Obama Will Meet With Who Now?

Loading

The Obama campaign must really be full of dunces. Who in their right mind came up with trying to excuse Obama’s ineptness at statemanship by claiming that hey, maybe he didn’t mean he would meet with achmedanutjob but with the Ayatollah instead. Susan Rice maybe? She was the first to spin this yesterday:

BLITZER: “How does Senator Obama defend that decision to meet without preconditions with a leader like Ahmadinejad?”

RICE: “Well, first of all, he said he’d meet with the appropriate Iranian leaders. He hasn’t named who that leader will be. It may, in fact be that by the middle of next of year, Ahmadinejad is long gone.”

BLITZER: “Let’s be precise because when they criticize Barack Obama, not only John McCain but others, for suggesting that he would meet without preconditions with Ahmadinejad, who only last week on Israel’s 60th anniversary called Israel a ‘stinking corpse.’ The question that they ask is what is Barack Obama going to talk with him about?”

RICE: “Well, first of all as I said, it would be the appropriate Iranian leadership at the appropriate time – not necessarily Ahmadinejad.”

And then the ever nutty Joe Klein kept it going with an interview with McCain:

KLEIN: I’ve done some research, and um –

MCCAIN: I have too.

KLEIN: Also checked, also checked with the Obama campaign and he never, he’s never sai — mentioned Ahmadinejad directly by name. He did say he would negotiate with the leaders, but as you know – Ayatollah,

MCCAIN: (Laughing) Ahmadinejad is, was the leader.

KLEIN: But if –

MCCAIN: Maybe I’m mistaken.

KLEIN: Maybe you are, because –

MCCAIN: Maybe. I don’t think so though.

KLEIN: The Supreme, you know, according to most diplomatic experts, the Supreme Leader Ali Khamenei is the guy who’s in charge of Iranian foreign policy and also in charge of the nuclear program, but you never mention him. Do you, you know, um, why do you always keep talking about Ahmadinejad since he doesn’t have power in that, in that realm?

MCCAIN: Oh I thin-Again, I respectfully disagree. When he’s the person that comes to the United Nations and declares his country’s policy is the extermination of the state of Israel, quote, in his words, wipe them off of the map, then I know that he is speaking for the Iranian government and articulating their policy and he was elected and is running for reelection as the leader of that country. Yes sir, go ahead.

NEW REPORTER: One more quest-

MCCAIN: I mean, the fact is he’s the acknowledged leader of that country and you may disagree, but that’s a uh, that’s your right to do so, but I think if you asked any average American who the leader of Iran is, I think they’d know. Go ahead. Or anyone who’s well-versed in the issue.

So which one is Obama going to sit down with? Achmedanutjob or Ali Khamenei?

Iran’s supreme leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei called on Friday for the destruction of Israel, describing it as a “cancerous tumor” in the Middle East.

“Iran’s stance has always been clear on this ugly phenomenon (Israel). We have repeatedly said that this cancerous tumor of a state should be removed from the region,” Khamenei told thousands of Muslim worshippers in Tehran.

“The Palestinian issue is not an internal Israeli matter. It involves the interests of the whole Islamic world, including Iran. All should strive to return that piece of land to Islamic hands.”

Khamenei offered an alternative solution which he said might be more “internationally acceptable”:

“Palestinian refugees should return and Muslims, Christians and Jews could choose a government for themselves, excluding immigrant Jews.

“No one will allow a bunch of thugs, lechers and outcasts from London, America and Moscow to rule over the Palestinians,” the ayatollah said in remarks broadcast on state radio.

Oh yeah, thats better. Just meet with that guy Big O’…..that won’t make you look like an appeaser….not at all.

Sigh.

But wait…it gets better. Remember the crack reporter, Joe Klein, said:

On Friday, I promised to check into whether Obama had ever said that he would negotiate — specifically, by name — with Mahmoud Ahmadinejad. Indeed, according to the crack Time Magazine research department and the Obama campaign, he never has.

Michael Goldfarb found proof that he DID mention that he would negotiate with Ahmedanutjob within a few hours. Guess Joe was too busy fitting that tinfoil hat?

Goldfarb:

But now we have a new narrative: Obama intends to meet with Ali Khamenei, the man with the real power in Tehran, because even though Obama pledged to meet with Ahmadinejad, and said it was a “disgrace” that Bush had not, he never had any intention of meeting with Ahmadinejad, and McCain is a liar for saying different.

The Dems and their boosters in the press are tying themselves in knots trying to explain Obama’s position. So what the heck is his policy? We have a right to know. Does Obama still intend to meet with Ahmadinjead? Does he intend to meet with Khamenei? And if he doesn’t intend to meet with A’Jad, why the sudden shift?

There is a lot of lying and obfuscation going on here, but none of it is emanating from the McCain camp.

It’s still baffling that a man as inexperienced, naive, and lacking so much good judgement as gotten this far in the primary, but then again we ARE talking about the Democrats.

0 0 votes
Article Rating
Subscribe
Notify of
15 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments

The real question is why does a reporter, Klein, feel the need to defend Obama’s position,,, oh hell I can’t keep a straight face,, LOL

Ali Khameni made it quite clear earlier this month that Iran will NOT give up it’s nuclear program:

“No threat can hinder the Iranian nation from its path,” he said.

And Iran’s top nuclear negotiator admitted that negotiations were only meant as a stalling tactic to give Iran time…

Time for what?

Let’s ask the all knowing, all seeing, all caring Obama. He should have the answer to that one should he not?

Obama should also be asked if he would accept Iran having nuclear weapons?

You know, the more Obie says, and the more he does, and the more things begin to fit together, the more convinced I am becoming that he may indeed be a sleeper.

I don’t consider myself to be a conspiracy nut but who really considers themselves to be a nut?

However, if you take the Muslim issue, and yes it is an issue as much as the Left and Himself wants to think it’s not, and combine it with the people he has chosen to associate himself with, and his positions on critical issues related to national security there’s a distinct and troubling pattern.

When you line up his associations you end up with a bunch of radical, America-hating, freedom bashing folks who have a very checkered past. Twenty years under Jerry Wright is just one example.

He’s been given a thumbs up by Hamas. They are actually running a phone bank for him to raise money. One of the radical Allah (PBUH) worshipers just the other day said that “Allah will soon send an American Gorbachev to end the American Empire soon.”

He’s soft on Iran.

He’s surrounded himself with advisers who, when you examine their backgrounds, you will realize that these aren’t good old mainstream American folk.

There are lots and lots of other strands to this thing, some seen, some unseen.

I know for sure that we had darn well do everything we can to keep this guy out of the White House.

Call it gut. Call it intuition. Call it logic. Whatever you want to call it.

I just know that we had better be damned sure he is never sworn in as President of the United States.

Susan Rice is caught in a dilemma. She was Clinton Admin person in charge of Africa when Sudan offered to hand over UBL and all of AQ leadership. SHE WAS THE ONE who led the charge in saying NO, we have to isolate Sudan, not talk to them, and do this because they’re a state-sponsor of terror. Now she’s an Obama advisor, still thick w her old ideas which contrast to Big O’s. So when Obama says one thing, and his campaign says another…it’s cause she disagrees.

Not a lot of respect for Susan “Sudan” Rice.

You know, the more Obie says, and the more he does, and the more things begin to fit together, the more convinced I am becoming that he may indeed be a sleeper.

I don’t consider myself to be a conspiracy nut but who really considers themselves to be a nut?

Aye,

I have been silently muttering the same things to myself and only venting to those closest to me who already know I am nuts in certain aspects. There are way too many things surrounding Obama that make you go, Hmmm.

From the Carter Administration on up to present, the people surrounding Obama as advisors with really questionable backgrounds, to his “colorful” associates and the complete farce we call the MSM. Add a good many of the people who have been elected to Congress on the left, our public edjukashun system, unions, the UN and the enviro-zealots.

I think it has been a slow and patient process and I am truly convinced that we are very close to seeing Marxists take over the govenment. If the Messiah gets elected and the Democrats control Congress, it will take decades to recover, if ever and the Supreme Court will be very busy.

Udderchaos,

I am glad that I am not alone.

I felt that I wasn’t alone, but few want to express what they really feel out of fear of being labeled racist or some such.

Frankly, I don’t give a rat’s behind what people label me.

This whole thing just keeps getting bigger and bigger.

Every time you find a thread and begin to pull it you just find more threads.

As imperfect as McCain is, he is much more desirable than Obie.

Heck, I’d choose Hillary over him.

I cannot believe I just typed that. Now I have to go wash my hands.

I felt that I wasn’t alone, but few want to express what they really feel out of fear of being labeled racist or some such.

I’ll be the first to stand up and admit, I am racist. There are individuals in the human race that I despise. They are in all colors, shapes and sizes but the one thing they all seem to have in common is the belief that America is responsible for all of the ills in the world and that it needs to be destroyed. If my hatred of them makes me racist, then I wear that badge proudly.

As imperfect as McCain is, he is much more desirable than Obie.

Heck, I’d choose Hillary over him.

I have issues with some of McCain’s policies but I honestly believe that his intentions are for the good of the country and not some self-serving ego trip or hidden agenda. Hillary has her share of questionable characters and beliefs in her background as well but at least she is a known “evil”. Like yourself, if forced to choose between her or Obama, Hillary would get my vote.

This one gets more disgusting every day. Well, I know for sure that I will vote for Captain McCain. With obama and clinton basically being left wing leninist-marxist traitors, the choice has been made for me. I was not a McCain supporter but he at least will stand against the scum in the middle east.

Check this out. And you might want to check out the main site.

http://directorblue.blogspot.com/2008/05/six-degrees-of-barack-obama-updated.html

Things that interest me:

Obama is a muslim by birth because his father was muslim. By muslim standards, he is an apostate and deserving of death, although there is some leniency towards those who leave the faith in their early years, as opposed to their adult years. Nevertheless, world muslims have made no statement in any way concerning this fact.

Obama is a Saul Alinsky disciple. Alinsky wrote “Rules for Radicals”, which advocates revolution from within. Alinsky advocates use of church organizations to promote his program. Hillary is also an Alinsky follower – in fact, worked with him. Their purpose is the overthrow of the government from within. They are communists.

Obama is passing as an African American, and appealing to American blacks on that basis. In fact, he is something like 50% white (we all know that) and 46% arab, with only about 3+% of negro blood. In fact, the arab-africans who are his ancestors might well have been some of those arab traders who captured blacks and sold them into slavery. Bizarre.

He is a fraud.

[Let’s ask the all knowing, all seeing, all caring Obama. He should have the answer to that one should he not?] Mike’s America.

This is the first picture that came to mind on this one…no disrespect to Johnny Carson intended! Hope it works:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DTI3rm5z6bo&NR=1

(if it doesn’t work, the title is Carson Skit #12 on YouTube!)