democrats have been desperate to stop the confirmation of Brett Kavanaugh to the Supreme Court. The Chinese spy in the Senate, Dianne Feinstein, has thrown a Hail Mary in the form of a decades old accusation from one Christine Blasey Ford.
[…] While his friend watched, she said, Kavanaugh pinned her to a bed on her back and groped her over her clothes, grinding his body against hers and clumsily attempting to pull off her one-piece bathing suit and the clothing she wore over it. When she tried to scream, she said, he put his hand over her mouth.
“I thought he might inadvertently kill me,” said Ford, now a 51-year-old research psychologist in northern California. “He was trying to attack me and remove my clothing.”
Ford said she was able to escape when Kavanaugh’s friend and classmate at Georgetown Preparatory School, Mark Judge, jumped on top of them, sending all three tumbling. She said she ran from the room, briefly locked herself in a bathroom and then fled the house.
Kavanaugh has categorically denied it.
Supreme Court nominee Brett Kavanaugh vigorously denied claims involving an alleged high school incident made in an undisclosed letter and turned over to FBI by Sen. Dianne Feinstein, D-Calif.
“I categorically and unequivocally deny this allegation. I did not do this back in high school or at any time,” Kavanaugh, 53, said in a statement Friday.
Feinstein ignited controversy Thursday by releasing a statement saying she turned information about Kavanaugh over to the FBI. She did not detail the accusation, and Republicans accused her of trying to orchestrate a last-minute smear.
The other person named by Ford in the alleged incident has also denied it:
Now that Ford’s name and more details about her allegations were released in the Poststory, Judge reiterated his denial:
“Now that the anonymous person has been identified and has spoken to the press, I repeat my earlier statement that I have no recollection of any of the events described in today’s Post article or attributed to her letter,” he said in a statement to Breitbart News.
Before Ford’s name was publicly released on Sunday, Judge strongly denied that the incident ever occurred. “It’s just absolutely nuts. I never saw Brett act that way,” Judge said to the Weekly Standard, addressing allegations that at the time stemmed from reports citing an unnamed woman.
Kavanaugh has been vetted 6 times by the FBI and this never turned up.
The event is said to have occurred 35 years ago. It was never reported- not to the police, not to anyone- her parents included, apparently. That alone makes it ring false to me. Ford also has a selective memory about the event:
According to the Post, Ford has an imperfect memory of the events. “Ford said she does not remember how the gathering came together the night of the incident.… She also doesn’t recall who owned the house or how she got there.” She does seem to remember the county, and this will no doubt be helpful to the committee if she musters the courage to appear.
Now, why might Ford be suddenly remembering this event?
In anticipation of public disclosure, Ford scrubbed her social media.
But not completely:
Motive 1
Christine Blasey Ford, the woman who claims she was physically attacked at a high school party by Supreme Court Justice nominee Brett Kavanaugh three decades ago, has taken part in events opposing President Donald Trump, including a science march in California last year where she donned a version of the “pussy hats” worn at the January 2017 Women’s March.
Motive 2
Brett Kavanaugh’s mother was the judge in a home foreclosure proceeding against the accuser’s parent.
And there’s this, and it’s a biggie:
She never mentioned the event to anyone until 2012, when she attended couples therapy. Why?
Motive 3. It may have been a plan since 2012.
So what happened in 2012? Coincidentally (or not), 2012 was another election year.
In 2012, Romney ran against Obama. Up until his 47% gaffe, Romney was doing well. He actually had a shot of winning.
For the Democrats, as has been the case since Bork, having a Republican in the White House, especially with the ever-aging but never retiring Ruth Bader Ginsburg a perpetual risk, raised the specter of a conservative judge getting appointed to the Supreme Court. With that in mind, one Twitter user, who must have an amazing memory, remembered something interesting he’d read back in 2012:
https://t.co/hxaYqQfPI0 March 2012, the left was preparing for a possible Romney win. They assessed that Kavanaugh would be his Supreme Court pick and this accusation was ready to go. Then Obama won so the story died. Now its reemerged. Read last few lines of this 2012 article
— Stonewall Jackson (@1776Stonewall) September 16, 2018
I’ll save you a click to The New Yorker website. The article, which The New Yorker published in 2012, is a Jeffrey Toobin analysis about Bret Kavanaugh and the threat he would pose should he get on the Supreme Court. According to Toobin, Kavanaugh was a scary conservative who, if he got on the Court, might overturn Obamacare:
In other words, according to Kavanaugh, even if the Supreme Court upholds the law this spring, a President Santorum, say, could refuse to enforce aca because he “deems” the law unconstitutional. That, to put the matter plainly, is not how it works. Courts, not Presidents, “deem” laws unconstitutional, or uphold them. “It is emphatically the province and duty of the judicial department to say what the law is,” Chief Justice John Marshall wrote in Marbury v. Madison, in 1803, and that observation, and that case, have served as bedrocks of American constitutional law ever since. Kavanaugh, in his decision, wasn’t interpreting the Constitution; he was pandering to the base.
In the nineteen-nineties, during Kavanaugh’s first brush with prominence, it was said that some conservatives suffered from Clinton derangement syndrome—an obsessive belief that the President and the First Lady had committed every misdeed that was attributed to them. (Hillary Clinton was involved in Vince Foster’s death; Bill Clinton had trafficked narcotics through Mena, Arkansas; and so on.) Kavanaugh’s bizarre opinion confirms that a contemporary analogue to the Clinton malady has taken hold: health-care derangement syndrome.
There’s more blah-blah from Toobin, a man who can never be trusted to be honest about the law. Don’t bother reading it. Just pay attention to that last paragraph:
If a Republican, any Republican, wins in November, his most likely first nominee to the Supreme Court will be Brett Kavanaugh. (Emphasis mine.)
If you have any remaining doubts, see here and here
H/T John McCormack
This plot has been in the works since 2012.
Sixty five women who knew Brett Kavanaugh in high school have signed a letter in support of him. According to her lawyer, Ford is ready to testify publicly.
Republicans would like this to happen immediately.
In a statement, Sen. Lindsey Graham (R., S.C.) said he “would gladly listen to what [Ford] has to say,” but if “the committee is to hear from Ms. Ford it should be done immediately so the process can continue as scheduled.”
But apparently, democrats want more time- like until after January 21st.
JUST NOW: @SenatorDurbin told me he supports public testimony from Dr. Christine Blasey Ford…but this week would be too soon.
— John Berman (@JohnBerman) September 17, 2018
There is little doubt that these accusations are not going anywhere and there is much doubt as to their veracity.
First, one way to help test the veracity of old claims is to ask whether there is any contemporaneous corroboration. Did the accuser tell a friend or family member or anyone about the alleged assault when it occurred? With Clinton, Trump, Moore, and many other politicians and celebrities, there was ample contemporaneous corroboration. Here, there was not. According to the Washington Post, “Ford said she told no one of the incident in any detail until 2012, when she was in couples therapy with her husband.”
That’s almost three decades of silence — three decades when memories can grow cloudy and recollections can change.
But even the allegedly corroborating notes of the therapist raise a separate problem. They actually contradict her story on a key detail. According to the Post, “The notes say four boys were involved, a discrepancy that Ford says was an error on the therapist’s part. Ford said there were four boys at the party but only two in the room.” Nor do the notes mention Kavanaugh’s name, even though her husband says Ford named Kavanaugh in the sessions.
Ford seems not to have told anyone. That’s very significant. I have a grown daughter and I can tell you for a fact that had something like this happened to her, she would have come to me or her mother immediately. Had it been me, I can assure you that there would have been consequences. Prompt consequences.
Yet she told no one- until 2012. When Romney might win and Kavanaugh’s name is brought up as a potential SCOTUS nominee. And now Ford has a lawyer who thinks that Trump advisers are “miscreants.” Debra Katz, a #metoo lawyer, has been dismissive of accusations against Bill Clinton and Al Franken.
Kellie Ann Conway issued a statement saying that “This woman should not be insulted and she should not be ignored.”
“Let me make very clear: I’ve spoken with the president, I’ve spoken with Sen. [Lindsey] Graham and others,” Conway said. “This woman will be heard. She’s going to … I think the Senate Judiciary Committee will decide how and through which forum.”
This is smart politics. Trump stays on the proper side of the debate and once this is swatted away, they can turn on Keith Ellison.
Update
https://twitter.com/WiredSources/status/1041728700914577410
I’m shocked. A refusal to cooperate and allow Ford to testify promptly proves this is a stunt, a bluff- one that Katz never expected Grassley to call. This was and is about throwing some sh*t on Kavanaugh and hoping it stinks.
Update 2
I have amended the post to remove the student evaluations. It is not clear that this Ford is the teacher in question.
DrJohn has been a health care professional for more than 30 years. In addition to clinical practice he has done extensive research and has published widely with over 70 original articles and abstracts in the peer-reviewed literature. DrJohn is well known in his field and has lectured on every continent except for Antarctica. He has been married to the same wonderful lady for over 30 years and has three kids- two sons, both of whom are attorneys and one daughter on her way into the field of education.
DrJohn was brought up with the concept that one can do well if one is prepared to work hard but nothing in life is guaranteed.
Except for liberals being foolish.
It is ironic that, as we learned during the Brett K hearing, IF we paid attention, that Brett agreed with MERRICK GARLAND about 97% of the time while they both served on the same court.
Dems/liberals are biting off their own noses to spite their faces.
There’s literally no difference between Brett B and Merrick G.
Fighting him is a matter of course, not logic.
~~~~~
And, you make an excellent point about accusers.
They pop up strategically when needed (2012).
Then they disappear completely.
Only, in her case, she had to pop up strategically TWICE.
The list of these phony bimbos is getting quite long.
Just follow the trail of tissues held by lib law women like Gloria Alred, Lisa Bloom, and Debra Katz.
Remember Debra Katz?
She said this about one of Bill Clinton’s accusers: “Paula Jones’ suit is very, very, very weak. She’s alleged one incident that took place in a hotel room that, by her own testimony, lasted 10 to 12 minutes. She suffered no repercussions in the workplace.” !!!
Does such a turnaround in POV cause her headaches?
When in doubt, when you have nothing, just accuse your enemy of rape, or “sexual misconduct”. Works every time.
At what point are they’re going to be laws against libel? It has real consequences, and engenders real evil. Like real crime.
@Nathan Blue: Interesting how “the Left” is trying to have it’s sexual assault charge while no one is accountable for it.
*Mrs Ford did not report an assault; she merely wrote a gossipy letter to her own CA representative.
*Her representative didn’t report an assault either, merely passing along a gossipy letter to one of CA’s Senators.
*Her Senator didn’t report an assault either; merely telling the FBI in a passed along letter – with redactions!
*The WaPo got info directly from Mrs Ford but sat on it for weeks – until Sen Diane went public – so they were not the ones who reported an accusation of assault.
Who does one go after for this slime job?
As I mentioned the other day, it was rather amazing how Rs whipped out a letter on the spot, all while claiming they knew nothing of these allegations.
Why is it that Trump seems to often want, nominate, or endorse accused rapist, teenage molesters, wage stealers, con men, money launders, mob figures, and such as that? And why is it that the likes of FA and others like you fully support these people, even after many of their convictions?
The Republicans have indeed gone to hell in a hand-basket. And you/they seem to be proud of it.
Oh, and there seems to be a circulation of signatures from Ford.s classmates claiming consistencies in her stories. But I know, that could only have (hell, would absolutely have) validity here if it were of a Democrat.
Roe v. Wade is one of the main reason republicans want to confirm Kavanaugh, who has responded to all confirmation questions on the matter with evasive answers. As with Trump, so long as republicans think Kavanaugh will give them things their voters want, they’ll overlook any controversy or failing.
Have anti-choice activists never wondered if a life-long libertine like Donald Trump might have paid for one or more abortions? We are talking about an enormously self-centered, self-promoting “billionaire,” who retained a full-time lawyer to buy his way out of any troublesome complication. He currently has the particulars of a number of lawsuits totally locked down for the duration of his presidency. (That would be somebody’s cue to fly in to a yammering digression about Bill Clinton.)
@Ajay42302:
Would you like to provide a link for that claim since the accuser herself claims she never told anyone until she told her shrink in 2012? How can her “classmates” attest to the claimed event if they were not there and she never told them?
@Ajay42302:
Well, stupid, you should take note of the timing. They don’t BECOME such until AFTER they are nominated by Trump.
Any ideas as to why none of this ever came to light, especially since it was alleged back in 2012, during the six FBI background checks that have been conducted on Kavanagh? Oh… I forgot. Questions send you a-running.
You know what I heard? I heard YOU are accused of sexual assault. Now, it happened 30 years ago and everyone associated with it have died and the house in which it happened has been razed, but since it is accused, it therefore HAPPENED. Kind of see how your corrupt party works nowadays? You have no facts and nothing to offer the country but lies. You and your party have become the most disgusting, despicable and corrupt organization in America, taking after your idols, the Nazis and Soviets.
@Greg: Have anti-choice activists never wondered if a life-long libertine like Donald Trump might have paid for one or more abortions?
@retire05:
It’s interesting how all clones here suffer the same reading disorder. I never said there were eyewitnesses or even people who knew of the alleged attack. I said there was a “circulation of signatures from Ford.s classmates claiming consistencies”.
Well, to name a few, you can find it on today’s front pages of:
TheHill, Vox, Washington Post, TIME, CNBC, The Nation, Spectator USA, ThinkProgress, New York Times, Grabien News, New York Post, JustOneMinute, Politico, CNN, The Wasahington Examiner, Crooked Media, Talking Points Memo, Political Wire, Splinter, twitchy.com, Shareblue Media, The NewYorker, Huffington Post, Yahoo News, AOL News, The Cut, and Above the Law
That final update, that Sen Diane F is refusing to aid the Senate in getting in touch with this loony bird says a lot about whether the Sen really wants to tie herself too closely with this nutcase.
We have posters here who are hitching themselves closer to Mrs Ford than Sen F is willing to do!
~~~~~
On that letter:
On the one hand the Left screams “white privilege!,” while on the other hand, when 65 women who’ve networked all their adult lives can pull a letter together in less than two days, the Left is screaming, “how can they do that?”
It’s easy, just call it what it is: elite white privilege.
It’s something we whites have been doing forever!
It’s why we get ahead while POC stay on the outs.
Back when hubby had the printshop, following up with cards and gifts was par for the course. It paid off in returning customers, too.
My take on Kavanaugh’s accuser:
“Drag $100 and a post-scandal, ghost-written book offer through a Leftist college campus, and you’ll never know what you find.”
A thought on the Kavanaugh accuser…
http://redpilljew.blogspot.com/2018/09/a-thought-on-kavanaugh-accuser.html
@Ajay42302:
No, Bubba, what you actually said was:
When I asked for links, you provide me a list of far left sites. Have all those left wing sites hired her classmates?
And how would her classmates be able to attest to the validity of “her stories” when she, herself, claims she never talked about the event until she told her shrink in 2012? Were they sitting in that office with her? Or were her classmates, and she, so stupid they didn’t graduate until 2012? Oh, that’s right; when posed with questions for which you have no answers, you run like a scared rabbit into your rabbit hole.
You need to learn to lie better.
@retire05: Because if it’s a LIE against a Republican, all liberals believe it at the same time.
I’ve asked AJ to back up his claims before. Yeah… that’s not going to work.
@Deplorable me, #7:
PRO-LIFE LEADER SAYS SHE’D STILL SUPPORT DONALD TRUMP IF HE PAID FOR AN ABORTION
Because, you know, he’s a winner, and it’s all about winning. Otherwise liberals will let people to make their own moral decisions in accordance with the dictates of their own beliefs and conscience.
@Greg: Weren’t all of Clinton’s sins forgiven by the left because the economy was in such good shape (though due to the dot com boom, nothing of Clinton’s doing)? Well, why shouldn’t anything and everything Trump does or has done be overlooked, as long as he is restoring the health of the country?
At what point should abortion be considered murder? At what point during the pregnancy should an abortion not be allowed? How old does a life have to be before it is allowed to have rights?
Oh, by the way… Trump hasn’t paid for any abortions, unless you can prove otherwise. However, we know if you get the urge to simply INVENT a helpful lie, you’ll do so. It’s the liberal way.
@Greg:
…as long as those beliefs are approved by the Left…and match up perfectly to very specific doctrine, that one may not stray from.
so…
…NO, liberals won’t, and are the enemies of free thought, morals, and conscience.
You support un-elected, para-information groups installing, and removing, and people they want into government by way of character assassination, libel, and deception.
@Greg: The idea of liberals allowing individuals to make their own moral decisions is the most absurd thing I’ve ever heard. Liberals come in all shapes, sizes, colors and genders. They celebrate the diversity of the package. However, in the realm of ideas they are required to be cookie cutter copies who never stray from the liberal doctrine of infallibility. Any minority who strays from the Democrat plantation is attacked without mercy.
@retire05: HoJay screwed up there, Retire. Shejay didn’t notice that ‘the story is that she never mentioned it to a solitary soul until 2012’ Hojay was just trying the standard stream of Liberal lies to defend the liberals. He just assumed her team mates would corroborate her story, no matter which way she amended it. But hell, Hojay herself can’t keep it’s story straight, how could another liberal that just made up a string of lies keep their story straight.
@NITZAKHON:
One thing you obviously will find is a ding bat professor that has no more respect for herself than to wear a pussy hat. Is she saying that’s the only part of her that has a value? Not many women would feel that way. I think it’s going to be very clear when this is over that there was only one objective. to stop his approval.
@retire05:
He can’t even remember his name most of the time. One time it ajay, then Hojay, then NoJay. sometimes even heyjay.
We are back in the day of “recovered memories”. Remember those child care facilities where children remembered being “molested”? And it never happened.
What Federal crime has been committed? What charge does the FBI have to investigate this matter? Where are the contemporary witnesses to this assault? Lots can happen in 35 years. When did Kavanaugh lie under oath? At least Anita Hill had two persons come forward and claim that they were told about Judge Thomas. But this time? Crickets.
What kind of parent lets their child go, alone, at 15, to a party where there are no chaperones and underage drinking?
I want to see a picture of Kavanaugh at 17. I taught at Landon School, and I would not be at all surprised that some of my charges then would have done this. Landon is a boy’s school not far from Georgetown Prep.
This is a BIG LIE, worthy of Goebbels.
Doc; is there a link for Motives 2 and 3?
Well, this is what “your party” thinks about women when they become a liability. Heard of “walk away”?
@Deplorable me:
Fixed. Thanks
@RichardS1963, #16:
That’s precisely what protecting the right of every woman’s right to choose for herself whether or not to continue a pregnancy is all about. Empowering the State to force someone to continue an unwanted pregnancy is the exact opposite of personal freedom, involving an invasion of a privacy on the most personal level imaginable.
The right will not get away with this sort of b.s. Try it, and we’ll destroy you at the ballot box. That’s a promise.
@Greg:
No you won’t. You’ll TRY to destroy us in the media and by throwing false accusations at us. It’s all you know anymore. Until you get the illegal immigrant voting in full force, you don’t have a chance except in liberal enclaves.
@DrJohn: Oh, no… thank YOU. I save these things to use later and that’s a good one.
@Greg:
If a female wishes to murder her unborn child because the thought of responsibility for ones actions is repugnant to the left, then she should pay for it herself I do not want my tax dollars being used for infanticide. If PP is so hell bent on killing babies let them come up with a payment plan.
@kitt: Planned parenthood makes so much they have millions to spare to donate to Democrats to support their death industry. They NEED no tax dollars.
@Redteam:
I’m sure if you revisit any given post from me, you will again read whatever it is that you prefer at that time, regardless of the actual wording.
@retire05:
Real head scratcher there. Uh, yeah, well, it was “her stories” which I was referring to. Oh well, at least you didn’t imagine a hojay or, or something.
You asked for a link to my “claim”( retire05-“Would you like to provide a link for that claim since the accuser herself claims she never told anyone until she told her shrink in 2012? How can her “classmates” attest to the claimed event if they were not there and she never told them?”) of
To be clear (and I don’t really know how to be clear to folks that imagine words in my writing that do not exist), these “far right” sites are simply reporting that a “circulation of signatures” exist (get that? there exist a circulation of signatures from other people) that the habits or behavior of Kavanaugh are in their opinion, consistent of what Ford is accusing him of. It’s not that they have some secrets to revel but simply that they ain’t surprised.
And on another note, many right leaning sites have now pointed this out too. But fox and such holds back on things like this as long as possible. Nothing new there.
@Redteam: Give it up. AJ has supported Hillary and even praised Bill’s rapes as his right. You aren’t going to get him to clarify anything he ever posts.
@Deplorable me:
I challenge you to produce a single time I’ve supported Hillary. Or, praised Bill Clinton raping someone.’
You can’t do it.
Why?
Because you are a Trump supporter, a profound liar, and will go to no ends to protect your bigoted loyalty to a bigoted , racist, and profoundly dishonest website. You must protect the haters and bigots.
You might argue your allegiance to racism and bigotry. You have no argument of your accusations of me. They aren’t there. If so, prove it. You can’t do it. You just spew your ilk as a good trump sucking bigot would do, You are a fraud.
Unfortunately for the country, this is what the unhinged corporate puppets called the Republican party has become.
@Ajay42302: So you are saying all her friends are saying she is consistant, she was always drinking, always couldnt remember where she was and how she got there, never knowing when horrible life changing things in her life happened?
Ford as “constantly cheerful” in high school. as described by a friend but Ford said the episode “caused her to go off the rails.”
Agan her friend “We aren’t doing this for political reasons…. “We”… does this woman have a gerbil up her ass?
Ford has not accepted his request to appear before the committee. A meeting set for Monday, perhaps they can send the gerbil.
Te Dems screaming too soon how can she be properly coached by Monday??!!
@Ajay42302:
Frankly, it has been a long time since anyone has come on this blog that is full of cr@p as you are.
The “victim” (and I use that term loosely) claims she cannot remember the date, the location of the house and that there were two other boys there (who remain unnamed). She also claims she NEVER told anyone until she bared her soul to a shrink in 2012. So, if her first story is correct, that she never told anyone until 2012, how can any of her ’80’s era classmates testify to the validity of her story?
Of course, she also wanted to remain anonymous, but golly gee, the Washington Compost found out who she is and contacted her for an interview? How does that work? Found out from whom? How much was she paid for her interview? What was her anonymity worth?
Remember Anita Hill? Same sh!t, different day. Destroying people is all you left wingers know how to do. Hopefully, just as in Anita Hill’s case, this left wing accuser will be equally unbelievable when, and if, she ever testifies.
@Hayjay42302:
Nobody imagines it. It’s not our fault you can’t remember who you are from one day to the next. Sometimes even from one post to the next. I did see it one time where you actually did use the same name two days in a row.
@Deplorable me:
yeah, I know, that’s why I never address anything serious with NoJay, he can’t keep up and never remembers anything and the liberal socialists are always right. nobody takes him as anything but a joke.
Oh, gee, look. Poor little AJ is DEMANDING someone provide substantiation for something they wrote. No, really. I’m not kidding.
This is the same AJ that repeatedly writes that many of us said we would support Hitler or Stalin, though he knows that NOT to be true. This is the same AJ that continually throws accusations he has been told to make without ANY validation and, when asked to support his accusations, runs like a lying, liberal psychology professor when given the opportunity to support HER accusations against a Supreme Court nominee, flailing his arms and pissing his panties.
In fact, THESE questions have been asked and remain unanswered:
What is your substantiation for calling Trump a racist?
Does Hillary dropping N-bombs make her a racist (and, by extension, all of her supporters)?
Is ANTIFA committing violence?
Shouldn’t the left be demanding Yale University change its name because Elihu Yale was a slave trader and the school was built with support from slave traders?
Tell us of how Trump “breached the Constitution”.
Why do liberals get to make vile, unsubstantiated accusations in media but conservatives get fired if they voice a non-liberal opinion?
How is questioning Obama’s demonstrably dubious birth records racist?
Are immigration laws expected to be enforced?
Who is justifying “mass murdering people not of their heritage”?
Who has ever asserted that “all Hispanic and Latinos are murders, rapist, and drug dealers”?
When did Trump ever grab anyone’s vagina and who was it?
What did Trump lie about?
Whose wages did Trump steal?
What is the nature of Trump’s “con”?
How did I indicate your answers would be meaningless?
What answer have you provided that has been ignored?
Can you show us an incident when conservatives overreacted to a tragedy and accused the wrong responsible party?
Do you denounce those who are rejoicing in the slaughter in Las Vegas and using it for obscene political gain?
Trump said a word. Weinstein groped, fondled and… whatever else that shall be revealed. Are you intellectually incapable of understanding the difference?
What is Trump doing that is “energizing the KKK and Neo-Nazis”?
Provide examples of anyone that “harass and falsely imprison and then beat and attributed death to people of color (even openly declaring his prison as his “own personal concentration camp)”.
How is calling Warren, who lied about being Native American, Pocahontas a slur?
But AJ DEMANDS I answer his questions. Poor, poor AJ. Seems no one shows the proper respect to a cowardly, sniveling liar anymore.
@retire05:
Uh, sure, whatever you say my incoherent friend. But it looks like the list has grown to 599 women from Christine Blasey Ford’s high school that have signed on to an open letter saying that they support her and believe her account that Supreme Court nominee Brett Kavanaugh sexually assaulted her in high school.
Now understand, this isn’t a testimony of facts (like “facts” matter to trump and his lickers anyway) but rather of behavior.
It’s unclear if you are trying to argue that this list of signatures do not exist because they are reported on “leftist” outlets or if you’re arguing some other aspect of it.
@Deplorable me:
Okay, you have nothing to substantiate your accusations of me. All you have is your ankle biting rubber/glue stratagem But we all knew that anyway.
@Ajay42302:
Hmm… even though she never told anyone about it, none of them were there (as far as Ford or anyone else can attest) and her recollections are contradictory. Well, that pretty much sums up what it takes to convince a liberal of a liberal lie.
Any speculation as to why Ford refuses to answer Senate questions? Or, is that question too tough (like all the rest) and has caused you to piss yourself and run away… again?
YOU yourself substantiate my accurate descriptions of you.
@Ajay42302:
I am quite coherent, Bubba. No one here seems to have trouble understanding what I write except you, leaving one of two possibilities; either you have a cognitive disorder that has kicked into warp speed or you are just flat out stupid.
Wow! So they believe her just based on her statements admitting she doesn’t know where this happened, it was four boys there, not two, a recent addition of another girl at the scene, has no idea of where the house is, how she got there or how she left, what she was doing upstairs, and is not even sure of the year? I guess idiots like Julia Louis-Dreyfus, who didn’t even attend the school at the same time our liberal p#ssy hat wearing accuser did, carries any credibility. Frankly, I don’t care if the whole Duke La Cross team supports her claims.
Oh, so now Dems have lowered their standards to include “opinion” when only facts should be included in a case of “claimed” sexually assault? Nice to know that.
I’m sure the signatures exist but they are not worth the paper they are written on. You don’t include “opinion” of those who were not even at the claimed incident in what is being presented as a criminal case.
Of course, now your believable accuser has decided she is not going to testify (she’s really only interested in one thing anyway; stopping a conservative jurist from being on the SCOTUS) unless there is an FBI investigation. You would think her top notch lawyer, who defended both Clinton and Al Franken in their sexual lawsuits, would understand the legal system better than she seems to.
Meanwhile, Keith Ellison’s accuser, who has lots and lots of proof of his abuse, is being snubbed by the Democrats:
Double standard much, Demorats?
@retire05:
Notice the absence of a link? Sort of an AJ trademark.
For a scumbag liberal like AJ to have double standards, they would have to have a single standard first.
@Deplorable me:
What’s most notable is that you came up short in validating your claim of: “AJ has supported Hillary and even praised Bill’s rapes as his right”.
But your childish rubber/glue nonsense has been exposed time and time and time again. Nothing new here. Same elementary logic from the same elementary playbook used to justify your profound hatred and bigotry.
@Ajay42302: Get a load of the cowardly liar AJ. He comes on here, consistently supporting liars and criminals and denouncing the United States, spreading lies and scurrying away from questions about those lied.
Then he wants answers.
Well, that’s the way it goes, crybaby. You can’t always get what you want, according to Mick Jagger. How about living by your own rules? Stop telling lies and begin engaging in honest debate and answering questions about your points and you get the same. Keep acting like a lying, corruption-supporting liberal, accept the consequences.
@Deplorable me:
No thanks
I believe Brett after the release of the year book seems none of the boys needed to force themselves on her or any of her classmates. The 80s… bad decorating, Farrah hairdos, cocaine, designer jeans, disco and urban cowboys.
@Deplorable me:
You made an accusation that you cannot prove. And like a true trump sucker, blame others for your very own lies.
Nothing new here.
@kitt:
One coward lying trump sucker amusingly taking the role to defend another cowardly lying trump sucker from his/her cowardly lies.
Again, nothing new here.
In the meantime, the first cowardly lying trump sucker fails to come up with even 1 example to prove his/her accusation that “AJ has supported Hillary and even praised Bill’s rapes as his right”.
This too is so common place among the cowardly lying trump suckers. Anything other would have indeed been something new.
@Ajay42302:
You are a whiny crybaby that makes accusations and lies and then runs away from questions about them. You don’t GET to complain.
Cowardly is supporting Bill, Hillary, Obama, Ellison, Byrd, Holder, Pelosi, Watters, Reid and all the other Democrat liars but running away from providing your proof of your accusations against Republicans. What YOU suck is certainly not admissible on these pages, crybaby.
@Deplorable me:
Looks like I made my obsessive stalker all mad.
Way too funny.
@Ajay42302: You should go to the NYT site where false allegations, lies and whining is appreciated. Here, you are simply a miserable lying coward.
Christine Ford SCRUBBED HER FACEBOOK PAGE IN ANTICIPATION OF THIS HIT JOB. She has ADMITTED to being an ALCOHOLIC and told her best friend she had 64 SEX PARTNERS between the 11th grade and college.” Anthony Scalia TYPES MUST BE BANNED from LAW” This DOESN’T EXACTLY SOUND like a person who could be easily taken ADVANTAGE OF.