We are now in the midst of a coup, not just of Trump, but of America

Loading

 

 

“There must never be a narrowly voted impeachment or an impeachment supported by one of our major political parties and opposed by another.”

– Jerry Nadler.

“Impeachment is a very serious matter. If it happens it has to be a bipartisan initiative.” 

– Nancy Pelosi

“In the absence of very graphic evidence, it would be difficult to get the support in the Senate needed to make an impeachment successful. Again, my feeling is let’s see what Bob Mueller produces. But the evidence would have to be pretty overwhelming.”

– Adam Schiff

If you ever needed proof that democrats were lying hypocritical dogs, there it is.

democrats have voted to send two whiny, small, narrow articles of impeachment to the full House for a vote. It’s the lamest case in the history of the US:

So that’s it? That’s all there is? After all the talk of obstruction of justice, collusion with Russia, bribery, extortion, profiting from the Presidency, and more, House Democrats have reduced their articles of impeachment against President Trump to two: abuse of power and obstruction of Congress. Honey, we shrunk the impeachment.

Democrats on the Judiciary Committee will vote as early as Thursday on the text of the two articles they unveiled Tuesday, and then they will rush it to the floor next week. It’s enough to suspect that Democrats understand they are offering the weakest case for impeachment since Andrew Johnson, that the public isn’t convinced, and so they simply want to get it over with.

There was not a single fact witness in the last two days. in fact, there was’t a single witness. It was, Louie Gohmert said, a “kangaroo court.”

“America needs to hear from the witnesses. And we didn’t get to hear from them here. This was a kangaroo court.”

It’s so lame that democrats want to impeach Trump for being too tall.

It’s a lot more than that. It’s gone from a fishing expedition that came up empty to a full blown coup.

A full array of government resources were used in attempt to frame the President.

3. Regarding the FBI’s actions in surveilling Trump campaign associates, it was a “travesty” and there were “many abuses.”

4. From “day one,” the FBI investigation generated exculpatory information (tending to point to the targets’ innocence) and nothing that corroborated Russia collusion.

5. It’s a “big deal” to use U.S. law enforcement and intelligence resources to investigate the opposing political party, and I cannot think of another recent instance in which this happened.

6. Evidence to start the FBI’s investigation into Trump associates was “flimsy” from the start and based on the idea that Trump aide George Papadopoulos expressed he may have had pre-knowledge of a Democrat National Committee computer hack. However, it was actually just an offhand barroom comment by a young campaign aide described merely as a “suggestion of a suggestion, a vague allusion” to the fact that the Russians may have something they can dump. But by that time, May 2016, there was already rampant speculation online and in political circles that the Russians had hacked Hillary Clinton’s emails in 2014 and that they might surface. So the idea that Papadopoulos’s comment showed pre-knowledge of the Democratic National Committee hack and dump “is a big stretch.”

The rest of the lists is at the link. Fortunately, it failed.

democrats and their henchmen in the left wing media have been hammering Trump and the GOP with lies non-stop for three years. The IG report has handed them their heads and shoved their egos up their backsides.

Thus the need to impeach, despite an absence of evidence or facts. Still, it gets worse. democrats mean to nullify the next election. They mean to take the election away from the voters.

Nadler:  “We cannot rely on an election to solve our problems, when the president threatens the very integrity of that election.”

Pelosi: “The weak response to these hearings has been, ‘Let the election decide.’ That dangerous position only adds to the urgency of our action, because POTUS is jeopardizing the integrity of the 2020 elections.”

They are telling the American people that they do not trust them. They know Trump cannot be beaten fairly and have resorted to this unconstitutional chicanery in an effort to smear Trump sufficiently that America won’t reelect him.

Not. Gonna. Work.

By the way, there is no Constitutional allowance for removing a President for a crime not yet committed.

democrat desperation grows by the second. Make no mistake. This is now a coup.  democrats are committed to preventing America from having its rightful and Constitutional voice in the next election.

That’s real obstruction. That’s real abuse of power. They must not succeed.

It’s not Trump assaulting the Constitution. It’s the democrat party.

0 0 votes
Article Rating
Subscribe
Notify of
124 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments

@Randy: Democrats rely heavily on the fact that they control the media, so they can throw all the stones they want and the media will help them blame someone else for the broken glass. Their problem here is the direct coverage of the hearings. Though the media tries to spin what happens, anyone watching the hearings can not only hear the unfiltered events but then witness how the media lies to them. The liberal media figured out how to control that when the Senate had the Horowitz hearing; they ignored Republican statements and only carried Democrat statements.

Because, you know… fairness.

@Deplorable Me: Still think Rudys deal and the impeachment are separate, Schiff needs a lesson. They wanna lawfare they wanna make up show trials waggle a pocket constitution, not recuse.
The House put forth a case, it isnt the Senates responsibility to fix it for the dolts, call up witnesses and supposed evidence they wouldnt be bothered to go the 3rd branch to “force compliance”.
Let the witness list the evidence and testimony stand as so meticulously(Grand Jury Pubah style) gathered.
Nothing new!
Let them all know thats what they are voting to put forward to the Senate. Hearsay, innuendo, gossip mind readers.
The testimony of the good congress woman that the 2nd and 3rd branch is not important that it this process. Her SOLE POWER (echo power)
I think that is why the AG and Durham never went to the Ukraine. Rudy was being Private Detective. (the server is at the bottom of the black sea in pieces)
Poor Greg is going to find out that the persons Rudy was representing are not government figures so Rudy wont be caught in the Flynn Trap.
Just my opinion
There is no vote for impeachment …yet

@kitt: Oh, I agree that that Giuliani’s investigations doesn’t have anything to do with the impeachment, but it could play a role. He was asking questions in Ukraine long before the desperate Democrats thought they could use this as a political weapon. Actually, it proves Trump’s concern was corruption, not worrying about the idiot moron Biden.

@Deplorable Me: Sorry innocent til PROVEN guilty they have their perfect “we got him now” case, just the 1.8 billion vanished is proof enough to prove suspicion of corruption as testified to by the crooked Ambassador. Now let them lawfare that.

@kitt: Giuliani says they are missing $5.3 billion.

@Deplorable Me: Oh I know 5 billion but 1.8 was direct deposit into a bank owned by an oligarch and major shareholder of Burisma only to vanish.
Who in hell at the State Dept and USAID thought that was a good place to make the deposit?
The Democrats want to make the case that the aid was repeatedly provided, well the Prez may have been a bit busy to have this 5 billion catch his attention until a new election of an Oligarch backed comedian.
He won the majority in his party,made important reforms and the check was then cut. In the delay the Soros backed NGOs operating in the country were running short of cash so began to whine, that Soros may have to use his own money not ours.
Draining the swamp is more complex than simply firing a few deepstate actors.

So, none of you has anything to say about McConnell and Lindsey Graham’s public announcements that they intend to take and then break an oath taken before God. Why am I not surprised?

I’ll answer my own question: Because Trump has openly broken his own oath, sworn to before God, to faithfully execute and uphold the law and protect the Constitution, and you don’t really give a doodly damn about that either.

December 17, 2019 – Conway says White House sees ‘no reason’ to bow to Democratic witness demands

What a surprise.

“We don’t do things just because Sen. [Charles] Schumer [D-N.Y.] asks us to do them. That’s very clear,” Conway told reporters at the White House on Monday evening. “Starting on Oct. 8, our White House counsel made very clear that he looks at the entire process as unconstitutional, illegitimate and ill-conceived.”

“There is no reason for them to go and testify in the Senate trial as far as we can see. Maybe someone will change their mind, but we haven’t done that,” Conway continued. “Why would we do that?”

Why? Because you’re making it totally obvious that you’re all part of the illegal cover-up. Do you think you can all gather in a circle around the Constitution urinating on it, and nobody will notice? You’re all going down. The American people aren’t as stupid as you think.

@Greg: No laws are folded into the articles not a single one, he isnt charged with anything tangible. How can you say with he perfect and complete ase against DT that he wasnt upholding the law?
You are just filled with MSM soundbites, unproven allegations and silly arguments that you as a baby murdering backer have no room to make about
statements about oaths in front of God.
We wont be held to a higher standard than you hold for your ilk.

@Greg:

So, none of you has anything to say about McConnell and Lindsey Graham’s public announcements that they intend to take and then break an oath taken before God. Why am I not surprised?

Isn’t it ironic that you Socialists whine about the Republicans when you defended the illegal actions of the Democrats; never complained that many who sat on the faux committees for impeachment had already voted for impeachment prior to even the beginnings of the hearings and then have the nerve to drag God into your argument when the DNC was more than willing to remove God from their platform. You simply expose how easily lies roll off your forked tongue.

Of course, one of your main sources was WRONG. It claimed the Nunes memo was total b/s and Lawrence Tribe suggested Nunes could be brought up on charges for the memo. Oppps, Howowitz totally destroy that argument and proved Nunes was catching flack because Nunes was square over the target.

But you’re an idiot (another nickel for you, Comrade Greggie) and are easily duped by the left wing talking heads. It is amazing to me how eager you are to give away your freedoms.

@Greg: Let’s address Schiff’s rampant and non stop lying FIRST. After all, that’s how we got here. What about his lies, Greg? Why do you ignore the crap that brings us to such situations?

Obama himself said the White House doesn’t have to comply with Congressional demands… and HE ignored them. So, just following precedent by, as you put it, “the best”.

So, live with it and LIKE IT.

I heard Nadler was out sick… GEE, I hope he doesn’t DIE.

@kitt, #109:

I realize Trump enablers like Matthew Whitaker have been on FOX News and elsewhere asserting that Abuse of Power is not a crime. He should tell that to Richard Nixon. That there has been continuous Obstruction of Congress is obvious. Trump has ordered subordinates to defy lawful congressional subpoenas. Thirteen who have direct inside knowledge of the matter under investigation have done so. Trump has obstructed the investigation and impeachment process at every turn.

It’s time to clear out the skunks.

@Greg: Just saying “abuse of power” as the lying Democrat scumbags are is not a crime. Something IS an abuse of power;abuse of power is not an act of its own. NO crimes were committed by Trump; Democrats are liars.

@Greg: How the hell would I know what this Whitaker was saying?
Obstruction by going to the courts? Major eye roll on that one as it was the courts that ordered Nixon to fork over the tapes.
They issued many before the vote, that made them invalid non enforceable, the rest they were in too big a rush to allow the 3rd branch to decide too bad so sad. Now because of their own need for speed, the weak ass case is what your Democrats are stuck with.
The senate is not the fact finding body.
I think the House blew it.

December 17, 2019 – Schumer indicates Democrats will force votes on impeachment trial witnesses

Senate Minority Leader Charles Schumer (D-N.Y.) indicated on Tuesday that Democrats will force votes during the Senate impeachment trial on calling witnesses such as acting White House chief of staff Mick Mulvaney and former national security adviser John Bolton.

Schumer said that he will discuss his initial proposal for a Senate trial with Majority Leader Mitch McConnell (R-Ky.) but stressed that “every senator will have a choice.”

“We will have votes on whether these people should testify, and whether these documents should be made public as part of the trial, and the American people will be watching. They will be watching. Who is for an open and fair trial?” Schumer asked.

Schumer added that senators will have to decide if they “want a fair, honest trial that examines all the facts” or “a trial that doesn’t let all the facts come out.”

Schumer sent his initial offer on Senate impeachment trial procedure to McConnell over the weekend. As part of his offer Schumer wants to call four witnesses, including Mulvaney and Bolton.

McConnell appeared to reject that offer on Tuesday, calling it “dead wrong,” and warned that it “could set a nightmarish precedent for our institution.”

The “nightmarish precedent” of witnesses who have direct, first-hand knowledge of events being called forward to testify under oath about what they know? The truth would be revealed. Is that not how trials are supposed to work?

Sorry. If republicans are going to rig the trial, they’re going to have to individually sign on the dotted line agreeing to do so, and then be accountable to the American people for for what they did.

Trials are about determining the truth, not about covering it up.

@Greg: Of course, Schumer’s position now is 180 degrees out from his position in 1999. But that’s just because he’s so fair… right?

In its lowest common denominator, Obama spied and lied and the demokrats and MSM lied and tried to cover it up.

@Greg:

The “nightmarish precedent”

Yes a nightmare that the house expects the senate to do all the dirtywork.
It is the houses sole responsibilty to impeach.
The senates sole responsibility to try that impeachment.
If Shumer wants a constitutional amendment then write one up.
Jabba and Bug eyes f*cked it up completely go for censure and try to do it the correct way.
Else push this with only what the house has, a nice tidy little flaming bag of dog poop they are trying to set on fire at the steps of the Senate.
As lawless as you say this President is and all the spies Pencil neck has it should be a piece of cake.
Take your banana republic excuses and sound bites of MSM and cram them.

If Schumer wanted consideration for his demands during the hearings, the time to make that case was to Schiff and Nadler before they began their little circus of the absurd. Expecting to get extra-conciliatory favors AFTER the Democrat majority has told Republicans in the House to shove it and like it, well…. that’s a little too late.

Clinton was impeached for lying under oath about a private sexual act with a consenting adult.

Donald Trump is being impeached for attempting to extort the cooperation of a foreign government in a scheme to destroy a political opponent, and for ordering 13 subordinates having direct inside knowledge of the situation to defy congressional subpoenas to cover his own worthless posterior. He has used his power of office to destroy the careers and reputations of honest public servants who have attempted to protect America from his bullshit, and has openly done and said things calculated to intimidate witnesses. He is currently in the process of destroying any shred of integrity remaining in the GOP. All for the greater glory Trump.

Yeah, Schumer’s attitude is different now than it was in 1999. It should be. Trump’s letter to Speaker Pelosi reads like something written by an angry, not particularly bright teenager. Pence should be reading up on Section 4 of the 25th Amendment. We may need an intervention.

@Greg: Sorry charlie, The Starr Report, presented on Sept. 9,1998, presented 11 impeachable offenses. Bill Clinton was eventually charged because he “…willfully provided perjuries, false and misleading testimony to the grand jury,” and made “…corrupt efforts to influence the testimony of witnesses and to impede the discovery of evidence.”
The House took time to gather all the evidence required to have the senate do their sole responsibility.
Sorry the Democrat representatives are so inept that they cant legislate or impeach properly.
No one really gives a rats as about what Schumer wants, thinks or if he simply spins off the planet now or in 1999.

@kitt: Can’t wait for greggie to get his next bulletin from his handler. They must be running our of ammunition.

@Randy: an you imagine walking into court to find they are also the prosecution? Thats what the Dems are trying to do with the senate trial. But there isnt a vote yet,.
knowing they will lose in the senate why would they burn political capital, but logic and reason isnt a democrat trait.
Virginas Bloomberg, Soros financed Government is baiting civil war. SMH

@Greg:

Clinton was impeached for lying under oath about a private sexual act with a consenting adult.

It doesn’t matter what it was about; he committed perjury. It it was such a “just a”, why didn’t he tell the truth? It’s not like that was his first time; at least it was consensual THAT time, not like the other incidents of harassment and rape.

Trump is being impeached because he presents a formidable opponent that none of their incompetent candidates have a chance to defeat… especially NOW that they’ve run this impeachment scam on him. You are a bit confused; BIDEN extorted Ukraine to cover for his crack-hear, bastard-producing son. Trump did NOTHING impeachable. But, that’s where Democrats get their ideas for accusations; they do it first to see what it looks like. If it’s scummy enough, they accuse a Republican of doing it.

Yeah, Schumer’s attitude is different now than it was in 1999. It should be.

There ya go. Let that partisan hypocrisy out! Let it flow! No one thinks you base opinions on rational thought anyway, so at least be honest about your hypocritical disdain for the Constitution.

@kitt: knowing they will lose in the senate why would they burn political capital, but logic and reason isnt a democrat trait.

It’s called “desperation”. They’ve run out of options. They ruled out governing and doing anything for the people (unless they be illegal immigrants) and they invested their full effort early on into overturning a legal election and disenfranchising 63 million voters. All because their corrupt process of selecting a known criminal for President was stopped by Trump.