Documents suggest Lois Lerner turned over tax information in violation of the law

Loading

John Sexton:

National Review’s Eliana Johnson has an important story today about a transfer of over a million pages of confidential tax documents to the Department of Justice back in 2010. It now appears that the transfer of those materials, made at Lois Lerner’s behest, violated the law.

The existence of the transfer itself has been known since 2014, but how exactly it was accomplished has not been clear. As the story explains, there were two ways in which the transfer could legally have been made, but this transfer did not meet either of those requirement.

Federal law prohibits the IRS from sharing tax returns filed with the agency, with very limited exceptions…Documents suggest that Lerner’s massive document transfer to the DOJ didn’t meet any of those exceptions, including one that allows the agency to disclose returns for use in criminal investigations — if they’ve been requested in relation to “an actual investigation about a person to whom the investigation is related,” says [former assistant Attorney General Eileen] O’Connor…

A lawful transfer of the documents would have required a formal request from the DOJ to the IRS, but DOJ trial attorney Stephanie Sasarak told Cause of Action in a March 9, 2016, letter that the department did not make any requests to the IRS for the documents it received. Alternatively, the secretary of the Treasury could have turned the documents over to the DOJ. In either case, section 6103 requires the Treasury secretary to disclose the transfer to the bipartisan Joint Committee on Taxation, which releases publicly a list of disclosures each year. But the Joint Committee on Taxation’s 2010 disclosure report does not show a transfer to the Department of Justice that matches the one Lerner sent in October of that year.

So the DOJ did not request the documents and the Secretary of the Treasury did not turn them over, or at the least did not notify the Joint Committee on Taxation as required. It seems as if the IRS, again at Lerner’s behest, handed the material over in violation of the law.

All of this took place at a moment in time when the Democratic Party, vocally led by President Obama, was concerned about the impact the Citizens United decision would have on elections. The president made the SCOTUS decision a major issue at the State of the Union and continued to campaign against, and to promote a fix called the DISCLOSE act, until it failed in Congress that summer.

Read more

0 0 votes
Article Rating
Subscribe
Notify of
4 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments

Why should the demac-RATS worry about the law their always violating the law as much as they violate the U.S. Constitution

Wonder if Learner will finally be prosecuted? I guess we all know this answer-not by this administration! When will Obama and Clinton supporters finally realize that if this behavior continuous, the left will be next. This is the type of behavior that is characteristic of Nazi Germany and Stalin’s Russia. I wonder where they will set up the gulags and concentration camps?

@Randy:

When will Obama and Clinton supporters finally realize that if this behavior continuous, the left will be next.

Never.

This is the type of behavior that is characteristic of Nazi Germany and Stalin’s Russia. I wonder where they will set up the gulags and concentration camps?

And Lenin. He is the one who got the ball rolling in Russia and had everything pretty much in place for “Uncle Joe”, as FDR fondly called him, to expand upon.

Is 1,000,000 pages a smidgen?