Obamacare Makes Life Much Easier For Michelle Obama! [Reader Post]

She is nothing more than an elitist. She is another of those who preach one thing knowing full well that they will never have to live with it themselves. There are truly very few moms like her, and not one of them worries about what a typical average mom in America has to worry about.

She and her kind will never have to worry about adequate healthcare combined with adequate living expenses due to a lower take home salary due to government intrusion that claims one thing, yet results in quite another:

Some major health insurance companies have stopped issuing certain types of policies for children, an unintended consequence of President Barack Obama’s health care overhaul law, state officials said Friday.

She and her kind will never have to worry about adequate food on the table for their growing children due to her husband’s and his associates war on America:

dependable access to adequate food has especially deteriorated among families with children. In 2008, nearly 17 million children, or 22.5 percent, lived in households in which food at times was scarce — 4 million children more than the year before. And the number of youngsters who sometimes were outright hungry rose from nearly 700,000 to almost 1.1 million.

She and her kind will never have to worry about adequate housing for their children, even after her husband’s and his associate’s failure to properly address the financial problems at Fannie and Freddie that contributed greatly to the current housing epidemic, particularly as they have already obtained real estate in a very well to do neighborhood near Chicago due to shady dealings with a Mr. Tony Reszko:

In a July 23 op-ed, Wall Street Journal Editorial Page Editor Paul Gigot put the blame for the GSEs’ collapse firmly on the members of the liberal establishment who took money from Freddie and Fannie. “Fan and Fred also couldn’t prosper for as long as they have without the support of the political left… This includes Mr. Frank and Sen. Chuck Schumer (D., N.Y.) on Capitol Hill, as well as Mr. [Paul] Krugman and the Washington Post’s Steven Pearlstein in the press.

“These two entities – Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac – are not facing any kind of financial crisis,” Frank said to the Times. “The more people exaggerate these problems, the more pressure there is on these companies, the less we will see in terms of affordable housing.” – Barney Frank

Rove said the Bush administration’s efforts to reform Fannie and Freddie were opposed by congressional Democrats – specifically Frank and Senate Banking Committee Chairman Christopher Dodd, D-Conn.

“And I got to tell you, for five years, I was part of an effort at the White House to fight this and our biggest opponents on the Hill who blocked this every step of the way were people like Chris Dodd and Barney Frank. And Fannie and Freddie are the $200 billion contagion at the center of this.”

She and her kind will never have to worry about college educations for their children given the fact that after leaving office, the book deals and speaking engagements will come rolling in to augment her husband’s annuity from the government. My guess is that annual income in the area of millions will be the norm in the Obama household, post WH.:

Most American families have lost ground in college affordability. Over the last two decades, the cost of attending two- and four-year public and private colleges (including tuition and other education-related expenses) has grown more rapidly than inflation, and faster than family income as well. As a result, the share of family income that is needed to pay for tuition and other college expenses has increased.

She and her kind will never have to worry about much that the typical average American family does, yet her rhetoric is meant as an ‘inclusion’ into that group of the average. Her ‘proud’ moment in her own history in America has turned out to be a decided lowpoint in American politics for an ever increasing number of American families.

@tadcf

I only claim that as a whole the Democratic fills my ideals about the how this country should be run–more so than Republicans.

I respectfully request that you list your ideals about how the country should be run and how the democrats relate to those ideals. We conservatives here could conjecture all day about how we see the democrats tearing the country apart and trashing the Constitution in the process, but I believe that we would like to hear your voice on the matter, if for nothing else, to be clear on just where you stand. Are you willing to open yourself up for debate on this, or are you just a coward who stands behind a wall of generalities?

BTW, most conservatives here are very willing to open themselves up on their beliefs politically and of life in general. We see no reason why you shouldn’t be willing to do the same.