Cause for ‘The Pause’ #38 – Cause of global warming hiatus found deep in the Atlantic Ocean

Loading

Anthony Watts:

From the University of Washington  and the department of Trenberth’s missing heat comes a claim that we’ll have to wait another 15 years for global warming to resume. Sounds like a goalpost mover to me.

The Oceans that Slowed 21st Century Global Warming
Why did the rapid global warming that characterized the latter part of the 20th century slow down over the last 15 years or so? Many different theories have been proposed, but a new study suggests that a massive movement of heat from shallow surface waters to deep regions of the Atlantic and Southern Oceans — but not the Pacific Ocean, as many researchers had predicted — might be responsible. Xianyao Chen and Ka-Kit Tung analyzed data from profiling floats, or oceanographic sensors that can move vertically throughout the water column, and traced the pathways that heat has taken through the world’s oceans since the turn of the 21st century. The oceans are capable of storing about 90% of the world’s surface heat content, and the researchers suggest that most of the excess heat that would have otherwise continued to fuel global warming is currently stored in the basins of the Atlantic and Southern Oceans.

(Top) Global average surface temperatures, where black dots are yearly averages. Two flat periods (hiatus) are separated by rapid warming from 1976-1999. (Middle) Observations of heat content, compared to the average, in the north Atlantic Ocean. (Bottom) Salinity of the seawater in the same part of the Atlantic. Higher salinity is seen to coincide with more ocean heat storage. Credit: K. Tung / Univ. of Washington

The researchers also suggest that a sudden shift in salinity that corresponded with the slowdown of global warming at the beginning of the 21st century may have triggered this migration of heat to deeper waters. Historically, similar events have lasted 20 to 35 years, according to Chen and Tung. Consequently, the researchers suggest that global warming will pick back up in 15 more years or so, when heat returns to the surface waters.

Article #11: “Varying planetary heat sink led to global-warming slowdown and acceleration,” by X. Chen at Ocean University of China in Qingdao, China; X. Chen; K.-K. Tung at University of Washington in Seattle, WA.

================================================================

Following rapid warming in the late 20th century, this century has so far seen surprisingly little increase in the average temperature at the Earth’s surface. At first this was a blip, then a trend, then a puzzle for the climate science community.

More than a dozen theories have now been proposed for the so-called global warming hiatus, ranging from air pollution to volcanoes to sunspots. New research from the University of Washington shows that the heat absent from the surface is plunging deep in the north and south Atlantic Ocean, and is part of a naturally occurring cycle. The study is published Aug. 22 in Science.

Subsurface warming in the ocean explains why global average air temperatures have flatlined since 1999, despite greenhouse gases trapping more solar heat at the Earth’s surface.

“Every week there’s a new explanation of the hiatus,” said corresponding author Ka-Kit Tung, a UW professor of applied mathematics and adjunct faculty member in atmospheric sciences. “Many of the earlier papers had necessarily focused on symptoms at the surface of the Earth, where we see many different and related phenomena. We looked at observations in the ocean to try to find the underlying cause.”

The results show that a slow-moving current in the Atlantic, which carries heat between the two poles, sped up earlier this century to draw heat down almost a mile (1,500 meters). Most of the previous studies focused on shorter-term variability or particles that could block incoming sunlight, but they could not explain the massive amount of heat missing for more than a decade.

“The finding is a surprise, since the current theories had pointed to the Pacific Ocean as the culprit for hiding heat,” Tung said. “But the data are quite convincing and they show otherwise.”

Tung and co-author Xianyao Chen of the Ocean University of China, who was a UW visiting professor last year, used recent observations of deep-sea temperatures from Argo floats that sample the water down to 6,500 feet (2,000 meters) depth. The data show an increase in heat sinking around 1999, when the rapid warming of the 20th century stopped.

Read more

0 0 votes
Article Rating
Subscribe
Notify of
14 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments

“The authors dug up historical data to show that the cooling in the three decades between 1945 to 1975 – which caused people to worry about the start of an Ice Age – was during a cooling phase. (It was thought to be caused by air pollution.) Earlier records in Central England show the 40- to 70-year cycle goes back centuries, and other records show it has existed for millennia.”

Nope. Can’t fool me. The sky is falling! The sky is falling!

With every paper that is published by the warmists, their claims get more ridicules. The US is the only country that is ruining their economy by condemning inexpensive coal energy. Every week, there is a new paper that indicates that CO2 is a minor contributor or a non-contributor to global warming.

I’m no professional scientist whose livelihood depends on government grants and research, but doesn’t heat RISE?

@Bill:

No no Bill…heavier than air CO2 rises while the heated air mass sinks. This is how hot air balloons work…the CO2 from the burning fuel fills the bag while the heat races toward the ground, propelling the balloon up.
(sarc off)

@Thirteen: Actually, a balloon rises not because of the heated air but because the density of the air has changed in relationship to the air outside of the balloon due to the heating of a certain quantity of air in a partially confined space. The ballon becomes lighter than air and floats like a piece of wood in water. (The excess air escapes through the bottom of the balloon.) The amount of CO2 has little to do with a balloon rising. Also, due to Bernoulli’s principles of the physics of air movement, CO2 will mix with the other components of air and not stratify.

@Randy:

Missed the “(sarc off)” I see.

@Thirteen: Well, with so many people not having any knowledge of science any more and believing that consensus and computer models are science, it is difficult to know what is ignorance and what is sarcasm!

I wonder how much heat they’re going to take for openly saying the previous study (which pointed to the Pacific as the primary cause of the hiatus) was junk science?

I think I’m understanding the question “Bill” was asking:

“I’m no professional scientist whose livelihood depends on government grants and research, but doesn’t heat RISE?”

Yes, Bill, it does. But in the oceans, when you heat the surface and evaporate off some of the straight H2O, you’re left with saltier, thus denser water that, although warmer, might then sink. Also in the ocean, though not necessarily relevant here, you can get cold water to rise. If a powerful current hits some object some of the water will go around but other water may be deflected up and produce an upwelling. In fact, such conditions are observed in the east Pacific occasionally, among other places.

Looks like the AGW crowd decided to desperately up their anti: Global Warming ‘Pause’ to Last Another Decade

After constant claims that the earth had but “ten years left” before global warming would destroy us all, temperatures suddenly stopped rising in the 1990s. Now, scientists say that the “pause” in rising temperatures might last another ten years.

The newest reason scientists think that temperatures are not rising as fast as predicted is that the Atlantic and Southern Oceans are storing the heat deep below their surfaces.

This is one of nearly a dozen theories offered by scientists to explain why climate predictions have been off for more than a decade. Scientists, though, have warned that focus on this “pause” or “hiatus” in rising temperatures is a “distraction” from what they consider the inevitable fact that the earth is still warming.

The new theory published in the Science journal this month claims that ocean currents have swept the warmer ocean waters deep into their depths, thereby stopping the heat from being released into the atmosphere.

The theory goes on to state that the heat can be stored for up to 30 years, causing cooler surface temperatures. In fact, theorists now claim that these ocean currents have been storing warming temperatures deep in the ocean for some time, even counteracting the effects of man-made global warming.

But this won’t last forever, scientists warn.

I suppose they think that by making this ridiculous claim, that they will be able to keep the worshiper’s filling their collection plates for the next ten years until their theories cause their pants to be on fire again. Of course they haven’t provided a legitimate oceanic climate model to prove said theory, nor an explanation as to how an infinitesimal (theoretical) fraction of a degree temperature change on the surface could possibly dissipate through the upper region’s great heat sink effect, pass through the thermoclime layer to raise the even greater heat-sink of the deep ocean. (Note: it is impossible to recreate the thermoclime layer on a laboratory scale.)

Their dog didn’t eat their homework, it ran away from home with their research papers in it’s slobbering mouth. But trust us they say, the mutt will return home someday, just you wait and see.

@Bodhisattva:

Yes, Bill, it does. But in the oceans, when you heat the surface and evaporate off some of the straight H2O, you’re left with saltier, thus denser water that… etc

I considered and understand that. However, in the cold, cold depths of the ocean, is it possible that heat is “stored” without being transferred and dissipated to the surrounding colder water and, through currents and circulation, slowly returned to the atmosphere continuously?

In other words, though I freely admit I could be wrong, I find it difficult to believe that we see no warming now because all that excess heat is being drawn to the ocean depths, stored and will resurface later and heat up the atmosphere.

@Bill: Warmists had to find some way to explain the lack of warming and the reason their computer models are far from predicting world temperatures.

'Missing heat' in the Atlantic – It doesn't work like that

This is a good explanation on why the “hidden heat” is bogus!

It appears your hiatus was bogus. Nothing has paused or slowed down. From the Christian Science Monitor, January 5: What really happened during the supposed climate change ‘hiatus’?

With enough evidence, even skepticism will thaw. As one of Greenland’s largest ice shelves shrinks, a once-doubtful scientist has come around to the role of climate change in melting it.

@Greg: Yep, the Christian Science Monitor is one of those peer reviewed journals just like the NYT.! What a dunce!