On This Day in History…

Loading

Those who have questioned the United States in this moment, I would argue, are living only in the moment. They have neither remembered the past nor imagined the future.

So first, lets just take a step back and consider why meeting the threat posed by Saddam Hussein is important to our security in the new era we are entering.

This is a time of tremendous promise for America. The superpower confrontation has ended; on every continent democracy is securing for more and more people the basic freedoms we Americans have come to take for granted. Bit by bit the information age is chipping away at the barriers economic, political and social that once kept people locked in and freedom and prosperity locked out.

But for all our promise, all our opportunity, people in this room know very well that this is not a time free from peril,especially as a result of reckless acts of outlaw nations and an unholy axis of terrorists, drug traffickers and organized international criminals.

We have to defend our future from these predators of the 21stcentury. They feed on the free flow of information and technology.They actually take advantage of the freer movement of people,information and ideas.

And they will be all the more lethal if we allow them to build arsenals of nuclear, chemical and biological weapons and the missiles to deliver them. We simply cannot allow that to happen.

There is no more clear example of this threat than Saddam Hussein’s Iraq. His regime threatens the safety of his people, the stability of his region and the security of all the rest of us.

I want the American people to understand first the past how did this crisis come about

And I want them to understand what we must do to protect the national interest, and indeed the interest of all freedom-loving people in the world.

Remember, as a condition of the ceasefire after the Gulf War,the United Nations demanded not the United States the United Nations demanded, and Saddam Hussein agreed to declare within 15days this is way back in 1991 within 15 days his nuclear,chemical and biological weapons and the missiles to deliver them,to make a total declaration. That’s what he promised to do.

The United Nations set up a special commission of highly trained international experts called UNSCOM, to make sure that Iraq made good on that commitment. We had every good reason to insist that Iraq disarm. Saddam had built up a terrible arsenal, and he had used it not once, but many times, in a decade long war with Iran,he used chemical weapons, against combatants, against civilians,against a foreign adversary, and even against his own people.

And during the Gulf War, Saddam launched Scuds against Saudi Arabia, Israel and Bahrain.

Now, instead of playing by the very rules he agreed to at the end of the Gulf War, Saddam has spent the better part of the past decade trying to cheat on this solemn commitment. Consider just some of the facts

Iraq repeatedly made false declarations about the weapons that it had left in its possession after the Gulf War. When UNSCOM would then uncover evidence that gave lie to those declarations, Iraq would simply amend the reports.

For example, Iraq revised its nuclear declarations four times within just 14 months and it has submitted six different biological warfare declarations, each of which has been rejected by UNSCOM.

In 1995, Hussein Kamal, Saddams son-in-law, and the chief organizer of Iraq’s weapons of mass destruction program, defected to Jordan. He revealed that Iraq was continuing to conceal weapons and missiles and the capacity to build many more.

Then and only then did Iraq admit to developing numbers of weapons in significant quantities and weapon stocks. Previously, it had vehemently denied the very thing it just simply admitted once Saddam Hussein’s son-in-law defected to Jordan and told the truth.Now listen to this, what did it admit

It admitted, among other things, an offensive biological warfare capability notably 5,000 gallons of botulinum, which causes botulism; 2,000 gallons of anthrax; 25 biological-filled Scud warheads; and 157 aerial bombs.

And I might say UNSCOM inspectors believe that Iraq has actually greatly understated its production.

As if we needed further confirmation, you all know what happened to his son-in-law when he made the untimely decision to go back to Iraq.

Next, throughout this entire process, Iraqi agents have undermined and undercut UNSCOM. They’ve harassed the inspectors,lied to them, disabled monitoring cameras, literally spirited evidence out of the back doors of suspect facilities as inspectors walked through the front door. And our people were there observing it and had the pictures to prove it.

Despite Iraq’s deceptions, UNSCOM has nevertheless done a remarkable job. Its inspectors the eyes and ears of the civilized world have uncovered and destroyed more weapons of mass destruction capacity than was destroyed during the Gulf War.

This includes nearly 40,000 chemical weapons, more than 100,000gallons of chemical weapons agents, 48 operational missiles, 30warheads specifically fitted for chemical and biological weapons,and a massive biological weapons facility at Al Hakam equipped to produce anthrax and other deadly agents.

Over the past few months, as they have come closer and closer to rooting out Iraq’s remaining nuclear capacity, Saddam has undertaken yet another gambit to thwart their ambitions.

By imposing debilitating conditions on the inspectors and declaring key sites which have still not been inspected off limits,including, I might add, one palace in Baghdad more than 2,600 acres large by comparison, when you hear all this business about presidential sites reflect our sovereignty, why do you want to come into a residence, the White House complex is 18 acres. So you’ll have some feel for this.

One of these presidential sites is about the size of Washington,D.C. That’s about how many acres did you tell me it was 40,000acres. Were not talking about a few rooms here with delicate personal matters involved.

It is obvious that there is an attempt here, based on the whole history of this operation since 1991, to protect whatever remains of his capacity to produce weapons of mass destruction, the missiles to deliver them, and the feed stocks necessary to produce them.

The UNSCOM inspectors believe that Iraq still has stockpiles of chemical and biological munitions, a small force of Scud-type missiles, and the capacity to restart quickly its production program and build many, many more weapons.

Now, against that background, let us remember the past here. It is against that background that we have repeatedly and unambiguously made clear our preference for a diplomatic solution.

The inspection system works. The inspection system has worked in the face of lies, stonewalling, obstacle after obstacle after obstacle. The people who have done that work deserve the thanks of civilized people throughout the world.

It has worked. That is all we want. And if we can find a diplomatic way to do what has to be done, to do what he promised to do at the end of the Gulf War, to do what should have been done within 15 days within 15 days of the agreement at the end of the Gulf War, if we can find a diplomatic way to do that, that is by far our preference.

But to be a genuine solution, and not simply one that glosses over the remaining problem, a diplomatic solution must include or meet a clear, immutable, reasonable, simple standard.

Iraq must agree and soon, to free, full, unfettered access to these sites anywhere in the country. There can be no dilution or diminishment of the integrity of the inspection system that UNSCOM has put in place.

Now those terms are nothing more or less than the essence of what he agreed to at the end of the Gulf War. The Security Council,many times since, has reiterated this standard. If he accepts them,force will not be necessary. If he refuses or continues to evade his obligations through more tactics of delay and deception, he and he alone will be to blame for the consequences.

I ask all of you to remember the record here what he promised to do within 15 days of the end of the Gulf War, what he repeatedly refused to do, what we found out in 1995, what the inspectors have done against all odds. We have no business agreeing to any resolution of this that does not include free, unfettered access to the remaining sites by people who have integrity and proven confidence in the inspection business. That should be our standard.That’s what UNSCOM has done, and that’s why I have been fighting for it so hard. And that’s why the United States should insist upon it.

Now, lets imagine the future. What if he fails to comply, and we fail to act, or we take some ambiguous third route which gives him yet more opportunities to develop this program of weapons of mass destruction and continue to press for the release of the sanctions and continue to ignore the solemn commitments that he made

Well, he will conclude that the international community has lost its will. He will then conclude that he can go right on and do more to rebuild an arsenal of devastating destruction.

And some day, some way, I guarantee you, he’ll use the arsenal.And I think every one of you whos really worked on this for anylength of time believes that, too.

Now we have spent several weeks building up our forces in the Gulf, and building a coalition of like-minded nations. Our force posture would not be possible without the support of Saudi Arabia,Kuwait, Bahrain, the GCC states and Turkey. Other friends andallies have agreed to provide forces, bases or logistical support,including the United Kingdom, Germany, Spain and Portugal, Denmark and the Netherlands, Hungary and Poland and the Czech Republic,Argentina, Iceland, Australia and New Zealand and our friends and neighbors in Canada.

That list is growing, not because anyone wants military action, but because there are people in this world who believe the United Nations resolutions should mean something, because they understand what UNSCOM has achieved, because they remember the past, and because they can imagine what the future will be depending on what we do now.

0 0 votes
Article Rating
Subscribe
Notify of
7 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments

You forgot that history only began in March of 2003. Everything that was said or happened before that was never said and never happened.

-Off to re-education camp with you.

So, the video shows our best intel was saying Saddam had a WMD program as early (if not before) 1998.
See it at the 2:25 mark and beyond.

But this Iraqi who wanted to bring down Saddam so much that he lied about the existence of WMD’s in Iraq only came forward in 2000.
So, his lies simply piled onto what we already had learned through other means.
Interesting.

I’ve been reading Cheney by Stephen Hayes, one thing of many that I did not know about the run up to the Iraq war was that it was Colin Powell that decided to go with a “WMD only” presentation at the UN. The original plan and preparation was for a two day event, Scooter Libby ordered research done on all of the violations, every single “where as”, they had it all wrapped up, Powell was chosen to make the case and he personally changed everything.

Missy: I seem to remember Colin Powell saying in an interview(that I don’t have off hand) that he was against the WMD presentation. Maybe he is trying to save his @$$ from the media?

@Zac:

Just finished the book last night. Cheney went from a well respected, from both sides of the aisle, member of Congress and Secretary of Defense to someone the left despised. Cheney didn’t care, he viewed the slings and arrows as part of what he had to endure for the country. Powell appears to be the opposite. In the end, Powell became someone Cheney no longer respects.

As far as the presentation, that was Powell’s decision, all he had to do was present the work that was already done, he chose not to. He whittled it down to the WMD issue only and the whole Bush 43 team took the heat for that for years. Powell to this day has not owned up to that nor given a reason as to why he chose to present the case for war…that way, the least he could have done.

He also withheld information from the Bush White House about Valerie Plame, he knew from the beginning that it was his deputy, Richard Armitage that leaked her name. To this day millions believe Cheney, Rove and others conspired to expose Valerie Plame out of revenge for what her husband did and Scooter Libby was convicted in a trial that never should have been held.

donald rumsfeld also said he didn;t think much of the state department that colin powell was the head of. powell and armitage and many in the state department hated what bush was doing so they sabatoged everything he did. if you can get a hold of a book also called SHADOW Warriors by kenneth timmerman it will tell you the whole story about what happened and how all the people who hated bush in executive branch were harming our iraq war. it will make you real mad. paul bremer also tried to sabatoge the iraq war effort by changing the plan that was set up and he was put under the defense department but he wouldn’t listen to donald rumsfeld. it is in his book he just wrote. doug feith also wrote a book and he said the same thing about the state department and paul bremer.