Hillary’s server was indeed hacked

Loading

Fox News:

The infamous Romanian hacker known as “Guccifer,” speaking exclusively with Fox News, claimed he easily – and repeatedly – breached former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton’s personal email server in early 2013.

“For me, it was easy … easy for me, for everybody,” Marcel Lehel Lazar, who goes by the moniker “Guccifer,” told Fox News from a Virginia jail where he is being held.

Guccifer’s potential role in the Clinton email investigation was first reported byFox News last month. The hacker subsequently claimed he was able to access the server – and provided extensive details about how he did it and what he found – over the course of a half-hour jailhouse interview and a series of recorded phone calls with Fox News. Fox News could not independently confirm Lazar’s claims.

The former secretary of state’s server held nearly 2,200 emails containing information now deemed classified, and another 22 at the “Top Secret” level.

The 44-year-old Lazar said he first compromised Clinton confidant Sidney Blumenthal’s AOL account, in March 2013, and used that as a stepping stone to the Clinton server. He said he accessed Clinton’s server “like twice,” though he described the contents as “not interest[ing]” to him at the time.

“I was not paying attention. For me, it was not like the Hillary Clinton server, it was like an email server she and others were using with political voting stuff,” Guccifer said.

The hacker spoke freely with Fox News from the detention center in Alexandria, Va., where he’s been held since his extradition to the U.S. on federal charges relating to other alleged cyber-crimes. Wearing a green jumpsuit, Lazar was relaxed and polite in the monitored secure visitor center, separated by thick security glass.

In describing the process, Lazar said he did extensive research on the web and then guessed Blumenthal’s security question. Once inside Blumenthal’s account, Lazar said he saw dozens of messages from the Clinton email address.

More

0 0 votes
Article Rating
Subscribe
Notify of
13 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments

You’ll need to retract this; Greg says it never happened.

And the Clinton camp said there were no indications her server was hacked. I guess it depends on what your definition of “hacked” is.

Do you consider a publicity-hungry Romanian hacker who has provided no evidence of a claim made during a “FOX News exclusive” to be a credible source of information? Hey, why not. You consider a narcissistic billionaire reality television host to be an entirely credible candidate for president.

Maybe he should be given full immunity from prosecution in return for politically useful testimony. He wouldn’t have any ulterior motive for making things up in a situation like that, would he? Maybe a GOP investigative committee could subpoena him, and make a big deal out of some hearings scheduled right before the election. You know, to make sure your idiot reality TV host gets elected. For the good of the country.

Or maybe the GOP will surprise me, pull the lever on Trump’s ejection seat, and run their own totally sane “third party” GOP candidate as an alternative to both Trump and Clinton. Stranger things have happened. I know there are still many reasonable people in the republican party. They just haven’t had much chance to be heard over the past few years.

@Greg: Scramble, scramble, scramble. Hillary is going to work you to death with her numerous scandals and failures you seem obligated to justify.

Even under Kerry the State Department seems bound and determined to continue, as you do, to cover for Hillary’s corruption.

http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2016/05/06/documents-show-state-department-missed-target-date-for-special-benghazi-unit.html

Since Hillary is so squeaky-clean, why does she and the administration do all they can to stonewall the facts from being revealed?

Since Hillary is so squeaky-clean, why does she and the administration do all they can to stonewall the facts from being revealed?

You mean, why don’t they let a politically motivated kangaroo court have full and unrestricted access to any State Department or White House file cabinet they wish?

Jeez, that’s a tough one to figure out.

@Greg:

They just haven’t had much chance to be heard over the past few years.

You mean the liberal press won’t deliver the conservatives messages. Well, count me as surprised.
Let’s see now. Okay beginning today, the ‘true’ conservatives are going to give the ‘true’ reasons why ‘true conservatives’ should be elected and we can all count on the liberal press to correctly deliver the message. Are you trying to sell snowballs in hell?

@Greg:

You mean, why don’t they let a politically motivated kangaroo court

Are you saying the President and his cabinet and justice dept are conducting Kangaroo court. I’d thunk you’d give the Dims more credit than that.

@Greg:

National Security Officials: Scant evidence that Clinton had malicious intent in handling of emails

That’s like robbing a bank with the intention to give the money to charity. No malicious intent but it damn sure still is a criminal act.

What I’m saying is that there’s no way Trump can win the presidential election based on his qualifications for the job. He has no such qualifications. In fact, he has a list of traits that should rule him out. His general lack of knowledge, his ego, his entire temperament make him unsuitable for the job, if not an outright danger. The guy’s angry, nonsensical tirades and rude personal attacks may appeal strongly to an angry minority, but most thoughtful voters see his obvious shortcomings, many republicans included. Consequently, any republican victory involving Donald Trump would necessarily depend on mounting a successful smear campaign against Hillary Clinton.

@Greg:

You mean, why don’t they let a politically motivated kangaroo court have full and unrestricted access to any State Department or White House file cabinet they wish?

Yeah, as a matter of fact, that’s EXACTLY what I mean. Documents requested are not provided and Hillary AND the State Department have been dragging their feet at every opportunity.

Why, it’s almost like they have something to hide.

We’ve seen Hillary’s “qualifications”. Frankly, we don’t need the nation degraded any further than Obama has taken it.

@Greg:

based on his qualifications for the job

The qualifications are age 35 and natural born citizen, one of which Obama didn’t fit. But seriously how can anyone ever bring up ‘qualifications’ after Barack Obama was elected. A foreigner, using a stolen SS card, never had a job. Never graduated from college and he got elected, so how can qualifications ever be an issue again. .

His general lack of knowledge

Trump’s lack of knowledge, do you realize the only job Obama ever had was as a community organizer, in which he failed miserably, much as he has done in the White House. Trump has created dozens of companies throughout the world. Obama has to have a guide dog to take him to the outhouse. No one can run a smear campaign against Hillary. She is so bad, she can’t be smeared, the truth is worse than what most could ‘make up’. No wait, you’re a socialist, right?