Posted by Rob on 10 October, 2007 at 9:45 pm. 3 comments already!


I found a really nice link to a movie
that has covered many of the points I have made in an article a few
months ago. The movie is a British Documentary titled, “The Great
Global Warming Swindle,” where simply, a scientists discovered the REAL
cause of Global Warming is variations in the sun not CO2!!!

Please click here to view the film!

(ed – click here to see the other posts on this great film from Flopping Aces)

also have a much shorter film for you. It is nowhere as good as the
first. Yeah, the video quality sucks, badly. And it would be harder to
find a worst host then the guy on the left. But this video makes some
good points I really like. I don’t agree with all of the points, but
there is enough of them where I’ll post it. So, thus, I give you:

Facts behind “The Great Global Warming Swindle.”

By the way, here is my latest article on Global Warming re-posted once again.

Global Warming and Basic Science.

By Robert Farrow

Basic science and liberals, never the twain shall meet. Curt at Flopping Aces
has covered the story regarding bad temperature data from Hansen’s Y2K
error and the change in the U.S. leaderboard. However, there is a more
basic error with the global warming cult that I would like to address.
Remember the dire predictions for Europe following Chernobyl and the
Iraqi oil fires causing a nuclear winter? All were in error. The
fallout area in Chernobyl was much, much less then predicted and the
suggestion by Carl Sagan that the Iraqi oil fires would generate a
small scale nuclear winter was an embarrassing blunder. Why did
intelligent men commit such major errors? One, they drifted outside of
their error of expertise. For instance, a man who designed nuclear
bombs may not be the best scientist to predict fallout. The second area
is that they allowed science to become politicized. Thus, it was no
longer science.

This politicization has allowed the libs,
who are never as smart as they think they are, to miss some basic
points about the climate. First of all, what drives the climate?

What causes the Earth’s climate to change?
Climate change is complex–there are many dynamics involved. A major
factor may be the relationship between the Earth and the Sun.
Astronomer Milutin Milankovitch (1879 — 1958) studied the variations in
the shape of the Earth’s orbit around the Sun and the tilt of the
Earth’s axis. He theorized that these cyclical changes and the
interactions among them were responsible for long-term climate changes.
Milankovitch studied three factors:
1. Changes in the tilt of the Earth’s axis;
2. Variations in the shape of the Earth’s orbit around the Sun; and
3. Precession: changes in how the tilt of the axis is oriented in relation to the orbit.

the source is here.

The episodic nature of the Earth’s glacial and interglacial periods
within the present Ice Age (the last couple of million years) have been
caused primarily by cyclical changes in the Earth’s circumnavigation of
the Sun. Variations in the Earth’s eccentricity, axial tilt, and
precession comprise the three dominant cycles, collectively known as
the Milankovitch Cycles for Milutin Milankovitch, the Serbian
astronomer who is generally credited with calculating their magnitude.
Taken in unison, variations in these three cycles creates alterations
in the seasonality of solar radiation reaching the Earth’s surface.
These times of increased or decreased solar radiation directly
influence the Earth’s climate system, thus impacting the advance and
retreat of Earth’s
the source is here.

how these facts never make Al Gore’s talking points. But of course
there may be a simpler explanation for climate change. It is not the
rotation or aix or orbit around the Sun, it may be the Sun itself.

Sun’s Output Increasing in Possible Trend Fueling Global Warming

In what could be the simplest explanation for one component of global
warming, a new study shows the Sun’s radiation has increased by .05
percent per decade since the late 1970s.

The increase would only be significant to Earth’s climate if it has
been going on for a century or more, said study leader Richard Willson,
a Columbia University researcher also affiliated with NASA’s Goddard
Institute for Space Studies.

The Sun’s increasing output has only been monitored with precision
since satellite technology allowed necessary observations. Willson is
not sure if the trend extends further back in time, but other studies
suggest it does.

“This trend is important because, if sustained over many decades, it could cause significant climate change,” Willson said.

In a NASA-funded study recently published in Geophysical Research
Letters, Willson and his colleagues speculate on the possible history
of the trend based on data collected in the pre-satellite era.

“Solar activity has apparently been going upward for a century or more,” Willson told today.

So, in another words, climatology is a subject
better left for astronomers then biologists and environmentalists. Thus
environmentalists may not be the best scientist to predict climate
change. But it actually gets more confusing then this, as plate
tectonics may also play a hand in climate change.

the Changes in the tilt of the Earth’s axis, Variations in the shape of
the Earth’s orbit, Precession, plate tectonics, a change in the Sun’s
output, (words liberals never use in any of their articles) and co2
emissions all may play a part in the earth’s climate. But according to
the liberals, it is all man made CO2 emissions and it is all proven.

Stick with one factor, ignore all the others, and beat the hell out of anyone who disagrees.

That is Al Gore. That is liberal science.

am not saying CO2 emissions play no part in climate change. What I am
annoyed with is that the scientific community has allowed itself to
become politicized and thus may be missing some important data on our
climate. I would even support Kyoto if it was a fair agreement that did
not exempt the third world and was not so destructive to our economy.
For I still believe the environment and economy are not mutually
exclusive concepts.
But the blame America first crowd once again shows they lack any ability to think outside of current liberal thought.

danger here is not just that by focusing on just CO2 emissions and
burning at the stake anyone who disagrees we may be missing other
important signs concerning our climate, but that real danger is that
the scientific community will continue to be politicized and will give
us more global warming, nuclear winters, and other ideas that are based
more on politics then science.

What we need is real, un-politicized science, not this.

And I am not willing to destroy our economy and put hundreds of thousands out of work because of bad politics and not science.

Crossposted from Baltimore Reporter

0 0 votes
Article Rating
Would love your thoughts, please comment.x