Schuster Owned By Zeigler On MSNBC Regarding Sarah Palin

Loading

John Zeigler absolutely owned the nimrod David Schuster during this interview. My favorite part? Zeigler telling Schuster he is a joke:

Then there was round two where he is owned once more:

He actually named David Brooks, Chuck Hagel and Kathleen Parker as Republicans who represent our party…..oh man, can’t make this stuff up.

And then he has the nerve to ask:

“Isn’t it important to try to test her credibility”

This coming from the network that did everything but wear a blue dress for Obama. Does anybody remember when it was that any MSM outfit asked Obama what the front page news story of the NYT’s was? Sheesh….what a nimrod.

I find it fascinating how downright scared these liberals are of Sarah Palin. We all know the MSM has their back and all but to start the attack machine four years before the next election is pretty indicative of a very scared party. They know Obama will own this recession. They suspect we may be attacked again since the enemy now knows we have another Clinton in office with no spine. And they understand that a very well qualified female, unlike the current President-elect who is completely unqualified for his job, could give Obama a run for his money.

0 0 votes
Article Rating
Subscribe
Notify of
19 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments

Good grief, it seems to be the norm in your country that every leftist interviewer is clearly assholes. Not only do they ask stupid questions, but they never let the other people answer them; they keep interrupting so the other one can never be heard. Fire all these idiots. They give a bad reputation to your country.

The media owners won’t fire the retards so the people are. How many former major news (sic) outlets are on the verge of bankruptcy? More S*** from the Nothing But Crap (MSNBC) is taking down the entire Nothing But Crap organization.

Just in case you missed it it Curt’s featured video section, here’s the excerpt from Media Malpractice to which Zeigler refers

You view, you decide is Shuster has a leg to stand on…. LOL

GREAT JOB SARAH KEEP SMOKING OUT THE LIBERAL MEDIA AND SHOWING HOW TRULY WEAK AND PARTISAN THEY ARE.

SHE IS DOING THIS ALONE EXCEPT FOR RUSH..

I think we should all say a big “Thank You” to John Zeigler for fighting the good fight against media bias. It is truly a “David vs. Goliath” struggle he is waging and Mr. Zeigler deserves our thanks and our prayers for taking on this battle.

Sarah Palin is one scary woman for libs, and someone for whom I will vote to help get elected to national office so libs can wet their collective pants. She scares them because she has an independent mind, sees their BS, and calls them on it.

The Palin/Ziegler interview excerpt is one more reason I respect her, because she tellls the truth, which I truly believe is one reason why libs hate her, amongst a plethora of reasons. One true fact libs cannot deny: Obama’s kids were off-limits, while Palin’s children were most definitely not off-limits.

As for the MSLSD jack@ss, he starts the interview from a false premise: Sarah Palin’s unqualified, so did she ever admit her shortcomings? It’s the same as that false set-up, ‘Did you stop beating your wife?’ question. How these clowns cannot see that Barry’s the most idiotic, dare I say, dumb candidate to come down the pike, is beyond me. Unqualified doesn’t even begin to cover our Barry. And, yes, the media all were wearing a blue dress when it came to Obama; the big difference is they also had heavily used, color-coordinated kneepads. I’m sure, though, the media learned the important lesson: Get the dress dry-cleaned.

The energy Palin brought to the campaign was thoroughly wasted By Juan McCain. And that is reason # 12,762 for why McCain lost.

I hope he gets on with matthews or olbermann now.

Palin has them so afraid that they are starting 4 yrs early to drag her down, wont work, you can count on it, truth always finds a way to surface.

If she is such a terrible candidate, Mr. Schuster, then as a Democrat, you should be happy. Let her run, your candidate will win. What’s with the venom?

David Scheuster is an ass. You can throw Matthews and Ohlbermann in that same group too. MSNBC can’t go away fast enough.

John Zeigler absolutely owned the nimrod David Schuster during this interview.

No offense to Zeigler, but is it really that hard to do that to Schuster? Clearly, Schuster’s long since proven that intelligence isn’t a high priority for himself.

@Craig:

Not only do they ask stupid questions, but they never let the other people answer them; they keep interrupting so the other one can never be heard.

Doesn’t Hannity do the same thing, Craig?

No, Wordsmith, I have never seen Hannity interrupting someone, but then again, I do not listen to him that often. But really, I personnaly never saw him do that. He is quite respectfull and listen to the answers.

P.S.: BTW, I have a post stuck in spam in: Barack Obama Is Not Even President Yet. Can you pull it out? Thanks

John Zeigler also ruined Norah O’Donnell’s day prompting her to claim “he (Zeigler) is not very fair” when he points out MSNBC’s reluctance to identify Illinois governor Blagojevich as a Dem or the fact that Obama had endorsed him twice. A very nice smack down!
http://www.breitbart.tv/?p=255773

who cares what david scheuster thinks. he does not even know sarah. david scheuster is only relevant if you make him relevent. quit watching those horrible, one sided news shows. if everyone would quit putting these stupid people on their websites then their ratings would go to nonexistence. along with that those stupid people like keith olberman and chris matthews. i’m sick to death of hearing their latest spew, it’s like commenting on the lates oprah spew. just tell us what zeigler is doing and what he is saying and we make our own comments. i don’t need to know what the stupid left is saying because it is always the same.

sarah palin 20012!

I’ve yet to see one hard hitting interview of Obama from MSNBC where they question his qualifications to be president or plunge into allegations made against him for refusing to release college records, the list of clients he represented as a lawyer, the decrepencies regarding his relationship with William Ayers and Rev. Wright or why he refuses to release a copy of his own birth certificate
Providing a copy of his birth certificate would say more about his qualifications to be president than a ten hour interview.

The fact that Obama has spent any more than the $12.00 cost of providing a copy of his actual birth certificate in order to keep from providing a copy illustrates something is amiss.
A news organization that was trying to appear fair would be all over this birth certificate matter…. unless they had an agenda.

It’s sad how far the media has declined. Their sychophant behavior as it relates to liberals is disgusting and treasonous.