Palin’s Trooper’Gate: Beating MSM distortions to the truth

Loading

**Welcome readers from Lucianne, Ace of Spades, Gateway Pundit, Protein Wisdom, The Corner, Wizbang, The Strata-Sphere, Macsmind, and Memeorandum….thanks for the link!**

View the ensuing posts, and on going story,
in the “Trooper’gate” Category archives

~~~

It’s been over 12 hours now since Alaskan Governor, Sarah Palin, has been named as GOP choice of Veep. Already, a desperate Obama camp of supporters are in search of talking points… other than the obviously poor choice of “inexperience”… or a scandal to take back what they perceive as the DNC ticket superiority.

Knowing the Palin-Monegan-Wooten investigation of abuse of power was their prime target, I’ve been spending time this AM researching the chain of events in hopes of beating the media to the political and biased distortions creating a new, and false “truth. I took into consideration that journalists… and ardent supporters like Markg8 on Curt’s thread… will be quick to post what they believe is damning evidence without reading more material on the issue.

So on that note, settle back and catch up with the reality of rural country politics. I’d like to share with you what appears to be the crux of the story, using both pro and con Palin bloggers and news media.

A timeline of events in the so-called “scandal”

4-11-05: Investigation of Mike Wooten by AST (Alaskan State Troopers) over two year allegation of misconduct involving family members commences.

5-1-05: Domestic complaint incident involving Mike and Molly [Sarah’s sister} Wooten, Sarah and Todd Palin. Transcript of Sarah Palin with troopers. Also, Trooper notes on the same interview.

SUMMARY: Molly calls Sarah (not yet Governor) in fear from husband. They leave an open phone line where both Sarah and Molly’s son hear Wooten threaten Molly and Sarah’s father (he’ll “eat an f*#king bullet). Palin doesn’t call police because she doesn’t want to hurt Wooten’s trooper career, nor make the situation worse…. Providing it didn’t get physical. Other incidents with Wooten noted.

8-18-05 Re’interview of both Sarah and Todd Palin. Trooper notes on Sarah interview. And Trooper notes on interview with Todd Palin, plus with bartender of Mug Shot Saloon.

SUMMARY: Sarah confirms an email on Aug 10th, 2005 to Col Julia Grimes, Director of AST (Alaska State Troopers) complaining of Wooten’s negative representation of the department. Wooten’s abuse of his authority and position in various instances. His racist attitudes towards native Alaskans (Todd Palin is a native Alaskan…), abuse of state resources (free gas/credit), illegal hunting activities, and Sarah’s daughter (Bristol) being a witness to Wooten’s tasering of his 11 year old stepson (verified)

SUMMARY: Todd also confirms Wooten’s disparaging remarks about Alaskan natives, his consistent abuse of authority and position, plus his hunting violations. Bartender confirms Wooten involving himself in bar fight, misusing his position as a trooper. Also bartender confirms Wooten with “girlfriend” at the bar, who was later arrested for DUI.

This is no means a complete picture of all that happened… but enough to give you a picture of an “out of control” trooper.

~~~
NOTE: Palin was not Governor of the State at this time… and this transpired BEFORE her primary campaign against GOP [see party affiliation correction at end of post, please]competitor, Andrew Halcro. Coincidently, the same man leading the pack screaming “scandal” over the “firing of Monegan”.

The investigations against Wooten started more than a year before she was elected governor, and about two months before launching her campaign”.

~~~

11-2006: Palin elected Governor of Alaska

3-1-06: Col. Julia Grimes findings on Wooten investigation results in suspension…. for only *five* days.

What we can derive from the timeline is that the investigations and complaints against Wooten as a State Trooper (not to mention with problems exhibiting a derelict father who tasers his step son, and is a physically and verbally abusive, unfaithful husband per the transcripts and testimony) had started prior to Palin’s term as Governor.

We can also determine that this is a man who most certainly does not need to be a trooper, armed with a badge and gun. And, if not in rural Alaska, Wooten is a law official who would have been run out of most departments as a seriously troubled man with violent tendencies.

Per Col. Julia Grimes in the Fairbanks Newsminer on July 28, 2008… and showing how long this “scandal” has dragged out…

The record clearly indicates a serious and concentrated pattern of unacceptable, and at times, illegal activity occurring over a lengthy period, which establishes a course of conduct totally at odds with the ethics of our profession,” Col. Julia Grimes, then head of Alaska State Troopers, wrote in March 1, 2006, letter suspending Wooten for 10 days. After the union protested it, the suspension was reduced to five days.

She warned that if he messed up again, he’d be fired.

Where’s the “abuse of power” scandal?

Now that we know who Wooten is, and the story of the Palin relationship, PLUS the documented timeline in mind, let’s look at commenter markg8’s evidence (the video below) of a local Alaskan TV station on the “scandal”, as posted johnny-on-the-spot by leftist Obama supporter, Josh Marshall’s TalkingPointsMemo.

First, the video accusation is that the Governor’s office has questionable reasons (meaning removing Wooten from the AST) for firing Public Safety Commissioner, Walt Monegan in July 2008. As we know, documented complaints from Palin about Wooten started prior to Monegan’s appointment… which Monegan may, or may not have been aware.

Yet Monegan was appointed by Palin. She is certainly within her rights to fire him. And if complaints were already lodged about Wooten to the immediate superior, Col. Julia Grimes, why did she need to pressure him to fire Wooten? Afterall, if Palin was going to “abuse” her power to get Wooten fired, why not direct that power over Grimes as the superior of the Troopers?

And if getting Wooten fired was her quest, why did she not take steps to do that in 2005 during the complaint period, instead of specifically stating under deposition she was staying silent in order not to put his job at risk? Not to mention the gap in time… why would it take her two one and a half years to fire Monegan because of Wooten?

Monegan’s “truth” problem

According to Monegan, he insists he was pressured by Todd Palin,“numerous times to talk about Wooten as well as Frank Bailey from the governor’s office and Commissioner of Administration Annete Krietzer who also pressured him to fire Wooten”.

If trooper recruitment and poor morale was one of Palin’s concern about Monegan’s performance, why would her husband Todd be doing the talking for Palin? And why would Palin send her husband… sans gubernatorial power… to convince Monegan to fire Wooten?

But the problem with Monegan’s charge is.… Todd Palin was *ordered* to talk to Monegan since Wooten was a potential threat against Alaska’s first family.

2. Todd Palin was ORDERED by the head of the Governor’s security detail, Special Agent Bob Cockrell, to discuss Trooper Wooten with Walt Monegan, as Wooten presented a credible threat to the Governor’s safety. Here’s a direct quote from Special Agent Cockrell, who is now providing security for his sixth consecutive governor:

“When made aware of the security concerns regarding a state trooper, I instructed the First Gentleman to contact the commissioner of Public Safety. It is standard protocol to ask every governor about any threats they perceive or have realized. “I will not hesitate to set the record straight in answering these false allegations by former Commissioner Monegan.” (emphasis added)

Monegan also states others “around Palin” also applied pressure… but not Palin herself.

But Monegan says pressure came from those around Palin, including former Palin chief-of-staff Mike Tibbles, Department of Administration Commissioner Annette Kreitzer, and director of boards and commissions Frank Bailey.

Tibbles, who is now the campaign manager for Alaska Sen. Ted Stevens, said Friday he couldn’t comment on whether he spoke to Monegan about Wooten.

Palin spokeswoman Sharon Leighow said Bailey never had such a conversation with Monegan.

Kreitzer could not recall, Leighow said.

Problem is, Palin directed none of these people to intercede her her behalf… either personally, or professionally. In fact, until someone presented her with the phone transcript of Bailey’s call, she had no idea these events had occurred… putting her in a more embarrassing position.

Frank Bailey, the boards and commissions director, told The Associated Press he acted on his own — and not on behalf of Palin or her husband, Todd — when he called Ketchikan-based Lt. Rodney Dial, pushing for the firing of Trooper Mike Wooten.

“There was never any direction by the governor, never any direction by Todd to make the call or to make any call to DPS on this stuff,” Bailey said.

In the recorded conversation, Bailey is heard telling Dial: “Todd and Sarah are scratching their heads, why on earth hasn’t, why is this guy still representing the department? He’s a horrible recruiting tool. … You know, I mean from their perspective, everyone’s protecting him.”

Palin said she heard the conversation for the first time on Tuesday when she returned to Anchorage from state business in Fairbanks. She said it was unclear why the recorded conversation only recently surfaced.

“It’s embarrassing for me to disclose at this time a conversation has occurred, again unbeknownst to me,” she said at a hastily arranged news conference at her Anchorage office.

In another instance that questions Monegan’s honesty, he and Gov. Palin had met over two dozen times—yet he says they only met four times. Since he has only alluded to, but not directly accused Palin of, pressuring him to fire Wooten, is he suggesting Wooten was the subject of the meetings (of which there should be some sort of official records… which there are none)? Or were these meetings about his performance?

Clearly Monegan is not being truthful about the amount of times he met with Gov. Sarah Palin, when confirmed with Government office records. What can we believe about the subject of his meetings?

Monegan fired for budget, recruiting and enforcement performance

Disagreements between Monegan and Palin over a budget cut in the troopers, department morale and recruiting, and bootlegging enforcement are documented by Andrew Halcro. (As I mentioned earlier, but it bears repeating…. Halcro also happens to be the losing primary GOP[Correction: Independent] candidate in the 2006 gubernatorial candidate, and is the source of the complaints against Palin.)

The political plot thickens…

Palin, giving more specifics later in the process than she should have, confirms her reasons for firing Monegan in that position, but offering him another in the department which she felt he was better suited for.

Per Alaskan Activist” on the Alaskan Pride blog:

Palin has been under heavy criticism since firing former Department of Public Safety Commissioner Walt Monegan. However, she also disclosed three reasons why she fired Monegan (I listened to the press conference in part on KFQD and specifically took down this information).

– He was not making headway on achieving key goals such as resolving the trooper shortfall.

– He was not making satisfactory progress on resolving alcohol issues.

– He was not a team player in regards to budget issues.

But recognizing his previous experience in dealing with alcohol issues, particularly in Bush Alaska, Governor Palin did not want to remove Monegan from the administration altogether, but to place him in charge of the Alcoholic Beverage Control board, where he could combine his rural expertise with a full-time focus on alcohol issues. Nevertheless, Monegan elected not to accept the post, and left the administration instead. Monegan continues to maintain he was pressured by Palin’s family and the administration to fire Trooper Wooten.

Alaskan Pride is no Palin fan for the Veep job, BTW. Also, there are links to “white nationalists” website links there. Frankly, just the sound of that gives me the creeps… But I figured hey… anti-Palin. Oddly enough, even he doesn’t deem Palin as corrupt, but naïve:

Sarah Palin could have saved herself a lot of grief if she had simply told us why she canned Walt Monegan last month instead of serving up some New Age Oprah-style drivel about “new energy” and “new direction”. There seems to be a disturbing aura of New Age influence within the Palin Administration.

So if Monegan and Palin disagreed on the budget, recruiting and enforcement (most over budget), and she was within her gubernatorial rights to replace him, just where does the scandal come into play?

It doesn’t… not that facts ever stop rumors or investigations in the political world. What we have here is the playing out of complaints instigated by a disgruntled loser’s political witch hunt. Fact is, if Palin wanted to do a gubernatorial power play, she could apply that to Grimes. However she had other grievances with Monegan.

Palin welcomes an investigation into the firing of Walt Monegan. Yet even that has some nepotism involved. The appointed prosecutor, Steve Branchflower, apparently has a very close relationship with Monegan.

Branchflower, who served as an Assistant District Attorney in Anchorage from 1974-1998, held numerous positions which required him to work extremely closely with the Anchorage Police Department, where Walt Monegan would become chief in 2001. He provided legal advice to APD officers, trained APD officers, and was even a co-founder of the APD’s Homicide Response Team. His wife also worked as a detective for the APD, not retiring until 2002, meaning that she worked under Walt Monegan. In short, it seems impossible to believe that Branchflower, whose entire career was wrapped up in his relationships with the APD, and his detective wife did not have at least some professional relationship with Walt Monegan, who was obviously one of the city’s top cops. Mrs. Branchflower also briefly came out of retirement to work as a cold case detective for the Alaska State Troopers.

So when you read of Palin also launching an independent investigation, you might consider having another investigator’s input is not such a bad idea in light of the personal ties between Branchflower and Monegan.

Palin replaced Monegan with Charles Kopp…who ended up resigning after two weeks under intense political scrutiny for an old (and removed from the books the previous year) sexual harassment charge. No doubt, that that will be the next attempted scandal… Either that, or it’s one jinxed position.

Now John Glass in is the Public Safety Commissioner seat…. Will the Alaskan local powers and the Obama camp make an issue of that? Only time will tell.

~~~

[Correction: Halcro was a GOP legislator in the Alaska House of Representatives. He ran against Palin on the Independent ticket. So sorry for the error… late, lots of data… zzzzz]

0 0 votes
Article Rating
Subscribe
Notify of
170 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments

“Todd confirms disparging remarks about Alaskan natives, abuse of “badge”, and hunting violations. Bartender confirms Wooten involving himself in bar fight with under abuse of “badge”. Also all confirms Wooten with “girlfriend”, who was later arrested for DUI prior to coming to home Sarah’s sister, Molly.”

You’re gonna get a big audience on this. How about a proofread?

“with under abuse of badge” what’s that?
“coming to home Sarah’s sister” huh?

Not complaining, and appreciate the legwork. It’s just minor things:

“with under” –> “under”
“to home” –> “home to”

Also, timeline should explicitly indicate what position Palin had starting from beginning. I know you say it parenthetically in the text, but keep in mind there may be clueless MSM types reading this.

Couple things–that Palin-Grimes email is chock full of personal phone numbers. Do you know if those numbers are now inactive? If not, probably want to scrub them, unless they’ve been out and about for a while.

As for this “scandal”, know something about the vetting process. Republicans are far better at it. In McCain’s team, somewhere in the background, is a crusty old fart. He’s an old line high dollar lawyer, former FBI or US Attorney’s Office, who went through this thing with a lice comb. There’s nothing here, not because of what anybody else says, but because of what crusty old fart said. Believe it.

Thanks for the info. So sad that all the major news networks (except Fox) are in a feeding frenzy over the “scandal”. But, what should I expect from the purely biased media that has openly endorsed Obama?!? Their focus should be on “The First Republican Female” nominee on the ticket! Thanks again!

Excellent post! Nicely pulled together. I linked to this.

Thanks for the information!

Congratulations on all the links Mata, lotsa of folks are reading you today. This time, I clicked in from Lucianne.com.

Excellent work!

Andrew Halcro is a metro-sexual with an overrated opinion of himself who inherited an avis franchise from his father. He seems to think being governor of Alaska is also his birthright. He should be investigated by the I.R.S. for tax fraud. During his run for govenor he ran name recognition and biography ads nonstop on all the radio stations tangentially mentioning his business. I would like the I.R.S. to compare the last seven years of his advertising deductions. If they can make a case, they should take it to trial. This isn’t just a sour grapes issue with him…he is a cheap, sexist/racist jerk, who thinks he’s too smart to pay taxes like the rest of us.

Fox, why “So sad that all the major news networks (except Fox) are in a feeding frenzy over the “scandal””?

The more the msm continues to chase useless red herrings the less discussion of the annointed one .

FYI folks, due to the large amount of traffic this post is getting I’ve had to turn on the cache system. Because of this the pageview hits on the top wont be going up. According to Statcounter the post has 7,783 page views so far….for those that care.

“Problem is, Palin directed none of these people to intercede her her behalf… either personally, or professionally. In fact, until someone presented her with the phone transcript of Bailey’s call, she had no idea these events had occurred… putting her in a more embarrassing position.”

Prove it.

Thank you for this very indepth article. My husband & I are now very excited about voting for the McCain/Palin ticket. Before, it was only because there was no alternative. Mr. McCain made a terrific choice.

A good reconstruction with links – an excellent job and service. Thanks for the hard work.

Do Democrats REALLY want to place themselves in the position of defending a state trooper shown to abuse his authority and violent as well? So much for sticking up for the least among us.

If all they are staking their “abuse of power” charge against Palin is the statements of a disgruntled former state employee than they are on thin ice.

tbogg, it’s up to the accuser to provide proof. Note that hearsay isn’t proof.

I still have to locate that verification that “Sarah’s daughter … [was] a witness to Wooten’s tasering of his 11 year old stepson (verified)”.

I guess the New York Times needs to locate that too, going by their hit-story on Sarah Palin today:

Monegan claimed that Mr. Todd Palin “had showed him some of the findings of a private investigator the family had hired and accused the trooper of a variety of misdeeds, including drunken driving and child abuse.”

To take only the abuse charge, was the tasering of the step-son “verified” only by the one private investigator, as the Times would have us believe?

And was there a private investigator at all? (Did I miss that above?)

Could you flesh out that word “verified” for me before I start to suspect that my local paper is misleading me? (Irony alert.)

Thanks for that clarification MataHarley. You’ve provided so much good material that I am dutifully plowing through it all.

I see that the P.I.’s name was “Leonard Hacket”.

Did you like how the NY Times presented only Todd Palin’s accusation “of a variety of misdeeds”? The piece only goes downhill from there. Sickening tabloid!

Great work.

tbogg,

Did you really just rely on negative proof as an argument? Really?

If you believe that Palin DID know, or DID direct her subordinates to apply the pressure, the burden of proof is upon YOU.

Thanks for the analysis. My lib friends out here in Santa Cruz are going nuts over the story. I needed the ammunition!! Perfect.

According to dictionary.com, it’s “gubernatorial” … plus there are numerous other grammar and spelling problems.

However, nice work on debunking the false scandal vomit coming from the NYT and others.

Great analysis! Thanks for posting this. I found you through Ace of Spades blog.

One slight correction: You wrote

“11-2005: Palin elected Governor of Alaska”

Palin was elected Governor of Alaska in 11-2006, not 11-2005. I don’t know how that affects the rest of your timeline.

Keep up the good work!

I am a longtime Alaska conservative Republican who voted for Sarah Palin in the general election but have not counted myself as a Palin-bot. I will state candidly that Gov. Palin’s role in ‘Troopergate’ stinks. Here are a few questions that remain unanswered and I am hopeful that the Branchflower investigation will have the answers.

I find it impossible to believe that Gov. Palin did not know that 2 dozen calls from her staff and her husband were made to DPS regarding Trooper Wooten. What about staff that viewed his personnel and workers comp files and leaked their contents in direct violation of Federal and State employment laws? This leaves the state wide open to a very profitable lawsuit by Trooper Wooten. Trooper Wooten is, clearly, not a model trooper but the charges against him were addressed through due process and the ‘case closed.’ For a governor to continue to ‘prosecute’ these charges is in violation of state personnel laws.

Why has the Governor refused to release emails stating executive privilege even though Todd Palin was a recipient as well as staff? I could go on and on with questions raised by the dissembling of our Governor on this issue.

She has demonized Commissioner Monegan, who has had a long and honorable career in law enforcement and is highly respected in our state. Rather than answer Andrew Halcro’s accusations directly she has attacked him personally; he’s also a well-respected businessman and legislator who has been doing the hard work reporters should be doing. I really wish Gov. Palin would just be up front and honest. The evidence points to an abuse of power. Admit to the poor judgment and move on. The cover-up is becoming worse than the offense.

You write, “if not in rural Alaska, Wooten is a law official who would have been run out of most departments.” Can you see the uninformed arrogance of this remark? I’ll add that the only Alaskans who have filed complaints against Trooper Wooten are members of the Palin/Heath clan. Clearly, theirs is not an objective opinion.

I do support, wholeheartedly, the McCain/Palin ticket. However, I think it is premature to dismiss these allegations as much ado about nothing.

The mere fact that you mention”In the recorded conversation, Bailey is heard telling Dial: “Todd and Sarah are scratching their heads, why on earth hasn’t, why is this guy still representing the department? He’s a horrible recruiting tool. … You know, I mean from their perspective, everyone’s protecting him.” Why is Todd even involved in governing dialogs. To mention Todd in this light suggests that Todd has been involved for some time in this matter. If he is supposed to be a stay at home Dad why is he pursuing business that does not pertain to him? This smells like crap, looks like crap, so it has to be crap. It sounds like a a dual governorship and Todd handles the crap she does not want to associate herself with for political reasons. This makes her look like she is ethical but is not. She was fighting for her sister because those in power before her did nothing to make her happy. She is just another Republican who sprays fragrance on her ass so her shit does not stink. Oh, and how about those nude photos? Any word if they are Sarah?

Thanks for the write up. I’d encourage you to add one very pertinent thing to your time line. In the very first part, you should make it clear that Molly Wooten and Sarah Palin are sisters. Without that knowledge, it’s a bit hard for the uninitiated to understand the beginning.

Just for the sake of argument, let’s just say the allegations against Palin are true, that she pressured the Monegan to fire Wooten, fired Monegan when he failed to do so. So, the Dem argument is that it is wrong to fire a guy who abused his wife and stepson, drank on the job, hunted without a license, and generally abused the authority granted him by the state of Alaska? Do they really want to go there? The record, by any *objective* standard, would be that the bozo should have been fired a long time ago.

Yes, Trooper Wooten gave the press access to his employment files. However, I am referring specifically to his medical records and his workers’ comp files which Frank Bailey says he saw. Those files are kept in the Dept. of Labor separate from personnel files and are specifically protected by Federal HIPAA Law. Trooper Wooten did not grant access to anyone to see those files. Very few state employees are granted access to those medical files.

No, the governor does not know what is said in every single phone call. However, to know that Todd Palin was so deeply involved it is impossible to believe she did not know.

Commissioner Monegan at first and for several days after his dismissal refused to comment on the Wooten issue when it was raised by Halcro citing statute that prevented him from commenting on the trooper specifically. After getting legal advice he stated that he had been pressured by Todd Palin and the governor’s staff to address the status of Trooper Wooten. The due process on the accusations was complete and there was nothing more that could be done. He has said nothing more and nothing less than answering the questions by the press to say yes he had received calls regarding the status of Trooper Wooten. Monegan is the professional here.

Don’t be misled. Commissioner Monegan was fired. Gov. Palin had Frank Bailey offer him a job on the Alcohol Board because she says she is not happy with his progress on bootlegging. It makes no sense. And to call it a reassignment is masterful PR…it’s analogous to offering Gov. Palin a job counting petition signatures in the Division of Elections.

Regarding rural politics and cronyism I would be careful comparing rural Oregon to Wasilla, Alaska. Wasilla, is not Bush Alaska. It is in the most densely populated area of the state. I can see a rogue trooper cowing a few people hundreds of miles off the road system but not thousands of Alaskans over a long career. Sorry, but there has been no one else who has complained. It just doesn’t make sense. Only the Palin/Heath clan have filed complaints.

Gov. Palin took the oath of office Dec 2006. The due process of Trooper Wooten was already complete. State personnel statute says nothing more can be done. Yet pressure was exerted by the governor’s office and family. To have pressured Col. Grimes would have been inappropriate. Commissioner Monegan was the ‘at-will’ employee accountable to the governor. She cannot go around him without risking a violation of personnel laws.

I know from long distance this looks like nothing much. But frankly, Gov. Palin’s side of the story is very, very difficult to believe. Especially, because I heard Frank Bailiey say himself in the recorded phone call that ‘Sarah and Todd’ were very concerned about Trooper Wooten and he was calling on their behalf. The governor said he was not speaking for her yet he is still employed by the State of Alaska. Amazing.

I appreciate your going through all this. Having an ‘outside’ opinion to make me consider what I know helps clarify the issues. I suspect that Todd Palin will end up taking the blame for all of this while the Governor continues to say she knew nothing.

It’s a lovely day in Anchorage today and I’m going to head outdoors and enjoy it.

“So give me an C or D for presentation”

I disagree strongly. Though I might not be totally objective in this matter I think you did a masterful job with an enormous amount of complex and confusing information. Your presentation skill is validated by the number of high traffic sites which have been linking to your piece.

Self editing can be a bitch, but that’s the nature of blogging.

I still don’t see anything in all the claims and counterclaims that provides any direct evidence that Sarah Palin or any member of her family abused their position. Of course they had very strong opinions on what this violent cop Wooten was doing to Sarah’s sister and her family. If this was your family wouldn’t you?

But the claims and counterclaims about improper pressure brought to bear on Monegan boil down to a she said he said. And frankly, since Monegan was fired we can bet he wants to tell his side of the story with more than a little bias.

It’s nice to see the New York Times getting on top of the story. How long did it take them to cover the Obama Rev. Wright story? Did they ever write about the John Edward’s scandal?

I know that the Dems are trying to create a mountain out of a mole hill and are blowing this story way out of proportion on purpose.

So much for the new politics that Obama claimed was his standard on Thursday night.

That didn’t last long did it?

Mata Harley

Congratulations for a job well done. Pay no attention to the nit-pickers or the trolls. I’ll give you an “A” on all counts. Great piece of work.

I am always amazed at how many people are so quick to jump to conclusions based on the word of the MSM when directed at conservatives and Republicans. These same people will bleat like sheep when conservatives go after liberals and Democrats and cry foul and unfair.

I was going to make some comments on my site regarding this issue when I had more information. Now I don’t need to look for most of what is here. You have provided the most comprehensive account (with solid links no less) of the real story. Thanks for the hard work and hopefully soon I will get through all of this and understand it all.

Excellent job! Thank you so much for the story and I too want to tell the people that are complaining about typos or grammatical errors to give you a break for God’s sake. You put the piece together in 12 hours and it is quite amazing. BTW I’ve linked your story on other sites.

Me thinks Lynne is actually an ardent Obama supporter portraying herself as a Republican. She is ignoring the “facts” and is doth protesting too much. The facts are the facts ma’am and if it was your family you’d have done the same thing. If it was my family, I would have been living in Julia Grimes office for two and half years demanding that that wife-beating pig be fired. He got off way too lightly and only because it was a small town and they were already woefully short of troopers.

Alex, the nude photos should be surfacing soon. When I did my google search for photo shop Gov. Palin I stumbled upon a chat room where they were discussing photo shopping the Govs photo onto some porn stars bodies. After you find these photos, my wish is that you go look at yourself in a mirror and physically get sick.

All this while Gov. Palin’s son is defending the scum that are doing this to his mother.

Mata, you score an A+, I’m recording it in my gradebook right now!

Excellent, excellent analysis. I would show it to my Palin-bashing friends, but they never let facts get in the way of a good rumor.

I coined the moniker “SARAH’CUDA” over at HotAir.com. Glad to find it here.

Matt,
Thanks for the info. You did a great job. Compared to the Chicago Annenberg Challenge in which Obama worked with Ayers closely in doling out money to various educational institutions which also included big money to Accorn, and where their organization doling out the money was deemed to be a failure; this “scandle” of Palin is small town potatoes. Lets hear the left put a pretty face on that one. It’s going to break out sooner or later with Stanley Kurtz doing extensive research.
Proud to be an American,
We need to Stand for Freedom
or we’ll be bent over for Socialism.

Thank you for pulling this all together.

Liberal or Conservative does it really matter when it comes to a wife batterer? I don’t understand how any Liberal can come to the defense of a man who hits his wife…full stop.

Can some Liberal explain why they are defending a wife batterer?

SteveO,

Plain and simple, because it has the potential to make Sarah look bad and make them look good. This justifies defending a wife beater to them. Anything to look good. Remember, this is the party that is against babies born alive during abortion attempts having the same right to life as wanted babies born alive because their parents don’t believe in abortion.

Her nickname on the basketball team was “Sarah Barracuda.”

Jesus Christ, your description is still way too long. Can’t you reduce it to a grand total of 5 bullet points, or something? There is enough to read in the blogosphere as it is. Please make something very succinct, for those of us who are going to believe you already and only need or want the very essence of the thing. Was Palin right to remove Monegan, or not? If yes: Why? 3-5 bullet points, please, tops.

“Manly#41. My apologies if you feel I lifted your phrasing. First off, haven’t seen Hot Air until this afternoon, and not the Palin threads. But I thought it was Sarah’s high school sports nickname. Perhaps I’m mistakened.”

As was pointed out later, her nickname was “Sarah Barracuda.” But that’s not important, and neither is an apology.

Run with the meme, Mata. Use it everywhere. Use it always. From this point forward, let her be known as SARAH’CUDA.

Yours faithfully,

ManlyRash