When you login first time using a Social Login button, we collect your account public profile information shared by Social Login provider, based on your privacy settings. We also get your email address to automatically create an account for you in our website. Once your account is created, you'll be logged-in to this account.
DisagreeAgree
Connect with
I allow to create an account
When you login first time using a Social Login button, we collect your account public profile information shared by Social Login provider, based on your privacy settings. We also get your email address to automatically create an account for you in our website. Once your account is created, you'll be logged-in to this account.
DisagreeAgree
29 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
jainphx
14 years ago
Are all you Obama supporters beginning to see his loyalties? He’s the head of the most powerful nation on earth, and he bows to a Saudi Prince, disgusting, but we tried to tell you. You just wouldn’t listen.
budvarakbar
14 years ago
They do not care
bigpapa
14 years ago
Nobama is such a worthless POS… since he supports abortion his mom should have had him aborted… would have saved us and our country a lot of trouble..
Bow to some freaking muslim “King”,,,, next thing you know he’ll give some jackass gift to the Queen of England and his ghetto wife will hug her..
Our enemies have become emboldened and the next attack will be soon.. they see weakness and they are right. Our “POTUS” is a worthess, weak, wannabee star.. as you sow so shall you reap..
I hope for change…
Tom
14 years ago
This is the most disgusting, embarrassing thing Obama has done yet! It’s even worse than giving out taxpayer’s money as bonuses to congressional staff members. The muslim extremists will take note of this gaffe and use it against us. I’ve been saying all along, as well as many others, the muslims goal is to destroy from within. It has begun and the Lemmings that put this bozo in office still don’t see it!!!
How quickly you forget that the Bush family has close ties to the Bin Ladin family in Saudi Arabia. The only planes allowed to fly right after 911 were Airforce One and all the planes that spirited the Bin Ladins out of America to protect them. The Saudis behead people, stone women who have been raped, and most of the terrorists who perpetrated 911 were from Saudi Arabia. They are a Muslim Theocracy of the worst kind. We protected them and turned a blind eye while we went about promoting Democratic values in the Middle East. Bush closed down our military base there to appease the Saudis. Osama didn’t like the “infidels” on Saudi soil, and Bush pulled out our troops. We value their almighty Oil more than we do spreading Democracy to the Saudis. You can rail against Obama because of this photo all you want folks, but Obama simply hasn’t had enough time to do the MAJOR A** kissing that Bush and Company have to the very Muslim Terrorist producing country that spawned the 911 terrorists who killed 3000+ Americans.
ruaqtpi2
14 years ago
@mooseburger,
You’re right that “Obama simply hasn’t had enough time to do the MAJOR A** kissing that Bush and Company have to the very Muslim Terrorist producing country…,” but he’s sure sending the signal that he’s willing to kiss a whole lotta A$$ in the Middle East. Hillary has already rolled out the red carpet for Hamas, and Soros has his connections all lined up to ensure that Obama puts the U.S. in the least favorable position for oil and arms negotitations. Besides, with Obama whittling down our defense budget, demeaning the importance of the work our soldiers perform, and gutting the auto industry, we won’t have much need for weapons or oil.
The U.S. isn’t going to be free any time soon of the need to import oil. Bush knew this, and was at least acting like a head of state. Our current genuflector-in-chief is acting like a subservient water boy – he must’ve identified a bit too closely with Gunga Din.
Looks like some of the liberal lemmings are starting to believe their own lies. Quick question, If the war in Iraq was all about getting their oil, why are we not getting their oil after 7 years in country? No answer? Here’s one for you, the War in Iraq IS NOT ABOUT OIL!! Never has been.
George Bush pulled out of Saudi Arabia because the leader of that sovereign country asked us to, we had no beef with them and we had the bases established in Iraq, we no longer needed the one in Saudi Arabia. Simple, logical answers that don’t serve the liberal left agendas tend to piss them off and cause them to invent stories that simply are not true. The people that are too lazy or too apathetic to research the truth fall in line like good little lemmings, believing anything they are fed right to the edge of the cliff.
Rick007
14 years ago
I think he learned how to bow like that from B Frank.
bill-tb
14 years ago
Obama is just embarrassingly juvenile in all he does. The other countries are probably saying to themselves, I can’t believe Americans elected this Dumbo.
huh
14 years ago
He is probably thanking him for a ll the campaign contributions!
I am removing my very crude comment and am replacing it with one that recognizes Obama’s positive side. (I’m probably more shocked than some of you are.)
While I in no way condone his bowing to the Saudis, and hope he comes to realize his error, I have to recognize that he’s also capable of positive gestures, like this one…
Ingratitude is a terrible thing, and so, since I am a Chabadnik, I have to be grateful for the President’s very positive action. Consequently I feel I am not going to be able to criticize him as I have in the past, even to the point of appologizing for underestimating him. So I have to recuse myself from any further public criticism, as I am now in a way biased in his favor.
Perhaps in the merit of this good G-d will redirect his intentions in other matters so that they will also be good, and not the opposite, G-d forbid.
mooseburger
14 years ago
To those who refute the Bin Ladin plane rides out of the country after 911, I say, point taken. (Thanks for the link GaffaUK). To those who bring up facts as to what the Administration is doing now, at least you are dealing in substance, and we can all debate the wisdom or folly of the current or past policies. To those who see a photo and get hysterical, I say get a grip. The Right coined a phrase called “Bush Derangement syndrome” to identify this very same hyper freak out partisan condition against everything Bush ever did from the far left. Crying Socialist, Marxist, secret Muslim, and Wealth redistributor seems to be in fashion with some leading Conservative voices. All this and that pallin’ around with terrorists stuff didn’t work before, and it has real risks. Being a hyper radical seldom changes reasonable peoples minds, nor does it give them even pause enough to consider the credibility of your positions. It mostly turns people off, doing a favor to the people whose agenda you oppose so strongly.
If preaching to the choir is good enough for you, then cool, but I doubt you will do much converting of Souls with the sharp hateful rhetoric.
The fact that the people who planned the killing of 3000+ Americans, I’m talking about Osama Bin Ladin and his ilk, are still alive, on the loose, and still sending out threats against America is a shameful indictment of Bush. You can shill for Bush all you want, and point out pictures of Obama like what this posting is about, but Obama is the President today precisely because of Bush’s failures. Failing to bring swift justice to Osama is perhaps his biggest failure of all. All the hate and bile spewed at Bush did little to slow down his agenda. I doubt that “Obama Derangement Syndrome” will have much effect against his agenda either.
What I was trying to convey in my above post was that if either Bush or Obama were held to the same standard, Bush had 8 years to work with, Obama had had less than 4 months. The Saudis are not our friends, they are the anti-most everything that we in America stand for. God gave some of the world’s most abundant, easiest to access oil supplies to our enemies. Like it or not, Bush and Obama have to deal with them, it seems strange to give Bush a pass and slam Obama because of some photo.
To those who see a photo and get hysterical, I say get a grip. The Right coined a phrase called “Bush Derangement syndrome” to identify this very same hyper freak out partisan condition against everything Bush ever did from the far left. Crying Socialist, Marxist, secret Muslim, and Wealth redistributor seems to be in fashion with some leading Conservative voices.
I mostly agree.
“OMG! Don’t do it Mr. President…..don’t go in for….
the shoulder rub!!!!”
But who are the “leading conservative voices” who talk of “secret Muslim”?
I think some of us are reacting with partisan extreme; and I also think some of it has been fueled by 8 years of Bush-bashing in the same spirit of hyperbolic hysteria and derangement. So what goes around, comes around, and it’s give and take, rightly or wrongly.
The fact that the people who planned the killing of 3000+ Americans, I’m talking about Osama Bin Ladin and his ilk, are still alive, on the loose, and still sending out threats against America is a shameful indictment of Bush.
No it’s not. We’ve never stopped searching for bin Laden and I’d say well over 80% of those “original players” have been killed or captured; and the Administration wasn’t out to seek “revenge”. One of their chief aims was to prevent the next terror attack. And with 9/11 a wake-up call for at least half the country and the Bush Administration, future plots have been foiled, al-Qaeda and takfiri terrorism has lost legitimacy in the eyes of many Muslims (thanks to the war in Iraq), and the succeeding 7+ years has seen America kept safe. Now the baton’s been passed to the next president. How will he run with it?
You can shill for Bush all you want, and point out pictures of Obama like what this posting is about, but Obama is the President today precisely because of Bush’s failures.
I agree that the perception of Bush’s failures had a big part in the election loss; but I also believe that perception will soften and turn by future historians. I think so much of the Bush record has been successfully distorted by its political foes.
Failing to bring swift justice to Osama is perhaps his biggest failure of all. All the hate and bile spewed at Bush did little to slow down his agenda.
I beg to differ. Political obstructionism along with “hate and bile spewed” did a heck of a lot of damage to the President, including the election loss of ’06 and in part, ’08.
What I was trying to convey in my above post was that if either Bush or Obama were held to the same standard, Bush had 8 years to work with, Obama had had less than 4 months.
I think what’s so disconcerting is the speed with which Obama is working his agenda of (radical) change along with Nancy and Harry…..all within the space of the first 74 days.
The Saudis are not our friends, they are the anti-most everything that we in America stand for.
Yup. Relationships, alliances, and foreign entanglements can be a bit of a complicated mess. But that relationship stretches before the Bush years, and continues even to this day, as attested to the “Obama bow”.
Like it or not, Bush and Obama have to deal with them, it seems strange to give Bush a pass and slam Obama because of some photo.
I agree that the photo is being made more about than it actually is for partisan politics. But like I hinted at, what’s good for the goose…..
I take skye’s photo with a grain of partisan humor.
@mooseburger: Obama is NOT a wealth redistributor?
Did you bother to read his budget blueprint?
mooseburger
14 years ago
Mike’s America said:
@mooseburger: Obama is NOT a wealth redistributor?
Did you bother to read his budget blueprint?
The tax system has always been used to redistribute peoples money, or wealth since long before Obama was ever born. My kids are raised and on their own, but my property taxes are used to pay for schools my kids don’t use. My taxes are used for roads and bridges I will never drive on. The tax system itself exists to take some of my wealth and redistribute it where the government decides it should be spent. That is the purpose of elections and representation. Even Reagan raised taxes to save Social Security, and redistribute my money to others. Local communities and States give big companies huge tax abatements as incentive to bring in foreign companies and jobs to their local areas while my taxes and other citizens carry the burden with no abatements for us.
You may not like what Obama is doing, and letting the Bush tax cuts expire certainly hits home to the Conservative base and gets them more upset than a Union meeting at WalMart, but to single Obama out as the Socialist Wealth Redistributer implies that he alone is radically changing the tax system, when in fact, it pretty much is already a redistributionist system and has been for a very long time.
They have been slicing up the tax money and doling it out to others for years. You can question if Obamas priorities are best or not, but the system is not going thru any radical change, other than there is a shift in emphasis away from the higher incomes and slightly in favor of the lower and middle income, and some folks don’t like it. I can understand that, I am a flat tax supporter myself. Not one person with a brain would be happy to pay more taxes. The fact is, under the current tax system, City, State, County, Federal, Local, whatever, they are all redistributionists, and elected to represent us and make these decisions.
Tom
14 years ago
Granted, our government has been redistributing wealth for years and years. Yes Ronald Reagan did raise taxes to save OUR Social Security syestem, but, Obama and the rest of the far left wants to take the money we law abiding American citizens have been paying into all our working lives and give access to the ILLEGAl scofflaw aliens after they are granted amnesty and into which they have paid NOTHING! If that’s not the wrong kind of wealth distribution, then I don’t know what is!!
Our wonderful new Secretary of State has gone so far as to call these illegals ‘Patriots’ just because they are uneducated and vote Democrat, disregarding the fact they are breaking the laws of our country just by being here. To me, that sends an invitation to anyone in the world to come here illegally, break whatever laws they want and they will still get my social security and free healthcare that I have to pay for. They can even fly the Flags of their home countries on our soil and not fear retribution! To me, this carries tolerance way too far and is the total opposite of what our founding fathers stood for. I got a bit off track there, but, all this to say, we are losing our country ladies and gentlemen and the current administration has shown me nothing to reassure me they won’t let it happen! Call it partisanship, radicalism or whatever, I’ll call it patriotism to stand against this sort of thing happening.
mooseburger
14 years ago
The amnesty bill in 2007 was endorsed by John McCain and if passed, would have certainly been signed by George Bush, both Republicans.
The borders were left open by Bush, even during the War On Terror. Your reference to “we are losing our country ladies and gentlemen and the current administration has shown me nothing to reassure me they won’t let it happen!”
Quite the contrary, Bush and the House/Senate have already let it happen. The Illegals are here. Mission accomplished.
I think the amnesty bill of 2007 was a political attempt by both parties to pander to the Hispanic vote. Shameless. Now that they are here, have kids who are citizens, do you really believe there is any way that ANYONE from any political spectrum will send them back home?
Not gonna happen.
Unlike the banner on the aircraft carrier after the invasion in Iraq, keeping the borders open by Mr. Bush certainly gives the words “Mission Accomplished” the ring of truth. The demographics of America have been changed in a major way and probably forever. Why Bush allowed this, and why you are blaming Obama escapes my ability to understand. Obama may have been in agreement with this, but he was not the President while this invasion happened, Republicans were in charge.
Tom
14 years ago
Yes a republican President was in charge, but the Democrats were in control of congress. I did not ‘blame’ Obama for the amnesty bill, although he was in fact part of it, I simply said he has shown me nothing to reassure me he would do something positive about it.
Tom
14 years ago
Sorry, I accidentally hit send, then was interrupted before I finished my last comment. Anyway, If anybody is to ‘BLAME’ it is us, the American people, for being so apathetic in our actions against this sort of thing. We are so afraid of being called intolerant or politically incorrect, we fail to take any action at all, even if it is absolutely the politically correct thing to do! I havn’t researched it myself, but I saw an article that said there are no less than 24 known terrorist training camps IN THIS COUNTRY! They were set up by the American Muslim Trust and nothing is being done to shut them down, The ACLU says they have the right to set up their facilities in this country and nobody is fighting them on it. This is a travesty. They should all be rounded up and charged as traitors if they are citizens and if they are not they should be held as political prisoners then deported. I for one, will do my own research and send letters to my representatives in congress and to the president. I will be called an intolerant bigot for my efforts, but so be it.
mooseburger
14 years ago
Tom Said:
I havn’t researched it myself, but I saw an article that said there are no less than 24 known terrorist training camps IN THIS COUNTRY! They were set up by the American Muslim Trust and nothing is being done to shut them down, The ACLU says they have the right to set up their facilities in this country and nobody is fighting them on it. This is a travesty. They should all be rounded up and charged as traitors if they are citizens and if they are not they should be held as political prisoners then deported. I for one, will do my own research and send letters to my representatives in congress and to the president. I will be called an intolerant bigot for my efforts, but so be it.
Do you have a link to that article Tom? I am sure we would all like to read that one.
Are all you Obama supporters beginning to see his loyalties? He’s the head of the most powerful nation on earth, and he bows to a Saudi Prince, disgusting, but we tried to tell you. You just wouldn’t listen.
They do not care
Nobama is such a worthless POS… since he supports abortion his mom should have had him aborted… would have saved us and our country a lot of trouble..
Bow to some freaking muslim “King”,,,, next thing you know he’ll give some jackass gift to the Queen of England and his ghetto wife will hug her..
Our enemies have become emboldened and the next attack will be soon.. they see weakness and they are right. Our “POTUS” is a worthess, weak, wannabee star.. as you sow so shall you reap..
I hope for change…
This is the most disgusting, embarrassing thing Obama has done yet! It’s even worse than giving out taxpayer’s money as bonuses to congressional staff members. The muslim extremists will take note of this gaffe and use it against us. I’ve been saying all along, as well as many others, the muslims goal is to destroy from within. It has begun and the Lemmings that put this bozo in office still don’t see it!!!
He has to bow to the ruler of the land where Mecca is located.
Only if he is a Muslim Mike. He swore up and down during his campaign he is Christian, not Muslim.
Jain, the left is not capable of such analysis or introspection.
As we have seen, they immediately make excuses for him.
Thanks Skye. Warrior’s Blood boiling again.
How quickly you forget that the Bush family has close ties to the Bin Ladin family in Saudi Arabia. The only planes allowed to fly right after 911 were Airforce One and all the planes that spirited the Bin Ladins out of America to protect them. The Saudis behead people, stone women who have been raped, and most of the terrorists who perpetrated 911 were from Saudi Arabia. They are a Muslim Theocracy of the worst kind. We protected them and turned a blind eye while we went about promoting Democratic values in the Middle East. Bush closed down our military base there to appease the Saudis. Osama didn’t like the “infidels” on Saudi soil, and Bush pulled out our troops. We value their almighty Oil more than we do spreading Democracy to the Saudis. You can rail against Obama because of this photo all you want folks, but Obama simply hasn’t had enough time to do the MAJOR A** kissing that Bush and Company have to the very Muslim Terrorist producing country that spawned the 911 terrorists who killed 3000+ Americans.
@mooseburger,
You’re right that “Obama simply hasn’t had enough time to do the MAJOR A** kissing that Bush and Company have to the very Muslim Terrorist producing country…,” but he’s sure sending the signal that he’s willing to kiss a whole lotta A$$ in the Middle East. Hillary has already rolled out the red carpet for Hamas, and Soros has his connections all lined up to ensure that Obama puts the U.S. in the least favorable position for oil and arms negotitations. Besides, with Obama whittling down our defense budget, demeaning the importance of the work our soldiers perform, and gutting the auto industry, we won’t have much need for weapons or oil.
The U.S. isn’t going to be free any time soon of the need to import oil. Bush knew this, and was at least acting like a head of state. Our current genuflector-in-chief is acting like a subservient water boy – he must’ve identified a bit too closely with Gunga Din.
Jeff V
Too much Michael Moore will rot your brain.
That ridiculous claim has been proven false over and over and over again.
Why are you trying to mislead the readers here?
http://www.snopes.com/rumors/flights.asp
Looks like some of the liberal lemmings are starting to believe their own lies. Quick question, If the war in Iraq was all about getting their oil, why are we not getting their oil after 7 years in country? No answer? Here’s one for you, the War in Iraq IS NOT ABOUT OIL!! Never has been.
George Bush pulled out of Saudi Arabia because the leader of that sovereign country asked us to, we had no beef with them and we had the bases established in Iraq, we no longer needed the one in Saudi Arabia. Simple, logical answers that don’t serve the liberal left agendas tend to piss them off and cause them to invent stories that simply are not true. The people that are too lazy or too apathetic to research the truth fall in line like good little lemmings, believing anything they are fed right to the edge of the cliff.
I think he learned how to bow like that from B Frank.
Obama is just embarrassingly juvenile in all he does. The other countries are probably saying to themselves, I can’t believe Americans elected this Dumbo.
He is probably thanking him for a ll the campaign contributions!
Obama Accepting Untraceable Donations
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2008/10/28/AR2008102803413.html
I am removing my very crude comment and am replacing it with one that recognizes Obama’s positive side. (I’m probably more shocked than some of you are.)
While I in no way condone his bowing to the Saudis, and hope he comes to realize his error, I have to recognize that he’s also capable of positive gestures, like this one…
Ingratitude is a terrible thing, and so, since I am a Chabadnik, I have to be grateful for the President’s very positive action. Consequently I feel I am not going to be able to criticize him as I have in the past, even to the point of appologizing for underestimating him. So I have to recuse myself from any further public criticism, as I am now in a way biased in his favor.
Perhaps in the merit of this good G-d will redirect his intentions in other matters so that they will also be good, and not the opposite, G-d forbid.
To those who refute the Bin Ladin plane rides out of the country after 911, I say, point taken. (Thanks for the link GaffaUK). To those who bring up facts as to what the Administration is doing now, at least you are dealing in substance, and we can all debate the wisdom or folly of the current or past policies. To those who see a photo and get hysterical, I say get a grip. The Right coined a phrase called “Bush Derangement syndrome” to identify this very same hyper freak out partisan condition against everything Bush ever did from the far left. Crying Socialist, Marxist, secret Muslim, and Wealth redistributor seems to be in fashion with some leading Conservative voices. All this and that pallin’ around with terrorists stuff didn’t work before, and it has real risks. Being a hyper radical seldom changes reasonable peoples minds, nor does it give them even pause enough to consider the credibility of your positions. It mostly turns people off, doing a favor to the people whose agenda you oppose so strongly.
If preaching to the choir is good enough for you, then cool, but I doubt you will do much converting of Souls with the sharp hateful rhetoric.
The fact that the people who planned the killing of 3000+ Americans, I’m talking about Osama Bin Ladin and his ilk, are still alive, on the loose, and still sending out threats against America is a shameful indictment of Bush. You can shill for Bush all you want, and point out pictures of Obama like what this posting is about, but Obama is the President today precisely because of Bush’s failures. Failing to bring swift justice to Osama is perhaps his biggest failure of all. All the hate and bile spewed at Bush did little to slow down his agenda. I doubt that “Obama Derangement Syndrome” will have much effect against his agenda either.
What I was trying to convey in my above post was that if either Bush or Obama were held to the same standard, Bush had 8 years to work with, Obama had had less than 4 months. The Saudis are not our friends, they are the anti-most everything that we in America stand for. God gave some of the world’s most abundant, easiest to access oil supplies to our enemies. Like it or not, Bush and Obama have to deal with them, it seems strange to give Bush a pass and slam Obama because of some photo.
@mooseburger:
I mostly agree.
“OMG! Don’t do it Mr. President…..don’t go in for….
But who are the “leading conservative voices” who talk of “secret Muslim”?
I think some of us are reacting with partisan extreme; and I also think some of it has been fueled by 8 years of Bush-bashing in the same spirit of hyperbolic hysteria and derangement. So what goes around, comes around, and it’s give and take, rightly or wrongly.
No it’s not. We’ve never stopped searching for bin Laden and I’d say well over 80% of those “original players” have been killed or captured; and the Administration wasn’t out to seek “revenge”. One of their chief aims was to prevent the next terror attack. And with 9/11 a wake-up call for at least half the country and the Bush Administration, future plots have been foiled, al-Qaeda and takfiri terrorism has lost legitimacy in the eyes of many Muslims (thanks to the war in Iraq), and the succeeding 7+ years has seen America kept safe. Now the baton’s been passed to the next president. How will he run with it?
I agree that the perception of Bush’s failures had a big part in the election loss; but I also believe that perception will soften and turn by future historians. I think so much of the Bush record has been successfully distorted by its political foes.
I beg to differ. Political obstructionism along with “hate and bile spewed” did a heck of a lot of damage to the President, including the election loss of ’06 and in part, ’08.
I think what’s so disconcerting is the speed with which Obama is working his agenda of (radical) change along with Nancy and Harry…..all within the space of the first 74 days.
Yup. Relationships, alliances, and foreign entanglements can be a bit of a complicated mess. But that relationship stretches before the Bush years, and continues even to this day, as attested to the “Obama bow”.
I agree that the photo is being made more about than it actually is for partisan politics. But like I hinted at, what’s good for the goose…..
I take skye’s photo with a grain of partisan humor.
@mooseburger: Obama is NOT a wealth redistributor?
Did you bother to read his budget blueprint?
Mike’s America said:
@mooseburger: Obama is NOT a wealth redistributor?
Did you bother to read his budget blueprint?
The tax system has always been used to redistribute peoples money, or wealth since long before Obama was ever born. My kids are raised and on their own, but my property taxes are used to pay for schools my kids don’t use. My taxes are used for roads and bridges I will never drive on. The tax system itself exists to take some of my wealth and redistribute it where the government decides it should be spent. That is the purpose of elections and representation. Even Reagan raised taxes to save Social Security, and redistribute my money to others. Local communities and States give big companies huge tax abatements as incentive to bring in foreign companies and jobs to their local areas while my taxes and other citizens carry the burden with no abatements for us.
You may not like what Obama is doing, and letting the Bush tax cuts expire certainly hits home to the Conservative base and gets them more upset than a Union meeting at WalMart, but to single Obama out as the Socialist Wealth Redistributer implies that he alone is radically changing the tax system, when in fact, it pretty much is already a redistributionist system and has been for a very long time.
They have been slicing up the tax money and doling it out to others for years. You can question if Obamas priorities are best or not, but the system is not going thru any radical change, other than there is a shift in emphasis away from the higher incomes and slightly in favor of the lower and middle income, and some folks don’t like it. I can understand that, I am a flat tax supporter myself. Not one person with a brain would be happy to pay more taxes. The fact is, under the current tax system, City, State, County, Federal, Local, whatever, they are all redistributionists, and elected to represent us and make these decisions.
Granted, our government has been redistributing wealth for years and years. Yes Ronald Reagan did raise taxes to save OUR Social Security syestem, but, Obama and the rest of the far left wants to take the money we law abiding American citizens have been paying into all our working lives and give access to the ILLEGAl scofflaw aliens after they are granted amnesty and into which they have paid NOTHING! If that’s not the wrong kind of wealth distribution, then I don’t know what is!!
Our wonderful new Secretary of State has gone so far as to call these illegals ‘Patriots’ just because they are uneducated and vote Democrat, disregarding the fact they are breaking the laws of our country just by being here. To me, that sends an invitation to anyone in the world to come here illegally, break whatever laws they want and they will still get my social security and free healthcare that I have to pay for. They can even fly the Flags of their home countries on our soil and not fear retribution! To me, this carries tolerance way too far and is the total opposite of what our founding fathers stood for. I got a bit off track there, but, all this to say, we are losing our country ladies and gentlemen and the current administration has shown me nothing to reassure me they won’t let it happen! Call it partisanship, radicalism or whatever, I’ll call it patriotism to stand against this sort of thing happening.
The amnesty bill in 2007 was endorsed by John McCain and if passed, would have certainly been signed by George Bush, both Republicans.
The borders were left open by Bush, even during the War On Terror. Your reference to “we are losing our country ladies and gentlemen and the current administration has shown me nothing to reassure me they won’t let it happen!”
Quite the contrary, Bush and the House/Senate have already let it happen. The Illegals are here. Mission accomplished.
I think the amnesty bill of 2007 was a political attempt by both parties to pander to the Hispanic vote. Shameless. Now that they are here, have kids who are citizens, do you really believe there is any way that ANYONE from any political spectrum will send them back home?
Not gonna happen.
Unlike the banner on the aircraft carrier after the invasion in Iraq, keeping the borders open by Mr. Bush certainly gives the words “Mission Accomplished” the ring of truth. The demographics of America have been changed in a major way and probably forever. Why Bush allowed this, and why you are blaming Obama escapes my ability to understand. Obama may have been in agreement with this, but he was not the President while this invasion happened, Republicans were in charge.
Yes a republican President was in charge, but the Democrats were in control of congress. I did not ‘blame’ Obama for the amnesty bill, although he was in fact part of it, I simply said he has shown me nothing to reassure me he would do something positive about it.
Sorry, I accidentally hit send, then was interrupted before I finished my last comment. Anyway, If anybody is to ‘BLAME’ it is us, the American people, for being so apathetic in our actions against this sort of thing. We are so afraid of being called intolerant or politically incorrect, we fail to take any action at all, even if it is absolutely the politically correct thing to do! I havn’t researched it myself, but I saw an article that said there are no less than 24 known terrorist training camps IN THIS COUNTRY! They were set up by the American Muslim Trust and nothing is being done to shut them down, The ACLU says they have the right to set up their facilities in this country and nobody is fighting them on it. This is a travesty. They should all be rounded up and charged as traitors if they are citizens and if they are not they should be held as political prisoners then deported. I for one, will do my own research and send letters to my representatives in congress and to the president. I will be called an intolerant bigot for my efforts, but so be it.
Tom Said:
I havn’t researched it myself, but I saw an article that said there are no less than 24 known terrorist training camps IN THIS COUNTRY! They were set up by the American Muslim Trust and nothing is being done to shut them down, The ACLU says they have the right to set up their facilities in this country and nobody is fighting them on it. This is a travesty. They should all be rounded up and charged as traitors if they are citizens and if they are not they should be held as political prisoners then deported. I for one, will do my own research and send letters to my representatives in congress and to the president. I will be called an intolerant bigot for my efforts, but so be it.
Do you have a link to that article Tom? I am sure we would all like to read that one.
Mooseburger, here is the link with video. http://shock.military.com/shock/videos.do?displayContent=185279#&ESRC=retirees.nl
He wasn’t bowing. No, really. His teleprompter was down on the floor, and he was bending over to read it.
Jules Crittenden calls it a “Posture Malfunction”.
Heh.