Posted by Curt on 8 March, 2009 at 1:31 pm. 5 comments already!

Great find at Patterico’s Pontifications. It’s a poll question from 2006, when we were in the thick of it in Iraq, asking if you wanted Bush to succeed. Can you guess what the outcome was on the Democrat side?

poll-should-bush-succeed.jpg

Of course this relates to the recent “outrage” over Rush’s statement that he did not want Obama to succeed.

So let me see, 51% of Democrats and 34% of Independents wanted Bush to fail in everything he does…including in Iraq. Rush and myself want Obama to fail in turning this country into a Socialist state, period. Rush couldn’t of been more clearer:

I got a request here from a major American print publication. “Dear Rush: For the Obama [Immaculate] Inauguration we are asking a handful of very prominent politicians, statesmen, scholars, businessmen, commentators, and economists to write 400 words on their hope for the Obama presidency. We would love to include you. If you could send us 400 words on your hope for the Obama presidency, we need it by Monday night, that would be ideal.” Now, we’re caught in this trap again. The premise is, what is your “hope.” My hope, and please understand me when I say this. I disagree fervently with the people on our side of the aisle who have caved and who say, “Well, I hope he succeeds. We’ve got to give him a chance.” Why? They didn’t give Bush a chance in 2000. Before he was inaugurated the search-and-destroy mission had begun. I’m not talking about search-and-destroy, but I’ve been listening to Barack Obama for a year-and-a-half. I know what his politics are. I know what his plans are, as he has stated them. I don’t want them to succeed.

If I wanted Obama to succeed, I’d be happy the Republicans have laid down. And I would be encouraging Republicans to lay down and support him. Look, what he’s talking about is the absorption of as much of the private sector by the US government as possible, from the banking business, to the mortgage industry, the automobile business, to health care. I do not want the government in charge of all of these things. I don’t want this to work. So I’m thinking of replying to the guy, “Okay, I’ll send you a response, but I don’t need 400 words, I need four: I hope he fails.” (interruption) What are you laughing at? See, here’s the point. Everybody thinks it’s outrageous to say. Look, even my staff, “Oh, you can’t do that.” Why not? Why is it any different, what’s new, what is unfair about my saying I hope liberalism fails? Liberalism is our problem. Liberalism is what’s gotten us dangerously close to the precipice here. Why do I want more of it? I don’t care what the Drive-By story is. I would be honored if the Drive-By Media headlined me all day long: “Limbaugh: I Hope Obama Fails.” Somebody’s gotta say it.

Wanting our country to remain what the founders envisioned is a bit different then wanting our country to fail in a war because of their ignorant hatred of the President.

So, as Patterico said, you can shove that poll response into the face of any liberal who whines that we want our country to fail because we want Obama to fail in enacting his Socialist policies. They have no right to the moral high ground now.

>