’s white, Republican, you endorse him.
i won’t stoop to your level and call you an “idiot”…you’ve pretty much said that about yourself already.
C Andrew Scottt
THE busyness people work hard to build their busyness, they deserve a kudo, not a word
to diminish the value of their work, and OBAMA has that bad habit to always humiliate the AMERICANS,
and at times when it’s very hard to strive, his speech fell in to angry people and rightfully to. who is he to lower the standing of proud people, HE DID IT BY BOWING TO OTHER COUNTRIES, HE DID IT BY APOLOGIZING FOR AMERICANS, HE HAS THAT HABIT, BY SENDING HIS MANY AGENCIES TO TELL BUSYNESS AND FARMERS HOW TO OPERATE THEIR OWN LIFESTYLE, THAT IS DIMINISHING THE PROUD PEOPLE, HE WANT TO CHANGE AMERICA FOREVER, HE HAS CUT THE EXPANSES ON THOSE STILL FIGHTING THE WAR, THAT IS DIMINISHING THE VALUE OF THE WARRIORS,
HE WON’T MAKE IT TOO FAR BY ALL THE WAY HE WANT THE PROUD PEOPLE TO, GIVE HIM
THEIR MONEY SO HE CAN SPEND IT AS HE ALONE WANT,
WELL THAT IS HIS SIGNATURE, HE DOESN’T HOLD AMERICA TO A HIGH VALUE SHE DESERVE,
HE JUST HOLD HIMSELF TO THE HIGH VALUE HE DOESN’T DESERVE,
HE HAS DONE NOTHING BUT OVER SPENT, NOT CREATING THE NEEDED JOBS, NOT PAID ATTENTION TO THE PEOPLE.
@ilovebeeswarzone: please, Bee…just accept the fact that you’re NOT American…and learn the concept of “context”.
Romney’s speech to the 2002 Olympians was hardly any different…if you bother to actually READ it.
@C Andrew Scott: You obviously lack the ability to note sarcasm when seen. Clearly this post was written as a sort of jab at liberals who can’t attack Romney on anything of substance. It’s hard to put out your neighbor’s fire when your own house is burning to the ground.
Romney is different from Obama is so many ways, I’m not even sure I could touch upon them all. Hell, Obama is much more different than most of the Democratic party! He’s in a league of his own when it comes to his background, ideology, and adherence (re: lack of) to the constitution.
I’m sorry I highlighted your idiocy. I apologize. Now, let’s get down to the beans of bullets. Exactly how is Obama no different than Romney again?
C Andrew Scott
please accept the fact that you are at FLOPPING ACES HERE, AND PEOPLE FROM ALL OVER THE WORLD ARE ALLOWED TO COMMENT, IT’S NOT RESTRICTED TO SOME FROM YOUR SIDE WHO LIKE TO SHOW ARROGANCE, TO THE SMART CONSERVATIVES, YOU MISLED THEIR TOLERANCE, BY TRYING TO DIMINISH THEIR COMMENTS, BUT HERE IS THE BEST INTELLIGENT COMMENT FROM THE BEST OF THIS NATION.
THAT IS THE CONSERVATIVES ALWAYS AHEAD OF THE DEMOCRATS BAD DECISIONS,
@CJ: i’m sorry i highlighted own idiocy…and you are still too blind to understand that.
jabs and sarcasms are one thing…but you might have well said…Romney has two legs, Romney drives a car, Romney watches television…because pointing out that he’s married, educated, etc…these are all things Obama’s supporters (i vote 3rd party) could spin right back at you.
i posted that quote from Romney where he basically says the same thing (i believe) that Obama was attempting to say…not to take credit away from “job creator” (unless Romney really was trying to take credit away from those Olympians), but rather point out that we’re all in this together and we need to work together to solve our problems.
and as far as Romney and Obama…weren’t they already connected with RomneyCare/ObamaCare???
the bottom line is…”liberal” or “conservate”…we all have to work together to solve the problems we’re facing. they are not the fault of Obama alone. there are intelligent people on both sides of the fence…but how stupid we BOTH look when we bicker and name call.
i’m actually having quite a hard time deciding which direction to go to in November. i live in Colorado…and lately, politics hasn’t been the focus of my attention.
@ilovebeeswarzone: as if “Republicans” never make mistakes, Bee? you are free to make your points as well…but as always, you cover your ears when anyone attempts to provide you with an intelligent rebuttle. it’s YOUR way or NO way. i’m sorry you can’t accept that or understand that. in the past, i have shown you respect only to have you spit all over my beliefs and opinions…because i’m “liberal”.
don’t be a hypocrite, Bee. don’t be so arrogant either.
@C Andrew Scott: No, they aren’t connected with RomneyCare and ObamaDon’tCare. There is a major difference. Romney was governor of a state and as such has the constitutional authority to impose things like mandatory health care if that’s something his particular state wanted. The difference is that there is no constitutional authority to mandate ObamaDon’tCare at the federal level. The Supreme Court ruled this way and then told them just to call it a tax. However, that will also be fought in court once the first Americans that refuse to pay the “tax” go to court and argue the equal tax clause of the Constitution. Romney knows the federal government doesn’t have the same powers the state governments do. Those powers and authorities are enumerated. This president doesn’t understand that when he ignorantly argues using RomneyCare or mentioning auto insurance, he’s comparing states’ rights to federal rights and two aren’t synonymous.
INDEPENDANT
YOU DON’T HAVE TO SPIT ON MITT ROMNEY if you want to explain why you will vote for OBAMA,
JUST GO AHEAD AND KEEP YOUR MOUTH SHUT INSTEAD OF SPITTING ON MITT ROMNEY.
IT WON’T HELP YOU TO WIN YOUR ELECTION, YOU ARE DOING LIKE OBAMA ALWAYS BLAMING OTHER FOR HIS LOSS.
This is satire, right?
None
yes it is, our CJ IS AN ORIGINAL,
HE COME UP WITH IDEAS DIFFERENTLY AND IT MAKE IT INTERESTING.
bye
“Never trust a man who doesn’t drink!” W. C. Fields
Frendly PHIL
it’s fun in a group, a bit of whine but not more than 2 glass for me,
bye
C Andrew Scott
on your 117, it was not me that was hypocrite and arrogant, remember on TEBOW’S POST?
IT WAS YOU WHO WHERE ARROGANTLY ACCUSING ME, ON AND ON, YOU MIGHT HAVE DRANK TOO MUCH, BECAUSE IT WAS CHRISTMAS EVE, SO YOU DON’T REMEMBER,
it’s okay, I can give you a pass, if you apologize,
but the two words hypocrite and arrogant are not match, one is the opposit of the other,
so make up your mind it’s one or the other. they don’t fit together,
where did you learn your ENGLISH?
[I always wanted to say that last line to someone]
by the way, you are right, the REPUBLICANS NEVER MAKE MISTAKE,
@ilovebeeswarzone:
actually…it might have been you who was “drunk”, but i too will let this pass.
also…i remember correctly that i DID apologize to you during that thread of you praising Tebow. i also remember you insisting on being an arrogant hypocrite (yes…they DO go together…you might want to freshen up on your Anglais) with your bashing of ANY other religion than your own.
and as for the Republicans and making mistakes…you might want to look up the word “sarcasm” as well.
à bientôt!
C Andrew Scott
I was kidding on some sentences,
you are like a dynamite stick, and it doesn’t take too much fire to light it
aint it true?
I also remember and I DON’T BASH ANY GOD LOVING RELIGION
YOU MIX SARCASS WITH A JOKE I said
@ilovebeeswarzone: ah…which is why it is so hard to have a civil discussion in a forum like this (not “conservative”…just interwebs)
and we can just agree to disagree, since you memory isn’t so good.
C Andrew Scott
ah you are bashing me again, you are a liberal trying to throw
your superiority, on me by the last nasty words,
my memory is super good.
it must be du to the food you eat, do you eat humus often?
I have read that too much foreign food can affect the margin on the brain between the negative thinking and the positive choice of expressing words.
@ilovebeeswarzone: my goodness, woman! you just want to fight don’t you. it has nothing to do with me being “liberal” it has to do with you being a hypocrite when you spout off about freedoms. you are very quick to want to condemn anyone else (i remember you bashing Muslims, atheists)…and then want to cry, cry, cry about the rights OUR Founding Fathers forged for US.
yes…i did eat hummus today. it was delicious.
perhaps one day you’ll understand that your xenophobic train of thought has no place in America. we are a nation of diversity and freedoms for ALL (despite what some think).
or do you not remember this conversation when you were defending Tim Tebow’s rights…while condemning anyone who was not “Christian”? perhaps you should go back and reflect.
in the meantime…i’m going to make some falafel and watch some baseball.
bon soir!
C Andrew Scott
would you know that woman was offended because her daughter had to recite the CONSTITUTION
WITH THE CLASS ONCE A WEEK, she was from an AFRICAN COUNTRY, AND did not want her daughter to learn that CONSTITUTION, SHE WAS ASK WHY SHE REJECT, AND SHE SAID; I thought
this was a GLOBAL COUNTRY, THIS STAYED WITH ME AS VERY DISTURBING, IN THESE TIMES TO LEARN THAT THOSE WHO COME HERE DON’T ALL KNOW IT IS THE USA AND NOT A GLOBAL UN COUNTRY,
SHAME IS IN IT?
@C Andrew Scott:
Yes this above is an example of snark failure. Snide presumptuous mockery promiscuously littering the venues occupied by the everyday Progressive-left. Why does the Progressive-Left everyman so embarrass himself with dimwitted failure? Perhaps because he is lazy, because he is ill informed and with little doubt because he lacks the critical thinking skills necessary to make a valuable contribution in a democratic society.
The earliest Mormon ‘s communities formed around the leadership of a charismatic con-artist, a dangerous manic-depressive leader, similar in stature to the deadly and unstable Rev. Jim Jones, the Marxist political ally of Nobel Peace Prize winner President Jimyah Carter. Fortunately for America the territorial governor of Missouri at the time had far more good Jacksonian sense than does Nobel Peace Prize winner President Jimyah Carter today. Thereafter if not for the coming Civil War, in my view, the US Army would likely had extinguished the mainstream branch of the Mormon “church” lead by another dangerous criminal, Brigham Young. Yet Mormons were if anything Americans and as the Mormon Church endured it could no longer survive as a cult and it was compelled to adapt by necessity, at the least, to the American context and to the justified American critique of their founding cult. Over the course of a century and a half Mormons have drawn upon their American experience and now function in the context of American separation of church and state more faithfully to the intent of the Founders than vast majority of their critics.
@Mike O’Malley:
i could say the same thing about so many “conservatives” i know. i could point out a few in this forum. it’s only snark failure when a “liberal” says something tho, right? because “conservatives” are such perfect individuals, free of any flaw or error.
your Mormons were not part of the Declaration of Independence, nor the Constitution. they, i will not refute, are part of the American fabric…as much as the Jews, the Muslims, Hindus, Buddhists, and (oh my!) atheists.
that is historical fact. would you like to attempt to prove otherwise?
@ilovebeeswarzone: perhaps you’d like to comment on the Westboro Baptist Church? or Rep. Louie Gohmert? do they represent the “good” conservative you want to represent?
or perhaps we should give a history lesson on the Pledge of Allegiance and the phrase “In God We Trust”?
i guess i shouldn’t be surprised…but you always reach to find a “black” woman or a “Muslim” immigrant to try and use as an example.
@C Andrew Scott:
We do not live in a political world of perfect symmetry Mr. Scott. As Dr. Anne Coulter has observed most of the time American Conservatives can barely tolerate their political leadership. As it is evident to any informed person of sound judgment, the Progressive-left conversely has time and time again heaped worshipful adulation on monster after monster enabling the internment of tens of millions in mass graves.
@Mike O’Malley: i did not come here heaping any “worshipful adulation” on anyone. i pointed out a flaw. i sought out intelligent discussion. i found insults and name-calling…and yet am “guilty” or “idiotic” if i try to defend myself.
i believe there are extremists in BOTH camps. i believe there was even some Romney-worship in this thread. i also believe that despite certain fundamental differences in beliefs…there are good people on both sides and when the finger-pointing and name-calling stops, progress as a nation, is possible.
oh…and have i mentioned, i vote 3rd party?
C Andrew Scott
so why should I not mention the word black woman, I DID NOT HERE, I said she was from an AFRICAN COUNTRY IT WAS NEEDED IN THE SENTENCE BECAUSE IT WAS IN THE READING OF WHERE I SAW IT, AND WHY CAN’T I SAY MUSLIM IF I NEED TO RELATE A STORY ABOUT MUSLIMS, WHAT IS IT WITH YOU, to find it offending, is in it the true name, I’LL TELL YOU WHY,
IT’s because you are looking for pinning racist card on here, it’s always you guys who open the first racist
sentences here, just check with TOM ON THE FIRST COMMENT WHICH HAD NOTHING TO DO WITH MUSLIM, AND THERE MERRILY HE WENT ON, THEN YOU HAD YOUR SLANG ACCUSING
AGAIN DEJA VU,
SO YOU ARE THE RACIST NOT THE CONSERVATIVES, I HAVE NOTICE THAT MANY TIME,
AND IF WE NEED TO SAY THE COLOR OF A PERSON, THAT IS NOT RACIST, IT’S BECAUSE OF THE SENTENCE NEED IT TO EXPLAIN, SAME FOR MUSLIM WORD OR CHRISTIAN OR ATHE OR ALL THOSE WORDS ARE USE TO DEFINE WHAT YOU WANT TO EXPLAIN. SIMPLE AS THAT.
Mike O’Malley
one thing where there are no doubt about their ALLEGIANCE TO AMERICA,
WE JUST HAVE to hear them all sing together, it move anyone who love AMERICA,
THE MOST BEAUTIFUL SONGS OF PATRIOTIC AMERICA
@C Andrew Scott:
The Black Book of Communism: Crimes, Terror, Repression
Demonic: How the Liberal Mob Is Endangering America
Mike O’Malley
by separating the people in define groups they keep them that way to suit their agenda
and votes. but it is against the CONSTITUTION, THAT’S WHY OBAMA SAY THAT LAW IS IN HIS WAY
Ann Coulter seems to be one of Mitt Romney’s biggest fans.
@Greg:
hmmmm …
Dr.Coulter lol loves Romney and prefers Christie for Veep. He’s as blunt as she is.
C Andrew Scott
you know you said you have the vote, but you vote 3rd party,
then your sure canceling your vote, aren’t you?
so your vote doesn’t count for this most important vote of your life,
@ilovebeeswarzone: first off, Bee…i’ll aplogize for using the word “racist” and return to the more apt word “xenophobic”. you’ve made your point loud and clear numerous times about your thoughts on “non-Christian” Americans. please…let me know when you get your Green Card. i’d be happy to give you a tour of the U.S. so you can see how wonderfully diverse our great nation is…a nation built by immigrants from all corners of the globe, not just those who share your skin tone, language (if you were a native English speaker), and/or bible. your comments about “freedom of speech” have often exluded those who do not agree with YOUR religious views. and again…you may want to do some homework on the Pledge of Allegiance (http://restorethepledge.org/) and the phrase “In God We Trust” (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/In_God_we_trust).
and regarding my vote not “counting”..actually, Bee…i vote 3rd party, in part thanks to the electoral college system. you see…during the last election, my vote was cast in Illinois (via absentee ballot). Obama was going to sweep the state (and thus all eleven electoral votes), so any voting Republican would have been as waste as well. i voted. i participated in the process. my vote was not wasted, because it was cast. in this election, i’m in Colorado, which is pretty much split. this may be the first election since Clinton’s first term (i did not vote for him the 2nd time) that i vote partisan. it is why i’m seeking out “non-biased” information about both candidates. i am not a fan of Ron Paul, unfortunately. i’ve often said i think the electoral system needs to be tweaked. it was designed when the vast number of Americans were uneducated or uninformed. in today’s America, people have access to information. some states split their votes (as Nebraska did in the last election), but that is uncommon.
C Andrew Scott
thank’s for elaborating although you did not have to knock me down for telling me,
that is interesting view, of voting for the least person to win, you know why well it’s your decision, but I have read many warning by many people including DEMOCRATS, all in their own words,
some not so loud but meaningful that this election is the most important of AMERICA
SINCE HER BEGINNING, if you hear that warning and think oh they are just don’t like the one in place, you miss the point. it’s deeper than that, it’s about your future, the one you love future, and most of all which touch the whole UNITED STATES IT’S FOR THE AGENDA TO CHANGE AMERICA FOREVER BY OBAMA’S MINDSET,
HEY DON’T BE FOOLED, I have lived in the USA FOR SOMETIMES THAT MADE ME LOVED IT SO MUCH.
and if you love it as I do, pay attention to the warnings, so you and your loved one won’t have to live with the consequences,
here I have chosen this FLOPPING ACES, EXACTLY BECAUSE OF WHAT I FOUND TO BE THE REAL
AMERICA LOVERS LIKE ME, AND I found the intelligence and tolerance living together, it was
what I knew is the AMERICAN SPIRIT WHICH NO ONE CAN KILL EVER, no matter how many efforts
to control, that agenda is good for submissive citizenry dictatorship FOREIGN COUNTRIES, WHERE
OBAMA WOULD BE FOLLOWING THEIR ANCIENT RULES, OBEY OR DIE,
NEVER WILL WORK IN AMERICA,
YOU SAID WE SHOULD GET TOGETHER TO FIX PROBLEM, THERE IS YOUR CHANCE TO HAVE THAT UNITING AMERICA, DON’T MISS IT.
WOW WHAT A PARTY WE WILL ALL HAVE IN NOVEMBER,
GET READY,FOR AMERICA’S PARTY TO SHOW HER REAL GRANDIOSE SPIRIT,
@ilovebeeswarzone: i’m sorry, Bee…i absolutely have no clue what the point of that last rant was.
perhaps you didn’t understand…me voting 3rd party made no difference in the Presidential election. if i had voted Republican, Obama would have still won 11 electoral votes. i voted 3rd party…he still got 11 electoral votes. understand the system before you feel the need to question my intelligence or love of my own nation.
as always…i’m amazed when i hear extremists from either side claim to have all the answers. you don’t, Bee. and nobody here has “all the answers” either. none of my tree-hugging liberal friends have all the answers. none of my fiscally conservative friends have all the answers. none of my Christian, Muslim, Jewish, or atheist friends have all the answers.
but what i do know…and believe…is if we WORK TOGETHER…we can still prosper as a nation. regardless of who i vote for or who is elected (or re-elected)…people will still need to set aside their differences for a common goal.
do not pretend you have infinite wisdom, Bee…NONE of us do. we no longer live in the United States of 1776, 1865, 0r 1950. unless we evolve and adapt with the ever-changing world…we will not succeed. that is MY opinion. you can agree to disagree. only when we unite as a people, will we find solutions to the problems we are facing, and have faced for decades.
“divided we fall, united we stand.” it goes both ways, Bee. if you want to push away the liberals…fine. if you want to bash the independents for not being on “your” team, fine. but understand that NO progress will be made until all parties work TOGETHER.
C Andrew Scott
do I hear you right? you don’t think it’s important to have the right PRESIDENT?
OR TO BE UNITED REGARDLESS OF THE PRESIDENT IN POWER?
NO YOU CAN’T
LIKE STOSSEL WOULD SAY,
YOU NEED TO SUPPORT THE CANDIDATE WITH THE ABILITY TO GET THE AMERICA IN ONE PIECE,
THAT IS A DIFFICULT TASK AND ROMNEY CAN DO BETTER AT IT, HE WILL GET THE BEST CREW AND THEY ARE BEING TEST BY NOW, NO SECOND HAND BUT THE NUMBER ONE, WHERE OBAMA DIVIDED IT,
HE SURE DID EVERYTHING TO DIG THE RIDGE DEEPER, HE DOESN’T HAVE THE SKILLS, NOR THE CREW, TO MEND
WHAT HE HAS BROKEN,
@ilovebeeswarzone:
no, Bee…you didn’t hear me right. no where did i say that i don’t think it’s important to have the “right” President. what i believe is, regardless of who is in office…both sides fight and inhibit the progress of the nation as a whole. and i believe it is imperative to be UNITED, regardless of which President or which Party is in office.
so much time is wasted when compromise FROM BOTH SIDES is not made.
that being said…i’m still undecided as to whether Romney (and the GOP) IS the “better” option this election. i most certainly have my reservations about Obama, but i do about Romney as well. ah…the beauty of America and the Two-Party system. it is one of the reasons i float around Flopping Aces (and other sites…both “conservative” and “liberal”)…as to get information, ideas, and opinions. i lean both ways…we’d agree on more topics than you probably believe.
but to suggest that i don’t “care” who is in office is not true. after the fact, after the election, i still believe everyone needs to work together, constructively…not against each other for four years at a time.
HOW sneaky to call me extremist, okay IT’S NOT ABOUT ME,
IT’S NOT ABOUT YOU IT’S ABOUT AMERICA,
THE WHOLE CONTINENT IN AMERICA IS TOUCH BY THE DEMISE OF THE UNITED STATES’ S PRESIDENT
AND RIGHT NOW DON’T AGREE WITH THE AGENDA THEY WANT TO PURSUE FOR THE NEXT 4 YEARS,
our ENEMIES are the same, and we depend on a strong USA
@ilovebeeswarzone: nothing sneaky about it, Bee. i just find it interesting that you insist that everyone supports the man in power when that man is your choice, but will fight tooth and nail to make your opposition fail. that is counter-productive, Bee. that is self-destructive.
the ENTIRE WORLD depends on a strong USA…not just Canada. rather than fight against each other and make no progress…why not work together and find solutions?
C Andrew Scott
if the AMERICANS want to work together, it begin by having a job to go to,
this is a miserable time in AMERICA, and MITT ROMNEY HAS THE SKILLS,
BUT HE NEED THE SUPPORT OF AMERICANS TO GET HIM THERE THOSE
WHO HAVE THE RIGHT TO VOTE, NO FRAUD BY DEAD PEOPLE, NO FRAUD BY DOUBLE VOTES, NO FRAUD BY ILLEGALS, JUST THE GOOD AMERICANS WANTING TO WORK AND GET THIS GOVERNMENT OF THEIR SHOULDERS, IMPOSING THEIR OWN VIEWS AND DECIDING ON THEIR OWN TO
WHAT THEY WANT IS GOOD FOR THE PEOPLE, EXCEPT THEY DON’T ASK AMERICANS WHAT THEY WANT,
@ilovebeeswarzone: Obama was voted in 4 years ago, Bee. i think the people spoke then, and there will always be “fraud” conspiracies. (remember Florida and GW?). we’ll have to see what happens in November.
i don’t believe it is fair to blame Obama on the employment situation. there are far more factors than to put all the blame on one man. we learned that trickle-down economics didn’t work. we’ve see how technology and other nations’ industries have changed the global economic landscape. the entire WORLD has changed in a very short period of time. that has to be accepted as well.