When you login first time using a Social Login button, we collect your account public profile information shared by Social Login provider, based on your privacy settings. We also get your email address to automatically create an account for you in our website. Once your account is created, you'll be logged-in to this account.
DisagreeAgree
Connect with
I allow to create an account
When you login first time using a Social Login button, we collect your account public profile information shared by Social Login provider, based on your privacy settings. We also get your email address to automatically create an account for you in our website. Once your account is created, you'll be logged-in to this account.
DisagreeAgree
9 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
bill-tb
14 years ago
well $900 billion in new debt sounds a lot better than a trillion in new debt. It sort of gets lost in the debt pile anyway doesn’t it?
They’re cowards, but they’re not even smart cowards. Smart cowards would know to fear their constituents more than the fear the Democrat leadership. We can only hope that the American people wake up and vote out all of those Congressmen who vote for this horrendous bill.
eaglewingz08
14 years ago
All Snowe and Spectre got for their porkulus concerns was 60 billion in ‘cuts’ in three years. So we should be thankful that the Blue Dogs got forty billion dollar bonus over an additional seven year period. Who says the democraps don’t look out for the little people?
Anyway, the one trillion dollar deficit is the low ball figure. If this bill comes in at less than three trillion dollars in additional deficit spending it will be a miracle. I hope the blue dogs vote for this monstrosity and get an earful when they go home to their constituents. Just like the Hillarycare blue dog democraps did in 1993.
suek
14 years ago
Don’t know if this info is correct, but if action will help, then ACT!
The point is that although I don’t know if this is a fact, I believe it.
DaMav
14 years ago
On the plus side, this should give us a specific bill to tear into, ending the bob and weave special of “there is no one specific bill”.
First place to start is examining the magic savings of 100 billion. Is this another unicorn dung special like the two claims the CBO tore apart? Liberals SAYING they have cut 100 billion doesn’t mean they have actually cut anything at all.
Timothy
14 years ago
Like the McCaskill meeting, the tea parties need to get “in their faces”
OLDPUPPYMAX
14 years ago
And this “socialist lite” thuggery was the real goal all along. Had they radical left gotten it all, fine and dandy. But these criminals were quite ready to accept this grotesque FOOT IN THE DOOR as the first step in the complete takeover of our liberty.
Hard Right
14 years ago
Good point DaMav.
I was going to buy a Bugatti Veyron, but bought a Lamborghini instead. I saved $700,000! That seems to be the “thinking” here. To make it worse, we are broke. Less deficit spending than planned is still deficit spending!!
well $900 billion in new debt sounds a lot better than a trillion in new debt. It sort of gets lost in the debt pile anyway doesn’t it?
Blue dogs, Democrats first, Americans second.
Lap dogs.
They’re cowards, but they’re not even smart cowards. Smart cowards would know to fear their constituents more than the fear the Democrat leadership. We can only hope that the American people wake up and vote out all of those Congressmen who vote for this horrendous bill.
All Snowe and Spectre got for their porkulus concerns was 60 billion in ‘cuts’ in three years. So we should be thankful that the Blue Dogs got forty billion dollar bonus over an additional seven year period. Who says the democraps don’t look out for the little people?
Anyway, the one trillion dollar deficit is the low ball figure. If this bill comes in at less than three trillion dollars in additional deficit spending it will be a miracle. I hope the blue dogs vote for this monstrosity and get an earful when they go home to their constituents. Just like the Hillarycare blue dog democraps did in 1993.
Don’t know if this info is correct, but if action will help, then ACT!
http://www.bookwormroom.com/2009/07/29/dems-trying-to-sneak-healthcare-through/
The point is that although I don’t know if this is a fact, I believe it.
On the plus side, this should give us a specific bill to tear into, ending the bob and weave special of “there is no one specific bill”.
First place to start is examining the magic savings of 100 billion. Is this another unicorn dung special like the two claims the CBO tore apart? Liberals SAYING they have cut 100 billion doesn’t mean they have actually cut anything at all.
Like the McCaskill meeting, the tea parties need to get “in their faces”
And this “socialist lite” thuggery was the real goal all along. Had they radical left gotten it all, fine and dandy. But these criminals were quite ready to accept this grotesque FOOT IN THE DOOR as the first step in the complete takeover of our liberty.
Good point DaMav.
I was going to buy a Bugatti Veyron, but bought a Lamborghini instead. I saved $700,000! That seems to be the “thinking” here. To make it worse, we are broke. Less deficit spending than planned is still deficit spending!!