Brutally Honest wonders why this isn’t front page news. I think we all know the answer to that one:
One of Al Qaeda’s senior theologians is calling on his followers to end their military jihad and saying the attacks of September 11, 2001, were a “catastrophe for all Muslims.”
In a serialized manifesto written from prison in Egypt, Sayyed Imam al-Sharif is blasting Osama bin Laden for deceiving the Taliban leader, Mullah Omar, and for insulting the Prophet Muhammad by comparing the September 11 attacks to the early raids of the Ansar warriors. The lapsed jihadist even calls for the formation of a special Islamic court to try Osama bin Laden and his old comrade Ayman al-Zawahri.
The disclosures from Mr. Sharif, also known as Dr. Fadl and Abd al-Qadir ibn Abd al-Aziz, have already opened a rift at the highest levels of Al Qaeda. The group’s deputy, Ayman al-Zawahri, a former associate of the defecting theologian in Egypt, personally mocked him last month in a video, remarking that he was unaware Egyptian prisons had fax machines. Meanwhile, leading Western analysts are saying the defection of Mr. Sharif indicates the beginning of the end for Al Qaeda.
The author of “Inside Al Qaeda,” Rohan Gunaratna said in an interview this week, “There is nothing more important than a former jihadist as important as Dr. Fadl criticizing the jihadist vanguard.”
~~~Mr. Sharif, currently serving a life sentence in an undisclosed Egyptian prison, wrote in the 1980s two of the modern seminal texts for Sunni jihadism and in particular Al Qaeda, in “Fundamental Concepts Regarding Jihad” and “The Five Ground Rules for the Achieving of Victory or Its Absence.” Those books are scholarly justifications, citing the Koran and Hadiths, for joining a war against Muslim apostates such as the Egyptian ruling class and for a broader jihad against the far enemy of America.
~~~Of his old associates he writes, “Bin Laden, al-Zawahri, and others fled at the beginning of the American bombing [in Afghanistan], to the point of abandoning their wives and families to be killed along with other innocent people,” according to a translation provided by the Middle East Media Research Institute. It goes on, “I think that a sharia court should be established, composed of reliable scholars, to hold these people accountable for their crimes — even if in absentia — so that those who are ignorant in their religion do not repeat this futility.”
Mr. Sharif also says Mr. Zawahri informed on his friends after he was arrested following the Sadat assassination in 1981. “I don’t know of anyone in Islamic history having committed such deceit, fraud, falsification, and betrayal of trust with such hostility to someone else’s book, and perverted it – no one before Ayman al-Zawahri,” he wrote.
We all know that the MSM cannot allow anything that would remotely suggest that Bush’s policies have helped to destroy al-Qaeda. That would be blasphemy.
But we also know, it’s all Bush’s fault.
Thankfully.
UPDATE
While your busy blaming Bush take a look at something else Bush is too blame for at Gateway Pundit.

See author page
Man, that’d be great to see a Sharia court held to try them in absentia. TFH
Thanks for the link up Curt. Much appreciated.
Yes Curt a giant hidden conspiracy is at work here, intent on hiding the truth from the American people.
MSM and Hollywood are under the total control of the non Christian ant-Americans, and that is the only reason that Bush has become THE President with the lowest approval ratings ever.
Nice spin John. Really good. Great example of the distraction/denial tactic directly in response to an example of how the media is NOT reporting something important to which you respond with a comment about the mating habits of Mediterranean Fruit Flies in the wake of global warming’s effect on California oranges.
Don’t bother to answer John. The man is always too scared to comment more then once on a thread. And that one comment is usually the vegas odds or some other idiocy.
The man’s a coward in my book. Always too afraid to debate anyone.
Well, then I look forward to his one response to my Pew Research Center post, which I think demolishes his snide comment here.
Isn’t it the 110th Congress that has the lowest approval number ever in history? And Harry S Truman with the lowest of any president (something like 23%)?