FBI to Michael Flynn: “Trust us. You don’t need a lawyer”

Loading

 

On January 24, 2017, the FBI interviewed Michael Flynn. At the time, Flynn was found to have done nothing wrong.



The FBI eavesdropped on telephone calls between President Donald Trump’s national security adviser and the Russian ambassador but found nothing improper, a U.S. intelligence official said.

The official, who spoke on condition of anonymity because they were not authorized to speak to the media, said late Monday that there was never a formal “investigation” of the calls in December between retired Army Lt. Gen. Mike Flynn and Sergei Kislyak, Russia’s ambassador in Washington.

According to the source, who was confirming a Washington Post report earlier Monday, intelligence officials merely listened in as part of routine eavesdropping on Kislyak.

Yesterday we learned something critical- proof that Michael Flynn was set up by the FBI to take a fall. Many have wondered why Flynn would talk to the FBI without a lawayer present. It turns out that the FBI told Flynn NOT to include a lawyer.

Former FBI Deputy Director Andrew McCabe, who arranged the bureau’s interview with then-national security adviser Michael Flynn at the White House on Jan. 24, 2017 — the interview that ultimately led to Flynn’s guilty plea on one count of making false statements — suggested Flynn not have a lawyer present at the session, according to newly-filed court documents. In addition, FBI officials, along with the two agents who interviewed Flynn, decided specifically not to warn him that there would be penalties for making false statements because the agents wanted to ensure that Flynn was “relaxed” during the session.

The new information, drawn from McCabe’s account of events plus the FBI agents’ writeup of the interview — the so-called 302 report — is contained in a sentencing memo filed Tuesday by Flynn’s defense team.

Citing McCabe’s account, the sentencing memo says that shortly after noon on Jan. 24 — the fourth day of the new Trump administration — McCabe called Flynn on a secure phone in Flynn’s West Wing office. The two men discussed business briefly and then McCabe said that he “felt that we needed to have two of our agents sit down” with Flynn to discuss Flynn’s talks with Russian officials during the presidential transition.

Who led this charade? None other than Andrew McCabe:

McCabe, by his own account, urged Flynn to talk to the agents alone, without a lawyer present. “I explained that I thought the quickest way to get this done was to have a conversation between [Flynn] and the agents only,” McCabe wrote. “I further stated that if LTG Flynn wished to include anyone else in the meeting, like the White House counsel for instance, that I would need to involve the Department of Justice. [Flynn] stated that this would not be necessary and agreed to meet with the agents without any additional participants.”

Worst of all?

“The agents did not provide Gen. Flynn with a warning of the penalties for making a false statement under 18 U.S.C. 1001 before, during, or after the interview,” the Flynn memo says. According to the 302, before the interview, McCabe and other FBI officials “decided the agents would not warn Flynn that it was a crime to lie during an FBI interview because they wanted Flynn to be relaxed, and they were concerned that giving the warnings might adversely affect the rapport.”

They screwed him royally. This is atrocious. This is how the Comey/McCabe cabal ran the FBI. The country is once again reminded of the two tiered justice system established by James Comey; one for the democrats, and another for everyone else.

hillary clinton’s aides were given immunity.

hillary and her aides were allowed to destroy evidence.

hillary and her aides were allowed to dictate the terms of the investigation and interviews.

Cheryl Mills was allowed to sit in on hillary’s FBI interview. Andy McCarthy:

Finally, something else about those lawyers. I nearly fell out of my chair upon reading the very first paragraph of the notes of Clinton’s interview, which identifies the lawyers for Clinton who were permitted to be present for the interview. Among them is Cheryl Mills, Clinton’s longtime confidant and chief-of-staff at the State Department.

Readers may recall that I suggested back in May that “the fix” was in in the investigation of the Clinton emails. The reason was that the Justice Department was allowing Cheryl Mills – a witness, if not a subject, of the investigation – to invoke attorney-client privilege on behalf of Mrs. Clinton in order to thwart the FBI’s attempt to inquire into the procedure used to produce Clinton’s emails to the State Department. Mills was a participant in that procedure – and it is the procedure in which, we now know, well over 30,000 emails were attempted to be destroyed, including several thousand that contained government-related business.

When she worked for Clinton at State, Mills was not acting in the capacity of a lawyer – not for then-Secretary Clinton and not for the State Department. Moreover, as Clinton’s chief-of-staff, Mills was intimately involved in issues related to Clinton’s private email set up, the discussions about getting her a secure BlackBerry similar to President Obama’s, and questions that were raised (including in FOIA requests) about Clinton’s communications.

hillary’s FBI interview was neither under oath nor recorded.

Paul Sperry reported that FBI lawyer James Baker wanted to indict hillary clinton but was overruled by you guessed it- James Comey.

James Comey is a pompous lying jackass who needs a good enema. Mueller should also get one. Flynn was framed- as I said nearly a year ago. Mueller then went on to ruin Flynn financially and finally got Flynn to cop a plea when Mueller threatened Flynn’s son with the same.

Michael Flynn was a three star general with 33 years of service, five of them in combat. He deserves better.

Want more proof that this is pure politics? The leak of the Flynn-Kislyak conversation is an egregious felony but Mueller has zero interest in it. As the Russian collusion fantasy falls apart completely democrats are turning to Trump’s personal finances.

It’s not about justice. It’s all politics and it needs to end. Mueller has created crimes that did not exist prior to his investigation.

Enough.

BTW, so you know:

In one striking detail, footnotes in the Flynn memo say the 302 report cited was dated Aug. 22, 2017 — nearly seven months after the Flynn interview. It is not clear why the report would be written so long after the interview itself.

Clearly, it went down that way so someone could rewrite it to incriminate Flynn.

 

5 1 vote
Article Rating
Subscribe
Notify of
138 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments

@retire05: Why should we look backwards to Obama or Bush admins—serves no purpose—-let’s keep a close eye on what’s going on right now. Trump has got his “friends” turning on him now. He will end up getting exactly what he has earned. My opinion of him irrelevant

I’m sure you know what happens when you ASSUME.

Have a great Sunday—I know I will.

@retire05: He also could not have “gotten away” with it in the Obama or Hillary administration because those members would instinctively take the 5th to protect themselves, even without knowing what the questions were. Or, like Rosenstein, simply won’t take any questions.

I don’t read that rag but obviously you do. No surprise. I’m sure you support muckraking.

Well, that’s what the propaganda says to believe.

It would be illegal for Mueller to release them. Of course, I doubt if Mueller would do that

First, I doubt he has them. Second, he would merely leak unsubstantiated details to the media if he did, per the seditionist’s handbook.

@Richard Wheeler:

Pecker –great name—and Trump best buddies and now, like Cohen

AGAIN, where is your proof they are “best buddies”? Asked this before, #90.

I really love watching crazy Rudy spin it—what the hell happened to America’s mayor?

He still stands up for America, against those who would destroy the government and nation because they didn’t like their criminal candidate losing.

Just blame that dam mainstream media for everything If they’d only treat our beloved leader fairly, like The National Enquirer does, we could get on with MAGA

The corrupt liberal media is the greatest threat this Republic faces. Obama nor Hillary would have ever survived with the media support they have. Likewise, without the heavy handed and in many cases blatantly false attacks on Trump, HE would not have won. Though much of the public has awakened to the propaganda support the media provides for the left, they still provide the only source of false and biased information to millions.

Why should we look backwards to Obama or Bush admins—serves no purpose

Why? Because we learn from history. Why look backwards to two years ago and the 2016 election? Serves no purpose, does it?

@Deplorable Me:

Why should we look backwards to Obama or Bush admins—serves no purpose

The whataboutism makes them uncomfortable, you cant go pointing to much worse crimes never punished or even questioned.
The Democrats have tried to impeach every Republican President since Dwight D. Eisenhower The I word wasnt even allowed to be whispered during the last administration, which is why we now ignore the word racist that card is over balance. The Mueller team is now in contempt of court as the original 302s and all notes of revision have not been submitted to the court.
17000 text messages have been retrieved from Lisa and Peters phones that were wiped clean before handing them to he IG (obstruction of justice, destruction of evidence, destruction of government records anyone helllloooo) Rich and Greg will promptly ignore this current news and tell us its policy, well its the type of policy that hinders transparency and accountability in our unelected government that has unlimited funds to prosecute innocent people..

@kitt:

Rich and Greg will promptly ignore this current news and tell us its policy, well its the type of policy that hinders transparency and accountability in our unelected government that has unlimited funds to prosecute innocent people..

Greg would say, “That’s just how every investigation is carried out” yet, in contrast, the “investigation” of Hillary was composed of allowing all the witnesses to destroy their evidence then giving them immunity. Hillary was “grilled” and allowed to answer “I don’t recall” 37 times and the answers she gave were lies. Hillary lied to Congress, ON VIDEO, yet remains free and has not been investigated or prosecuted for perjury. Hillary was allowed to have one the co-conspirators present when she was questioned as “her attorney”. Hillary was exonerated before the investigation began.

Rich will defend Mueller on the basis of his military service while blindly accepting the accusations of Gen. Flynn despite the rapidly unraveling of the case against him. But, he preferred Hillary over Trump (though he says he didn’t vote for her) though she and her husband hates the military. He remains a staunch supporter of the party of military hatred.

That may have happened in a time long, long ago but it is still pertinent to the level of honesty and accuracy the left demands of Republicans today. I am not the least bit surprised liberals would want that covered by a blanket of, “that was in the past, dude”. Perhaps, “What difference, at this point, does it make?” can be employed as well. But, not only is this clear, irrefutable evidence of the liberal double standard (a standard for everyone else, none for them), it also shows the horrific crimes they are comfortable with their representatives committing and ignoring while pretending to be concerned with any activity they can construe as “illegal”. In other words, their values destroys any credibility they might believe they have with rational people.

So let me get this straight. The right’s story is that Flynn was tricked into lying to the FBI during their initial contact with him, even though he later pleaded guilty to having done so to a judge under oath; consequently, all other information that he provided to the FBI concerning 6 separate investigations during numerous subsequent interviews must also a bunch of lies.

Seriously? This would mean that every other instance of Flynn lying during every other interview would represent a separate criminal offense. You either have that situation—which Flynn would have to be totally nuts to allow himself to become a party to—or Mueller has truthful testimony from Flynn about the Trump campaign and administration.

Do you really think Flynn is crazy? Because if he’s not, what he told Mueller’s team is almost certainly true.

@Greg: No, the fact is he didn’t lie. Mueller was so absolutely desperate to fulfill his mission to find something for the Democrats to use against Trump that took the variations between what Gen. Flynn remembered about a conversation the FBI had transcripts of (Gen. Flynn told the FBI he assumed they recorded the conversation) and bankrupted him to try and get him to lie against Trump. Meanwhile, though Hillary, Clapper, Brennan, Comey, McCabe, Strzok all told SUBSTANTIVE and DELIBERATE lies and you liberals don’t care. You don’t care about facts, you don’t care about truth and you don’t care about justice. If you did, you wouldn’t support trash like Obama and Hillary in the first place.

@Deplorable Me: Rational people would be those who see Trump an habitual liar and voted against him 1n 2016 and 2018 and disapprove of him currently–RCP polls and 2018 midterm vote would put that majority at about 57% of the electorate.
The irrational people—Trump says he could “stand in the middle of 5th Ave. and shoot someone and they’d still support me” are at about 43%—Fortunately the irrational have remained a minority since 2016 election—this will not change.

Many Dem vets secured House seats in 2018—in some cases beating non Vet Repubs—Dem support for the military is strong—“can’t remember which bad foot it was” Trump– mostly wind.

Re Flynn
He admits he lied to Pence–got him fired
He admits he lied to FBI
KISS

@Deplorable Me: We will see what he Judge does Monday when the FBI Special(his mom says so)Prosecutor has failed to hand over the documents requested. This Judge is not one to get fresh with he has a history of putting lying crooked DC lawyers in their place.

@Richard Wheeler: Any action with the possible outcome of seeing Hillary as President is in no way rational for an American citizen that wants to see the country strong and secure.

Among other things, Hillary made State Department classified information available to foreign powers in order to be able to hide whatever she was doing to line her pockets from FIOA requests. There is also ample evidence to support the very, very strong suspicion that she approved the sale of US uranium to a company she KNEW was controlled by Russians in exchange for lots of money.
This is NOT debatable; that is what she did.

So, as a veteran and one who served to defend the nation, is THAT what you would have preferred to Trump?

You may not like Trump and that is understandable; I wasn’t too keen on him though I have absolutely lost all doubts and concerns due to his performance thus far. However, a CRIMINAL like Hillary that has cause substantial damage to the country already should not EVER be allowed to attain the power of the White House.

RCP polls and 2018 midterm vote would put that majority at about 57% of the electorate.

The same as Obama’s at this point. Do you have the same opinion of him?

Liberals HATE the military and that has not changed.

Gen. Flynn didn’t lie. The agents support this. Mueller tried to get him to lie about Trump by ruining him. He plead guilty to get Mueller to stop. I can’t believe any American would abide by that. Disgusting.

@kitt: Unlike liberals that cling to every rumor they hear about the end of Trump with wild celebration, I don’t see a lot of hope for any judge doing what obviously and justly should be done, but I would LOVE to see it. It damn sure NEEDS to be done. I would love to see Mueller held in contempt if, for no other reason, just to watch the left completely ignore his disregard for the courts, proving (again) their actual disdain for justice when it interferes with their banana republic activities.

@Deplorable Me: You keep saying Flynn didn’t lie—what. He says now he lied to Pence–he says he lied to FBI—So is he lying about lying lol But hey you don’t think Trump lies.
Show me where Obama was EVER at RCP average of 43% approval—NEVER HAPPENED–so you are either lying or very poorly informed.

I absolutely agree HRC was a terrible candidate–my vote was foe Dem Jim Webb–Dems will field a much stronger candidate in 2020
Hope DT is primaried by Kasich, Rubio or Haley—would also love to see Ben Sasse R-NEB take a shot

@Rich wheeler 107.
Dem support for the military is strong—

But for serving. What I have seen, most veterans of all ages tend to be Republicans.

RLTW

@rich wheeler: I assume you are a self-propelled adult, yet you can’t seem to grasp the concept that, due to a minor mistake in his remembering of his Kisliak conversation, (which he was recalling but the FBI had transcripts of) Mueller, desperate for someone to provide him with the pretense to attack Trump, persecuted Gen. Flynn and bankrupted him. When he still held out, Mueller went after his family. All the General could do is plead guilty and take his punishment; but he wouldn’t lie about Trump.

The FBI agents said he didn’t lie. Only Mueller’s 7 month late 302 says he did. I’ll support the General over a glory hound with a history of bungling investigations and going after the wrong people.

https://www.realclearpolitics.com/epolls/other/president_obama_job_approval-1044.html 2014. Note that the Fox poll (one that does not over-sample Democrats) has Trump at 46; probably more accurate. One wonders what hsi approval would be if the liberal media did not lie about Trump 24/7 and suppress news of his positive accomplishments? Meanwhile, Obama had total support from 95% of the media, yet his approval was most often not much higher.

I absolutely agree HRC was a terrible candidate–my vote was foe Dem Jim Webb–Dems will field a much stronger candidate in 2020

That is in no way, form or fashion an answer to my question. You knew damn well Webb had a snowball’s chance in Hell defeating Hillary and Trump. You would prefer Hillary over Trump?

@rich wheeler:

Show me where Obama was EVER at RCP average of 43% approval—NEVER HAPPENED–so you are either lying or very poorly informed.

Show us where he ever had over 90% of the press stories released negative, in spite of everything he touched turning to a steaming pile of dung. Tell us of the great things he did for the country. You bore me with the look at me I threw away my vote BS, continue to fill your brain with boob tube trash. Tell my why people are fleeing Democrat mismanaged corrupt states and cities. Cheer on the rot, look what we did with vote harvesting yeah!

Once again you are the guy way back on answering questions
We can agree Flynn lied to Pence

RCP average includes Ras poll -repub—–Obama NEVER polled as low as Trump right now—a fact you can’t disprove so stop lying er trying

I’ve said before the meme that Trump’s approval or–lack thereof is all MSM—ridiculous—his words and actions can be heard and seen by all-

HRC OR TRUMP—EQUALLY BAD—My conscience is clear—get em’ in 2020

@rich wheeler:

RCP average includes Ras poll -repub—–Obama NEVER polled as low as Trump right now—a fact you can’t disprove so stop lying er trying

I provided you with proof. YOU are either lying or blind. 2014, 42.5% approval, with the benefit of media worship and suppression of this lies and failures.

Once again you are the guy way back on answering questions

No. I’m not. YOU are. Would you prefer Hillary to Trump?

@Richard Wheeler:

RCP polls and 2018 midterm vote would put that majority at about 57% of the electorate.

With 95% adverse reporting from the lame stream media, Trump’s approval rating on RCP for December 15, 2018 was 43%

With 95% positive reporting from the lame stream media, Obama’s approval rating on RCP for December 16, 2010 was 45%.

Not much difference considering that the left wing talking heads, and left wing reporters (90% of the press) hate President Donald Trump.

@rich wheeler:

RCP average includes Ras poll -repub—–Obama NEVER polled as low as Trump right now—a fact you can’t disprove so stop lying er trying

On 10/8/2011, Obama polled at 42.1%.
On 12/02/2013, Obama polled at 40%.

His polls continued to hoover right around 45% approval until 2/28/2016.

All RCP numbers.

Either you are lying, or just freaking clueless.

We will see what he Judge does Monday when the FBI Special (his mom says so) Prosecutor has failed to hand over the documents requested.

What documents has Mueller supposedly failed to hand over?

@Greg: The original302s supposed to be filed within 5 days of the inquisition, what he handed over was 6 months after.
https://www.americanthinker.com/blog/2018/12/is_the_flynn_guilty_plea_going_to_be_thrown_out.html
Obviously a racist move on Muellers part ignoring the black judges reasonable request.

Trump’s problem is simple–in first 2 years of his Presidency he has never achieved 50% approval in any RCP weekly poll and the majority of weeks under 45%-many under 40%
In Obama’s first two years achieved over 60% 8 times over 50% 24 times and was never under 43%

We’re looking at DT averaging about 42% over 23 months–currently 43%
Obama averaged 51% weekly first 2 years

We’ll see where we go from here

@Richard Wheeler:

and was never under 43%

WTH is wrong with you?

On 10/8/2011, Obama polled at 42.1%.
On 12/02/2013, Obama polled at 40%.

Obviously, you just want to ignore what does not fit your agenda.

So now we know, you’re just lying. Pathetic.

@retire05In #120: Referring to first 2 years as POTUS for both–Hell the way DT is going he may not make it through 4 years

Your 95% positive press for Obama vs 95% negative for Trump—that would be imaginary numbers—-though Trump has certainly earned his negative numbers

Do you really think Trump even close to Obama in approval now—-or anytime? That’s a Trumpeteer fantasy.05

@Richard Wheeler: So, since you called me a LIAR over it, are you going to acknowledge I proved you wrong?

Yeah, media coverage of Trump overwhelmingly negative, mostly false.

Media Trump Hatred Shows In 92% Negative Coverage Of His Presidency: Study

In addition to that, the media does not cover his successes. Trump is winning the trade war. He brought N. Korea to the negotiating table instead of firing missiles and testing nuke and he GAVE UP NOTHING to do it. He recently signed a bill for economic support for impoverished areas (mostly minority) praised by black leaders. Though losing the House, he gained seats in the Senate in the mid-terms, almost unprecedented (certainly far better than Obama). He has succeeded enormously on immigration, defending the border against an invasion which would have brought MORE crime, gangs and disease.

He has also succeeded, by way of the investigation against him, the deep, deep state corruption at work in the United States to try and make sure the American people get no voice in their government and it is all run by left-leaning moneyed interests.

If there is any coverage of any of these, it is all negative. If the media was neutral and honest, reporting only the facts, Trump would have approval of around 80% and Obama would have been in the teens.

All the way back at #109; would you prefer Hillary to Trump. Will you EVER answer the question? Last chance. I’ll make my assumptions if you can’t answer.

@kitt: The original 302 is gone, wiped away like Hillary did her server, she and her gang did their laptops and phones and Mueller did Strzok’s and Gates’ phones. It’s called destruction of evidence and obstruction of justice and it’s what criminals do routinely. The one that showed Gen. Flynn did not lie was of no use to the Mueller coup so he had it destroyed and replaced with one that could leverage him to lie about Trump.

@Deplorable Me: Funny Someone around here touts bad poll numbers, that could be in NY or CA but where Stinky and Barry cant fill a small HS gym, Trump has overflow for arenas sets up Jumbo trons for those that cannot get in so they can see the rally like a Rock Star doesnt have to use Hollywood personalities.
Was Trump attending the wreath laying at Arlington covered?
Have they said anything about him sending a navy hospital ship to treat Venezuelans escaping socialism? A tiny blurb maybe. 27 thousand manufacturing jobs in November. Low unemployment, low inflation, strong dollar, lower taxes yes these horrible facts.
http://thefederalist.com/2018/12/17/heres-whats-weird-robert-muellers-latest-michael-flynn-filing/?utm_source=The+Federalist+List&utm_campaign=8894d0dcaf-RSS_The_Federalist_Daily_Updates_w_Transom&utm_medium=email&utm_term=0_cfcb868ceb-8894d0dcaf-84050067

@Richard Wheeler:

Referring to first 2 years as POTUS for both–Hell the way DT is going he may not make it through 4 years

He’ll make it through four years, in spite of the deep state’s attempt to destroy him.

Your 95% positive press for Obama vs 95% negative for Trump—that would be imaginary numbers—-though Trump has certainly earned his negative numbers

It may have been a stretch, but it doesn’t negate the fact that the press has been hostile to this Administration. And no, I don’t believe Trump has earned all the negative press. He has done some really good things, and for that he gets no credit as you lefties continue to slobber over Obama.

https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/byron-york-harvard-study-cnn-nbc-trump-coverage-93-percent-negative

Do you really think Trump even close to Obama in approval now—-or anytime? That’s a Trumpeteer fantasy.05

I gave you dates and percentages from your own source, RCP. You simply choose to ignore them. But, hey, that’s what leftist do, isn’t it? Ignore anything that doesn’t fit with your agenda.

Pew: Trump media three times more negative than for Obama, just 5 percent positive

You can read the Pew survey for yourself. But then, it would, again, show how clueless you are.

You rail on Trump as being a “draft dodger” yet you supported Bill Clinton, a BIG draft dodger. You also seemed to support John Kerry, who should have been imprisoned for treason in Leavenworth since he was still in uniform. You don’t like Trump, and consequently, you and that little weasel, Greggie Gullible, refuse to give the President any credit for anything he has done that is positive. How sick y’all are.

The difference between you and conservatives is we did not hate Obama the man. We hated his Socialist policies. You hate Trump the man. You just cannot accept that a New York tycoon, who is a street fighter and not a pansy, defeated She Who Was To Be Crowned.

Like the Bushes, and unlike the Clintons and the Obamas, Trump loves our military. Yet, again, you supported Clinton, twice. Clinton, the draft dodger.

While I disagreed with you on many issues, Wheeler, I accepted your opinion for years. Now you have just reduced yourself to a petty hypocrite and I have absolutely no respect for you. You, like Benedict Arnold, have used up all respect anyone should have for you.

You love to brag about your time “in country” yet turn on Flynn who served five years in combat. But then, Flynn is a Christian and the Socialist head of the DNC thinks Christians are what is wrong with our nation. That’s YOUR party, Wheeler, and you own it.

@retire05:

It may have been a stretch, but it doesn’t negate the fact that the press has been hostile to this Administration.

It was a 3% stretch. Liar, liar, liar. Meanwhile,

Show me where Obama was EVER at RCP average of 43% approval—NEVER HAPPENED–so you are either lying or very poorly informed.

See any admission of error, correction or apology? Or, for that matter, answers to questions?

@Deplorable Me: He cant answer his brain is fighting facts, he is mainlining MSM so his head will stop hurting.
I saw where Juan Williams said there was zero evidence drugs and disease was coming over the border, dude needs a straight jacket, sorry huggyme coat.

@Deplorable Me:

I have been reading Wheeler’s posts here for years. And frankly, I am sick of his crap. He loves to obfuscate. He ignores facts that doesn’t agree with his agenda (Trump hatred). He lives in the most Socialist state in the nation, Loonafornia, and doesn’t seem to mind that Socialist policies are killing a once beautiful, and dynamic state. He rails on others because they did not “serve” yet admitted to supporting Bill Clinton, TWICE. He will never give any Republican, except that slime John McCain, credit for anything good. He has been insulting to women himself, yet thinks Trump is a women hater. Oh, my, Trump may have had sex with a porn star, but JFK looooved Las Vegas hookers and you don’t read Wheeler demanding the names of Congress critters who, though a taxpayer supported slush fund, paid women off during their campaigns.

He doesn’t answer my questions but demands I answer his. He’s a moral coward because he knows, many times, admitting the truth destroys his “facts.”

His double standards have become boring.

@Deplorable Me: My apologies to you and any other Trumpeteers re OBAMA/TRUMP #”s rcp POLL PUBLIsHED WEEKLY–Obama’s 8 YRS approx. 415 polls he did indeed finish under 43 % on approx.10- 15 polls—never under 43 during first 2 years 104 polls—-DT FIRST 2 years 100 polls under 43% many times.
Trump has never hit 50% BHO OVER 60% MANY TIMES IN FIRST 2 YEARS

I have said positive things about many Repubs including Rubio,Kasich Haley and much maligned Mac-Think Ben Sasse a great choice to run
No matter his party have never supported Trump–nor HRC primary or General–can’t choose between 2 I dislike.

At work will comment further later

@Richard Wheeler: You have to choose; one or the other was going to be President. Would you have preferred a criminal that got people killed in Benghazi, lied about it and damaged national security over someone you simply find personally repugnant? For most Americans, it’s not a difficult answer if one admits the facts.

Math question If Pew report says DT gets 95% neg coverage and 3x worse than BHO–doesn’t BHO get about 32% neg 68% positive –not 5%/95%–Quite a difference
DEP–would you rather die from firing squad or hanging?

Moral cowards are those who support an habitually lying morally bereft Prez only to achieve political goals

RE Repubs—I’d campaign for Ben Sasse.

@Richard Wheeler:

Moral cowards are those who support an habitually lying morally bereft Prez only to achieve political goals

Since you supported both Clinton, and Obama, who habitually lied, that definition applies to you, Wheeler.

Glad you owned up to it.

@Deplorable Me, #130:

For most Americans, it’s not a difficult answer if one admits the facts.

Most Americans did not vote for Donald Trump. Of those who voted, nearly 3 million more voted for Hillary Clinton—another plain and simple fact that Trump followers also deny.

@retire05: Trump lies more in a week than Clinton or Obama in a year—shut down his” personal bank” Foundation today–damn crook
I didn’t support him or HRC—
Your seemingly unwavering support of someone you]re smart enough to know is a lying grifter makes you a moral coward 05

@Greg: Perfect reason for the electoral college we know highly populated areas that dont know better because possibly braindamage from lead in the water and over flouridation had more votes for Stinky. Cost her a billion dollars, there are more computer users so the voters being swayed by less than 20K nation wide Russian ads makes no sense at all and never has.
Trumps Foundation being shut down wont have the lifestyle effect that it would with the Clintons by a long shot.

@Greg:

Most Americans did not vote for Donald Trump

No, only those that didn’t want an incompetent, lying, corrupt criminal to occupy the White House and sell seats on the Supreme Court to the highest bidder.

Of those who voted, nearly 3 million more voted for Hillary Clinton—another plain and simple fact that Trump followers also deny.

No doubt if California would cooperate with Trump’s investigation of voter fraud we’d find out how many illegal immigrants and corpses comprised that 3 million. The effort to turn Texas blue by fraud has been in full swing.

@Richard Wheeler: But you preferred Hillary as President. We know this because you won’t deny it when given numerous opportunities. You wanted her but tried to give yourself absolution by voting for someone that had no chance whatsoever.

Trump is absolutely 100% factual compared to the endless flow of lies spewing forth from Obama and Hillary’s gaps. Obama even CONTINUES to lie.

@Richard Wheeler:

Trump lies more in a week than Clinton or Obama in a year—

Care to back that up with proof?

shut down his” personal bank” Foundation today–damn crook

Why not shut down the Clinton Foundation? Damn crooks
https://saraacarter.com/financial-bounty-hunters-testify-clinton-foundation-operated-as-foreign-agent/

I didn’t support him or HRC—

Are you saying you did not vote in the General Election or you left the choice for President blank?

Your seemingly unwavering support of someone you]re smart enough to know is a lying grifter makes you a moral coward 05

I supported Obama, i.e. the Office of the President of the United States. I hoped he would not be the disaster I feared he would be. But he was a disaster and I didn’t support his agenda of turning this country into a Socialist nation.

I always support any President and hope they will govern wisely. Lying grifter? What was Bill Clinton? He didn’t have two nickels to rub together when he got to D.C. Look at how much money he had when he left office. How many women did he sexually assault? But you never ridicule Bill Clinton. Talk about someone towing the party line. That would be you, Wheeler, a moral coward.