Judicial Watch: Hillary e-mail requested printout “without any identifiers”

Loading

Ed Morrissey:

A new release from the State Department of e-mails involving Hillary Clinton aides and the secret, unauthorized private server once more calls into question denials by Hillary of sending or receiving classified data. Judicial Watch received dozens of pages in response to a FIOA lawsuit filed last May that specifically sought e-mails from Huma Abedin in the scandal. They note that Abedin discussed Hillary’s movements through unsecured e-mail, potentially putting the Secretary of State at risk, and found a number of other issues within the trove, too:

Judicial Watch today released nearly 70 pages of State Department records that show that former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton and her top aides, Deputy Chiefs of Staff Huma Abedin and Jake Sullivan, received and sent classified information on their non-state.gov email accounts. …

The new documents show that Hillary Clinton used the clintonemail.com system to ask Huma Abedin (also on a non-state.gov email account) to printtwo March 2011 emails, which were sent from former British Prime Minister Tony Blair (using the moniker “aclb”) to Jake Sullivan on Sullivan’s non-state.gov email account.  The Obama State Department redacted the Blair emails under Exemption (b)(1) which allows the withholding of classified material.  The material is marked as being classified as “Foreign government information” and “foreign relations or foreign activities of the US, including confidential sources.”

Another email shows that Clinton wanted to know how meetings in Washington, including a four-hour meeting concerning America’s war on Libya, would impact her Hampton vacation.  Responding to an email that details the sensitive meetings in DC, Clinton emails Abedin on August 26, 2011, “Ok. What time would I get back to Hamptons?”  Again, this email discussion takes place on non-state.gov email accounts.

The documents also include advice to Clinton on Libya from Sidney Blumenthal, a Clinton Foundation employee who, according to a Judicial Watch investigative report, also had business interests in Libya.  Clinton wanted Blumenthal’s March 9, 2011, Libya memo to be printed “without any identifiers.”

That memo is less problematic than others. The memo from Sid Blumenthal has “CONFIDENTIAL” at the top of the message, but that’s from Blumenthal, not a government classification. State released that memo without redactions.  The need to strip “identifiers” off of it almost certainly reflected the need to keep Blumenthal’s involvement quiet in the face of intense dislike of him at the White House.

The Tony Blair e-mail will be much more difficult to explain:

jw2

These redactions are justified under 5 USC 552 (b)(1), which allows the government to block the release of classified information in the FOIA process. As Judicial Watch points out, the designations 1.4(B) and (D) refer to foreign government information; the (D) can also refer to “confidential sources,” which might describe Blair or perhaps someone else Blair discussed in the redacted message. Note too that both Jake Sullivan and Hillary got this from Blair, with Hillary getting it on her personal e-mail. She then forwards it to Huma Abedin with instructions to print it out. So much for never sending or receiving classified information. Note too that this time the classification notice comes from State, and not the IG from the intel community.

This isn’t the only curiosity in the trove.

Read more

0 0 votes
Article Rating
Subscribe
Notify of
3 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments

“Ok. What time would I get back to Hamptons?”

Wow, that screams commitment and interest.

Typically, Ed Morrisey’s article is a load of manure. It doesn’t stand up to even superficial inspection.

The new documents show that Hillary Clinton used the clintonemail.com system to ask Huma Abedin (also on a non-state.gov email account) to print two March 2011 emails, which were sent from former British Prime Minister Tony Blair (using the moniker “aclb”) to Jake Sullivan on Sullivan’s non-state.gov email account.

All that’s left of the letter is a boiler plate disclaimer from The Office of Tony Blair, but that’s sufficient. The Office of Tony Blair is a private consultancy business operated by the former prime minister. It would not be appended to any official UK government document. It would not have contained classified information, because a former prime minister would not be casually passing around classified information. The text has become classified simply because the State Department or intelligence community don’t want it to plastered all over the internet. For all we know, there was an embarrassment factor. Maybe it was kept from the public simply as a courtesy to the former PM.

Another email shows that Clinton wanted to know how meetings in Washington, including a four-hour meeting concerning America’s war on Libya, would impact her Hampton vacation.

It’s called scheduling, Ed. Nothing sensitive about the meeting was revealed. It was a meeting. It was about Libya. It was in Paris. No one felt a need to redact anything.

The documents also include advice to Clinton on Libya from Sidney Blumenthal, a Clinton Foundation employee who, according to a Judicial Watch investigative report, also had business interests in Libya. Clinton wanted Blumenthal’s March 9, 2011, Libya memo to be printed “without any identifiers.”

The information from Blumenthal was not classified when it was sent. It was not from a classified source. Nor did anyone feel it was necessary to classify it before it was recently released for public inspection. Clinton felt a need to have it printed without identifiers because it was being turned into a paper document. That’s a simple and reasonable precaution. Paper documents tend to be less secure by their nature. They’re easily misdirected. They can be easily photocopies. They sometimes wind up in a trash basket before they head for the shredder.

It can be easily assumed that in a Hillary administration, there would be no security of classified information. Only her under-the-table business dealings would receive classified treatment.

Just like as Secretary of State.