Liberals – Edwards Affair Is No One’s Business

Loading

Ace found this perfect example of the liberal hypocrisy at work regarding the Edwards affair, which I’m sure most of you by now know he has finally admitted is true. This blogger, a former Edwards blogger, says that ok, its true he had a affair, but just as in the Clinton affair…none of it is our business:

My official stance is that unless it’s a matter of hypocrisy, it’s none of your damn business. So, if someone has a history of dogging gay people, prostitutes, people who have sex outside of marriage, etc., their business is now public property because they treat your business like it’s public property. Edwards, as far as I know, has never been a “sanctity of marriage” wanker, and so this is officially None Of Our Business, and anyone who dogged him on this story should be fired on the principle that they don’t know journalism from rooting around in the trash. Hypocrisy is a story; human weakness is not.

Yup, if a reporter had the gall to actually report on the infidelity and character flaw of a former Presidential nominee, they should be fired because its no one’s business but Edwards.

It gets better. She goes on to say the McCain divorce is relevant, while the Edwards affair isn’t.

Incredible.

And then this video should send you into fits of laughter….or tears.

David Schuster says that he knew all along about the affair but failed to dig deeper into the story because “credible” sources inside the campaign assured him it wasn’t true.

Basically admitting he has terrible judgment in gathering sources and that he just didn’t want to dig to hard. Being a Democrat and all you see. We all know how hard these yahoos would dig if the candidate had a R next to his name.

To top it all off he gets angry that his sources lied to him.

That is one skilled reporter eh?

Ace puts it…well, as only Ace can:

It was Shuster who failed to do his job.

Why are they to blame? They never held themselves out as disinterested parties or objective observers. They’re supposed to be invested in their client’s/friend’s future.

It’s Shuster, and the rest of his sucker-of-%^&* buddies in the media, that fell on their smug, soft faces here.

And it’s insulting to hear them all whine about being “used.”

And of course then Shuster turns around and reasserts his superiority as a journalist over those working at the National lEnquirer, even while conceding they somehow stupidly blundered into getting the story right, while Genius Journalist David “Sucker of &*^%” Shuster was all righteous and ethical and brilliant while getting it completely wrong.

Two perfect examples of some of the worst character traits in liberals….hypocrisy and smug arrogance.

0 0 votes
Article Rating
Subscribe
Notify of
25 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments

Did anybody notice that while the world is worrying about who this pussy porked, the out-of-control terrorists ^Wpolice in an all-citizens-are-disarmed zone stormed an innocent house, summarily executed two innocent dogs and terrorized the human occupants?

For what?

Oh. they might have flushed the evidence. If that is all the evidence they had, we have a very sick set of crime definitions.

I want to puke.

When will the Messiah fess up to his back seat affair and drug use (1999)? Since Slick declared that a BJ is not sex, then the Messiah can say since he was with another man getting/giving a BJ or doing a little tu** packing it was not sex. The liberals will provide an excuse and/or lie for him so he has no worries. He won’t lose a liberal vote and may make a few more Male on Male ‘connections’.

Larry Sheldon, careful now. Liberal town and liberal administration. You’ll get in trouble with the ‘disarmament democrats’, they make no mistakes.

“What the hell does a story about the police getting a search warrant…”

I question the priorities, is all.

And no report that I have read anywhere says they were “serving” a search warrant.

Several reports that the violated the warrant.

But I guess it is a really a question of what is important.

I don’t think who or what that pussy porked is important.

If I were in a better mood I’d find the fact…THE FACT that the National Enquirer scooped the MSM funny. But I’m not. so it isn’t.

Pardon me for interrupting the finger-licking.

“And no report that I have read anywhere says they were “serving” a search warrant.

Several reports that the violated the warrant.”

So you’re saying that there was no warrant, and in the very next sentence that they overreached the warrant?

Does not compute.

As far as Edwards is concerned, it just shows that he cannot be trusted. If someone cannot keep faith with the one vow that is probably the most important promise most of us will ever take, “to serve, protect and defend” hardly carries much weight.

I find it highly unlikely they raided the house without a warrant. The likely reason you haven’t read about a warrant is because your only hearing one side of the story. If they did raid the house without a warrant then they are up a creek. Would be stupid tho, with 32lbs of weed being delivered to their house they had more then enough to get a warrant.

“…anyone who dogged him on this story should be fired on the principle that they don’t know journalism from rooting around in the trash.”

But, it’s journalism to make up stories. This pandagon guy is an idiot.

Well, now we have sorted out the folks here by type.

I didn’t say “no warrant” I said they violated the warrant they had.

As I understand it, they sent a package of dope to the house, then got a warrant that required some observance of civil rights, based on the box.

But instead they stormed the house in violation of their warrant for the box they sent, shot two dogs dead for no reason, and proceeded to terrorize the humans for some time.

Humans who, as somebody said, would have driven to the station and taken the box with them, had somebody called on the phone.

But as you say, it is far more important to worry about whether Edwards was or was not capable of porking some wench. And a seriously ugly one at that.

I’m out.

Don’t worry about the Messiah, this gives him cover in Hawaii to ‘find’ another birth record that doesn’t show the forgery so clear. Is there an honest democrat left in the country?

Larry: I have no idea what you are talking about and I don’t care. Perhaps you would prefer to hijack this thread and divert us all from discussing how John Edwards lied and is STILL lying, but that and the liberal media covering for him is the topic here.

Larry you really should seek medical help. And I’m not talking about “Medicinal Marijuana” either.

Unless its already too late…

All I know is that when I first heard of an “affair” my thought was ‘I wonder who the guy is Edwards had the affair with’! I was really surprised to hear it was a woman. I knew he was lying about something, just off a little, I guess.

There’s something subtle being implied by the Leftie Reporting. That this ‘affair’ was a moment or two of weakness.

From the information that was leaking out months ago, this thing went on for several weeks or months.

What about all the NYT insinuation that McCain was baning a lobbyist? That was ok to report, but it’s not ok to report this story-a story where a Dem Presidential candidate admits to screwing around, and then he made his wife-who is dying of cancer-suffer the indignation of media specualtion indefinitely…well, until the party told him to stop putting his wife through that.

Makes it clear this man puts party before family, and if he does that, then he surely put party before country.

…and I supported him in 04.

Disappointed/disgusted

John Edwards has finally told the truth! He cheated! Now it is Obama’s turn to tell the truth about Larry Sinclair! Help us to fight for the truth!

When they tried to silence Larry Sinclair, they tried to silence all
of us.

First came the personal attacks, attempts at discrediting Larry Sinclair and those following his story.

Next came attacks on Sinclair’s family.

Next came multiple death threats made on Sinclair.

Next came a petition encouraged by Jane Hamsher, an Obama supporter,
with ties to David Axelrod and the Obama Campaign, to block
Larry Sinclair’s news conference.

Next came Larry Sinclair’s arrest after his news conference at
the National Press Club. A DC warrant was fabricated for the arrest.

Next came more lies, smears and discreditation attempts by Jane
Hamsher and others aligned with the Obama Campaign.

From the beginning, the press, the MSM, has failed to do their job.
There is enough information, facts, about Obama, to cause any
intelligent, inquisitive news organization to dig beneath the
surface and discern the truth about the Larry Sinclair Story.

“To be honest with you, its not so much whether you believe me or not, as much as you hear me.”

-Larry Sinclair

Larry’s words, my post! http://larrysinclair0926.com/ Please donate to the legal fund! Every donation welcome and appreciated!

What ridiculous assertions Larry. That box was addressed to their address, a dope sniffing dog found it before it left to go to the house.

Rachel Lucas has followed that Dog story a little bit more. One thing to note:

Prince George’s County police arrested two men involved in a scheme to transport marijuana. Once packages were dropped off by a deliveryman, a suspect would pick them up — with the addressee oblivious to the plot. Police seized a half-dozen packages that contained about 417 pounds of marijuana, including the 32 pounds delivered to Tomsic, the Associated Press reported.

Still its completely ridiculous to threadjack here for that.

I reluctantly join one of the most bizarre and disjointed threads I have seen in my short time at this site.

The private lives of politicians should be off limits. They are distractions from the real issues.

“The private lives of politicians should be off limits. They are distractions from the real issues.”

Unless of course it’s a Republican in which case one or two bad apples can be inflated to describe the entire party.

Let’s all make a note of Dave Hussein Noble’s comment next time the subject is a Republican.

…and I supported him in 04.

Scott…for the life of me, I truly do not understand how anyone can go for this former ambulance-chasing “I was the son of a millworker” trial lawyer’s “rich vs. poor” class warfare rhetoric.

When it comes to politicians I despise (as a politician), he ranks at the top of my list.

As for his personal business, I don’t care much to know about it.

For me, I personally believe that the Presidency has become a place where taking political stands is too difficult-too costly in polls/power-to actually steer the ship that is America. Instead, I think most post-Kennedy Presidents (not all, but most) have and will be riders of the river that is history. To that end, I think the most important thing nowadays MIGHT be how well the man/woman can lead the nation-not just lead Republicans, not just lead Democrats, but lead all Americans (particularly those who don’t pay attention to the rest of the world and cast their votes on how a candidate sounds or against a candidate’s swagger or trival bs. Back in 04, Edwards was principled. He supported the war, and I thought he could lead Democrats away from their deliberate division of America towards a unifying position of standing up to dictators, tyrants, and terrorists. In 06, he lost my support when he came to Akron and backed striking workers at Goodyear. He also completely changed his position on the war in 06, and began the uber-pandering that kept him in the race. He lost my support. He lost my belief that he was principled, and now, he’s lost my respect.

I think Sen Obama’s got the same thing that Sen Edwards had in 04, and since his foreign policy is a continuation of the Bush foreign policy, I’m not all that uncomfortable w him winning. I do think, however, that Sen McCain is infinitely more qualified. So-FOR ME-it comes down to a choice between a massively qualified guy who probably can’t lead the nutroots and end their need oppose rather than support America’s war effort OR a guy who can lead the entire nation, but can’t muster enough integrity and resolve to answer even the simplest of questions without sounding like he’s parsing the response or adding a buzzillion ass-covering-caveats (when was the last time Obama simply said, “Yes.” or “no” or “absolutely”?)