Al Qaeda’s resurgence

By 2 Comments 243 views

The murder of Ambassador Stevens and three other Americans in Libya on September 11 has created a growing political backlash in the United States, but there are three other reasons that this attack is significant. First, an al Qaeda unit successfully assaulted American soil for the first time since 9/11. Second, we were — once again — caught by surprise, and third, the attacks show that al Qaeda is not just alive and kicking (as I mentioned in my previous post), but that our current strategy for dealing with the group is failing.

While various plots have been attempted by al Qaeda and individuals or cells associated with the group, the sacking of the Benghazi consulate was the first successful attack that can be definitively tied to the organization. Excellent work by Thomas Joscelyn suggests that the attack on the consulate was just one of four separate assaults on embassies carried out by al Qaeda that day. This simultaneity is, by the way, one reason that I immediately suspected — and wrote about – al Qaeda involvement in the raids, since this is as much a hallmark of al Qaeda operations as, for instance, the use of suicide bombers in Muslim-majority countries and the targeting of international organizations.

Just as worrisome for future events is the fact that the United States was caught off-guard, yet again, by this massive and sophisticated operation. I would argue that there are four reasons for this failure: a widely accepted narrative, a false view, the successes of the targeted attrition program, and assumptions about the war in Libya. For the past 18 months there has been a building narrative among both the expert community and this administration that, with the death of Bin Ladin, al Qaeda is nearly finished and that there is nothing left but a small group of “dead-enders,” known as the “core,” that need to be dealt with. Al Qaeda, in the narrative, is so weakened that it can barely stay alive, let alone carry out successful and complex attacks like that in Benghazi.

This narrative is based on a false view of al Qaeda: that the “core” is a small terrorist group whose main objective is attacking the United States, that the affiliates have primarily local concerns, that there is little command and control between the “core” and the affiliates, and that, therefore, the United States must only kill off the central leadership to be safe. I responded to this view of al Qaeda in several earlier posts, arguing that the core and affiliates are intimately connected, that the main objective of al Qaeda is taking over the Muslim-majority world, and that the organization is, in fact, attempting to create and lead a global insurgency. If this is all true, then al Qaeda is nowhere near defeat, and is, in fact, doing far better today than at any time in its existence.

The successes of counterterrorism czar John Brennan’s targeting program played into both the narrative and the current accepted view of al Qaeda by giving the impression of progress in the war with al Qaeda. As each member of the leadership was killed — most especially Bin Laden, but many others as well — experts and administration officials proclaimed that we could see the light at the end of the tunnel. The belief that the United States was making progress against al Qaeda (along with the notion that the affiliates have mainly local concerns) created a false sense of security in many places, including Libya.

Rest at Shadow Government

Filed under Uncategorized

2 Responses to “Al Qaeda’s resurgence”

  1. 1

    Nan G

    Ever since Obama first hit the national stage as a speaker (what else is he?) everything he has said have reminded me of one of the earliest narrative-driven ”success stories” I ever took part in.

    I couldn’t have been more than 10.
    Mary Martin was Peter Pan on stage and a little light was Tinkerbelle.
    Tink had drunk poison meant for Peter and was dying.
    Peter broke all the old rules for a musical stage play and turned to us in the audience and spoke directly to us.
    If we believed we had to clap our hands.
    If or belief was strong enough Tinkerbelle would live.
    We clapped, Tink lived.
    Simple as that.

    That’s how Obama’s narratives are designed also.
    There is no logic to them.
    They just ”look good on paper.”
    Just SAYING al Qaeda is dying might as well be just saying ”Open Sesame!”
    It doesn’t make it work.
    It doesn’t make it true.
    It has no effect on the enemy, except maybe to incite him to prove you wrong.
    But it LULLS unthinking people into a false sense of security.

  2. 2

    MOS 8541

    Told you is was coming. The fool and the slut are trying to burying everthing..The best is yet to come.. The damage is not yet on American will be here soon, count on it. This administration has been one great big lie.. counterterrorism czar John Brennan’ is a fool, he has already miss the mark on 5 major occasions. LOOK, he accepted blame for the killing of the US ambassador.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *