Making sense of the news about Sidney Powell

It only makes sense for President Trump’s legal team to formally distance themselves from SidneyPowell so that President Trump isn’t directly responsible for the annihilation of his own party. Remember, Sidney warned that it looks like both parties are nearly equally culpable of election fraud since problems with Dominion have been reported for nearly a decade.

But F*ck the rinos anyway.

March 23, 2021; Sidney Powell’s defense in court: No reasonable person would have taken her election fraud claims seriously.

Right-wing lawyer Sidney Powell is claiming in a new court filing that reasonable people wouldn’t have believed as fact her assertions of fraud after the 2020 presidential election.

The election infrastructure company Dominion Voting Systems sued Powell for defamation after she pushed lawsuits and made appearances in conservative media on behalf of then-President Donald Trump to sow doubt about the 2020 election results. Dominion claims that Powell knew her election fraud accusations were false and hurtful to the company.

In a new court filing, Powell’s attorneys write that she was sharing her “opinion” and that the public could reach “their own conclusions” about whether votes were changed by election machines.

“Given the highly charged and political context of the statements, it is clear that Powell was describing the facts on which she based the lawsuits she filed in support of President Trump,” Powell’s defense lawyers wrote in a court filing on Monday.

“Indeed, Plaintiffs themselves characterize the statements at issue as ‘wild accusations’ and ‘outlandish claims.’ They are repeatedly labelled ‘inherently improbable’ and even ‘impossible.’ Such characterizations of the allegedly defamatory statements further support Defendants’ position that reasonable people would not accept such statements as fact but view them only as claims that await testing by the courts through the adversary process.”

Election authorities and Dominion have resoundingly called Trump’s loss in the election accurate and untainted by any possible major security risks. Trump’s lawyers and his allies quickly lost or dropped all but one minor case out of nearly 60 following the election, as the then-President sought to overturn Joe Biden’s win in multiple key states.

Rep. Peter Meijer of Michigan, one of the Republicans who voted to impeach Trump in January after the January 6 Capitol attack, tweeted that Powell’s argument is “pathetic.”

“Absolutely infuriating. GOP lost the Senate & 5 ppl died in attack on the Capitol in part bc Sidney Powell misled millions claiming stolen elections. Now Powell backtracks saying “no reasonable person” wld believe what she *ALLEGED IN COURT* were “statements of fact”!?! Pathetic.”

Though the Trump campaign had sought to distance itself from Powell after she held a conspiracy-filled news conference with his other attorneys, Trump had told people he liked Powell’s arguments and wanted to see more of her on television.
In one chaotic Oval Office meeting in December, Trump said he had considered naming her as a special counsel to investigate voter fraud allegations.

Besides Powell, the meeting included her client, former Trump national security adviser Michael Flynn, two people familiar with the matter previously told CNN, describing a session that began as an impromptu gathering but devolved and eventually broke out into screaming matches at certain points, as some of Trump’s aides pushed back on Powell and Flynn’s more outrageous suggestions to overturn the election…

The following day, Trump’s campaign legal team sent a memo to dozens of staffers instructing them to preserve all documents related to Dominion Voting Systems and Powell, in anticipation of litigation by the company.
The lawsuit — filed in January — outlined Powell’s TV appearances and online posts in extraordinary detail, including when she repeated her unfounded beliefs that Dominion was linked to communist Venezuela and Georgia officials were in on election fraud.
“Emboldened by Trump’s endorsement of her false accusations, which launched her into political superstardom, Powell’s defamatory media campaign continued and intensified” with her media appearances, Dominion alleged in its lawsuit.
A former federal prosecutor based in Texas, Powell rose to prominence through her criticism of the Robert Mueller investigation and her promotion of right-wing conspiracy theories about a range of topics on social media.

Powell also claims in court that her statements about the 2020 election were a “matter of public concern” about a publicly known company, Dominion, and thus protected speech.
…

The avalanche of lies Powell publicly told in the course of her defamation campaign against Dominion resulted in permanent damage to their corporate reputation which will likely cost them millions of dollars in lost business. They also contributed to the violence that followed on January 6th. So here she is now, trying to disclaim responsibility by asserting that any reasonable person would have known she was lying.

First Rudy Giuliani stated in court that his election lawsuit wasn’t really about election fraud; now Sidney Powell asserts as a defense in a defamation lawsuit that no reasonable person would have believed her election fraud claims.

No comments, I guess. That would require thought about fact that the massive election fraud campaign was nothing but a LIE.

Based on Trump’s massive voter fraud lie—which in Georgia will hopefully result in racketeering charges—the Governor of Georgia has just signed into law massive voter suppression legislation, which includes such absurd measures as making it unlawful to provide food or drink to people waiting in line to vote. That should be helpful, since other measures could be used to keep people in targeted locations standing in line for hours.

Republicans state legislators may have overplayed their hand, in Georgia and elsewhere. They could be headed for a backlash like they’ve never seen before, in the courts and at the polls. Their real intentions are far too obvious, and there’s no election fraud evidence supporting the need for their actions.