When you login first time using a Social Login button, we collect your account public profile information shared by Social Login provider, based on your privacy settings. We also get your email address to automatically create an account for you in our website. Once your account is created, you'll be logged-in to this account.
DisagreeAgree
Connect with
I allow to create an account
When you login first time using a Social Login button, we collect your account public profile information shared by Social Login provider, based on your privacy settings. We also get your email address to automatically create an account for you in our website. Once your account is created, you'll be logged-in to this account.
What terrible news for Zero ….wah wah wah. The Zero’s approval ratings have dropped a massive 49 points in less than a year.
That sound you hear is liberal heads exploding 😉 Too bad, so sad.
Davey
14 years ago
This could almost be funny if that graph didn’t resemble a shark’s mouth so much.
yonason
14 years ago
At this point it’s hard to imagine how any sane person could approve, let alone strongly, of anything the cipher and his hench-ghouls are up to. The other hard pill to swallow is that there are so many delusional among us.
savage24
14 years ago
The only suprising thing here is that it took this long. It sure couldn’t have been, trying to sort out the truth from the lies. I haven’t heard the truth out of him yet.
I believe the result was somewhat obvious given his policies. By the way, Obama winning Nobel prize, gives every one another reason to ridicule him even more and wonder what is Nobel prize actually about!
Taqiyy.
14 years ago
Yassir Arafat, quintessential terrorist, was awarded the Nobel Peace Prize. That should tell anyone with any sense at all that the prize is meaningless.
“Obama winning Nobel prize, gives every one another reason to ridicule him even more and wonder what is Nobel prize actually about!”
Unless they are young, people should have already gotten the message when Yasser Arafat, father of modern terror, was given it. If y’ask me, Obama and Gore are in “good company.”
See the list at bottom here of those who were passed over in order to fill the cipher with hot air. Oh, heck, here it is…
As a bonus, let’s consider who the Nobel Committee considered less worthy than Barack Hussein Obama to receive to Nobel Peace Prize:
* Chinese Human Rights Activist Hu Jia – imprisoned for campaigning for human rights in the PRC, not as worthy as Barack Hussein Obama.
* Wei Jingsheng, who spent 17 years in Chinese prisons for urging reforms of China’s communist system. — not as worthy as Barack Hussein Obama. (Not to mention the symbolic value of awarding a Chinese dissident on the 20th Anniversary of the Tianenmen Square Massacre.)
* Greg Mortenson, founder of the Central Asia Institute has built nearly 80 schools, especially for girls, in remote areas of northern Pakistan and Afghanistan over the past 15 years – not as worthy as Barack Hussein Obama.
* Prince Ghazi bin Muhammad, a philosophy professor in Jordan who risks his life by advocating interfaith dialogue between Jews and Muslims, also not as worthy as Barack Hussein Obama.
* Afghan human rights activist Sima Samar. She currently leads the Afghanistan Independent Human Rights Commission and serves as the U.N. special envoy to Darfur and is apparently also not as worthy as Barack Hussein Obama. http://www.moonbattery.com/archives/2009/10/barack_obama_wi.html
Former Chrysler dealers fight back
using the Quo Warranto
By: Devvy
December 7, 2009
Two attorneys who have been prominent in the court battles regarding whether Obama is Constitutionally eligibile to be President have joined forces. Leo Donofrio and Stephen Pidgeon represent a group of former Chrysler dealers. These dealers lost their businesses as result of the federal government’s intervention and partial take over of Chrysler.
This is a complicated legal undertaking and as I have said in other columns, another learning experience for those of us who are not attorneys and have no legal training. In an effort to make sure I have my facts straight, Leo was gracious enough to spend some time with me this morning on the phone. He would like to make it very clear that this new legal undertaking is on behalf of clients (former Chrysler dealer James Anderer and others) who have retained him and Stephen to act on their behalf and in the best interests first and foremost. If that means settling the case in their best interests of their clients, that is their obligation.
As reported by Dianna Cotter in her December 5, 2009, piece, I specifically asked Leo about the two proposed actions:
1. A motion to reconsider the Court’s approval of the dealer rejections.
2. A quo warranto in the D.C. District Court pertaining to Obama and his administration.
Those of us following all these cases have learned the core traditional use of the Quo Warranto is for removing a usurper from office. But Leo has pointed out other traditional uses for the writ of quo warranto as codified in the DC Code:
§ 16-3501. Persons against whom issued; civil action
A quo warranto may be issued from the United States District Court for the District of Columbia in the name of the United States against a person who within the District of Columbia usurps, intrudes into, or unlawfully holds or exercises, a franchise conferred by the United States or a public office of the United States, civil or military. The proceedings shall be deemed a civil action.
Leo points out that the statute not only applies to eligibility, but also to the unlawful “exercise” of authority via public office. At the common law, quo warranto was not only used to challenge usurpation of office but also to challenge illegal government actions and the current quo warranto statute was written as a catch all in this regard. So Leo and Steve will bring two counts under 3501, eligibility and illegal use of Government funds. The second count refers to the use of TARP funds to facilitate the Chrysler Bankruptcy sale.
The 2d Circuit Court of Appeals dealt with this issue as raised by creditors of Chrysler in an appeal of the Sale transaction to which the dealers were not a party. In that decision, the Court of Appeals stated that the issue raised “interesting and unresolved issues”, but the appellants did not have standing based upon their limited injuries. The Chrylser dealers have the requisite injury – loss of their franchises – to meet the standing requirements. They will raise the issue in the quo warranto petition before the DC District Court.
You may recall that former Treasury Secretary Paulson refused to use TARP funds to bail out the auto industry indicating that to do so was not proper under the statute. A Congressional bill to allow TARP funds to be used for that purpose failed in the Senate, but the Obama administration went forward with it anyway.
Donofrio and Pidgeon also plan a third quo warranto count based upon 16-3521(2) of the quo warranto statute which states:
A quo warranto may be issued from the Superior Court of the District of Columbia in the name of the District of Columbia against…
(2) one or more persons who act as a corporation within the District of Columbia without being duly authorized, or exercise within the District of Columbia corporate rights, privileges, or franchises not granted them by law in force in the District of Columbia. The proceedings shall be deemed a civil action.
In other words, the actions taken by the government were an illegal exercise of corporate authority. The government has acted as a political agent (acting as board of directors) against corporations using taxpayer money to restructure the auto industry under their vision.
As to the time frame for filing of these lawsuits, Leo indicated it would be soon. He isn’t trying to be vague, but rather it is important sometimes for lawyers in these types of high profile, complicated cases to keep things ‘close to the vest’ until the actual date of filing. Additionally, situations can be fluid and attorneys have to adjust their strategy to deal with changes as the situations develop.
Obama was and always will be constitutionally ineligible to serve as president of these united States of America because he was not a natural born citizen at birth. However, one step at a time as we see how this effort develops.
Related links:
Senators seek answers on auto dealer closures
“The Obama administration is not directly involved with the negotiations, and would disagree with any congressional action to overturn what it called “exceptionally complicated” decisions on dealership terminations.”
The General Motors National Dealer Council (”NDC”) strongly opposes
“Automobile Dealer Economic Rights Restoration Act of 2009” (“H. R. 2743”)
Who says that Obama cannot continue to impress us? Who says that he cannot set new standards for the US Presidency? And yet we all know people sitting at home in a bubble of delusion who still believe with all their heart and soul (if they believed they had one) that only a fringe element of racist extremists disagree with the obvious greatness of The One. “How could he possibly be unpopular?” they ask each other. “Nobody I know voted against him!”
Patvann
14 years ago
This narcissist gives himself a “solid B+” regarding how well he thinks he’s done so far…
this obama and his ilk in the white house needs to be impeached. they are at war with the american people.
be at the polls in 2010! vote out the democrats and rinos. also, be ever deligent for voter fraud.
Missy
14 years ago
Obama the narcissist may have given himself a B+, but 54% of the NYDaily News readers have given him an F. It may be un-scientific but it’s definately more realistic!
I am astounded that so much of the American public still refuses to acknowledge the obvious. The Marxist indoctrination in our public school systems and our universities along with the propaganda bureaus of the so-called Fourth Estate ( a self anointed title) or Main Stream Media who considers themselves to be the watchdogs of government. I like dogs so I wont refer to them as poodles, but rather piss ants, who ever heard of watch piss ants?
These institutions of dubious responsibility, yes there are some responsible teachers, although pitifully few and far outnumbered by multitudes of devout Marxists, that manage to keep the cerebrally compromised in the clutches of International Progressive Marxism.
Breitbart tv and pjtv may have the winning scenario, using the tv to eventually capture the Oprah and View dullards amongst us, who believe if it comes from the tv it must be true, a result of public education.
Creativity is required on all levels to expose the fraud and corruption of the White House, it is obvious the simple facts are not significant enough to reach a sizable portion of our population. Hopefully we will have more with the means, talent, and imagination step forward and challenge the status quo of the Lame Stream Media to put forth a non-Marxist programing.
We should give credit to Fox News, yet they are relying on Glen Beck for too much of their programing. To capture the rest of America, they need shows like the View and Oprah. I believe the talent is out there, most talent is never given an opportunity. Well its time to go see some horses. I will check in later tonight.
Hard Right
14 years ago
Well Skook, about half the populace probably couldn’t tell you who the VP is let alone understand what the obomanation is trying to do or what is happening.
Skookum
14 years ago
Hard Right, I read your comment today on my Blackberry while working and it stuck with me all day. Perhaps in the future we should have two presidents: one would be an American Idol type like Obama, a purely ceremonial post; and then we could have a real president who actually runs the country. You can only vote in one election and you actually need to be functionally literate to vote for the real president.
What terrible news for Zero ….wah wah wah. The Zero’s approval ratings have dropped a massive 49 points in less than a year.
That sound you hear is liberal heads exploding 😉 Too bad, so sad.
This could almost be funny if that graph didn’t resemble a shark’s mouth so much.
At this point it’s hard to imagine how any sane person could approve, let alone strongly, of anything the cipher and his hench-ghouls are up to. The other hard pill to swallow is that there are so many delusional among us.
The only suprising thing here is that it took this long. It sure couldn’t have been, trying to sort out the truth from the lies. I haven’t heard the truth out of him yet.
I believe the result was somewhat obvious given his policies. By the way, Obama winning Nobel prize, gives every one another reason to ridicule him even more and wonder what is Nobel prize actually about!
Yassir Arafat, quintessential terrorist, was awarded the Nobel Peace Prize. That should tell anyone with any sense at all that the prize is meaningless.
@savage24:
“I haven’t heard the truth out of him yet”
Your not ever likely too, either. I think he’s constitutionally incapable of telling it.
@Monica:
“Obama winning Nobel prize, gives every one another reason to ridicule him even more and wonder what is Nobel prize actually about!”
Unless they are young, people should have already gotten the message when Yasser Arafat, father of modern terror, was given it. If y’ask me, Obama and Gore are in “good company.”
See the list at bottom here of those who were passed over in order to fill the cipher with hot air. Oh, heck, here it is…
Maybe this will help Obama’s approval rating (somewhere):
http://caosblog.com/archives/15203
Talk about “yikes”…
Top it off with this …
Former Chrysler dealers fight back
using the Quo Warranto
By: Devvy
December 7, 2009
Two attorneys who have been prominent in the court battles regarding whether Obama is Constitutionally eligibile to be President have joined forces. Leo Donofrio and Stephen Pidgeon represent a group of former Chrysler dealers. These dealers lost their businesses as result of the federal government’s intervention and partial take over of Chrysler.
This is a complicated legal undertaking and as I have said in other columns, another learning experience for those of us who are not attorneys and have no legal training. In an effort to make sure I have my facts straight, Leo was gracious enough to spend some time with me this morning on the phone. He would like to make it very clear that this new legal undertaking is on behalf of clients (former Chrysler dealer James Anderer and others) who have retained him and Stephen to act on their behalf and in the best interests first and foremost. If that means settling the case in their best interests of their clients, that is their obligation.
As reported by Dianna Cotter in her December 5, 2009, piece, I specifically asked Leo about the two proposed actions:
1. A motion to reconsider the Court’s approval of the dealer rejections.
2. A quo warranto in the D.C. District Court pertaining to Obama and his administration.
Those of us following all these cases have learned the core traditional use of the Quo Warranto is for removing a usurper from office. But Leo has pointed out other traditional uses for the writ of quo warranto as codified in the DC Code:
§ 16-3501. Persons against whom issued; civil action
A quo warranto may be issued from the United States District Court for the District of Columbia in the name of the United States against a person who within the District of Columbia usurps, intrudes into, or unlawfully holds or exercises, a franchise conferred by the United States or a public office of the United States, civil or military. The proceedings shall be deemed a civil action.
Leo points out that the statute not only applies to eligibility, but also to the unlawful “exercise” of authority via public office. At the common law, quo warranto was not only used to challenge usurpation of office but also to challenge illegal government actions and the current quo warranto statute was written as a catch all in this regard. So Leo and Steve will bring two counts under 3501, eligibility and illegal use of Government funds. The second count refers to the use of TARP funds to facilitate the Chrysler Bankruptcy sale.
The 2d Circuit Court of Appeals dealt with this issue as raised by creditors of Chrysler in an appeal of the Sale transaction to which the dealers were not a party. In that decision, the Court of Appeals stated that the issue raised “interesting and unresolved issues”, but the appellants did not have standing based upon their limited injuries. The Chrylser dealers have the requisite injury – loss of their franchises – to meet the standing requirements. They will raise the issue in the quo warranto petition before the DC District Court.
You may recall that former Treasury Secretary Paulson refused to use TARP funds to bail out the auto industry indicating that to do so was not proper under the statute. A Congressional bill to allow TARP funds to be used for that purpose failed in the Senate, but the Obama administration went forward with it anyway.
Donofrio and Pidgeon also plan a third quo warranto count based upon 16-3521(2) of the quo warranto statute which states:
A quo warranto may be issued from the Superior Court of the District of Columbia in the name of the District of Columbia against…
(2) one or more persons who act as a corporation within the District of Columbia without being duly authorized, or exercise within the District of Columbia corporate rights, privileges, or franchises not granted them by law in force in the District of Columbia. The proceedings shall be deemed a civil action.
In other words, the actions taken by the government were an illegal exercise of corporate authority. The government has acted as a political agent (acting as board of directors) against corporations using taxpayer money to restructure the auto industry under their vision.
As to the time frame for filing of these lawsuits, Leo indicated it would be soon. He isn’t trying to be vague, but rather it is important sometimes for lawyers in these types of high profile, complicated cases to keep things ‘close to the vest’ until the actual date of filing. Additionally, situations can be fluid and attorneys have to adjust their strategy to deal with changes as the situations develop.
Obama was and always will be constitutionally ineligible to serve as president of these united States of America because he was not a natural born citizen at birth. However, one step at a time as we see how this effort develops.
Related links:
Senators seek answers on auto dealer closures
“The Obama administration is not directly involved with the negotiations, and would disagree with any congressional action to overturn what it called “exceptionally complicated” decisions on dealership terminations.”
The General Motors National Dealer Council (”NDC”) strongly opposes
“Automobile Dealer Economic Rights Restoration Act of 2009” (“H. R. 2743”)
Thomas: H.R. 2743
http://www.devvy.com/new_site/chrysler_120709.html
Who says that Obama cannot continue to impress us? Who says that he cannot set new standards for the US Presidency? And yet we all know people sitting at home in a bubble of delusion who still believe with all their heart and soul (if they believed they had one) that only a fringe element of racist extremists disagree with the obvious greatness of The One. “How could he possibly be unpopular?” they ask each other. “Nobody I know voted against him!”
This narcissist gives himself a “solid B+” regarding how well he thinks he’s done so far…
http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20091214/ap_on_en_tv/us_obama_oprah
So he IS doing all this on purpose.
this obama and his ilk in the white house needs to be impeached. they are at war with the american people.
be at the polls in 2010! vote out the democrats and rinos. also, be ever deligent for voter fraud.
Obama the narcissist may have given himself a B+, but 54% of the NYDaily News readers have given him an F. It may be un-scientific but it’s definately more realistic!
If you wish to participate:
http://www.nydailynews.com/news/politics/2009/12/14/2009-12-14_b_for_me_bam_sez_first_couple_hosts_oprah_on_abc.html
I am astounded that so much of the American public still refuses to acknowledge the obvious. The Marxist indoctrination in our public school systems and our universities along with the propaganda bureaus of the so-called Fourth Estate ( a self anointed title) or Main Stream Media who considers themselves to be the watchdogs of government. I like dogs so I wont refer to them as poodles, but rather piss ants, who ever heard of watch piss ants?
These institutions of dubious responsibility, yes there are some responsible teachers, although pitifully few and far outnumbered by multitudes of devout Marxists, that manage to keep the cerebrally compromised in the clutches of International Progressive Marxism.
Breitbart tv and pjtv may have the winning scenario, using the tv to eventually capture the Oprah and View dullards amongst us, who believe if it comes from the tv it must be true, a result of public education.
Creativity is required on all levels to expose the fraud and corruption of the White House, it is obvious the simple facts are not significant enough to reach a sizable portion of our population. Hopefully we will have more with the means, talent, and imagination step forward and challenge the status quo of the Lame Stream Media to put forth a non-Marxist programing.
We should give credit to Fox News, yet they are relying on Glen Beck for too much of their programing. To capture the rest of America, they need shows like the View and Oprah. I believe the talent is out there, most talent is never given an opportunity. Well its time to go see some horses. I will check in later tonight.
Well Skook, about half the populace probably couldn’t tell you who the VP is let alone understand what the obomanation is trying to do or what is happening.
Hard Right, I read your comment today on my Blackberry while working and it stuck with me all day. Perhaps in the future we should have two presidents: one would be an American Idol type like Obama, a purely ceremonial post; and then we could have a real president who actually runs the country. You can only vote in one election and you actually need to be functionally literate to vote for the real president.