Larry Correia:
This is a great read about the political bias in mainstream publishing. http://www.nickcolebooks.com/2016/02/09/banned-by-the-publisher/
But remember, all of those allegations about ideological bias against conservative and libertarians was just in you Wrongfans’ imagination.
I don’t know Nick Cole. I spoke with him on the internet for the first time this week. I’ve never read any of his books, but apparently lots of people have. From what I understand he was a solid midlister, who was selling well, and growing his backlist. The usual good career track stuff. His last book did well and got great reviews. However, one small bit in the next (under contract) book in the series hopelessly offended a young editor at Harper and it went sideways. But read Nick’s account. It is fascinating stuff.
For years we’ve known there is a liberal bias in the publishing industry. I mean come on, almost all of them work in Manhattan. Duh. Of course the publishing industry vehemently denies that. Left wing fans don’t see it the same way fish don’t notice water is wet. It just is. Right wing fans get sick of being preached at or treated like they’re stupid, and go spend their entertainment dollars elsewhere.
Because this isn’t my first rodeo, I already know exactly how Nick is going to get attacked and dismissed.
- There is no bias.
On the contrary, it is biased, and anybody who has paid any attention at all knows it. Just like Americans in general, some authors are politically apathetic and don’t pay any attention to that part of their business. Other authors know about the bias, but they benefit from it, so they’re cool. Other authors know it, but don’t say anything because speaking up is at best a hassle, and at worse, career damaging. Then there’re some of us who can’t keep our big stupid mouths shut.
Authors are about as evenly divided ideologically as the rest of America, but you wouldn’t know it from looking at what we say in public, or reading our books. That’s because most of the non-left keep their heads down to avoid rocking the boat. In my genre there are hundreds of outspoken left wing authors, because that’s accepted, normal, and good, while there are a few dozen outspoken on the right. And that’s way more than when I started. The declining power of traditional gatekeepers has enabled more writers to speak freely.
Once I started being really vocal I was shocked by how many well-known, established authors I met who had the wrong politics who were keeping their heads down out of fear of damaging their careers. I’m talking living legends, and I’m all like “Whoa… You?” There are lots more than you’d think. We’ve got like a secret handshake and a decoder ring and everything now.
I’ve also spoken to a bunch of liberal authors who think the system is hopelessly biased to the point of stifling free expression and artistic creativity, but even being on the home team they can’t say anything without fear of hurting their careers. All the time at cons I meet an author for the first time and get some variation of “I disagree with your politics, but you’re right about this.” And then it usually turns into them ranting about how messed up their publishing house is.
- Let’s quibble over the definition of “censorship” and “banned”.
I haven’t read the other side’s take on Nick’s article yet, but knowing them as well as I do I can guarantee that will be brought up. While I was reading that link the second I saw those terms I knew the CHORFs would do the whole Strain at a Gnat, Swallow a Camel thing, nitpick the definitions, and then dismiss the whole thing.
Yes. A publisher is perfectly free to reject a book.
Yes. Refusing to publish someone’s work is not the same as banning it.
Yes. Part of an editor’s job is “censoring”.
Yes. Part of an editor’s job is understanding the author’s market, what the customers want, and providing them a product which will sell and be profitable.
Duh.
Great. Now that the stupidly obvious is out of the way for the dimwits at File 770 (don’t forget to look both ways before crossing the street!), let’s get down to the important part ofWhy it was rejected.
Politics. Period.
So, for definitions I wouldn’t use the word Ban, but it is certainly censorship: the practice of officially examining books, movies, etc., and suppressing unacceptable parts.
In this case, unacceptable was a small idea that cast a bit of liberal orthodoxy in a negative light.
And this wasn’t a message book. This wasn’t a big recurring theme. This wasn’t a preachy, beat you over the head with Special Topic X message of the day (note, all that stuff is perfectly cool with mainstream publishing when it is left wing), this was one bit of backstory about one group of characters explaining their motivations.
But that one kernel of something that could be construed as going against holy left wing dogma was the kiss of death. It was horribly offensive. AIs find casual abortion of convenience an indicator of humans possessing a callous disregard for life… (that’s actually a pretty clever idea for the usual AI uprising trope). Nope. That’ll offend 50% of your audience!
Oh bullshit.
In a genre where we can be eyeball deep in murder, rape, genocide, every crime known to man while inventing a bunch of new ones, carnage, and sheer awfulness, with dangerous ideas supposedly our bread and butter… Yet having a bit that from the PoV of one group looking at a progressive sacrament in a negative light is just too offensive to tolerate. Now if a left wing author wants to sprinkle liberal amounts of abortion through their fiction, make all the Christians into belligerent inbred rednecks, and then kick George Bush’s severed head down the street, nobody in Manhattan publishing is going to bat an eye. Because they live in a Manhattan echo chamber where everybody thinks the same way, and the idea of there being customers who would find that offensive is simply inconceivable to them.
This is supposed to be a genre of ideas, big ones, small ones, and dangerous ones. The problem is that for too long we’ve had a homogenous bunch of gatekeepers, many of whom were willing to sacrifice story and creativity in favor of enforcing a rigid group think. And then some ideas just aren’t allowed.
I seem to remember a time when people were being blacklisted for their thoughts and beliefs. Seems that used to be bad.
Gramscian behavior as intended. The left cannot compete in the arena of ideas, because their ideology is factually, morally and ethically bankrupt. That is why leftists have to lie about everything, and shut down all opposition. They claim this bogus devotion to diversity while demanding lockstep intellectual enslavement to the politically correct cognitive fart fad of the moment, designed for no purpose other than to work up the weakminded into raging mobocracy. The leftist cannot allow any thought critical of leftist thought, lest the idiocy of all collectivist facism dissolve under the light of reality.
Leftist ideology led to over 100 million murders in the 20th century. Leftist philosophy leads people deluded into believing they are educated arguing that the National SOCIALIST German WORKERS party was not leftist, but rightwing. Leftist thinking leads people to laugh at those who used to believe in the geocentric model of the universe, yet swallow the lies of the AGW pseudoscience of GIGO computer models of zero predictive accuracy over the actual measured raw temperature data. Leftist insanity says that despite an XY set of chromosomes, obvious male genitalia, and having sired multiple children via production of sperm, that it is crazy and criminal to refer to such an individual as “male”, if said individual suddenly decides he thinks he is a woman. (And yet leftists call those who disagree with them ‘science deniers’) Leftists still believe in the insane Keynesian economic stupidity that when you are in more debt than your annual income, that you can spend spend spend your way out of debt, and that people will not alter their economic habits when government raises tax rates.
Leftism is inherently irresponsible and dishonest. It will NEVER admit error, because their emotionally-based belief system cannot accept the ego blow of having to accept responsibility for failure. It is all about how the leftist FEELS about itself (yes, I said ITSELF) because it cannot accept the possibility that someone else has an effective method or design for task accomplishment.
Cam Newton’s failure to even try to recover his fumble, and his childish behavior in the postgame press conference is CLASSIC leftist behavior. A man of character and integrity would have congratulated the Broncos on playing more effectively, and said something about learning from the experience and using it to play better next year.
Leftist ideology is for cowards, the lazy, the envious, the dishonest, and the stupid. Should rhe American voter continue this lurch to the left, then the hell that comes will be fully deserved.
Similar to the following:
Emperor Joseph II: My dear young man, don’t take it too hard. Your work is ingenious. It’s quality work. And there are simply too many notes, that’s all. Just cut a few and it will be perfect.
Wolfgang Amadeus Mozart: Which few did you have in mind, Majesty?
I barely remember Hollywood’s blacklisting era.
But it was bad.
So, today we are having a new era of blacklisting writers, only in publishing, not just movies and TV.
The thing that comes to mind is from a long-dead now escapee from the USSR.
He used to try to teach me to read the paper BETWEEN the lines.
He said that was the only way to know what was going on in the USSR.
Looks like we all might begin looking at disseminated media in that way here, too, now.
What a long way we’ve fallen.
Teach a young person how to identify hidden agendas in what they read recreationally.