Subscribe
Notify of
20 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments

Tom Delay quoted as saying FBI is ready to recommend an indictment against Hillary.

Get out the popcorn, if true….

maybe it is because of her stroke she had a few years ago which nobody can prove

@Pete: Certainly could happen—however—two recent polls—CNN Bernie 57–The Donald 34
NBC Bernie 54—The Donald 39

Isn’t Trump the one who is always bragging about his poll numbers? Wonder when he’ll mention these two stunners?

@Rich Wheeler: CNN & NBC… perhaps your typical heavily-weighted-with-Democrats polls the corrupt left wing media is famous for?

@Rich Wheeler:

If the voters of the US are truly stupid enough to vote for a definitional marxist, then the republic is beyond salvaging.

@Pete: I’ll take ANYONE over Trump or Clinton– I just watched Bernie for the last hour plus—I can see how he can beat Clinton—I think he could beat Trump. I think he would lose to a moderate like Rubio or Kasich
You.ve joined Word and Aqua as my favorite Conservatives at F.A.—we’ve lost some good ones in Mata and Aye Chi—that endorsement may hurt your cred.

@Richard Wheeler: Sanders can beat Hillary because Hillary is repugnant to many Democrats and independents as well as all Republicans. That’s pretty much the sum of it.

@Richard Wheeler trump has already won before a single vote has been cast

@farmer: At this point Trump is simply a legend in his own mind. If you believe the polls that show him up double digits for Repub. nom you gotta believe the CNN and NBC polls that have him trailing Sanders 57-34 and 54-39 respectively.–I DON’T BUY ANY OF IT.
He’s got a LONG ways to go–he won’t be POTUS.

@Pete:

@Rich Wheeler:

If the voters of the US are truly stupid enough to vote for a definitional marxist, then the republic is beyond salvaging.

Believe me, RW would not hesitate a moment to pull the lever for the Bern. And Trump lives rent free in RW’s head. Perhaps because his own party has given him such meager crumbs from which to choose from this election season. Talk about an “old white party.” Certainly fits the Democrats these days. RW is probably hoping Webb will rise like a phoenix from the ashes that was Webb’s oh, so short lived campaign.

Remember, when a liberal has favorite conservatives, you need to question the conservatism of those “conservatives.”

First Sarah- now Sheriff Joe–Who’s next David Duke?
Can Trump make it any easier for Dems in General Election?

05–Are you questioning Pete’s bona fides?lol

@Pete, #5:

Here’s Sander’s website. Veritas et virtus.

“The American people must make a fundamental decision. Do we continue the 40-year decline of our middle class and the growing gap between the very rich and everyone else, or do we fight for a progressive economic agenda that creates jobs, raises wages, protects the environment and provides health care for all? Are we prepared to take on the enormous economic and political power of the billionaire class, or do we continue to slide into economic and political oligarchy? These are the most important questions of our time, and how we answer them will determine the future of our country.”

More useful Latin: Caveat emptor. Bernie is an idealist. I do like him, however. I would certainly vote for Sanders or Clinton before Trump or Cruz. I would have been happiest with Biden.

@Rich Wheeler:

05–Are you questioning Pete’s bona fides?lol

Are you playing stupid, or does it just come naturally?

RW, I appreciate the kind words, but please understand I do not post my beliefs because I am looking for popularity. Truth is what it is, regardless of who or what I am. I personally am irrelevant – Truth is eternal.

Greg, – this is my shocked face – O O
^
(_)

That you think a marxist anti-American scumbag is someone to admire.

If marxist economics worked like you leftists think it should, then why is China’s economy collapsing, and why, despite the dramatic drop in oil prices, is the economy declining even more?

If this country is truly so insane that a damnable marxist piece of filth like Sanders actually ends up winning, I am going Galt. I will not be a slave for the lazy entitled masses who think it is fair to take 66.8% of my earnings (as Sanders evil tax plan would do) to allow slimey politicians to buy the votes of the uneducated, unmotivated, lazy and envious.

Honestly, if the US goes marxist, it is time to burn it all down.

@retire05: In #6 I said Pete was a favorite FA Conservative of mine. Based on your #10 would you not question his Conservatism? Sorry that got by you.

Pete You have earned my “kind words.” Keep it up.

@Pete, #14:

I think Bernie Sanders tells people exactly what he believes to be the truth. That’s a lot more than can be said for most politicians. For that, if nothing else, I believe he deserves respect.

I think much of what Sanders says is actually true. That’s why so many people support him. They see an increasingly unfair system, where the working and middle class are losing more and more ground to concentrated wealth and power. It isn’t because they believe they should get something for nothing.

@Greg: Really. He hasn’t yet addressed what his $18 trillion in new debt is going to do to the country.

@Greg:

Only people with no concept of economic reality, ignorance of true liberty, and a complete lack of historical understanding of the evil of marxist philosophy think Bernie Sanders is worthy of being president. People who think like 5 year olds with regard to “fairness”, who suffer from the childhood predilection for “magical thinking” – those are the ones who cannot see the inherent design flaws in marxist economic theory.

Would it be wonderful if every human on the planet was altruistic and performed a beneficial/productive task or function that benefitted society as a whole, and was compensated in a manner worthy of his contribution AND was sufficient for him or her to provide for him/herself and family? Sure it would! Unfortunately, reality shows that human nature precludes such a system ever existing.

Because that would mean that there was no more laziness…no more selfishness…no more greed….no more dishonesty….and no more cheating. It would mean that laws would no lonnger be required to enforce fairness, honesty and diligence. Such a situation does not and can never exist given the flaws of human nature. Hence reality requires some sort of tangible reward – motivation, stimulus or benefit for individuals to behave productively for society OF THEIR OWN ACCORD, and not because some complete asshole like Sanders arbitrarily decides HE has the right to determine how much of an individual’s hard earned income they get to keep versus what the government gets to forcibly take for the purpose of rewarding laziness and a misdirected sense of entitlement.

Again – if the voters of the US decide that Bernie Sanders is our next president, I am done. I will not support a nation that believes marxism is a worthwhile system of government. I will quit my job, leave the US, and renounce my US citizenship. I will NEVER be a slave to a marxist country.

@Pete: Hillary is so unpopular with Dems that Sanders could get the nom.—long hard fight with Sanders gaining with minorities to go with his white libs.
If this happens he will beat Trump who is considered by a majority to be scarier than Bernie–Anyone but Trump or possibly Cruz could beat Sanders—Rubio most likely
The war between Fox/Meghan and Trump is a gamble for both—it could cost Trump a win in Iowa but won’t hurt him overall—if Fox stays all in against Trump yet can’t stop his nom their cred–fair and balanced will forever suffer the Trumpist slings and arrows.
Third party candidates like Bloomberg or Webb may be emboldened by this Fox-fight–Stay tuned–I love it.

@Rich Wheeler:

Trump’s popularity is based, in my opinion, on the well earned distrust of the DC self-annointed elitists who propagandize what they think people want to hear while enacting policies that burden the middle class while garnering more power to the DC cabal. The left does it theough blatant pandering to economic ignorance and envy, while the GOPe pretends to care about conservative policies as they engage in polticial theater trying to hide their betrayal of their publicly expressed ideas in favor of slightly less leftist policies.

Trump has grabbed onto the anxiety over uncontrolled illegal immigration/invasion and the economic uncertainty resulting from egregiously stupid federal Keynesian acts, playing up his persona of toughness, while downplaying his history of greasing the political establishment he now claims he is outside of. His pedantic posturing over Kelly being a debate moderator calls into question how he would deal with those who oppose him both on the national and international stage.

If the choice boils down to Trump versus either the wholly untrustworthy Clinton or the contemptible Sanders, God have mercy on us all.