<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Flopping Aces &#187; North Korea</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.floppingaces.net/category/north-korea/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.floppingaces.net</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 21 Nov 2009 19:18:29 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>Venezuela-Iran:  A Budding Nuclear Love Story</title>
		<link>http://www.floppingaces.net/2009/09/26/venezuela-iran-a-nuclear-relationship/</link>
		<comments>http://www.floppingaces.net/2009/09/26/venezuela-iran-a-nuclear-relationship/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 26 Sep 2009 13:35:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Wordsmith</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Iran]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[North Korea]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Venezuela]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[WMD]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[foreign policy]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.floppingaces.net/?p=28105</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[
Love at First Sight
Iranian President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad (R) greets Venezualan President Hugo Chavez in Tehran July 29, 2006. REUTERS/Raheb Homavandi (IRAN)
Last November, MataHarley mentioned about how Russia was planning to help Hugo Chavez build a nuclear energy program.  Of course, like the typical power-hungry dictator that he is, all he claims to want is [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><center><a href="http://www.floppingaces.net/wp-content/uploads/ahmadinejad_chavez_3.jpg"><img src="http://www.floppingaces.net/wp-content/uploads/ahmadinejad_chavez_3.jpg" alt="IRAN" title="IRAN" width="460" height="355" class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-28107" /></a><br />
<FONT SIZE=2><strong>Love at First Sight</strong></font><FONT SIZE=1><br />
Iranian President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad (R) greets Venezualan President Hugo Chavez in Tehran July 29, 2006. REUTERS/Raheb Homavandi (IRAN)</FONT></center></p>
<p>Last November, <a href="http://www.floppingaces.net/2008/11/28/russia-sells-armstransports-to-chavez-pledges-aid-to-build-nuke-energy-program/">MataHarley mentioned about how Russia was planning to help Hugo Chavez build a nuclear energy program</a>.  Of course, like the typical power-hungry dictator that he is, all he claims to want is to acquire nuclear power for clean energy and peaceful medical purposes.</p>
<p>At this point, they are still in <a href="http://www.startribune.com/world/59389492.html">the planning stages</a>, with Chavez explaining, &#8220;not to worry, folks&#8221;:</p>
<blockquote><p>&#8220;I say it before the world: Venezuela is going to start the process of developing nuclear energy, but we&#8217;re not going to make an atomic bomb, so don&#8217;t be bothering us afterward &#8230; (with) something like what they have against Iran,&#8221; Chavez said Sunday.<br />
<span id="more-28105"></span><br />
The socialist president is closely allied with Iran and defends its nuclear program while the U.S. and other countries accuse Tehran of having a secret nuclear weapons program.</p></blockquote>
<p><a href="http://www.floppingaces.net/2009/09/25/september-may-bring-push-for-iran-sanctions/">What</a>, what, whaaaat?!  Countries accusing Tehran of ambitions to deceive the &#8220;international community&#8221; on nuclear programs?  <a href="http://www.floppingaces.net/2009/09/25/obama-knew-iranians-lied-about-nuclear-facility-still-wanted-to-help-them/">No way</a>!</p>
<p>Iran&#8217;s deception (no surprises there) and the failure of the international community to curb its nuclear ambitions, is inspiring the Viper of Venezuela to emulate the defiance of Iran.  Equally troubling, is news of nuclear collaboration by this budding &#8220;<a href="http://www.forbes.com/2009/09/09/mahmoud-ahmadinejad-hugo-chavez-opinions-columnists-claudia-rosett.html">Axis of Unity</a>&#8220;:</p>
<blockquote><p>the label that Iran&#8217;s President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad and Venezuela&#8217;s President Hugo Chavez have themselves chosen for their alliance. The rise of this partnership, according to Morgenthau, dates from Ahmadinejad&#8217;s election as president of Iran in 2005. At that point, said Morgenthau, what had been relatively routine ties between the two countries &#8220;changed dramatically.&#8221;</p>
<p>Over the past four years, the two despotic rulers have exchanged multiple visits, struck extensive military and business deals between their two countries, supported each other in cultivating policies and practices hostile to the U.S. and introduced each other to like-minded actors in their respective regions of Latin America and the Middle East.</p>
<p>Morgenthau cited reports that Iran has been building and running mysterious factories in parts of Venezuela so remote that they lack such basic amenities as restaurants and grocery stores. He added that since 2006, Iran has been embedding advisers with the Venezuelan military&#8211;which has thrown out its old U.S. army field manual and replaced it with instructions in asymmetric warfare as taught to Iran&#8217;s Revolutionary Guard Corps and Iranian-backed terrorist groups Hezbollah and Hamas.</p>
<p>Iran has also opened a bank in Venezuela, the Banco Internacional de Desarrollo, or BID. With Iran already under a long list of U.S. sanctions, as well as under a number of targeted sanctions by the United Nations, the U.S. Treasury last October added the BID to its blacklist. <strong>But Venezuela itself is under no broad sanctions. Its banks enjoy access to the U.S. financial system. Morgenthau warned that this is a &#8220;perfect&#8221; sanctions-busting setup for Venezuela to help Iran process dollar-denominated purchases of materials needed for making missiles, nuclear weapons and roadside bombs.</strong></p>
<p>Morgenthau highlighted two investigations, publicly announced by his office this past year, that have uncovered &#8220;a pervasive system of deceitful and fraudulent practices employed by Iranian entities to move money all over the world without detection.&#8221;</p>
<p>One of these investigations, for which Morgenthau said further results may be announced within the next 30 days, already led to a deferred prosecution agreement this January. In that instance, a British bank, Lloyd&#8217;s TSB, agreed to $350 million in fines and forfeitures for stripping out details that would have identified as illegal more than $300 million worth of Iranian transactions running through the U.S. financial system. Another investigation led to the indictment this spring of a Chinese company, LIMMT, and its manager, Li Fang Wei, for using aliases and shell companies to get around U.S. sanctions meant to block payments involved in &#8220;shipment of banned missile, nuclear and so-called dual-use materials to subsidiaries of the Iranian Defense Industries Organization.&#8221;</p>
<p>Morgenthau warned that &#8220;based on information developed by my office, the Iranians with the help of Venezuela are now engaged in similar economic and proliferation sanctions-busting schemes.&#8221;</p></blockquote>
<p>The international body seems adept at issuing &#8220;serious threats&#8221;, &#8220;harsh warnings&#8221;, &#8220;strong reprimands&#8221;, with military action (although unstated) off the tables.  The <a href="http://www.floppingaces.net/2008/02/25/iaea-collapses-into-irrelevance/">IAEA appears inept</a> at preventing illegal nuclear proliferation.  <a href="http://www.floppingaces.net/2007/11/14/intel-reports-saddam-could-hav/">Sanctions did not deter the nuclear ambitions of Saddam</a>; nor have they deterred North Korea or Iran- the other two nations in President Bush&#8217;s &#8220;Axis of Evil&#8221; triumvirate.  Nations undermined sanctions against Saddam by doing business with the Butcher of Baghdad.  </p>
<blockquote><p>
The most chilling line in Morgenthau&#8217;s talk is hypothetical. But set amid a wealth of detail about mysterious factories, disturbing shipments, covert illicit finance and shared interests of &#8220;two of the world&#8217;s most dangerous regimes&#8221;&#8211;by which he meant Iran and Venezuela&#8211;it sounds like no idle comment. Morgenthau noted that Venezuela&#8217;s location &#8220;Is ideal for building and storing weapons of mass destruction far away from Middle Eastern states threatened by Iran&#8217;s ambition and from the eyes of the international community.&#8221;</p>
<p>This is a different picture from the congeniality implied by President Barack Obama&#8217;s handshake with Chavez in April at a Summit of the Americas.</p>
<p>So why is Morgenthau going out on a limb to sound the alarm? He&#8217;s no Republican cowboy. He&#8217;s a Democrat, whose credentials include a ringing endorsement of President Obama&#8217;s pick of Supreme Court Justice Sonia Sotomayor when he testified at her confirmation hearings in July. Now 90 years old, still spry, but planning to retire at the end of December, Morgenthau as New York District Attorney has spent 34 years pounding one of America&#8217;s most vital law enforcement beats.</p>
<p>What this legendary DA has discovered about growing ties between Iran and Venezuela has evidently left him so concerned that he specifically asked for a Washington venue to deliver his public briefing on the subject. He spoke at a lunch at the Brookings Institution, hosted by a think-tank program called Global Financial Integrity, and The American Interest magazine. The full text of his remarks is now posted on his office&#8217;s Web site.</p>
<p>Morgenthau noted that his office and other law enforcement agencies &#8220;can play a small but important role&#8221; in trying to stop the flow of illicit funds, which he called &#8220;the lifeblood&#8221; of Iran&#8217;s nuclear and weapons programs. But he also spelled out that &#8220;Law enforcement in the U.S. alone is not enough to counter the threat effectively.&#8221;</p>
<p>That sounds like a plea to federal authorities, all the way up to President Obama, <strong>to get serious about stopping the rise of the Iranian-Venezuelan &#8220;axis of unity.&#8221;</strong> If this is to be tried via sanctions, then the going has evidently been far too slow and erratic. Morgenthau did not make a direct call for broad sanctions on Venezuela, but he certainly made a terrific case for doing so before the clock strikes midnight.</p>
<p>While Morgenthau was speaking in Washington, Chavez was continuing an 11-day tour that further underscores Venezuela&#8217;s fast-growing role as a hub in Latin America for interests deeply hostile to the U.S.</p>
<p>This included Chavez&#8217;s stopover last weekend in Iran; this was his eighth visit there since Ahmadinejad became president. This time, <strong>making no secret of a shared interest in nuclear technology, the two tyrants declared their intention of setting up an Iranian-Venezuelan &#8220;nuclear village.&#8221;</strong></p>
<p>And while the U.S. administration has been pondering options such as more stringent efforts to squeeze Iran&#8217;s regime by way of sanctions on its imported gasoline, Venezuela and Iran have been forging ahead on ways to counter such measures. From Iran, Chavez announced a deal in which Venezuela later this fall would start exporting 20,000 barrels of gasoline per day to Iran.
</p></blockquote>
<p><a href="http://townhall.com/news/world/2009/09/25/venezuela_seeking_uranium_with_irans_help">AP News</a>:</p>
<blockquote><p>Iran is helping Venezuela to detect uranium deposits and initial evaluations suggest reserves are significant, the South American government said Friday _ the same day world leaders criticized the Islamic republic of secretly building a uranium-enrichment plant that could be used to make an atomic bomb.</p></blockquote>
<p><a href="http://www.economist.com/world/americas/displaystory.cfm?story_id=14444403">The Economist</a>:</p>
<blockquote><p>
 The foreign-policy section of Venezuela’s “First Socialist Plan—2007-2013” (dubbed the “Simón Bolívar National Project”) assigns an “integral political alliance” with Iran, Syria, Belarus and Russia the highest priority outside the Latin American and Caribbean region. The rationale for this curious hotchpotch of alliances is the “common anti-imperialist interests” of those five countries—the imperialist in question being America.</p>
<p>Among the scheme’s aims is the strengthening of national defence and sovereignty. Not only the tanks but sophisticated anti-aircraft systems make up the order to Russia. Mr Chávez, a former lieutenant-colonel in Venezuela’s army, says these weapons will make it “very difficult for foreign aircraft to come and bomb us”. Having already spent at least $4.4 billion on Russian weapons, he has now secured an additional $2.2 billion credit-line from that country to lavish on more military hardware. Three submarines are among other possible purchases, press reports say.</p>
<p>In pursuit of his goal to “break North American imperialist hegemony”, the Venezuelan president has deployed to the full his prime asset—the country’s oil reserves. Thus Iran was promised 20,000 barrels of petrol a day, in potential defiance of sanctions advocated by America and despite Venezuela’s current problems supplying its own markets with fuel. Russia’s national oil consortium was also assigned a patch of the Orinoco heavy oil belt.</p>
<p><center>~~~</center></p>
<p>His avowed calculation is that by helping to stir up trouble for America in many places simultaneously, he can bring about the collapse of “the empire”. The regimes he is so assiduously cultivating are, by this account, the nucleus of a new world order. Although this seems far-fetched perhaps the world should start to take him a little more seriously.</p></blockquote>
<p>Chavez clearly wants to play in the big leagues and as a counter-force to the United States.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.floppingaces.net/2009/09/26/venezuela-iran-a-nuclear-relationship/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>9</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>FINALLY, Americans Approve Of Bush&#8217;s Foreign Policy</title>
		<link>http://www.floppingaces.net/2009/08/06/finally-americans-approve-of-bushs-foreign-policy/</link>
		<comments>http://www.floppingaces.net/2009/08/06/finally-americans-approve-of-bushs-foreign-policy/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 Aug 2009 11:41:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Scott</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Anti-Americanism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Anti-military]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Barack Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Baracks Broken Promises]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bush Derangement Syndrome]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Culture of Corruption]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fanatical Islam]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[History]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Iran]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[MSM Bias]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Middle East]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Military]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Moonbats]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[North Korea]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Obama Euphoric-Rapture Syndrome]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Post-Invastion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Support the Troops]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Iraqi War]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[War On Terror]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[foreign policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[military history]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.floppingaces.net/?p=25911</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[President Obama has chosen to continue President Bush&#8217;s policies regarding Iraq, Afghanistan, and Pakistan.  He&#8217;s &#8220;tried&#8221; to talk to Iran but it&#8217;s not like he&#8217;s flown there himself to really reach out.  President Clinton flew to North Korea and actually accomplished more than President Obama has.  And with that&#8230;how are the hated [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>President Obama has chosen to continue President Bush&#8217;s policies regarding Iraq, Afghanistan, and Pakistan.  He&#8217;s &#8220;tried&#8221; to talk to Iran but it&#8217;s not like he&#8217;s flown there himself to really reach out.  President Clinton flew to North Korea and actually accomplished more than President Obama has.  And with that&#8230;how are the hated Bush policies viewed by Americans (albeit with a different face marketing them)?</p>
<blockquote><p>Only foreign policy offered a bright spot: <a href="http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=20601087&#038;sid=akA7XABFTuSs">52 percent of poll respondents approved of his job on this front</a>, compared with 38 percent who disapproved. </p></blockquote>
<p>Proof yet again that opposition to President Bush&#8217;s policies was just opposition to Bush.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.floppingaces.net/2009/08/06/finally-americans-approve-of-bushs-foreign-policy/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>18</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>It&#8217;s time to give up on Iran and North Korea</title>
		<link>http://www.floppingaces.net/2009/08/02/its-time-to-give-up-on-iran-and-north-korea/</link>
		<comments>http://www.floppingaces.net/2009/08/02/its-time-to-give-up-on-iran-and-north-korea/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 02 Aug 2009 16:53:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Scott</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Barack Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Baracks Broken Promises]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bush Derangement Syndrome]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Iran]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Middle East]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Military]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Moonbats]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[North Korea]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Obama Euphoric-Rapture Syndrome]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[WMD]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[War On Terror]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[foreign policy]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.floppingaces.net/?p=25720</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[President Obama is worthy of admiration for his efforts to improve relations with America&#8217;s adversaries Iran, North Korea and a few others. But for most of those states, it&#8217;s time to give it up, and the Obama administration appears to realize that.
I agree.  There&#8217;s no point in trying carrots or stick diplomacy with Iran [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>President Obama is worthy of admiration for his efforts to improve relations with America&#8217;s adversaries Iran, North Korea and a few others. But for most of those states, it&#8217;s time to give it up, and <a href="http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?f=/c/a/2009/08/01/INH7190F4S.DTL">the Obama administration appears to realize that.</a></p></blockquote>
<p>I agree.  There&#8217;s no point in trying carrots or stick diplomacy with Iran or North Korea.  Diplomacy has failed.  I do wonder, however, how the writer plans to deal w NKorea&#8217;s nukes and Iran&#8217;s nukes+terrorist ties?  Just live with it, and wait for something to go wrong/hope that &#8220;sane&#8221; people like Kim and Ahmadinejad can be trusted w nuclear weapons?  Or is the writer advocating support for military action since it&#8217;s obvious that Iran and NKorea cannot be trusted w nuclear weapons, and obvious that diplomacy has failed.</p>
<p>So what is it?  Now that we&#8217;ve established the long-held &#8220;neocon&#8221; claim that diplomacy w NKorea and Iran isn&#8217;t possible-what is it? <span id="more-25720"></span></p>
<p>trust the insane dictators who routinely sell/give weapons to proxy terrorists and rogue regimes<br />
OR<br />
bomb em?</p>
<p>I suspect the leftnut writer from San Fran didn&#8217;t think as far ahead as a 2-move chess player in this matter.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.floppingaces.net/2009/08/02/its-time-to-give-up-on-iran-and-north-korea/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>4</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>North Korea, China, and Russia Attack United States</title>
		<link>http://www.floppingaces.net/2009/07/08/north-korea-china-and-russia-attack-united-states/</link>
		<comments>http://www.floppingaces.net/2009/07/08/north-korea-china-and-russia-attack-united-states/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Jul 2009 12:22:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Scott</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Barack Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Baracks Broken Promises]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[North Korea]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Obama Euphoric-Rapture Syndrome]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Russia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[china]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[foreign policy]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.floppingaces.net/?p=24494</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A few days ago, I read this article &#8220;Spies &#8216;infiltrate US power grid&#8217; &#8220;, and I thought, &#8220;Wow, that&#8217;s hardly a surprise,&#8221; but I blew it off.  I disregarded it-not because Michael Jackson&#8217;s funeral was on TV, or because I was preparing/partying/recovering from 3 days of straight BBQ party for the Fourth of July. [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A few days ago, I read this article &#8220;<a href="http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/technology/7990997.stm">Spies &#8216;infiltrate US power grid&#8217; </a>&#8220;, and I thought, &#8220;Wow, that&#8217;s hardly a surprise,&#8221; but I blew it off.  I disregarded it-not because Michael Jackson&#8217;s funeral was on TV, or because I was preparing/partying/recovering from 3 days of straight BBQ party for the Fourth of July.  No, I blew it off because we all suspected this kind of thing was always happening, always possible, and it&#8217;s like the threat of nuclear war: awful, not something one wants to think about, and we kind of already know the consequences.  </p>
<p>Today, multiple papers are reporting a combined attack, and this time&#8230;it IS an outright attack on the United States-not a mere probe.<br />
<span id="more-24494"></span><br />
<a href="http://apnews.myway.com/article/20090708/D99A79QG0.html">Official: N. Korea believed behind cyber attacks</a></p>
<blockquote><p>SEOUL, South Korea (AP) &#8211; South Korean intelligence officials believe North Korea or pro-Pyongyang forces in South Korea committed cyber attacks that paralyzed major South Korean and U.S. Web sites, a lawmaker&#8217;s aide said Wednesday.</p>
<p>The sites of 11 South Korean organizations including the presidential Blue House and the Defense Ministry went down or had access problems since late Tuesday, according to the state-run Korea Information Security Agency. Agency spokeswoman Ahn Jeong-eun said 11 U.S. sites suffered similar problems.</p></blockquote>
<p><a href="http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/technology/8139821.stm">Governments hit by cyber attack </a></p>
<blockquote><p>A widespread computer attack has hit several US government agencies while some South Korean government websites also appear to be affected.</p>
<p>The US Treasury Department, Secret Service, Federal Trade Commission and Transportation Department were all hit by the attack that started on July 4.<br />
&#8230;<br />
The attack slowed down and, in some cases, shut government websites, including the site of the presidential office, for several hours.</p></blockquote>
<p>President Obama hasn&#8217;t commented on having his website shut down by the North Koreans, but one can expect yet another &#8220;stern warning&#8221; like the twelve warnings NKorea got after they fired missiles, launched an ICBM, tested a nuke, threatened the entire United Nations, and declared the half century armistice as over.</p>
<p>On a more serious note, this is clear evidence that North Korea, China, and Russia are working together closely-even while President Obama is actually IN RUSSIA.   </p>
<p>(from earlier)<br />
<a href="http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/technology/7990997.stm">Spies &#8216;infiltrate US power grid&#8217; </a></p>
<blockquote><p>The WSJ reported that the intruders had not sought to damage the power grid or any other key infrastructure so far, but suggested they could change their approach in the event of a crisis or war.<br />
US government computer<br />
A report last year said China had been accessing sensitive US databases</p>
<p>Security watchers said that, if true, the involvement of the Chinese and Russians in such a scenario would show they were strategically thinking about how either to constrain the US or to inflict more damage if they felt a need to do so.</p>
<p>&#8220;I think that China recognises if in a very strategic sense you want to ensure you have the ability to exploit another country&#8217;s potential weakness or vulnerability, but do it in a way that isn&#8217;t confrontational or cause an international crisis, then this is a very good way of doing that,&#8221; Eric Rosenbach, of Harvard University&#8217;s Kennedy School of Government&#8217;s Belfer Center, told Reuters news agency.</p>
<p>The motives behind these potential attacks are undoubtedly military or political in nature, said Tim Mather, chief security strategist for the RSA Conference, the world&#8217;s biggest security event.</p>
<p>He told the BBC: &#8220;These countries are not doing this willy-nilly. There is a tactical reason for all of this and no doubt tied to a longer term strategic plan which is gosh if they need to jerk the chain of the US, then this is the way to do it.</p>
<p>&#8220;This is like having an ace in the hole for the Chinese or Russians, just in case,&#8221; said Mr Mather. </p></blockquote>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.floppingaces.net/2009/07/08/north-korea-china-and-russia-attack-united-states/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>11</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>N. Korea Kim&#8217;s Youngest Son Named Successor</title>
		<link>http://www.floppingaces.net/2009/06/02/n-korea-kims-youngest-son-named-successor/</link>
		<comments>http://www.floppingaces.net/2009/06/02/n-korea-kims-youngest-son-named-successor/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Jun 2009 13:43:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Scott</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[North Korea]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.floppingaces.net/?p=22587</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The heir apparent&#8217;s only known official position in the North Korean government is as a minor functionary for the National Defense Commission, the nation&#8217;s top military body.
He is 5 feet, 10 inches tall and weighs about 198 pounds, according to Yonhap, which reported that he has high blood pressure and diabetes. 
link
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>The heir apparent&#8217;s only known official position in the North Korean government is as a minor functionary for the National Defense Commission, the nation&#8217;s top military body.</p>
<p>He is 5 feet, 10 inches tall and weighs about 198 pounds, according to Yonhap, which reported that he has high blood pressure and diabetes. </p></blockquote>
<p><a href="http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2009/06/01/AR2009060103750_2.html?hpid=topnews">link</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.floppingaces.net/2009/06/02/n-korea-kims-youngest-son-named-successor/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>U.S. ‘Likely’ Could Intercept North Korean Missile</title>
		<link>http://www.floppingaces.net/2009/06/01/us-%e2%80%98likely%e2%80%99-could-intercept-north-korean-missile/</link>
		<comments>http://www.floppingaces.net/2009/06/01/us-%e2%80%98likely%e2%80%99-could-intercept-north-korean-missile/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Jun 2009 11:01:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Scott</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Barack Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Baracks Broken Promises]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Military]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[North Korea]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[WMD]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[War On Terror]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[foreign policy]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.floppingaces.net/?p=22571</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[“if North Korea launched a missile or two against us, we wouldn’t sit back and say, ‘I wonder if we have enough test data in order to launch,’” McQueary said. “We would launch.” 
The only thing missing is the will to defend the United States; to give the order
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>“if North Korea launched a missile or two against us, we wouldn’t sit back and say, ‘I wonder if we have enough test data in order to launch,’” McQueary said. <a href="http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=20601087&#038;sid=aGjZayXyqTxc&#038;refer=worldwide">“We would launch.”</a> </p></blockquote>
<p>The only thing missing is the will to defend the United States; to give the order</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.floppingaces.net/2009/06/01/us-%e2%80%98likely%e2%80%99-could-intercept-north-korean-missile/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>24</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>President Warns North Korea; If Nukes Are Used, &#8220;&#8230;it would be the end of their country.&#8221;</title>
		<link>http://www.floppingaces.net/2009/05/29/president-warns-north-korea-if-nukes-are-used-it-would-be-the-end-of-their-country/</link>
		<comments>http://www.floppingaces.net/2009/05/29/president-warns-north-korea-if-nukes-are-used-it-would-be-the-end-of-their-country/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 May 2009 15:01:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Scott</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Barack Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[North Korea]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Obama Euphoric-Rapture Syndrome]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Clintons]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[WMD]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[foreign policy]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.floppingaces.net/?p=22372</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[It would be hard to imagine President Obama ever standing only a few feet from the North Korean border and warning its leaders that if they ever used nuclear weapons, &#8220;it would be the end of their country.&#8221;
Mr. Obama is not the threatening kind. He prefers &#8220;soft&#8221; power to win over his adversaries. In fact, [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>It would be hard to imagine President Obama ever standing only a few feet from the North Korean border and warning its leaders that if they ever used nuclear weapons, &#8220;it would be the end of their country.&#8221;</p>
<p>Mr. Obama is not the threatening kind. He prefers &#8220;soft&#8221; power to win over his adversaries. In fact, after North Korea&#8217;s May 25 test of a bomb close in size to the one dropped on Hiroshima, he said the US would merely &#8220;work with our friends and allies to stand up to this behavior.&#8221;</p>
<p>What a contrast to the last Democratic president.</p>
<p>It was President Clinton who actually spoke those threatening &#8220;hard power&#8221; words – within earshot of North Korean soldiers – in 1993.</p></blockquote>
<p><a href="http://www.csmonitor.com/2009/0528/p08s01-comv.html">link</a></p>
<blockquote><p>At the time, Pyongyang was revving up its nuclear-bomb program.</p>
<p>Mr. Clinton knew something back then that Obama is learning on the job: Tough talk against an enemy is sometimes needed simply to reassure America&#8217;s allies that the US will live up to its defense promises. Those commitments include its unique role to provide nuclear deterrence, or promised retaliation, if an ally is attacked.</p>
<p>By his actions and his words, Obama is sending worrisome signals to Japan and South Korea that they might be left alone in a confrontation with North Korea or even perhaps China. </p></blockquote>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.floppingaces.net/2009/05/29/president-warns-north-korea-if-nukes-are-used-it-would-be-the-end-of-their-country/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Obama Defense Secretary Says North Korea NOT A THREAT</title>
		<link>http://www.floppingaces.net/2009/05/29/obama-defense-secretary-says-north-korea-not-a-threat/</link>
		<comments>http://www.floppingaces.net/2009/05/29/obama-defense-secretary-says-north-korea-not-a-threat/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 May 2009 14:53:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Scott</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[American Intelligence]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Barack Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Military]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[North Korea]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Obama Euphoric-Rapture Syndrome]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[WMD]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[foreign policy]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.floppingaces.net/?p=22368</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[
Defense Secretary Robert Gates, en route to an annual security summit in Singapore Friday, signaled as much, saying North Korea&#8217;s actions so far do not warrant sending more US troops to the region.
&#8220;I don&#8217;t think that anybody in the [Obama] administration thinks there is a crisis,&#8221; Mr. Gates told reporters aboard his military jet early [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><center><img src="http://www.csmonitor.com/photosoftheday/2009/0528//images/1.jpg" alt="South Korean children in Seoul practice for a North Korean chemical weapons attack" width="550" /></center></p>
<blockquote><p>Defense Secretary Robert Gates, en route to an annual security summit in Singapore Friday, signaled as much, saying North Korea&#8217;s actions so far do not warrant sending more US troops to the region.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.csmonitor.com/2009/0529/p02s05-usmi.html">&#8220;I don&#8217;t think that anybody in the [Obama] administration thinks there is a crisis,&#8221;</a> Mr. Gates told reporters aboard his military jet early Friday morning, still Thursday night in Washington. </p></blockquote>
<p>If something does happen w DPRK during the rest of President Obama&#8217;s reign&#8230;these words will be the catalyst for the next version of a 911 Commission.  In the meantime, South Korean children continue to practice for the NON-threat of a North Korean chemical weapons artillery attack.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.floppingaces.net/2009/05/29/obama-defense-secretary-says-north-korea-not-a-threat/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>4</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Army chief: US able to fight NKorea if necessary</title>
		<link>http://www.floppingaces.net/2009/05/29/army-chief-us-able-to-fight-nkorea-if-necessary/</link>
		<comments>http://www.floppingaces.net/2009/05/29/army-chief-us-able-to-fight-nkorea-if-necessary/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 May 2009 13:23:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Scott</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[American Exceptionalism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Military]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Military Families]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[North Korea]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Support the Troops]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[WMD]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[foreign policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[military history]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.floppingaces.net/?p=22366</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[WASHINGTON – The United States could fight an old-fashioned war against North Korea if necessary, even while newer forms of conflict against terrorists and extremists continue, the Army&#8217;s top officer said Thursday.
Asked whether the United States would be prepared to fight if war broke out between South Korea and North Korea, Gen. George Casey replied, [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>WASHINGTON – The United States could fight an old-fashioned war against North Korea if necessary, even while newer forms of conflict against terrorists and extremists continue, the Army&#8217;s top officer said Thursday.</p>
<p>Asked whether the United States would be prepared to fight if war broke out between South Korea and North Korea, Gen. George Casey replied, &#8220;The short answer is yes,&#8221; then added that &#8220;it would probably take us a little bit longer to shift gears&#8221; away from the type of counterinsurgency fighting that now occupies the Army.</p>
<p>Casey said his usual rubric for how long it would take the Army to gear up for a new &#8220;conventional&#8221; war is about 90 days. That doesn&#8217;t mean it would take 90 days for the U.S. to effectively fight the North&#8217;s million-man army, he said.</p>
<p>&#8220;We&#8217;d move forces as rapidly as we could get them prepared,&#8221; Casey said during an appearance at the Center for Strategic and International Studies.</p>
<p>North Korea has threatened war following condemnation of its underground nuclear test this week, and the United States has a long-term commitment to South Korea&#8217;s defense.</p>
<p>&#8220;<a href="http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20090529/ap_on_go_ca_st_pe/us_pentagon_nkorea_2">This is a combat-seasoned force</a>&#8221; that can pivot quickly, Casey said.</p></blockquote>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.floppingaces.net/2009/05/29/army-chief-us-able-to-fight-nkorea-if-necessary/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Obama Admin Says North Korean No Threat&#8230;. (Then Puts Forces On High Alert)</title>
		<link>http://www.floppingaces.net/2009/05/28/obama-admin-says-north-korean-no-threa-then-puts-forces-on-high-alert/</link>
		<comments>http://www.floppingaces.net/2009/05/28/obama-admin-says-north-korean-no-threa-then-puts-forces-on-high-alert/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 May 2009 12:51:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Scott</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[North Korea]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[WMD]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[foreign policy]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.floppingaces.net/?p=22319</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[National security adviser downplays N. Korea threat 
“Nothing that the North Koreans did surprised us,” Jones said. “We knew that they were going to do this, they said so, so no reason not to believe them.”
But the Obama administration is in a tough position with regards to North Korea and in the coming weeks administration [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://thehill.com/leading-the-news/national-security-adviser-downplays-n.-korea-threat-2009-05-27.html">National security adviser downplays N. Korea threat </a></p>
<blockquote><p>“Nothing that the North Koreans did surprised us,” Jones said. “We knew that they were going to do this, they said so, so no reason not to believe them.”</p>
<p>But the Obama administration is in a tough position with regards to North Korea and in the coming weeks administration officials will try to reach a “global consensus” on how to handle North Korea, Jones indicated.</p></blockquote>
<p><a href="http://apnews.myway.com/article/20090528/D98F7QUG1.html">S. Korea, US troops on alert after North&#8217;s threats</a></p>
<blockquote><p>SEOUL, South Korea (AP) &#8211; South Korean and U.S. troops raised their alert Thursday to the highest level since 2006 after North Korea renounced its truce with the allied forces and threatened to strike any ships trying to intercept its vessels.</p>
<p>The move was a sign of heightened tensions on the peninsula following the North&#8217;s underground nuclear test and its firing of a series of short-range missiles earlier this week.</p>
<p>In response, Seoul decided to join more than 90 nations that have agreed to stop and inspect vessels suspected of transporting banned weapons.</p></blockquote>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.floppingaces.net/2009/05/28/obama-admin-says-north-korean-no-threa-then-puts-forces-on-high-alert/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>10</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>North Korea Threatening to Attack US Ships</title>
		<link>http://www.floppingaces.net/2009/05/27/north-korea-threatening-to-attack-us-ships/</link>
		<comments>http://www.floppingaces.net/2009/05/27/north-korea-threatening-to-attack-us-ships/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 May 2009 20:47:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Scott</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Barack Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Baracks Broken Promises]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Economy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[John McCain]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[MSM Bias]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Military]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[North Korea]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Obituaries]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Post-Invastion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Iraqi War]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Vietnam War]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[WMD]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[War On Terror]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[foreign policy]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.floppingaces.net/?p=22303</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[

Recap:
-North Korea tests nuke
-Obama gives speech saying he&#8217;s outraged, then goes golfing
-North Korea fires two missiles
-Obama&#8217;s UN Ambassador, Susan Rice (the same woman that the 911 Commission says turned down Sudan&#8217;s offer to hand over Osama Bin Laden) goes on Today Show and says UN is going to meet, threatens more UN sanctions on the [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><center><img src="http://www.military.cz/usa/navy/uss/carriers/stennis/jcs_battlegroup.jpg" alt="olik" width="550" /></center><br />
<span id="more-22303"></span><br />
Recap:<br />
-North Korea tests nuke<br />
-Obama gives speech saying he&#8217;s outraged, then goes golfing<br />
-North Korea fires two missiles<br />
-Obama&#8217;s UN Ambassador, Susan Rice (the same woman that the 911 Commission says turned down Sudan&#8217;s offer to hand over Osama Bin Laden) goes on Today Show and says UN is going to meet, threatens more UN sanctions on the already fully isolated country<br />
-UN meets, doesn&#8217;t pass new sanctions, does send &#8220;stern letter&#8221;<br />
-North Korea responds by test firing another anti-ship missile<br />
-Obama Press Secretary is pressed by ABC News Jake Tapper to explain what Obama&#8217;s next attempt will be, Gibbs dodges (clearly had no idea &amp; Admin is fully stumped)<br />
-Russia goes on military alert concerned there could be nuclear war<br />
-North Korea responds by announcing it is no longer bound by the 50+ yr old cease-fire/armistice, and that it will take action.<br />
-North Korea also restarts its shut down nuclear facilities<br />
-<a href="http://apnews.myway.com/article/20090527/D98EKAHG0.html">North Korea then declares it will attack US and/or South Korean ships</a></p>
<blockquote><p>North Korea warned Wednesday that any attempt to stop, board or inspect its ships would constitute a &#8220;grave violation.&#8221;</p>
<p>The regime also said it could no longer promise the safety of U.S. and South Korean warships and civilian vessels in the waters near the Korea&#8217;s western maritime border.</p>
<p>&#8220;They should bear in mind that the (North) has tremendous military muscle and its own method of strike able to conquer any targets in its vicinity at one stroke or hit the U.S. on the raw, if necessary,&#8221; it said.</p>
<p>The maritime border has long been a flashpoint between the two Koreas. North Korea disputes the line unilaterally drawn by the United Nations at the end of the Koreas&#8217; three-year war in 1953, and has demanded it be redrawn further south.</p>
<p>The truce signed in 1953 and subsequent military agreements call for both sides to refrain from warfare, but doesn&#8217;t cover the waters off the west coast.</p>
<p>North Korea has used the maritime border dispute to provoke two deadly naval skirmishes &#8211; in 1999 and 2002.</p>
<p>On Wednesday, the regime promised &#8220;unimaginable and merciless punishment&#8221; for anyone daring to challenge its ships.</p></blockquote>
<p>Personally, I think this is all the result of a regime change happening inside DPRK, but it could also be a military distraction similar to the cause of the 1983 Falkland Islands War.  In any event, let&#8217;s HOPE Obama is ready to lead on day 130 or so &#8217;cause he sure as hell ain&#8217;t leading on day 1, and he&#8217;s gonna have to start leading instead of blaming if he wants things to CHANGE.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.floppingaces.net/2009/05/27/north-korea-threatening-to-attack-us-ships/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>31</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Obama &#8220;Concerned&#8221; Over N.Korea Nuke Test&#8230;..Will Send A Stern Letter Soon</title>
		<link>http://www.floppingaces.net/2009/05/25/obama-concerned-over-nkorea-nuke-testwill-send-a-stern-letter-soon/</link>
		<comments>http://www.floppingaces.net/2009/05/25/obama-concerned-over-nkorea-nuke-testwill-send-a-stern-letter-soon/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 May 2009 01:49:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Curt</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Barack Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[MSM Bias]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Moonbats]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[North Korea]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Russia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The UN]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[War On Terror]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[china]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[foreign policy]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.floppingaces.net/?p=22208</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I&#8217;m sure many of you remember this ad Obama put out in response to the 3am Clinton ad:

Well, as Mike wrote about earlier we can see how well that &#8220;good&#8221; judgment has worked out so far:
North Korea announced Monday that it successfully carried out a second underground nuclear test, less than two months after launching [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m sure many of you remember this ad Obama put out in response to the 3am Clinton ad:</p>
<p><center><object width="425" height="344"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/9BvyF351RS8&#038;hl=en&#038;fs=1"></param><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true"></param><param name="allowscriptaccess" value="always"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/9BvyF351RS8&#038;hl=en&#038;fs=1" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowscriptaccess="always" allowfullscreen="true" width="425" height="344"></embed></object></center></p>
<p>Well, as <a href="http://www.floppingaces.net/2009/05/24/north-koreans-explode-a-nuke/">Mike wrote about earlier</a> we can see how well that &#8220;good&#8221; judgment has worked out so far:</p>
<blockquote><p>North Korea announced Monday that it successfully carried out a second underground nuclear test, less than two months after launching a rocket widely believed to be a test of its long-range missile technology.</p></blockquote>
<p><a href="http://online.wsj.com/article/SB124277648950937029.html">John Bolton</a> predicted this a few days ago:</p>
<blockquote><p>The curtain is about to rise again on the long-running nuclear tragicomedy, &#8220;North Korea Outwits the United States.&#8221; Despite Kim Jong Il&#8217;s explicit threats of another nuclear test, U.S. Special Envoy Stephen Bosworth said last week that the Obama administration is <strong>&#8220;relatively relaxed&#8221;</strong> and that <strong>&#8220;there is not a sense of crisis.&#8221;</strong> They&#8217;re certainly smiling in Pyongyang.</p></blockquote>
<p>And what does <a href="http://latimesblogs.latimes.com/washington/2009/05/barack-obama-north-korea-statement.html">Obama do</a>? <span id="more-22208"></span></p>
<blockquote><p>Today, North Korea said that it has conducted a nuclear test in violation of international law. It appears to also have attempted a short range missile launch. These actions, while not a surprise given its statements and actions to date, are a matter of grave concern to all nations. North Korea’s attempts to develop nuclear weapons, as well as its ballistic missile program, constitute a threat to international peace and security.</p>
<p>By acting in blatant defiance of the United Nations Security Council, North Korea is directly and recklessly challenging the international community. North Korea’s behavior increases tensions and undermines stability in Northeast Asia. Such provocations will only serve to deepen North Korea’s isolation. It will not find international acceptance unless it abandons its pursuit of weapons of mass destruction and their means of delivery.</p>
<p>The danger posed by North Korea’s threatening activities <strong>warrants action by the international community</strong>. We have been and will continue working with our allies and partners in the Six-Party Talks as well as other members of the U.N. Security Council in the days ahead.</p></blockquote>
<p>Warrants action huh?  Judging by your &#8220;good&#8221; judgment so far I&#8217;m guessing that&#8217;s going to be a stern lecture via the UN.  I&#8217;m sure Russia and China will go along with that.  </p>
<p>Nope&#8230;.the days of using the UN to accomplish anything has been over for sometime but we know Obama&#8217;s history, what little there is of it, and that is the only tool he will use&#8230;.unsuccessfully.  He has no backbone, and no stomach to be ill thought of by the world, the days of the paper tiger have come back, and our <a href="http://nz.news.yahoo.com/a/-/world/5594366/japan-panel-wants-strikes-enemies/">allies know it</a>:</p>
<blockquote><p>TOKYO (Reuters) &#8211; A Japanese ruling party panel is to propose that pre-emptive strikes against enemy bases be allowed despite the country&#8217;s pacifist constitution, Kyodo news agency said on Monday, weeks after a North Korean missile launch.</p>
<p>North Korea fired a ballistic missile in April that flew over northern Japan after warning that it planned to launch a satellite, prompting the government to deploy missile interceptors to the area .</p>
<p>&#8221; Japan should have the ability to strike enemy bases within the scope of its defence-oriented policy, in order not to sit and wait for death,&#8221; Kyodo quoted the Liberal Democratic Party (LDP) committee as saying in its proposal.</p></blockquote>
<p>Thanks lefties&#8230;&#8230;you helped to elect a totally inexperience community organizer as our President during the 2nd inning of a war on terror.  But what do they do when the heat starts getting turned up?  Why they <a href="http://legalinsurrection.blogspot.com/2009/05/will-left-apologize-to-bolton.html">make excuses.<br />
</a><br />
Bolton:</p>
<blockquote><p>&#8230;Iran and other aspiring nuclear proliferators will draw precisely the same conclusion: Negotiations like the six-party talks are a charade and reflect a continuing collapse of American resolve. U.S. acquiescence in a second North Korean nuclear test will likely mean that Tehran will adopt Pyongyang&#8217;s successful strategy.</p>
<p>It&#8217;s time for the Obama administration to finally put down Kim Jong Il&#8217;s script. If not, we better get ready for Iran &#8212; and others &#8212; to go nuclear.</p></blockquote>
<p>What a laugh&#8230;.Obama put down the script of Kim Jong Il!  Face it, with this man at the helm there is no more getting ready for a nuclear armed Iran, it WILL happen.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.floppingaces.net/2009/05/25/obama-concerned-over-nkorea-nuke-testwill-send-a-stern-letter-soon/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>7</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>North Koreans  Explode a Nuke!</title>
		<link>http://www.floppingaces.net/2009/05/24/north-koreans-explode-a-nuke/</link>
		<comments>http://www.floppingaces.net/2009/05/24/north-koreans-explode-a-nuke/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 25 May 2009 06:31:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Mike's America</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Barack Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[North Korea]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[foreign policy]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.floppingaces.net/?p=22139</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[So much for Obama&#8217;s charm offensive!!!
On Friday, President Obama told the graduates at the Naval Academy:
&#8220;We uphold our fundamental principles and values not just because we choose to, but because we swear to &#8212; not because they feel good, but because they help keep us safe.&#8221;
It was the culmination of a week of high minded [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><em><strong>So much for Obama&#8217;s charm offensive!!!</strong></em></p>
<p>On Friday, President Obama <a href="http://www.breitbart.com/article.php?id=CNG.bd0713f4765981d1edbe5b522ce08354.3e1&amp;show_article=1">told</a> the graduates at the Naval Academy:</p>
<blockquote><p><strong>&#8220;We uphold our fundamental principles and values not just because we choose to, but because we swear to &#8212; not because they feel good, but because they help keep us safe.&#8221;</strong></p></blockquote>
<p>It was the culmination of a week of high minded Obama talk about national security and how his make nice campaign with the world promised peace.</p>
<p>On Monday, the North Koreans did this:</p>
<blockquote><p><strong>NKorea says it has conducted a second nuclear test</strong><br />
By JEAN H. LEE<br />
<a href="http://www.breitbart.com/article.php?id=D98D25Q80&amp;show_article=1">Associated Press </a><br />
May 24 11:47 PM US/Eastern</p>
<p>SEOUL, South Korea (AP) &#8211; North Korea announced Monday that it successfully carried out a second underground nuclear test, less than two months after launching a rocket widely believed to be a test of its long-range missile technology.<br />
<span id="more-22139"></span><br />
North Korea, incensed by U.N. Security Council condemnation of its April 5 rocket launch, had warned last month that it would restart it rogue nuclear program, conduct a second atomic test as a follow-up to its first one in 2006, and carry out long-range missile tests.</p>
<p>On Monday, the country&#8217;s official Korean Central News Agency said the regime &#8220;successfully conducted one more underground nuclear test on May 25 as part of measures to bolster its nuclear deterrent for self-defense.&#8221;</p>
<p>The regime boasted that the test was conducted &#8220;on a new higher level in terms of its explosive power and technology of its control.&#8221;<br />
&#8230;<br />
Seismologists from the U.S., South Korea and Japan reported activity shortly after 9:50 a.m. in a northeastern area where North Korea conducted its first nuclear test in 2006.</p>
<p>The Japan Meteorological Agency measured the seismic activity at magnitude-5.3. Quake expert Gen Aoki noted that its depth was &#8220;very shallow.&#8221;</p>
<p>&#8220;The area is not active seismically so it is highly possible that it could be an artificial quake,&#8221; Aoki said in Tokyo.</p>
<p>In Seoul, the Korea Institute of Geoscience and Mineral Resources reported seismic activity in Kilju in North Hamgyong Province—the same area where North Korea carried out a nuclear test in October 2006.</p>
<p>Seismological measurements back North Korea&#8217;s claim that the test was far stronger than in 2006. </p></blockquote>
<p><strong>As Americans celebrate Memorial Day we are reminded that freedom isn&#8217;t free. Many thousands of Americans have died to keep this nation safe. We are also reminded that weakness invites aggression and encourages evil doers. Peace and freedom are best maintained by strength, not weakness.</strong></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.floppingaces.net/2009/05/24/north-koreans-explode-a-nuke/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>10</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>NKorea threatens nuclear, missile tests</title>
		<link>http://www.floppingaces.net/2009/04/29/nkorea-threatens-nuclear-missile-tests/</link>
		<comments>http://www.floppingaces.net/2009/04/29/nkorea-threatens-nuclear-missile-tests/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Apr 2009 14:41:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Scott</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Barack Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[North Korea]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Obama Euphoric-Rapture Syndrome]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[foreign policy]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.floppingaces.net/?p=20703</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Obama&#8217;s 100th Day
How&#8217;s that foreign policy workin&#8217; out?
SEOUL, South Korea (AP) &#8211; North Korea threatened Wednesday to conduct nuclear and missile tests and start an uranium-enrichment program in addition to its existing plutonium-based one, unless the U.N. apologizes for criticizing its recent rocket launch, dramatically raising its stake in the worsening standoff over its atomic [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Obama&#8217;s 100th Day</p>
<p>How&#8217;s that foreign policy workin&#8217; out?</p>
<blockquote><p>SEOUL, South Korea (AP) &#8211; North Korea threatened Wednesday to conduct nuclear and missile tests and start an uranium-enrichment program in addition to its existing plutonium-based one, unless the U.N. apologizes for criticizing its recent rocket launch, dramatically raising its stake in the worsening standoff over its atomic programs.</p>
<p>Pyongyang&#8217;s Foreign Ministry said in a statement the country &#8220;will be compelled to take additional self-defensive measures&#8221; unless the U.N. Security Council apologizes immediately. &#8220;The measures will include <a href="http://www.breitbart.com/article.php?id=D97S4DRG0&#038;show_article=1">nuclear tests and test-firings of intercontinental ballistic missiles.</a>&#8221; </p></blockquote>
<p>Call me crazy, but it appears that President Obama&#8217;s rhetoric didn&#8217;t stop the last missile test.  So&#8230;why would he be able to do the same exact thing and get different results?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.floppingaces.net/2009/04/29/nkorea-threatens-nuclear-missile-tests/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>List of Obama Admin Foreign Policy Issues (90 days in)</title>
		<link>http://www.floppingaces.net/2009/04/14/list-of-obama-admin-foreign-policy-issues-90-days-in/</link>
		<comments>http://www.floppingaces.net/2009/04/14/list-of-obama-admin-foreign-policy-issues-90-days-in/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 14 Apr 2009 11:45:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Scott</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Afghanistan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Africa]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Barack Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Baracks Broken Promises]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fanatical Islam]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Iran]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Middle East]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NATO]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[North Korea]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Obama Euphoric-Rapture Syndrome]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Post-Invastion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Iraqi War]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The UN]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[WMD]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[War On Terror]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[foreign policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[somalia]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.floppingaces.net/?p=20038</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[90 days into his Administration, let&#8217;s take a look at President Obama&#8217;s accomplishments and challenges.

Iraq
-President Obama has vowed to remove &#8220;about&#8221; 100,000 troops within 19 months, leave 50,000 there indefinitely without a date for their withdrawal, and also in keeping with President Bush&#8217;s policy, he&#8217;ll adhere to the Status of Forces Agreement.  However, General [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>90 days into his Administration, let&#8217;s take a look at President Obama&#8217;s accomplishments and challenges.<br />
<span id="more-20038"></span><br />
Iraq<br />
-President Obama has vowed to remove &#8220;about&#8221; 100,000 troops within 19 months, leave 50,000 there indefinitely without a date for their withdrawal, and also in keeping with President Bush&#8217;s policy, he&#8217;ll adhere to the Status of Forces Agreement.  However, General Odierno in Iraq says that <a href="http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/news/world/iraq/article6069734.ece">there&#8217;s a good chance that timeline ain&#8217;t gonna happen</a>.</p>
<p>Iran<br />
-President Obama campaigned on the promise to &#8220;talk&#8221; to Iran, and made the world expect that simply talking to the Iranians would make the world&#8217;s largest sponsor of terrorism (which is actively attacking Americans in Iraq and Afghanistan as you read this) stop making their nuclear bomb factories.  He tried backdoor communications.  He tried writing a letter.  He sent a video to the Iranian people.  He tried UN communications.  He&#8217;s even trying direct communications in the UN negotiations.  None of this has worked one bit. Iran now boasts it has 7000 centrifuges up and running, and the Israelis are saying that if Obama doesn&#8217;t get some sort of result soon&#8230;.they&#8217;ll attack Iran on their own.  Such an attack would no doubt bring a retaliation from Iran, and US forces are literally, physically under caught in the crossfire of ballistic missiles, airstrikes, and commando operations.  Talk might work, but it&#8217;s time to start talking fast.</p>
<p>Afghanistan<br />
-President Obama has sent a few more troops there, but only half as many as were originally going to go.  Sec Defense Gates says that making Afghanistan a secure &#038; stable ally in the war on terror is an objective the US cannot meet.  SO, Obama has sent more diplomats instead.  He also went to Europe (as promised during his campaign) to get NATO to send more troops, but he failed.</p>
<p>Pakistan<br />
-Obama&#8217;s stepped up covert operations inside Pakistan, killed hundreds of civilians with Predator drone missile attacks, and put the nuclear armed nation of 170million people <a href="http://ricks.foreignpolicy.com/posts/2009/04/13/bill_roggio_does_pakistan">on the verge of collapse</a>.</p>
<p>Thailand<br />
-President Obama has done nothing to stave off the collapse of that Southeast Asian nation, and <a href="http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/worldnews/article-1169244/Two-killed-Thai-army-fires-protesting-crowds-tourists-warned-Stay-away-Bangkok.html">it is in the midst of collapsing</a>.</p>
<p>Somalia<br />
-Somalia effectively collapsed years and years ago.  Since then piracy has become its biggest source of GDP.  Recently, the long-ignored problem of Somali piracy hit home when an American-flagged cargo ship was seized.  The crew-not confident that they&#8217;d be saved by the US Navy, Obama Admin diplomatic talks, or the UN forces in the area-rescued themselves.  The Captain was taken hostage, and President Obama chose to vote PRESENT rather than give an order to rescue the hostage from the 4 teenage tribesman/pirates.  Instead, his vague order was to take action only if the hostage was in imminent danger (this after the Captain had tried to escape and been shot at, but apparently being shot at isn&#8217;t imminent danger).  Thankfully, 4 US Navy SEAL Team snipers fired in unison and made truly remarkable shots.  The issues was closed, and now the dazed and confused Obama Admin policy regarding Somali pirates has shifted to chest-thumping bragging, credit stealing, and impotent <a href="http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=washingtonstory&#038;sid=aYhvgOfyTmYA">threats to attack pirate bases on shore</a>.</p>
<p>North Korea<br />
-North Korea was kind enough to give a full 6 weeks of daily warnings that it was going to launch an ICBM in direct violation of multiple UN resolutions.  President Obama said that words have to mean something.  He said that a rogue regime cannot be allowed to flaunt, dismiss, and ignore the will of the United Nations.  Sadly, his words meant nothing to the North Koreans, so they launched their missile while the Obama Admin in effect did nothing and failed to stop or even dissuade the illegal act.</p>
<p>Mexico<br />
-Like Pakistan, Afghanistan, Thailand, and other emerging crisis&#8217;, <a href="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/nathan-gardels/while-us-focuses-on-iraq_b_2522.html">Mexico is also on the verge of collapse</a>.  Again, the Obama Administration has in effect done nothing to curb this.  However, there was talk of immigration reform in the United States which would allow Mexican refugees from a collapse to come here to the United States where jobs are plentiful, and the economy can support the influx of millions of poverty stricken, jobless, homeless people.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.floppingaces.net/2009/04/14/list-of-obama-admin-foreign-policy-issues-90-days-in/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>5</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
