Next Stage In Scandal: White House Claims They Didn’t Edit Benghazi Talking Points

By 3 Comments 173 views

Rob Port @ Say Anything:

Earlier this week David Petraeus told Congress that talking points the CIA issued in the aftermath of the Benghazi attack were edited to exclude references to al-Qaeda involvement. UN Ambassador Susan Rice, in the days after the attack, used talking points in media appearances which made no reference to a planned terrorist attack. She further stated that “the currently available information suggests that the demonstrations in Benghazi were spontaneously inspired by the protests at the US Embassy in Cairo.”

In other words, the attack wasn’t an act of terrorism planned and executed by terrorists but rather a protest of a YouTube clip which spiraled out of control.

So who edited the report, the “talking points,” produced by the CIA and approved by the nation’s intelligence agencies? The Obama administration is saying it wasn’t them:

The White House yesterday denied it edited talking points about the terrorist attack that killed the American ambassador to Libya — contradicting remarks made a day earlier by disgraced ex-CIA chief David Petraeus.

“The only edit that was made by the White House and also by the State Department was to change the word ‘consulate’ to the word ‘diplomatic facility,’ since the facility in Benghazi was not formally a consulate,” Deputy National Security Adviser Ben Rhodes told reporters aboard Air Force One.

“Other than that, we were guided by the points that were provided by the intelligence community. So I can’t speak to any other edits that may have been made.”

This leaves us with the following choices:

1) Petraeus is lying.

2) The Obama administration is lying.

3) Neither is lying, and some other intermediary changed the report.

That last is hard to believe as you’d expect there to be a verifiable chain of who all handled this information. There just can’t be that many people who are allowed to access and edit this sort of information. If not, we’re apparently to believe that the Obama administration is running off to the media spouting talking points edited, from the time they were produced by the intelligence community, by some unknown entity.

Read more

Filed under Uncategorized

Curt served in the Marine Corps for four years and has been a law enforcement officer in Los Angeles for the last 24 years.

3 Responses to “Next Stage In Scandal: White House Claims They Didn’t Edit Benghazi Talking Points”

  1. 2

    Liberal1 (Objectivity)

    As posted with the blog of origin:

    “Why do you need to know what was edited from Patraeus’s report. What if the information is top-secret? What if the information is simply that ‘Patraeus’s statement that the Benghazi affair was Al Qaeda inspired, was based on his own opinion and not based on facts’—and that there was some concern that such an irrational statement the truth came out would put Patraeus’s legacy in a poor light, or that we might would ultimately suffer international criticism for claiming false representation if Patraeus’s conclusion were proved wrong.”

  2. 3


    @Liberal1 (Objectivity):

    So did Petreaus tell the truth the first time he spoke with Congress, when he said the “protests” were due to an obscure video or did he tell the truth this time when he said he knew right away it was a terrorist attack? It has to be one or the other.

    But like all questions put to you, you will run and hide under your bed instead of answering.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *