The gunmen who have seized a federal building in Oregon claim they’re patriots.
But on social media, many are calling the self-styled “militia” terrorists — and mocking the group that has taken over the Malheur National Wildlife Refuge headquarters with derisive nicknames.
Some are calling them Y’All Qaeda:
Read at HuffPo.
I’ve also seen some racebaiting with claims that if these were blacks or Muslims, they’d be shot dead by now. Is there really a double-standard at play because I’m not seeing the comparison that’s being drawn by the race-baiters.
See what I mean?
@Wordsmith:
So, the left is upset that 2nd amendment supporting protesters aren’t being shot? The occupy protesters were also not shot. They are also slandering them in calling them “terrorists” when no terrorist act has been committed. There has been no riots, no burning or looting of businesses, no rapes, no vehicles over-turned or burned, no one beaten by these protesters, nothing thrown at law enforcement officers, no police cars pooped on.The protesters are merely trying to stop the injustice of non-terrorists who served their sentence being made to suffer double jeopardy by virtue of a Obama-picked leftist prosecutor and leftist court over-riding a lower court judge who refused to sentence non-terrorists as “terrorists.”
And here we thought lefties liked “judicial activism” to stop injustice.
Yeah, if they were black or Muslim, the would have been shot. Why, just look at how the police mowed down violent rioters at Ferguson, Baltimore, LA or Wall Street.
Yeah, they kill the Muslims… but they are usually already firing at police.
In actual fact, these militia are armed because, since they are NOT all black, the government would more than likely move in violently if they weren’t, as opposed to how they allow OWS and BLM to simply plunder until they go tired of it.