The Truth About Trump

Loading

John Schindler:

I’ve watched the campaign of Donald J. Trump for the presidency with interest since the moment this unique spectacle began. As I explained early on, while I considered the man himself to be a clownish character, I was glad that he was raising issues that needed to be discussed but weren’t until The Donald entered the race.

I knew from the moment Mitt Romney lost an election in 2012 that he shouldn’t have that the Republican Party would take all the wrong lessons from that needless defeat. As I predicted, rather than refocus to win more votes from demographics that felt unloved by Romney — especially working class whites — the GOP establishment would jump through great intellectual hoops to reach any other conclusion. And so they did.

Right-leaning pundits and the GOP’s donor class, which between them pretty much call the shots on what’s acceptable Republican discourse, wanted nothing to do with any outreach to downmarket whites, whom they despise. So it’s safe to say we wouldn’t be talking about out of control illegal immigration or job losses to China if it weren’t for Trump, who sashayed and tweeted his way into the campaign and shifted the GOP’s Overton window in a stunning fashion.

There will be much for future historians to ponder in this year’s remarkable Republican primary race, which left the party’s “stars” gasping for breath, not sure exactly what hit them when the vaunted Trump train barreled through their ranks. Like pretty much every other pundit in America, I got it wrongwhen I said last summer that Trump stood no chance of getting the Republican nomination, much less winding up in the White House. Otherwise I stick by most of what I said about Trump and his candidacy when this strange saga kicked off.

That said, I always had doubts about Trump, enormous ones. How not? This, after all, is a reality TV star whose all-over-the-map business dealings can charitably be called dodgy. In a field like national politics that attracts narcissists like schoolyards beckon pedophiles, Trump is a standout for his rank, tacky self-absorption. His inability to admit ever being wrong, his incessant need to double, then triple-down on any issue, however small, was impossible to miss. Warning signs were large and neon-lit for anyone caring to see.

Nevertheless, I had hopes that, eventually, professional handlers would get a hold of Trump and moderate his rough edges. Once he secured the GOP nomination a more focused Trump — one not needing to respond to every imagined slight with an incendiary tweet — had to arrive. Surely if he expected to be competitive in the general election, Trump knew he would have to refocus, stop pandering to his narrow but fervent base, and start talking like, well….a president.

Alas, I was wrong. Wise friends of mine like Tom Nichols and Rick Wilsonwere right all along. There is no better Trump. There is no responsible Trump. There is no balanced Trump. There is no presidential Trump. There is only Trump.

This is a man who cannot listen to any opinions contrary to his own. Sycophancy is a requirement for admission to Trump’s inner circle, which explains why his echo chamber is so effective at silencing reality. His campaign is now in free fall. His self-immolation in the weeks after the Republican convention — between attacks on the family of a dead American soldier to asking the Kremlin to find Clinton’s missing emails — is unprecedented in our country’s political history. Trump will lose catastrophically on November 8 to Hillary Clinton, an almost unimaginably flawed candidate whom any normal Republican could defeat, and whose moving back into the White House fills me with dread.

I’m not a very partisan person, as my longtime readers know, and until the last year I was never particularly anti-Hillary, whom I regarded as a world-class grifter with few, if any, firm convictions beyond the naked pursuit of power and money. Corrupt politicians scare me less than fanatical ones. However, the revelations of EmailGate, which I’ve analyzed in great depth, reveal a woman whose crass disregard for our nation’s laws and its security renders her unfit to be commander-in-chief.

Yet she will be. Trump has now self-destructed in such a shocking fashion, revealing his true, ugly self, that many average Americans have decided he’s crazy. I’ll leave actual diagnosis to mental health professionals, but the case for Trump having something very wrong with him now seems self-evident.

Let me be clear. Even if Trump were the picture of rectitude, a modest man not prone to outbursts and devoted to country over self — in other words, the opposite of who he actually is — he would still be unfit to be commander-in-chief. Allow me to dispense with the usual liberal pieties about his “racism” and “bigotry.” His numerous repulsive utterances aside, I see no evidence that Trump actually has any firm convictions — about race, creed, religion, politics, anything — outside himself.

Now that Trump has decided to ham-handedly pander to African Americans while going wobbly on deporting illegal immigrants, thereby undoing his main reason for getting in the presidential race in the first place, he has revealed himself to be every bit as insincere as Hillary Clinton. If Trump’s ardent AltRight fanbase, which values frog memes over policy, doesn’t now realize that they are just one more Trumpian long con, in his long list of them, they never will.

Read more

0 0 votes
Article Rating
Subscribe
Notify of
10 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments

Trump has donated supplies to the New Oleans flood victims dont ever expect that i the pages of the birdcage liners/Parrots Toilets or the talking heads either

Curt Thanks for posting this—he absolutely describes Trump. No more need be said.
He also says he will not vote for HRC.

Concur. What say you Marine?

@Richard Wheeler: John Schindler seems to genuinely have no clue. There is nothing in his post that accurately describes Trump. But I don’t expect you to understand that. Concur?
Didn’t know who Schindler is so checked ‘google’, might want to be careful opening Twitter messages from him.

That makes this quote from his message especially humorous: “Then, early this morning, Trump was back to being himself, tweeting unhinged personal insults at members of the media whose coverage of The Donald has been deemed insufficiently fawning” Imagine; he is warning of tweets from Trump.

@Redteam: Exactly. This guy describes Trump perfectly. Trump is gonna single handedly return the Senate to the Dems.
Trump is a complete buffoon and America is getting to see what a laughing stock he truly is. Down 10% in most recent poll he’s twisting and turning like a rag doll on immigration. He’s clueless and probably brain damaged. He can be thankful his opponent is also without merit,
Trump has absolutely conned you .

@Richard Wheeler:

Trump has absolutely conned you .

Hasn’t conned me. I understand him well and understand very well that the Supreme Court justices he will appoint are nothing like what Shrillary will appoint. You open any tweets from Schindler?

@Redteam:
Undercover hildebeast supporters like him won’t mind at all. If he does not understand what is at stake, he’s on the other side. He’ll attack anyone who goes against her.

“Truth” does not need loaded language.
Words loaded with negative connotations would have to be removed for this to even approach a truthful essay.
Imagine an scientific research project dripping with such nasty language about the potential outcome, if it goes the opposite of the researcher’s wishes.
Do you think he would skew his results?
Sure, of course he would.

So, remove the:
spectacle
clownish character
sashayed
dodgy
rank
tacky
crazy
unfit
long con

And, I’m sure the rest of the article is just a filled with slanted language.
Some of these terms, many of them in fact, are only debatable by going down to the writer’s level.
That means it is a waste of time to even begin.
He is so opposed he cannot see straight.
If someone wants to re-write his essay in neutral terms, (If that leaves any actual points on his side) maybe it would be worth it to begin a discussion.
But not now under these ”givens.”

@Nanny G:

That means it is a waste of time to even begin.
He is so opposed he cannot see straight.

So true.
listening to tv a few minutes ago, I heard the statement: ” Trump with his many flaws” and I thought, does Trump have ‘many flaws’? What are they? What are his serious flaws? I couldn’t think of any ‘serious’ flaws. What are any flaws? I still can’t think of any. Funny thing is, the person that made the statement on tv didn’t mention what any of these ‘flaws’ were. When I hear a liberal try to state a flaw, seems it almost always starts with ‘racist’. No one can name any incidence of racism by Trump. Not a single one.
Why do all the Republicans or non Dimocrats spend all their time talking about why Trump is not suitable and none of their time talking about why Hillary is not suitable. See this whole Post above, not one word critical of Hillary. I did go to one conservative blog a couple days ago and believe it or not, it was actually in support of Trump.
This blog is supposed to be a ‘conservative blog’ but I know of no regular author that actually supports Trump. Please excuse me if I’m wrong, but I’ve seen no posts ‘supportive’ of the anti Alinskyites /liberals.
For those that can’t seem to accept it, Hillary is a very flawed candidate. She is an outright crook. She has serious mental problems, which will be painfully obvious if she ever takes a debate stage. (I don’t believe she will do a debate).

@Redteam: The fact is the majority of Conservatives do not support Trump.
He’s a Democrat turned Populist. Cruz was the Conservative choice. The choice of Kitt, O5, DrJ, Vince, Lynn Tercel, David, Dr. Pete and others.
Some Conservatives dislike Trump but dislike HRC more–Brother Bob comes to mind.
The question is why would a true Conservative vote for a flim flam Populist–only possible reason is the presence ok HRC.

@Richard Wheeler:

He’s a Democrat turned Populist.

I’d put that in the ‘real plus’ column. Wouldn’t you?

The fact is the majority of Conservatives do not support Trump.

So? They have two choices. Trump or Hillary no one with a functioning brain cell will vote for a genuine certified crook. I have heard no one, not even Dimocrats, claim that Trump is a crook.
Neither of the choices is Cruz. He’s not an American citizen and not eligible. I think Cruz’s politics is certainly preferable to Hillary’s, but I can’t get past the fact he is an ‘establishment’ politician from Canada.

The question is why would a true Conservative vote for a flim flam Populist–only possible reason is the presence ok HRC.

Why is that a question? A ‘true’ (whatever that means) oh, and I consider myself to be one, has two choices Trump and Hillary. Make that one, Hillary is NOT a option for a conservative.
What does ‘flim flam’ mean? What is wrong with being a Populist? Is that one of the parties on the ballot?
Doesn’t ‘Populist’ kind of mean, being for what is popular? Like standing for the National Anthem? Want to bet on which side Kaepernick is for? It won’t be the Trump side. Hillary’s crowd doesn’t support the US flag either, not a single one on the Dim stage on opening night of their convention.
I notice you didn’t point out any of Trumps’ ‘flaws’, guess you can’t think of any either.

My prediction is still: Hillary will never take the debate stage.