Archive for the ‘Calipari Shooting - Italy’ Category

After 19 updates to this thread of posts, and over a year of no news, comes this:

Italian prosecutors have called for a US soldier to stand trial for the killing of an Italian intelligence officer in Baghdad in 2005.

Nicola Calipari, 51, was shot dead at a US roadblock while escorting Italian journalist Giuliana Sgrena, who had been released by kidnappers in Iraq.

Italy and the US government disputed the circumstances of his death.

Italian prosecutors want a US marine, identified as Mario Lozano, to go on trial for the March 2005 killing.

Last week Mr Lozano’s court-appointed lawyer, Fabrizio Cardinali, said he expected his client to be tried in absentia for murder and attempted murder.

The Italian version of events, which differs from the US version, stated the following:

The inexperience of U.S. troops and a lack of signals at a makeshift roadblock in Baghdad contributed to the shooting death of an Italian intelligence agent in Iraq, a report by Italian military and diplomatic officials said.

The officials, who helped investigate the March 4 shooting of Nicola Calipari, disputed U.S. findings that the car in which he was riding was traveling at 100 kilometers an hour and failed to heed warning shots and a spotlight on the car. Calipari, 51, was headed to the Baghdad airport with freed hostage Giuliana Sgrena, an Italian journalist wounded in the shooting.

“The level of stress and inexperience may have led these soldiers to react in an instinctive way with little control,” said the report posted on the Web site of Italy’s intelligence agency. The driver “was not in a hurry to reach the airport. The road was wet and he was heading into a curved ramp that was partially obstructed and that led to a 90 degree curve.”

So say the Italian version is correct, which I do not believe, but lets just say it is. How in the world can they come to the conclusion that the soldier deliberately wanted to kill Calipari? He had malice aforethought and set out that day to kill the Italian…or so the Italians believe now.

One more reason why this series of posts is titled the way it is. True idiots one and all.

You can see the 20 some odd posts I did on this incident by clicking on the Calipari Shooting catagory.

Well, the moment we have all been waiting for with bated breath is here. The Italians have released their “findings” of the Sgrena incident:

May 2 (Bloomberg) — The inexperience of U.S. troops and a lack of signals at a makeshift roadblock in Baghdad contributed to the shooting death of an Italian intelligence agent in Iraq, a report by Italian military and diplomatic officials said.

The officials, who helped investigate the March 4 shooting of Nicola Calipari, disputed U.S. findings that the car in which he was riding was traveling at 100 kilometers an hour and failed to heed warning shots and a spotlight on the car. Calipari, 51, was headed to the Baghdad airport with freed hostage Giuliana Sgrena, an Italian journalist wounded in the shooting.

“The level of stress and inexperience may have led these soldiers to react in an instinctive way with little control,” said the report posted on the Web site of Italy’s intelligence agency. The driver “was not in a hurry to reach the airport. The road was wet and he was heading into a curved ramp that was partially obstructed and that led to a 90 degree curve.”

The Italian report said it is possible the American command didn’t know the exact movements of Calipari’s car before the shooting, though it knew he was on a mission to try to free a hostage and was due to return to the airport that night.

What a load of bullshit. But at least they state at the end that maybe, just maybe the Italians didn’t coordinate with the US too well.

We all know this is a face saving report. They couldn’t very well come out with a report that states basically the same thing as the US version since they WANT to believe that we screwed up, not the hero who didn’t let anyone know they were there nor Berlusconi who agreed to pay a ransom and fund continued terrorist operations against our troops.

This report doesn’t even provide any evidence of their findings. How did they come to the conclusion that her car wasn’t going 100 kilometers? Based on the communists word? Give me a break.

Previous:

Italian Idiots - Update XVII
Italian Idiots - Update XVI
Italian Idiots - Update XV
Italian Idiots - Update XIV
Italian Idiots - Update XIII
Italian Idiots - Update XII
Italian Idiots - Update XI
Italian Idiots - Update X
Italian Idiots - Update VIIII
Italian Idiots - Update VIII
Italian Idiots - Update VII
Italian Idiots - Update VI
Italian Idiots - Update V
The Idiots In Italy
Italian Idiots - Update II
Italian Idiots - Update
Italian Idiots

The report has been released and did someone screw the pooch bad. The person who classified the document redacted the portions that needed to be hidden but did not understand Adobe Acrobat to well. Apparently there is a way to get those black marks off the top of the text and extract what is under it, I didn’t know the technique either but I sure do know. What is quite troublesome is the fact that the classified version gives away our strategies in dealing with IED’s, among other things:

* An itemization of IEDs and VBIEDs deployment techniques which have been most effective,

* An analysis of the tactical strengths and weaknesses of specific checkpoints along “Route Irish”

* Combat readiness assesment of the units and soldiers involved

* A detailed description of how the checkpoint is laid out

* Exact grid locations of various assets

* Details of how checkpoint searches are set up and executed

* Details of how checkpoints are expected to deal with approaching vehicles, including threat assesment methods

* A statistical analysis of “normal” traffic approaching the checkpoint

* It names the soldiers involved and details the specific actions taken by those soldiers. It names the soldier who killed Calipari

What is also amazing is that there are some who don’t see a need for redacting classified reports. They don’t see the need for keeping our operational secrets…secret, from our enemies. This saves life’s, specifically our soldiers lives.

Patterico’s Pontifications is doing some excellent detective work on the LA Times. Apparently they are doing some redacting of their own by changing the wording or leaving things completely out of some Reuters reports:

Los Angeles Times editors have edited a Reuters story to remove critical facts supporting the U.S. position on an important international issue.

This morning?s L.A. Times publishes an article about the March 4 shooting by U.S. soldiers of a car bearing Italian journalist Giuliana Sgrena. The shooting killed Italian intelligence officer Nicola Calipari, and created an international controversy, which strained U.S.-Italian relations.

An important contested issue in the controversy was the speed of the car as it approached a U.S. checkpoint. Sgrena has maintained that the car was traveling at a ?regular speed? ? no more than 25-30 mph. Americans have said that the car was traveling at least 50 mph.

The L.A. Times story today portrays that critical issue as a still-unresolved queston

The L.A. Times story is actually an edited version of a Reuters story that appeared on the news service yesterday afternoon. The Reuters story reported that investigators using satellite footage of the incident have conclusively determined that the car was speeding, just as the U.S. has always maintained. On page two of the story, the Reuters news service reported:

CBS news has reported that a U.S. satellite had filmed the shooting and that it had been established the car carrying Calipari was traveling at more than 60 mph per hour [sic] as it approached the U.S. checkpoint in Baghdad.

Thus, the Reuters story reported that there is definitive proof that the car was speeding towards the checkpoint ? critical information that tends to justify U.S. soldiers? decision to fire on the car. But in the version appearing in the L.A. Times, editors cut out the passage reporting that proof.

The L.A. Times slightly alters that first sentence to read as follows:

The United States and Italy disagreed Friday in the conclusions of a joint investigation into the slaying of an Italian agent by U.S. troops in Iraq, further straining ties between the two allies.

In this edited version of the sentence, Times editors moved the word ?Friday,? changed the word ?killing? to ?slaying,? and replaced the word ?in? with ?on,? making the sentence grammatically awkward.

Today he posted about some more shenanigans at the LA Times:

A Reuters story filed Saturday morning states on page two:

CBS news has reported that a U.S. satellite had filmed the shooting and that it had been established the car carrying Calipari was traveling at more than 60 miles per hour as it approached the U.S. checkpoint in Baghdad.

Today?s L.A. Times reprint of the article edits out that passage, which suggests that there is definitive proof that the car was speeding ? a critical issue in the controversy.

Anyone else feeling that sense of d?j? vu?

As I told you yesterday, the same exact passage was contained in a Friday Reuters dispatch, and was edited from the L.A. Times reprint of that article in yesterday?s paper.

Today?s edit proves that yesterday?s suppression of this information was no accident. It was part of an ongoing effort to hide this evidence from the paper?s readers. After all, The Times still has not told its readers about this evidence, even though CBS News aired it Thursday night, and it?s now Sunday morning.

Some people are questioning the satellite angle since the official report apparently doesn’t mention a satellite (I haven’t read the thing yet so I am going off of other readers). But the LA Times doesn’t even mention it at all, not even the military “alleging” that there is satellite evidence.

What pisses me off more tho is the changing of the word KILL to SLAY. The word kill can mean a couple different things. Could be a accident, could be deliberate.

“The man was killed in a auto accident today”

But slay means a deliberate act. You won’t see

“The man was slayed in a auto accident today”

Added with the omission of the satellite evidence by the paper and it looks like the LA Times is reporting their believe that Sgrena is telling the truth and our soldiers are not. So much for no bias huh?

Check out Michelle Malkin, Blackfive, Opinipundit, Joust The Facts, Rhymes With Right, Say Anything, & Captains Quarters for more.

Previous:

Italian Idiots - Update XVI
Italian Idiots - Update XV
Italian Idiots - Update XIV
Italian Idiots - Update XIII
Italian Idiots - Update XII
Italian Idiots - Update XI
Italian Idiots - Update X
Italian Idiots - Update VIIII
Italian Idiots - Update VIII
Italian Idiots - Update VII
Italian Idiots - Update VI
Italian Idiots - Update V
The Idiots In Italy
Italian Idiots - Update II
Italian Idiots - Update
Italian Idiots

The timeline of the shooting has been released:

The report said the soldiers were ordered to block the road to all traffic until then-U.S. Ambassador John Negroponte passed on his way to Camp Victory, a U.S. military base near the airport.

The report defines an Alert Line as the point on a roadblock where the soldiers are alert to possible danger from an approaching vehicle; the Warning Line is the point past which an intruder elicits the firing of warning shots.

Here is a timeline of what happened after the soldiers set up the roadblock, according to the U.S. Army report:

7:30 p.m. ? Seven soldiers from an unnamed company establish roadblock on airport road.

7:45 p.m. ? The soldiers are told a convoy carrying Negroponte has left the fortified Green Zone ? the location of U.S. embassy and Iraqi government institutions ? and is on its way to Camp Victory.

8:10 p.m. ? The company captain requests permission to remove roadblock until 15 minutes before Negroponte arrives.

8:14 p.m. ? The command center tells the company captain that the company can remove the roadblock.

8:15 p.m. ? The company captain then tells the command center that the roadblock will remain in place.

8:30 p.m. ? The company captain asks again to remove roadblock. He is told not to, and that the Negroponte convoy would be moving down Route Irish in approximately 20 minutes.

At approximately the same time, Calipari and an unnamed agent recover Sgrena from Baghdad’s upscale Mansour neighborhood and head toward the airport.

8:45 p.m. ? The soldiers have successfully turned around 15-30 vehicles, none getting more than a few yards beyond the Alert Line.

The report said none of the soldiers knew the Italians were coming.

As the Italians’ car approached the ramp to Route Irish, the unnamed Italian agent is on his cell phone, updating a fellow Italian agent waiting at the airport on their position and reporting that everything was going fine.

The unnamed agent gave his speed as 43-50 mph as he headed onto the ramp.

The atmosphere in the car was a mix of excitement over the recovery of Sgrena and tension from the tasks yet to be completed, the report said.

At approximately 8:50 p.m. ? A soldier from an unnamed company sees a car approaching the ramp to Route Irish, approximately 153 yards from his position. Holding the spotlight in his left hand, the soldier shines it onto the car before it arrives at the Alert Line. Another soldier focuses his green laser pointer onto the windshield of the car. Both soldiers perceive the car to be traveling more than 50 mph, faster than any other vehicles that evening.

The car crosses the Alert Line without slowing down. The first soldier continues to shine the spotlight and shouts at the vehicle to stop.

The car continues to speed, coming closer to the soldiers than any other vehicle that evening. When the car gets to the Warning Line, the first soldier, still holding his spotlight in his left hand, uses his right hand to quickly fire a two-to-four round burst into a grassy area to the right of the vehicle.

The vehicle maintains its speed as it goes beyond the Warning Line. The first soldier drops the spotlight and immediately switches his weapon to his right hand (the report is not clear on how the soldier would have switched the weapon to his right hand when it said in the previous paragraph it already was in that hand). With both hands on the weapon he fires another burst toward the ground on the passenger’s side of the vehicle and toward the car’s engine block in an attempt to disable it. The rounds hit the right and front sides of the vehicle, deflate the left front tire, and blow out the side windows. (Here again the discrepancies are not explained.)

The unnamed Italian agent speaks into the phone, “They are attacking us.” He steps on the brakes, curls up on the left side of the car and drops the phone.

The soldier stops firing. Approximately four seconds elapsed between the firing of the first round and the last round, and no more than seven seconds from the time the car crossed the Alert Line until it came to a stop.

Once the car comes to a stop, the unnamed Italian agent gets out with his hands raised, cell phone in one hand, and tells the soldiers he is from the Italian Embassy.

The soldiers approach the car with weapons raised, pat down the driver and ask him if there are others in the car. He responds that there are two others and that there is one weapon on the front seat and another with the male passenger in the back seat. He warns that both weapons are loaded.

Upon searching the vehicle the soldiers find Calipari gravely wounded. One of the soldiers bandaged his wound, but he dies a few minutes later. The soldier then turns his attention to Sgrena’s wounds.

Previous:

Italian Idiots - Update XV
Italian Idiots - Update XIV
Italian Idiots - Update XIII
Italian Idiots - Update XII
Italian Idiots - Update XI
Italian Idiots - Update X
Italian Idiots - Update VIIII
Italian Idiots - Update VIII
Italian Idiots - Update VII
Italian Idiots - Update VI
Italian Idiots - Update V
The Idiots In Italy
Italian Idiots - Update II
Italian Idiots - Update
Italian Idiots

Hmmm, interesting news today. The news is reporting that Sgrena’ vehicle was recorded via satellite when it was travelling down that road before she was shot. Wanna guess what the recording showed?

A US satellite reportedly recorded a checkpoint shooting in Iraq last month, enabling investigators to reconstruct how fast a car carrying a top Italian intelligence official and a freed hostage was traveling when US troops opened fire.

The report, which aired Thursday on CBS News, said US investigators concluded from the recording that the car was traveling at a speed of more than 60 miles (96 km) per hour.

Giuliana Sgrena has said the car was traveling at a normal speed of about 30 miles an hour when the soldiers opened fired, wounding her and killing Nicola Calipari, the Italian agent who had just secured her release from a month’s captivity.

US soldiers said at the time of the March 4 incident that the car approached at a high rate of speed and that they fired only after it failed to respond to hand signals, flashing bright lights and warning shots.

The conflicting accounts were among a number of differences that have prevented US and Italian authorities from reaching agreement on what happened.

CBS, citing Pentagon officials, said the satellite recording enabled investigators to reconstruct the event without having to rely on the eyewitness accounts.

It said the soldiers manning the checkpoint first spotted the Italian car when it was 137 yards (meters) away. By the time they opened fire and brought the car to a halt, it was 46 yards (meters) away. CBS said that happened in less than three seconds, which meant the car had to be going over 60 miles an hour.

CBS said Italian investigators refused to accept that the Americans were justified in shooting so quickly, arguing among other things that the checkpoint was not properly marked.

Holy christ, you mean the communist was lying? Noooo, say it ain’t so.

Looks like Opinipundit broke the news first yesterday and I missed it. Apparently the video also shows that the vehicle was warned with flashing lights.

Check out Clear and Present, and LGF for more.

Previous:

Italian Idiots - Update XIV
Italian Idiots - Update XIII
Italian Idiots - Update XII
Italian Idiots - Update XI
Italian Idiots - Update X
Italian Idiots - Update VIIII
Italian Idiots - Update VIII
Italian Idiots - Update VII
Italian Idiots - Update VI
Italian Idiots - Update V
The Idiots In Italy
Italian Idiots - Update II
Italian Idiots - Update
Italian Idiots

We have all heard about the results of this investigation a week ago but now the official report is ready to be released:

A U.S. military investigation has cleared American troops of any wrongdoing in the shooting death last month of an Italian security agent in Baghdad, according to a senior Pentagon official.

The agent’s death strained relations between the United States and Italy, two stalwart allies in the Iraq war.

The U.S. soldiers involved will face no disciplinary actions, the Pentagon official said Monday….

The investigators’ report also said there appears to have been no attempted coordination on the part of the Italians to clear the U.S. checkpoint, the official said….

Italian media reported that while Italian officials participated in the U.S. investigation, it is unclear whether they would endorse the report. News reports in Italy also said officials there do not agree with the findings.

Guess what the communist reporter is saying:

An Italian journalist rescued from hostage-takers in Iraq last month has reacted angrily to a US military investigation absolving American soldiers of responsibility for killing the man who rescued her…

In a front page editorial in her left-wing daily Il Manifesto, Sgrena called on Silvio Berlusconi, the Prime Minister, to respond what she called a “slap in the face for the Italian Government”.

Sgrena, a veteran war correspondent who was held hostage for a month in Iraq, wrote: “After the apologies comes the slap in the face.” She said that the Americans had not listened to either her testimony or that of another Italian agent, even though, she said, both had given the same evidence without discussing what had happened. “Obviously, our two testimonies given to the American commission were useless. Or will I be charged with perjury?” questioned the journalist. “The greatest disappointment would be if our authorities were to accept this insult without reacting.”…

The Americans have offered to release the report, but Italy is blocking its publication while the Government works out its response….

It comes a very bad time for Signor Berlusconi, just when he’s reforming his Government after disastrous losses in regional election,” Owen said. “It will also increase pressure on him to withdraw Italian troops as soon as possible.”

Or how about the terrorist newspaper Al Jazeera with this headline:

U.S. clears soldiers who murdered Italian agent in Iraq

I’m sure there will be more “outrage” in the days to come by the communists windbags in Italy so stay tuned….more hilarity to come.

Check out The Jawa Report, Opinipundit, and The Dread Pundit Bluto for more.

I didn’t watch the Sgrena lies last night but I heard it was a hoot. CBS still digging itself an even larger grave.

Claudia over at Freedom of Thought has a bit of the transcript:

Sgrena says that as the car rounded a turn, driving no faster than 30 miles an hour, it was hit by gunfire and at the same time, a bright light.
. . . .

?Vehicle traveling at high speed refused to stop at a check point.? [The soldiers] ?attempted to warn the driver to stop by hand and arm signals, flashing white lights, and firing warning shots?when the driver didn?t stop the soldiers shot into the engine block which stopped the vehicle.?

“I think that is a lie,” says Sgrena.

“Let’s take this piece by piece,” says Pelley. “Vehicle was speeding.”

“No,” says Sgrena.

“Attempted to warn the driver by hand signals,” says Pelley.

“No,” says Sgrena.

“Arm signals. Flashing white lights,” says Pelley. “Firing warning shots.”

“Nothing at all,” says Sgrena.

“What you?re saying in this interview is that none of those things happened?” asks Pelley.

“Nothing. No,” says Sgrena. “I’m sure.”

God, what an idiot she is. It’s her assassination story all over again.

At least there is some good news today. News today from NBC that the soldiers in the shooting have been exonerated:

U.S. soldiers reportedly have been cleared of wrongdoing in the shooting of an Italian journalist and an intelligence agent last month in Baghdad.

U.S. military officials told NBC News that a joint American-Italian investigation found the soldiers acted properly in firing on a car bearing a just-freed hostage, journalist Giuliana Sgrena, and an intelligence officer, Nicola Calipari.

The car was about 130 yards from a checkpoint when the soldiers flashed their lights to get it to stop. They fired warning shots when the car was within 90 yards of the checkpoint, but at 65 yards, they used deadly force. Calipari was killed and Sgrena wounded.

You will remember that Sgrena said the following recently:

Sgrena says that as the car rounded a turn, driving no faster than 30 miles an hour, it was hit by gunfire and at the same time, a bright light. She and Calipari were in the back seat. “He [Calipari] pushed me down and with this, the body, covered me,” says Sgrena. “He pushed me down in the car. And I was asking, ‘Why?’ Nicola doesn?t say, he doesn?t speak it, doesn?t say nothing.”

The Captain responds with an excellent analysis:

She claimed that the car slowed down for the checkpoint to somewhere around 30 MPH or so, which would equal around 44 feet per second. If the Americans flashed their warning lights at 390 feet, the driver had almost three seconds to recognize and heed the signal before the soldiers fired their warning shots. After the warning shots, the driver had another two seconds to stop the car before the soldiers applied lethal force. Overall, the driver had almost six full seconds to stop the car from the time of the first warning signal to when they fired directly into the vehicle. That sounds like plenty of time, especially for a driver who knew that he was using a highway that American troops regularly patrolled and one which led directly to the strategic Baghdad International Airport.

Im glad he did the math because I suck at it.

I find it very humorous that CBS does this sympathetic interview with the communist idiot and then news comes out that the investigation clears our soldiers. Guess it’s another failed attempt at fact checking by Dan Rather.

Of course most of the MSM isn’t reporting this news:

Update: Okay, this is weird. Doing a Google search, I can’t find a reference to this decision on the WaPo, the NY Times, the LA Times or the Globe. The NY Post, the Scotsman and NBC/MSNBC are the only major publications carrying it. You may remember the entire world was up in a roar over US troops killing her bodyguard, but when an investigation finds them innocent, we get nothing?

I’m sure these rags will pick the story up soon but will spin it towards some typical left wing conspiracy charge. I give it a few days until we hear that Rove was in on the investigation and its a big cover up.

Check out Protein Wisdom, LGF, The Jawa Report, Alpha Patriot, Wizbang, No Oil For Pacifists, Uncorrelated, In The Bullpen, and Outside The Beltway for more info.

What a perfect venue for the queen idiot herself Giuliana Sgrena to accuse our military of Lying. Which venue you might ask? 60 Minutes Wednesday, Dan Rather’s alma mater:

Journalist and former hostage Giuliana Sgrena says that the American military is lying about the shooting at a security checkpoint in Iraq that wounded her and killed an Italian intelligence officer.

Days before the Pentagon is expected to release the results of its investigation into what happened at the checkpoint, Sgrena tells Correspondent Scott Pelley that shortly after her release by insurgents, American soldiers in Baghdad opened fire on her car without any warning.

Even better there appears to be a disgruntled former military officer who agreed to talk shit about our military:

A former U.S. Marine captain who led an elite combat unit in Iraq says that encounters at military checkpoints are often confusing, sometimes with tragic results.

“The hand and arm signals are hard to see; they’re hard to interpret,” says Nathaniel Fick. “The warning shots are difficult to see…almost impossible to hear in a speeding car at a long distance and the warning shot into the engine block is…Hollywood fantasy most of the time.”

After struggling with the Pentagon’s checkpoint procedures, Fick tells Pelley that he improvised a solution; he stole a traffic sign. “At every checkpoint we set up after that, we put the stop sign down the road near the wire and it was hugely successful,” he says.

Fick tells Pelley he had to make quick decisions about cars that were speeding toward his checkpoints. “You’ve got four seconds,” he says. “They’re snap judgments…You make these decisions and you hope at the end that you’ve made more right than wrong.”


Fick remembers his Marines killed one driver who seemed to be charging their checkpoint. “We determined that there were no bombs in the car, no weapons in the car and the other men in the car said that they didn’t know why they’d charged at us,” says Fick. “They were scared and disoriented and confused. … In hindsight, was it a mistake? I think it was.”

Since most everyone in the blogosphere is already blogging about the corrupt UN and the need for that organization to be ignored, I figured I would blog a bit about Italy’s village idiot Giuliana Sgrena.

There was an interview recently of Naomi Klein, a well known moonbat who believes the US is eeeevilllll, an example:

In a September 2004 article for Harper’s Magazine entitled “Baghdad Year Zero: Pillaging Iraq in pursuit of a neocon utopia”, she argues that, contrary to popular belief and criticisms, the Bush Administration did have a clear plan for post-invasion Iraq, which was to build a fully unconstrained free market economy. She describes plans to allow foreigners to extract wealth from Iraq, and the methods used to achieve those goals.

Or how about this:

In the run-up to the June 30 underhand (sorry, I can’t bring myself to call it a “handover”), US occupation powers have been unabashed in their efforts to steal money that is supposed to aid a war-ravaged people. The state department has taken $184m earmarked for drinking water projects and moved it to the budget for the lavish new US embassy in Saddam Hussein’s former palace. Short of $1bn for the embassy, Richard Armitage, the deputy secretary of state, said he might have to “rob from Peter in my fiefdom to pay Paul”. In fact, he is robbing Iraq’s people, who, according to a recent study by the consumer group Public Citizen, are facing “massive outbreaks of cholera, diarrhoea, nausea and kidney stones” from drinking contaminated water.

So as you can see not the most even handed journalist huh?

So knowing this context lets sit down for a interview with her about her new pal Sgrena:

One of the things that we keep hearing is that she was fired on on the road to the airport, which is a notoriously dangerous road. In fact, it’s often described as the most dangerous road in the world. So this is treated as a fairly common and understandable incident that there would be a shooting like this on that road. And I was on that road myself, and it is a really treacherous place with explosions going off all the time and a lot of checkpoints. What Giuliana told me that I had not realized before is that she wasn’t on that road at all. She was on a completely different road that I actually didn’t know existed. It’s a secured road that you can only enter through the Green Zone and is reserved exclusively for ambassadors and top military officials. So, when Calipari, the Italian security intelligence officer, released her from captivity, they drove directly to the Green Zone, went through the elaborate checkpoint process which everyone must go through to enter the Green Zone, which involves checking in obviously with U.S. forces, and then they drove onto this secured road.

OK, so let me get this straight. Now her story has changed once again. They reallly wern’t on the road that we initially said we were on, but another safe road.

Lets say this is true, this road is only to be used for high ranking officials and they go through this elaborate checkpoint but the roving checkpoint down the road doesn’t know you are coming? Or are they trying to assassinate you again?

And the other thing that Giuliana told me that she’s quite frustrated about is the description of the vehicle that fired on her as being part of a checkpoint. She says it wasn’t a checkpoint at all. It was simply a tank that was parked on the side of the road that opened fire on them.

Yes, that would be called a roving checkpoint Einstein

There was no process of trying to stop the car, she said, or any signals. From her perspective, they were just — it was just opening fire by a tank.

Hmmm

The Italians say the car was swerving around cement blocks in the road when a bright light went on and, with no warning, the car was pummeled with automatic weapons fire for 10 to 15 seconds. U.S. military officials say troops made hand and arm signals, flashed white lights and fired warning shots to no avail.

More of her interview:

The other thing she told me that was surprising to me was that they were fired on from behind. Because I think part of what we’re hearing is that the U.S. soldiers opened fire on their car, because they didn’t know who they were, and they were afraid. It was self-defense, they were afraid. The fear, of course, is that their car might blow up or that they might come under attack themselves. And what Giuliana Sgrena really stressed with me was that she — the bullet that injured her so badly and that killed Calipari, came from behind, entered the back seat of the car. And the only person who was not severely injured in the car was the driver, and she said that this is because the shots weren’t coming from the front or even from the side. They were coming from behind, i.e. they were driving away. So, the idea that this was an act of self-defense, I think becomes much more questionable.

This also comes from the lady who said 300-400 bullets were shot at the car, even tho pictures of the car show virtually no damage plus admitted to staging her tearful hostage video:

She did suggest that she appeal to the Italian people to demonstrate in favour of a withdrawal of the country?s 3,000 troops. But when the guards filmed her, they told her the film wasn?t dramatic enough. She was a hostage, they insisted, she must be more convincing and ordered her to make a direct appeal to her boyfriend of 25 years, Pier Scolari. For the first time, Sgrena broke down in tears.

?Usually I cry over even the tiniest things, but until then I hadn?t cried. I realised I could talk directly to Pier, and I became emotional. I knew that he would never give up,? she says.

But you know as well as I that the lefties will eat this stuff up, and judging by a quick search of the moonbats blogs they are all over it with headlines such as:

Sgrena Set The Record Straight

There Was No Checkpoint, No Self-Defense

There Was No Checkpoint

Was There Really A Checkpoint?

Or my favorite

Bush Team Clears Assassination Squad

Ok, so we have a wackjob who writes for a leftist paper and has been lying through her teeth from day one talking to another wackjob who believes captilism is eeeevillllll who then talks to this reporter to write about. Think I got that about right?

I have one word for you

Idiots!

Oh boy, this is some good stuff here:



High-level European intelligence sources report that the 51-year old slain Italian SISMI military intelligence agent, Dr. Nicola Calipari, killed by U.S. sharpshooters while accompanying the freed Italian hostage?Il Manifesto journalist Giuliana Sgrena?to Baghdad International Airport, was a prized target of opportunity for American assassins because of his knowledge about past Republican White House ties to Saddam Hussein’s nuclear program.

Calipari was also reportedly privy to information about illegal U.S. covert operations in Iraq from his sources within the bloc of Iraqi resistance fighters led by former Republican Guards. Moreover, European intelligence sources report that Calipari was not the first Italian intelligence agent with expertise on Iraq to be killed by U.S. covert “wet affairs” operatives.


Wait, there’s more:


In 1989, the former Italian military attach? in Baghdad, Air Force Colonel Giuseppe Schiavo, was found shot to death in his home in Turin. Police ruled the death a suicide, however, Schiavo’s diplomatic and military colleagues in Baghdad claim that Colonel Schiavo had stumbled across critical evidence of a complicated scheme by the George H. W. Bush administration, the CIA, Italian businessmen and government officials, U.S. auditors, Iraqi diplomats, spies, and central bankers, British and Italian intelligence agents, and Saudi bankrollers to finance Saddam Hussein’s NBC (nuclear, biological, chemical) weapons program through U.S.-government-backed credits provided by Atlanta’s Banca Nazionale del Lavoro (BNL). Schiavo was killed before Italian magistrates could question him about his knowledge of the Iraqi weapons affair. One colleague of Schiavo in Baghdad called him a professional and not someone who would kill himself. “He was taken out because of what he knew,” claimed the colleague.

You really gotta love the moonbats dont ya? They will find a conspiracy in ever facet of life. The article goes on to name Bush Sr, the Clintons, and just about every American company in a vast conspiracy to make Saddam strong, so one day he too shall become a superhero.

Well, as we're finding out more everyday, the Europeans are just a bunch of pussies. Italy has once again agreed to the terrorists demands and will be hauling ass out of Iraq.

Leading U.S. ally Italy said on Tuesday it would start withdrawing its soldiers from Iraq in September, in a fresh blow to President Bush's shrinking coalition. Prime Minister Silvio Berlusconi, one of Bush's most vocal supporters, said he was in talks with British Prime Minister Tony Blair (news - web sites) about a total exit strategy from Iraq, adding people in both countries wanted their troops to return home. "We will begin to reduce our contingent even before the end of the year, starting in September, in agreement with our allies," said Berlusconi, who faces an election next year and went against public opinion to deploy troops in Iraq. Asked on RAI state television when a total withdrawal would take place, Berlusconi said: "It will depend on the capacity of the Iraqi government to provide adequate security." Despite strong opposition at home, Berlusconi sent some 3,000 troops to Iraq — the fourth largest foreign contingent after U.S., British and South Korean forces. But pressure has mounted on him to withdraw the troops since intelligence agent Nicola Calipari was killed earlier this month by U.S. soldiers shortly after rescuing an Italian hostage. The incident has strained Italy's relations with the United States and Bush has promised an investigation.

It never ceases to amaze me how cowardly the Europeans can be. We had to save their ass 65 years ago and they will never learn. Not only did this government pay the terrorists money to get this witch out of Iraq, now they will be turning tail and running. How do they look at themselves in the mirror when they see how happy the Iraqi people were while voting, see the demonstrations in support of Democracy in Lebanon, see the demonstration today in Iran:

Tehran was left in a standstill this evening as the population poured into the streets to mark the national 'fire' festival of Chahar-shanbeh Souri despite intense pressures by the Iranian regime to prevent a possible uprising. Eye-witnesses reported that full-size puppets of high-ranking officials, such as the Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei and the regime's president Mohammad Khatami, were set on fire by youths at numerous locations throughout the Iranian capital. Trucks belonging to Iran's security forces were also set ablaze. "Guns, tanks, the Bassij (Para-military security forces) no longer have an affect", large crowds shouted in central Tehran, as they took part in the traditional celebrations where Iranians jump over fires ablaze on the streets. Despite a general ban on the festival by the regime and repeated demands by the Iranian authorities that people avoid leaving their houses on the day, the main Iranian opposition group, the People's Mojahedin Organisation of Iran (PMOI) issued a call for the nation to take part in the event and call for the overthrow of the clerical regime. The authorities brought in State Security Forces to create an atmosphere of fear, causing tensions to spark, leading to riots and clashes in several districts throughout Tehran. "Khamenei resign! Get off your thrown", youths shouted, as the government unleashed its Revolutionary Guards to crack down on the demonstrators.

How do they not see fighting for Democracy is a good thing? I just don't get it. Yeah, I know Berlusconi wants to get re-elected, but I guess a politician with balls, who stands up for his convictions like George Bush did, is hard to find in Europe. But these people don't see it….the Mideast sure does:

DUBAI, United Arab Emirates Listen to the conversations in the cafes on the edge of the creek that runs through this Persian Gulf city, and it is hard to believe that the George W. Bush being praised by Arab diners is the same George W. Bush who has been widely excoriated in these parts ever since he took office. Yet the balmy breeze blowing along the creek carries murmurs of approval for the devoutly Christian U.S. president, whose persistent calls for democracy in the Middle East are looking less like preaching and more like timely encouragement. Nowadays, intellectuals, businessmen and working-class people alike can be caught lauding Bush's hard-edged posture on democracy and cheering his handling of Arab rulers who are U.S. allies. Many also admire Bush's unvarnished threats against Syria should it fail to pull its soldiers and spies out of Lebanon before the elections there next month — a warning the United Nations reinforced last week with immediate effects. For Bush, it is not quite a lovefest but a celebration nonetheless. "His talk about democracy is good," an Egyptian-born woman was telling companions at the Fatafeet (or "Crumbs") restaurant the other night, exuberant enough for her voice to carry to neighboring tables. "He keeps hitting this nail. That's good, by God, isn't it?" At another table, a Lebanese man was waxing enthusiastic over Bush's blunt and irreverent manner toward Arab autocrats. "It is good to light a fire under their feet," he said.

The Italians, the Spanish, and the rest of the cowards can go to hell as far as I am concerned. Maybe them leaving is a good thing, at least it will be harder for the terrorists to fund themselves. Check out The Jawa Report, Short Family Online, The Dread Pundit Bluto, My View Of The World, LGF, Jihad Pundit, Captains Quarters, & Ace Of Spades for much more.

Finally! The Italian government has told this ignorant communist to shut the hell up:

 

ITALY'S justice minister has urged former hostage Giuliana Sgrena to stop making "careless" accusations after being shot by US forces in Baghdad, saying she had already caused enough grief.

Ms Sgrena has repeatedly suggested US soldiers shot her on purpose and said today she had little faith in a joint investigation by Italy and the United States into the "friendly fire" incident.

"She has created enormous problems for the Government and also caused grief that perhaps was better avoided," Justice Minister Roberto Castelli told reporters in Bologna.

I'm sure they are finally starting to realize what a raving dingbat this lady is, how could they not after her continually changing stories. She first says that the Americans were trying to kill her:

"It can't be just said that it was just an accident. We can't accept this, it is not possible." "Everyone knows that the Americans do not like negotiations to free hostages, and because of this I don't see why I should exclude the possibility of me having been the target," she said. "The fact that the Americans don't want negotiations to free the hostages is known," Sgrena told Sky TG24 television by telephone, her voice hoarse and shaky. "The fact that they do everything to prevent the adoption of this practice to save the lives of people held hostages, everybody knows that. So I don't see why I should rule out that I could have been the target."

Today she thinks differently:

The Italian journalist Giuliana Sgrena, who was wounded by American fire last Friday soon after being released by kidnappers in Baghdad, has said that she does not think that the Americans were trying to kill her. "I never said that they wanted to kill me," she said on a television talk show, "but the mechanics of what happened were those of an attack."

She's a freaking wackjob. The Captain has a post up with some quotes that are interesting:

Many Italians have been irked by her descriptions of her kidnappers. She said they were not killers and that she may have over-dramatised her videotaped appeal from captivity for Italy to withdraw its 3,000 troops from Iraq.

She sobbed in the video and begged her family and the government to do something to save her life.

"Sgrena, I think, should perhaps be more careful. She has said a load of nonsense, speaks somewhat carelessly and makes careless comments," Castelli said. …

"I feel like I'm being accused for being kidnapped and then saved," Sgrena said, speaking from a Rome hospital, where she is undergoing treatment for her injuries.

Thankfully it looks like the Italians have a little more common sense then the Spanish. The Jawa Report is putting out news that the Italian DA's are talking to this wackjob:

Meanwhile, Italian prosecutors conducting their own investigation on Thursday questioned former Italian hostage Giuliana Sgrena again in the Rome military hospital where she is recovering from a shoulder wound sustained in the March 4 shooting.

Hopefully they are looking into the whole situation, including the alleged kidnapping because this whole thing smell's fishy to me. It would not surprise me if this idiot set the whole kidnapping up for publicity or to try to get the Italians out of Iraq or maybe even to get the aliens from The Devore Imperium to come to earth and make mad passionate alien love to her….who knows. And now she is even whining some more:

"I feel like I'm being accused for being kidnapped and then saved," Sgrena said, speaking from a Rome hospital, where she is undergoing treatment for her injuries.

Yes, you are being accused, and hopefully you will be tried. What is starting to piss me off even more is the fact that when she was making all these wild idiotic claims the MSM was all over her and the story. Now every day new information comes out showing what a raving fool she is and what do we hear? Cricket Cricket. Check out Opinion Bug for added information.

Natasha Bita over at The Australian has an interesting report:

In an unprecedented move, the White House has agreed to let Italian officials take part in a joint investigation in Baghdad over the coming month. However, Italian Prime Minister Silvio Berlusconi yesterday disputed White House claims that American soldiers had opened fire on the Italians because their car was speeding towards a military checkpoint. He also denied Washington's assertion that the Italian secret service agents had failed to notify US military authorities in Iraq of their movements. Mr Calipari had obtained security passes to travel in Baghdad and even phoned from his car to alert American military authorities of his "immediate re-entry in the airport zone", Mr Berlusconi said. Mr Fini later admitted to RAI television that Calipari had not told American authorities he was in Iraq to rescue a hostage. "He did not advise what he had come to do in Iraq because we are a sovereign country," Mr Fini said. "We have a rapport of absolute loyalty with the US, but not one of subordination." Italy had a moral duty to bring home hostages kidnapped on foreign soil, he said.

Mr. Fini is Foreign Minister Gianfranco Fini, and he is apparently saying here that the US was never advised the reason he was there or that there was a rescue operation going. This disputes the Prime Minister's numerous statements. So now we find out that they believed it was wise to not let our military know since if they did then they would be subordinates. Guess the family of Calipari might feel differntly since this simple act would of saved his life. Michelle Malkin makes a good observation about the leftist channel CNN and their reporting on this story:

There they go again:

In an article published Sunday in her communist newspaper, Il Manifesto, Sgrena wrote, "Our car was driving slowly," and "the Americans fired without motive.

Here is Sgrena's Il Manifesto article, as translated by CNN. As I noted before (here and here), her Il Manifesto article doesn't say what CNN says she said. In fact, she seems to say the opposite: "The car kept on the road, going under an underpass full of puddles and almost losing control to avoid them."

CNN quietly removed the quotes from an earlier article about 15 minutes after I published this post.

Bluto over at The Dread Pundit Bluto posted about an article written by Harald Doornbos, a leftist co-worker of Sgrena's (via The QandO Blog & Zacht Ei):

It doesn't sound very nice to be critical of a fellow reporter. But Sgrena's attitude is a disgrace for journalism. Or didn't she tell me back in the plane that 'common journalists such as yourself' simply do not support the Iraqi people? 'The Americans are the biggest enemies of mankind,' the three women behind me had told me, for Sgrena travelled to Iraq with two Italian colleagues who hated the Americans as well. 'You don't understand the situation. We are anti-imperialists, anti-capitalists, communists,' they said. The Iraqis only kidnap American sympathizers, the enemies of the Americans have nothing to fear. But they knew better. When we arrived at Baghdad Airport, I was waiting for a jeep from the American army to come pick me up. I saw one of the Italian women walking around crying. An Iraqi had stolen her computer and television equipment. They were standing outside shivering, waiting for a cab to take them to Baghdad. With her bias Sgrena did not only jeopardize herself, but due to her behavior a security officer is now dead, and the Italian government (prime minister Berlusconi included) has had to spend millions of euros to save her life. It is to be hoped that Sgrena will decide to have a career change. Propagandist or MP perhaps. But she should give up journalism immediately.

Even her leftist friends can't stand this bitch. Plus here is a great discription of the dangerous road she was travelling that night from the perspective of a soldier who worked that road (via Austin Bay):

My Army staff section dubbed the dangerous high-speed dash through Baghdad "Route Irish Racing." Route Irish is the military code name for the 8 kilometers of highway linking Baghdad International Airport (BIAP) with the Green Zone. This brings us to roadblocks. Roadblocks put a crimp in the car bomber's plans. Roadblocks stop vehicles and people, particularly suspicious vehicles and suspicious people. In a war zone featuring auto kamikazes, roadblocks aren't user-friendly places — and any honest adult will admit they aren't supposed to be. Iraqis complain about American roadblockss — they're hassles. Iraqis complain more about terrorist bombs — 2,000 Iraqis demonstrated against terror in Hilla last week to make that point. At Route Irish's Green Zone exit, traffic slows to a crawl as it weaves through concrete barriers. Once stopped, young Americans and young Iraqi National Guardsmen — their automatic rifles ready — quiz drivers and scowl. It's understandable — in late June, an Iraqi Governing Council official was assassinated at the barrier. A bomb-laden car slammed the councilman's vehicle and detonated. Occasionally, temporary roadblocks halt Route Irish traffic. I recall a long wait in July as Iraqi police closed a lane and redirected non-military vehicles. Yes, I felt like a target — it's a war zone, stay alert. Route Irish's approach to BIAP is clearly marked with signs. Heavy trucks await inspection by troops. Concrete barriers divide the lanes. The man driving the car carrying communist writer and newly released terrorist hostage Guiliana Sgrena didn't slow down as he approached a roadblock on the way to the airport. Perhaps he was afraid and fear led to speed, or perhaps he was laughing. Sgrena wrote that her car "kept on the road, going under an underpass full of puddles and almost losing control to avoid them. We all incredibly laughed. It was liberating. Losing control of the car in a street full of water in Baghdad …" Roadblocks have rules. Coalition and Iraqi troops operate roadblocks with Rules of Engagement (ROE). The ROE can change, based on current intelligence and command judgment. But one rule never changes at a roadblock: Even escorted military convoys slow down as they approach a roadblock. As for a single civilian auto approaching at high speed? If a driver doesn't hit the brakes, the troops will shoot.

Amen, Hopefully they will continue to engage any suspicious vehicle approaching their checkpoint that fails to obey their commands.

So the communist reporter now backtracks saying:

"I have not never said that the Americans wanted to kill me, I have only said that the mechanics of this fact is the mechanics of an ambush".

This is from the translated text so the funny wording is probably the translator programs fault, but for her now to say she never said this ridiculous:

"It can't be just said that it was just an accident. We can't accept this, it is not possible." "Everyone knows that the Americans do not like negotiations to free hostages, and because of this I don't see why I should exclude the possibility of me having been the target," she said. "The fact that the Americans don't want negotiations to free the hostages is known," Sgrena told Sky TG24 television by telephone, her voice hoarse and shaky. "The fact that they do everything to prevent the adoption of this practice to save the lives of people held hostages, everybody knows that. So I don't see why I should rule out that I could have been the target."

All of these quotes are attributed to her. Her and her communist rag paper both alleged it was an ambush from the start. Now she has finally gotten some common sense? Nope, the government came down on her and told her to shut her pie hole is all. Now there is information that she is lying once again:

A senior U.S. military official tells ABC News he believes the investigation into the fatal shooting of an Italian intelligence officer by U.S. troops in Iraq will ultimately prove the officer's car was traveling in excess of 100 mph. But, according to the senior U.S. military official, the car was traveling at speeds of more than 100 mph. The driver almost lost control several times before the shooting as the car hydroplaned through large puddles, the official told ABC News. The car had not gone through any previous checkpoints, the source added.

This is getting funnier every single day. The real story in this whole thing is all that money given to terrorists and guess what, no one in the MSM is writing about it. Americans everywhere should be outraged that millions were given to terrorists for more car bombs that will kill our soldiers and innocent Iraqis. Disgusting. At least the Wall Street Journal has written about it (hat tip Michelle Malkin):

Arguably far more reckless was Italy's decision to pay ransom–reportedly of $6 million or more–to secure her release. Italy is also believed to have paid ransom for the release of two aid workers taken captive last year. The Italians know the U.S. opposes the policy, which may be why Ms. Sgrena's transfer to the airport was not sufficiently coordinated with U.S. forces. Not only does paying ransom encourage more kidnapping–of Italians especially–it also puts money in the hands of the enemy in a country where $40 buys an automatic rifle and $200 an attack on U.S. forces. The shooting of a speeding car at a military checkpoint in a war zone is an unintentional tragedy, but the paying of ransom amounts to a policy of deliberately aiding terrorists.

Finally there is this news today:

The United States must assume responsibility for the "friendly fire" killing of an Italian intelligence agent in Iraq in order to put the incident behind the two allies, the Italian prime minister said Wednesday.

When hell freezes over 

The Italian paper La Republica has the pictures of the communist reporters vehicle (hat tip Captains Quarters):

Wow, either 390 bullets failed to hit the target or this communist piece of shit is a liar. These pictures only prove that it was hit a few times. Sounds similiar to what our troops said huh? They said they shot to disable the vehicle and it sure appears to be the case.