She hasn’t even been elected and she’s made herself into a complete laughingstock- updated

To quote Nancy Pelosi, “He (she) is a gift from God.”

One of the Alinsky tactics is to isolate and ridicule the opposition. Sadly, no one is clever enough to set-up the humiliation Alexandra brings upon herself. The entertainment value of her silliness and stupidity is almost as potent as the damage she is inflicting on the Leftist-Socialist brand.

Let the games continue.

I would have thought that the white male head explosions from a less than all right female kicking a prominent white male’s ass would have diminished by now.

I guess it was just a bit more traumatic for the white male’s ego than I thought.

But by all means DJ (and the DJ band of kowtowing merry-men), if it’s therapeutic for you, carry on.

How could anyone determine if the jibberish gobbledy-gook in #5 is true or false? I don’t think she has to worry about catcalls. Ratcalls, maybe, but not catcalls.

@Ajay42302: So, you are a supporter of Ocasio-Cortez? You think she makes such solid and valid points that any criticism HAS to be based on gender and race?

@Ajay42302:

With the realization I’m actually responding to one with the proven intelligence of soup, uh, what???????????????? Did I say I supporter Cortez? Never mind as your idiocy is obvious,

Wait. You are calling someone an idiot and accuse them of saying something they did not say because they asked you two simple questions which were:
“So, you are a supporter of Ocasio-Cortez?” and “You think she makes such solid and valid points that any criticism HAS to be based on gender and race?”

Looks to me like you’re projecting.
Now, care to answer the questions posed to you?

@Ajay42302: I would have thought that the white male head explosions from a less than all right female kicking a prominent white male’s ass would have diminished by now.

I guess it was just a bit more traumatic for the white male’s ego than I thought.

Seems both the race and gender card came when you slithered into the thread.
Some of my best friends are caucasian males so watch your racist and sexist tone. Stop dehumanizing entire groups of people.

@Ajay42302:

With the realization I’m actually responding to one with the proven intelligence of soup, uh, what???????????????? Did I say I supporter Cortez? Never mind as your idiocy is obvious,

So, you DON’T support her. OK, then we can further assume (since you are short on details) the the reason you don’t is because you don’t like her ideas. So, one must wonder, why do you (as you do 100% of the time) immediately play your well-worn race card on those who also don’t like her ideas and openly criticize them?

You have no issues (or your clones) with “gender or race:”?

Nope. None. Yet, YOU do. SERIOUS issues. Note that YOU brought the issue up, not anyone else.

Should transsexuals (being you invoked the gender card) be allowed to vote? It’s no more than a question if blacks (since you invoked the race card) be allowed to vote.

If they meet all the requirements of a legitimate, legal voter, of course they should. Why would they not?

????? I don’t see what is so tough about those questions. Like your earlier stupid questions about voting for Hitler, Stalin, etc, they are such stupid, moronic, idiotic questions that one wonders why anyone would ask such questions with such obvious answers. But, as you can clearly see (but will claim the opposite), I readily answered them. Now, if only you would answer all those questions I’ve asked of you over time, but I know that truth and facts are not your style. George would bet so MAD if you honestly answered questions.

Another question: what is a “piuppet”? Won’t George the multi-billionaire spring for Spellcheck?

@retire05: Note also that he did NOT answer the question.

@kitt: AJ actually thinks that scurrying out from under the refrigerator and committing one of his drive-by accusations of racism actually makes people smart enough to know what actual racism is feel guilt or shame. Perhaps he is a CONSERVATIVE plant to make liberals look incredibly stupid, idiotic and cowardly. If so, NICE JOB!

By the way, Alexandria is now claiming fact-checking her is “sexist”. Apparently, she’s read all of Hillary’s books.

@Ajay42302:

As a matter of fact, there’s been an admission from you and yours that you’d vote Hitler or Stalin or such rather than a Democrat.

Again, you are a liar. I didn’t; the opposite, in fact. However, YOU regularly express support for candidates that share the politics and tactics of Hitler, Stalin and Mao so, obviously, if George told you to, YOU would support them as well.

I too think the Republican Voter ID laws that have disenfranchised over 80,000 transsexuals in several states because of the language of the gender question is wrong.

It is difficult to determine if you are merely stupid, an idiot or insane. HOW have voter ID laws disenfranchised ANYONE, much less someone so confused that they don’t even know what sex they are, much less who they should vote for? I know you have a cowardly policy of NEVER answering questions (and blatantly lying about those of us who DO answer your stupid questions), but TRY to get your balls back from George and answer that one.

I also challenge your “fact” of there being 80,000 transgenders. Since you won’t provide any data to back that up, we will simply declare that, along with the rest of your positions, a lie as well.

But, surprisingly, we DO agree on some points. We agree that only Republicans care about fighting voter fraud, while Democrats protect, embrace and utilize it. We also agree you are a liar and a coward; I state it and you go forth and prove it.

@Deplorable me: @kitt: @retire05: Gentlemen, many people here have commented that it never pays to get down in the mud with the pigs. The pigs love it there. I sometimes also forget that and get muddy, too, in my attempts to educate those who are less fortunate than us.

@Greg:

…and yet she scares some people silly. I understand why. She’s not afraid of wearing the “socialist” label the right reflexively uses to demonize anybody they don’t like.

That level of stupidity allowed to roam about freely is scary. As a candidate, though, I hope and pray some Republican can face her. Oh, please, please, please!

She’s not afraid to embrace the title of socialist because she is a socialist. Among liberals, this is a badge of honor since, as you say, so many are too cowardly to openly expose their belief system. Trying to buy votes with the false offer of “everything for free” is a characteristic of most Democrats nowadays.

@Randy, #19:

Name one successful capitalist country that has no collectively supported social programs a majority of the population benefit from and rely upon.

You people like to pretend capitalism and socialism are two mutually exclusive, all or nothing propositions. That has never been the truth. I won’t play that game.

@Greg: Funny how the only way to fund socialism is with capitalism. Socialism itself is a disaster. Socialists in control of capitalism destroys them both.

I don’t think you really know what socialism is. There’s very little about our nation’s economy or governmental institutions that corresponds to any sort of traditional socialist model, either in theory or practice. Social Security isn’t really part of a socialist system; it’s a form of social insurance. Collecting taxes to to provide for the general welfare of the people isn’t socialism; it’s the only way of sharing our collective social responsibilities to one another with one another. Progressive tax schedules aren’t socialist; they’re the fairest way of doing the aforementioned, while simultaneously redistributing a portion of concentrating wealth to prevent capitalism from self-destructing.

In U.S. politics, socialism is mainly one of the right’s favorite boogie men. It’s a tag they stick on things they don’t like to scare people. They’ll use it in reference to efforts to provide greater access to health care, in reference to public education, in reference to unions and collective bargaining, in reference to publicly funded nutrition programs, etc, without ever once feeling any need to explain what such things actually have to do with any reasonable definition of socialism.

Most likely I’ll be called “stupid” for pointing that out. That’s certainly the easiest alternative to demonstrating that what I’ve said is wrong.

@Greg:

There’s very little about our nation’s economy or governmental institutions that corresponds to any sort of traditional socialist model, either in theory or practice.

How about we keep it that way and keep mindless socialist drones like Alexandria out of our government?

After what Obamacare did to health care and insurance, people SHOULD be afraid of socialists and socialism. You know, the $42 trillion tab for Bernie and Alexandria’s socialist plan is not the total budget; that is just the cost for THEIR programs. Is this where you turn off your concern for debt and deficits again?

@Greg: More equitable than a system that provides equal opportunity for all and has raised more people out of poverty than any other system in the world?

Nice try, Greg. After seeing the opportunity, wealth and growth capitalism provides, Americans are not going to buy into giving up their freedoms and rights for the sake of providing “free” benefits to those that won’t lift a finger in their own behalf.

I guess the biggest question is, why did they pair Alexandria’s picture with one of Michelle?

@Greg: I think that little speech is best made on a stage with fake Grecian columns and a “Hope and Change” backdrop.

And, of course, as I proved, you are wrong; the tax cuts are paying for themselves and while owners of businesses doing MORE business naturally make MORE money but jobs are created and wages are increased and MORE opportunity for others to start businesses are created.

What we DON’T need is socialism. Obama proved how corrupt that can get.

@Greg: No, I proved it with math. The tax revenues are higher than they were BEFORE the tax cuts.

Meanwhile, after just a few years, 80 percent of total continuing tax cuts will be going to the wealthiest, while taxes paid by the rest will be higher than they were before tax reform.

It is only necessary to vote to extend the middle class tax cuts because Democrats would not support ANY tax cuts. So, will Democrats support tax cuts for the wealthy in 9 years or will they vote for tax cuts for the middle class? Right now, their campaign platform is for raising taxes more and more and more. What do YOU think they will do?

Does this joke republicans keep telling about tax cuts paying for themselves ever get to the punch line?

The punch line is 4% and greater consistent growth. Isn’t that funny? Obama said those days were gone, along with low unemployment and manufacturing jobs; Trump proved what an economic idiot Obama actually was.

It is only necessary to vote to extend the middle class tax cuts because Democrats would not support ANY tax cuts.

When the nation is already $21 trillion in debt and relying on increasing levels of borrowing just to pay the bills, declining to support another round of huge tax cuts is known as fiscally responsible behavior. Giving enormous permanent tax cuts to those who needed them the very least, and who already had historically low tax rates, is a stunning example of self-serving stupidity.

Trump and company have brought the mindless worship of wealth and the republican culture of corruption back with a vengeance. They’re the cancer that might kill capitalism, by perverting it into something with consequences that the people won’t tolerate.

That, Virginia, is where things like socialism actually come from. They’re made to seem appealing by way of comparison.

You really don’t understand the part about the tax cuts encouraging business growth AND paying for themselves, do you?

What all reasonable people understand is that the Laffer Curve rises, flattens at its peak, and then turns steeply downward. It doesn’t actually demonstrate ever-increasing revenue with each additional reduction in tax rates. That irrational interpretation is a fairy tale.

The tax cuts are a cash and power grab, plain and simple. All one must know to figure this out is where the most of the money is going, and who will ultimately be left paying more taxes than before and holding a bag of debt.