The FBI released new documents on Hillary Clinton Friday showing her lawyers negotiating with the DOJ over her “successor server” also known as the infamous Platte River server.
National Security reporter, Jordan Schachtel combed through the tranche of Hillary documents released by the FBI show Hillary’s lawyers negotiating with the DOJ and FBI over her “successor server.”
So the FBI and DOJ were negotiating evidence…amazing.
Screenshots of FOIA’d FBI docs Thanks to Judicial Watch:
1st page:
2nd page:
Jordan Schachtel tweeted: Surprise! Hillary lawyers announce that there is a “successor server” that they can request access to.
FBI is not thrilled with the revelation.
More:
Surprise! Hillary lawyers announce that there is a "successor server" that they can request access to.FBI is not thrilled with the revelation. pic.twitter.com/H2AdYHO0c3
— Jordan Schachtel @ dossier.today (@JordanSchachtel) August 3, 2018
FBI docs show a lot of back and forth between Hillary’s lawyers and DOJ over what the FBI could and could not see.
FBI has released new info on Hillary Clinton investigation. Most interesting thing I've seen thus far is timeline documenting back & forth btwn DOJ & Hillary's lawyers over what they could & could not see. A lot of negotiating! Was she hiding something?https://t.co/2G6oA7vDDv pic.twitter.com/nlbYIncsKu
— Jordan Schachtel @ dossier.today (@JordanSchachtel) August 3, 2018
Why is the FBI negotiating evidence?
So, did the FBI ever get to examine the 2nd server? Hard to tell. Was it Bleachbit by the time they got it?
Isn’t that what is regarded as “withholding evidence”? If the FBI was told they received all the equipment and then found out later there was another server, isn’t that lying to the FBI?
Oh, but here’s a better idea; let’s DROP this investigation and put all our resources on investigating accusations we’ve made up against Trump.
Oh, I can’t wait until the next time I hear, “If Hillary was guilty, why wasn’t she indicted?”
@Deplorable me: Equality under the law is not one of the tenents of liberal philosophy. Their most important tenents revel that any means to an end. How can Trump and Clinton, Comey, and the rest of the individuals involved in this violation of constitutional rights be treated equally if the “progressive” end is to be achieved?
@Randy: When the people who wish to be in power break the law to do so, and when the DOJ has been turned into a tool for the left to use to PROTECT that illegal activity, equal protection under the law is impossible.
This is what the left has rendered our Constitutionally protected rights down to. It will take a lot of time and much effort to fix this.
I assume Greg won’t be commenting on this one…
@Nathan Blue: Well, I don’t know who else will come on and tell us not to believe our lying eyes. Right now, his propaganda sources are frantically scrambling to find a spin for this, like Hillary was just trying to help the FBI with their case load, didn’t want to bother anyone with their crimes, etc.
Some months ago my neighbor gave me an old computer for parts. I didn’t need the hard drive, and she was concerned that something personal may be on it – so she asked me to do a ‘Hillary’ on it. I immediately knew what she meant.
I smashed the hard drive with a sledge hammer, showed the pieces to her, and she was pleased.
If it’s good enough for Hillary….