The word “czar” cannot be found in the United States Constitution, thank God. Neither can “tsar” for you spelling sticklers. That, alone, does not mean government czars are unconstitutional but they are nevertheless.
For example, the Marines are not mentioned in the Constitution but providing for the common defense is. The establishment, organization and funding of the Marines is merely one mechanism by which the specific duty is manifested.
Carried out logically, each of the Joint Chiefs of Staff could be viewed as the czar for each respective military branch. However, no one would seriously argue that any branch of the military, or any of the Joint Chief positions, is unconstitutional.
But a “green jobs” czar?
The first occasion I could find where an appointed official was called a “czar” was from the early 1970s when the press gave the nickname to John Love, President Richard Nixon’s in-house energy guru. Perhaps the most visible czar historically was William Bennett, President Ronald Reagan’s drug czar, who was part of a well-publicized effort to convince people, and especially children, to “just say no” to illicit drugs. President George W. Bush appointed numerous leaders to oversee various areas of government, some of which the White House described as “czars”, some the media merely dubbed as “czars”. Many were new appointments to old positions created by previous presidents. To my knowledge, none were approved by Congress. Read the rest of this entry »





