IRS regulations require e-mails that are “federal records” to be stored in separate, permanent system

By 22 Comments 216 views

Allah:

 little something extra on The Mysterious Case of Lois Lerner’s Hard Drive. There seem to be two different IRS regs governing e-mails. The Daily Caller already flagged one of them, “Emails as Possible Federal Records,” section 1.10.3.2.3. Subsection 3 states in part:

If you create or receive email messages during the course of your daily work, you are responsible for ensuring that you manage them properly. The Treasury Department’s current email policy requires emails and attachments that meet the definition of a federal record be added to the organization’s files by printing them (including the essential transmission data) and filing them with related paper records. If transmission and receipt data are not printed by the email system, annotate the paper copy.

If your e-mail’s a federal record, you’re supposed to print it and add it to the file. What’s a “federal record”? The same section defines it, and does so broadly: Any e-mail “created or received in the transaction of agency business” qualifies, which means, in theory, any message sent or received by Lois Lerner about scrutinizing tea-party groups should have been printed by her at some point and the hard copy sent for storage in the relevant file. Think she bothered to do that?

But wait. Morgen Richmond tweeted to me that there’s another section of IRS regulations that’s relevant, “Standards for Managing Electronic Mail Records,” section 1.15.6.6. Why this section is necessary when the one above already makes clear that “federal records” must be printed, I’m not sure. Here’s the key bit, though:

IRS offices will not store the official recordkeeping copy of e-mail messages that are federal records ONLY on the electronic mail system, unless the system has all of the features of an electronic recordkeeping system, some of which are specified in paragraph 2 above. If the electronic mail system is not designed to be a recordkeeping system, ask an E-Mail/System Administrator to instruct you on how to copy the information from the electronic mail system to a recordkeeping system or produce a hard copy for recordkeeping purposes.

IRS offices that maintain their e-mail records electronically will move or copy them to a separate electronic recordkeeping system unless their system has the features specified in IRM 1.15.6.6.2 above. Backup tapes are not to be used for recordkeeping purposes.

The boldface there actually appears in the regs themselves, apparently to stress that e-mails that qualify as “federal records” must be copied and preserved in a separate system. The fear, obviously, is that if the only copy is the e-mail itself, it might end up being deleted (accidentally or deliberately). In order to preserve it permanently, an extra copy needs to be made and sent to the permanent digital record repository. How that squares with the regs about printing a hard copy, I’m not sure. Do you print a copy, send that to the file, and send an electronic copy to the digital records file, or does doing one or the other suffice? It’s unclear, but what is clear is that, according to the agency’s own regulations, it’s important to make sure that business e-mails are preserved somewhere outside the normal e-mail channels.

Read more

Filed under Uncategorized

Curt served in the Marine Corps for four years and has been a law enforcement officer in Los Angeles for the last 24 years.

22 Responses to “IRS regulations require e-mails that are “federal records” to be stored in separate, permanent system”

  1. 1

    Nanny G

    Yes, they, by law, must be printed out and filed.
    What happened?
    Nothing.
    Obama blew the dog whistle when he told the IRS that investigators will not find a ”smidgeon” of corruption at IRS.
    The dogs started shredding.
    I wonder if they are competent enough to have actually got rid of ALL the copies?
    They are pretty incompetent.

  2. 2

    Randy

    I do not know why anyone is surprised. These bureaucrats are only following the examples set by their lying president. This same model is apparent in every phase of our government to include the VA, EPA, Justice Department, Health and Human Resources, Homeland Security, State Department, and any other federal organization you can name. So much for transparency promised in government!

Trackbacks/Pingbacks

  1.  Watcher of Weasels » Watcher’s Council Nominations: The Search For The Lost E-mails Edition
  2.  Watcher’s Council Nominations: The Search For The Lost E-mails Edition | Liberty's Spirit
  3.  Watcher’s Council Nominations: The Search For The Lost E-mails Edition | Virginia Right!
  4.  Watcher’s Council Nominations: The Search For The Lost E-mails Edition | Nice Deb
  5.  Watcher’s Council Nominations: The Search For The Lost E-mails Edition | www.independentsentinel.com
  6.  Watcher’s Council Nominations: The Search for the Lost E-mails Edition | therightplanet.com
  7.  Watcher’s Council Nominations: The Search For The Lost E-mails Edition | NoisyRoom.net
  8.  Trevor Loudon's New Zeal Blog » Watcher’s Council Nominations: The Search For The Lost E-mails Edition
  9.  Watcher’s Council Nominations: The Search For The Lost E-mails Edition | askmarion
  10.  Watcher’s Council nominations for June 18, 2014
  11.  The Council Has Spoken!! This Weeks’ Watcher’s Council Results | Nice Deb
  12.  The Council Has Spoken!! This Weeks’ Watcher’s Council Results – 06/20/14 | NoisyRoom.net
  13.  Trevor Loudon's New Zeal Blog » The Council Has Spoken!! This Weeks’ Watcher’s Council Results – 06/20/14
  14.  The Council Has Spoken!! This Weeks’ Watcher’s Council Results | therightplanet.com
  15.  The Council Has Spoken!! This Weeks’ Watcher’s Council Results | www.independentsentinel.com
  16.  The Council Has Spoken!! This Weeks’ Watcher’s Council Results 06.20.14 | askmarion
  17.  Watcher’s Council winners for June 20, 2014
  18.  WoW!! - Citizens News
  19.  The Razor » Blog Archive » Council Submissions: June 18, 2014
  20.  The Razor » Blog Archive » The Council Has Spoken: June 20, 2014

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <s> <strike> <strong>